Evidence Commons^™

Recognition, Use Of Force, And The Legal Effect Of United Nations Resolutions Under The Revised Restatement Of The Foreign Relations Law Of The United States, Malvina Halberstam

Articles

No abstract provided.

Evaluating The Expert: Judicial Expectations Of Expert Opinion Evidence In Child Placement Adjudications, Jane W. Ellis

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Commissioning Morallity: An Introduction To The Symposium, Alan J. Weisbard, John D. Arras

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Admission Of An Unavailable Witness’ Grand Jury Testimony: Can It Be Justified?, Judd Burstein

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Confidential Communication Element Of The Attorney-Client Privilege, Gerald Sobel

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Testimonial Immunity And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: A Study In Isomorphism, Peter Lushing

Articles

This Article accepts and will develop the Court's isomorphic theory of immunity and privilege, and will show why Portash is nonetheless correct in result. A case for a broadened view of the privilege, partially because of the availability of testimonial immunity, will be made. Apftlbaum will be shown to be incorrect in result. This Article will also analyze the problem of immunized testimony and perjury by inconsistent statement, a problem faced once by the Court but left unresolved. Finally, this Article will discuss the constitutional requirements of an immunity statute, and consider an immunity case presently pending before the Supreme …

Statistical Implications Of Reasoning With Polygraph Evidence: Developing Instructions For The Trier Of Fact, James A. Finder

Cardozo Law Review

Report and Recommendation to the New York State Bar Association by the Committee on Federal Constitution

Burden Of Proof With Respect To The Defense Of Withdrawal From Conspiracy: United States V. Read, Alan S. Fox

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Full Faith And Credit, More Or Less, To Judgments: Doubts About Thomas V. Washington Gas Light Co., Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

Workmen's compensation awards, decrees of administrative tribunals rather than courts, present the question of how far the mandate of the full faith and credit clause should reach and whether the clause should bar a claimant from pursuing supplemental compensation in a second state. Recently, in Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., the Supreme Court decided that full faith and credit should not prevent a claimant from obtaining supplemental compensation. Professor Sterk criticizes the Court's analysis, demonstrating the Thomas Court's neglect of the federal interests that the clause should protect. After examining the clause and its policy underpinnings, Professor Sterk …

Faces Without Features: The Surface Validity Of Criminal Inferences, Peter Lushing

Articles

The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in County Court v. Allen, arguing that the Court's approach to evaluating instructed inferences in criminal cases undermines the integrity of the fact-finding process. The central concern is that the Court's methodology, which assesses inferences as applied rather than on their face, fails to address the potential irrationality of such inferences and the pressure they may exert on jurors to convict without thorough consideration of the evidence. The article advocates for a more rigorous standard to ensure the rationality and constitutionality of instructed inferences in criminal trials.

"To Decide The Case At Hand": Benjamin N. Cardozo, Monrad G. Paulsen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Lester Brickman, Richard O. Lempert

Articles

The forword highlights the significant concern over unmet legal needs among low and middle-income populations, emphasizing the fragmented and inefficient state of research in this area. It argues that the lack of coordination among studies, inconsistent terminology, and duplication of efforts hinder progress. The authors propose a coordinated approach to identify research gaps, set priorities, and improve the delivery of legal services.

Kariti V. Attorney General, Zvi Berinson, Eliyahu Manny, Binyamin Halevy

Translated Opinions

The appellant was charged on five counts of incorrect capital and income returns over some three years. One count was struck out by mutual consent. He was convicted by the Magistrate's Court on two counts and acquitted of the remaining two. On appeal to the District Court he was acquitted of a further count. Affirmation of his conviction on the remaining count was vaguely attributed to one of two years or both of them and the charge was amended accordingly and in the result the struck out count was revived. The appellant pleaded on appeal that in convicting him the …

Berenblat V. Attorney General, Haim Herman Cohn, Moshe Landau, Yitzhak Olshan

Translated Opinions

The appellant was convicted on five counts under the Nazi and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law. 1950. On two of these counts he was convicted on the strength of the evidence of a single witness, found to be credible by the lower court. He appealed against conviction.

Held, granting the appeal, that in criminal matters, a court can convict on the evidence of a single witness without corroboration, after duly "cautioning" itself as to its credibility per se and considering its weight and relevance in the whole complex of evidence tendered by the prosecution with regard to the circumstances of the …