Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 331 - 360 of 374

Full-Text Articles in Evidence

The Admissibility Of Dna Testing, D. H. Kaye Nov 1991

The Admissibility Of Dna Testing, D. H. Kaye

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Decision And Inference, Peter Tillers Nov 1991

Decision And Inference, Peter Tillers

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen Nov 1991

The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Reply To Allen, L. Jonathan Cohen Nov 1991

A Reply To Allen, L. Jonathan Cohen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Expert-Novice Differences And Implications For Choice Of Bench Versus Jury Trial, Anne W. Martin Nov 1991

Expert-Novice Differences And Implications For Choice Of Bench Versus Jury Trial, Anne W. Martin

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers Nov 1991

Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard Lempert Nov 1991

Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard Lempert

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Credal Probablity, D. H. Kaye Nov 1991

Credal Probablity, D. H. Kaye

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Mistrial By Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets The F-Word, Paul Bergman, Al Moore Nov 1991

Mistrial By Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets The F-Word, Paul Bergman, Al Moore

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson Nov 1991

Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment On Professor Nesson’S Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance Nov 1991

Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment On Professor Nesson’S Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability, David T. Wasserman Nov 1991

The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Decision, Disciplined Inferences And The Adversary Process, Robert S. Thompson Nov 1991

Decision, Disciplined Inferences And The Adversary Process, Robert S. Thompson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman Nov 1991

Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Reply To Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics, David T. Wasserman Nov 1991

Reply To Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson Nov 1991

Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Incentives To Spoliate Evidence In Civil Litigation: The Need For Vigorous Judicial Action, Charles R. Nesson Nov 1991

Incentives To Spoliate Evidence In Civil Litigation: The Need For Vigorous Judicial Action, Charles R. Nesson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Kicking Rocks With Dr. Johnson: A Comment On Professor Allen’S Theory, Craig R. Callen Nov 1991

Kicking Rocks With Dr. Johnson: A Comment On Professor Allen’S Theory, Craig R. Callen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler Nov 1991

What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Laying Down The Law In Literature: The Example Of Kleist, J. Hillis Miller Jul 1990

Laying Down The Law In Literature: The Example Of Kleist, J. Hillis Miller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner Feb 1990

Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Contingent Fees Without Contingencies: Hamlet Without The Prince Of Demark?, Lester Brickman Oct 1989

Contingent Fees Without Contingencies: Hamlet Without The Prince Of Demark?, Lester Brickman

Articles

According to conventional wisdom virtually all contingent fee percentages exceeding fifty percent are illegal and excessive, but most lower percentages are valid. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom, an amalgam of the unassailability of the standard one-third rate, notions of fairness versus price gouging, lawyer effort versus lawyer' reward, and the right of a lawyer to contract freely for a fee. It advances instead two propositions for determining the legitimacy of contingent fees. The first is that for a contingent fee to be valid, there must be an actual contingency, which means a realistic risk of nonrecovery. Though this proposition …


Theories Of Truth Finding In Criminal Procedure: An Evolutionary Approach, John D. Jackson Dec 1988

Theories Of Truth Finding In Criminal Procedure: An Evolutionary Approach, John D. Jackson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Law And Consciousness, Charles A. Reich Oct 1988

Law And Consciousness, Charles A. Reich

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Charting New Territory In Judicial Proof: Beyond Wigmore, Peter Tillers, David Schum Feb 1988

Charting New Territory In Judicial Proof: Beyond Wigmore, Peter Tillers, David Schum

Cardozo Law Review

In this Article, Professor Tillers and Professor Schum investigate judicial proof in a way that combines three distinct methods of analyzing the probative significance of evidence. They call these three modes of analysis legal structuring, temporal structuring, and relational structuring. Although scholars in various disciplines have recognized the importance of these three types of analysis in the assessment of evidence, no extant theory provides a systematic account of the relationships between legal analysis, temporal analysis, and relational analysis. Professor Tillers and Professor Schum describe some of the matters that a three-dimensional analysis of proof must take into account and they …


Prior Probability - A Black Hole In The Mathematician's View Of The Sufficiency And Weight Of Evidence, Leonard R. Jaffee Feb 1988

Prior Probability - A Black Hole In The Mathematician's View Of The Sufficiency And Weight Of Evidence, Leonard R. Jaffee

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Pope V. Illinois: The Reasonable Person As The Supreme Court's Latest Arbiter Of Obscenity, Penny E. Paul Jan 1988

Pope V. Illinois: The Reasonable Person As The Supreme Court's Latest Arbiter Of Obscenity, Penny E. Paul

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Pleading The Fifth: Record Custodians And The Act-Of-Production Doctrine, Amy Schlesinger Rich Feb 1987

Pleading The Fifth: Record Custodians And The Act-Of-Production Doctrine, Amy Schlesinger Rich

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Evaluation Of Subjective Selection Systems In Title Vii Employment Discrimination Cases: A Misuse Of Disparate Impact Analysis, Stacey B. Babson Jan 1986

Evaluation Of Subjective Selection Systems In Title Vii Employment Discrimination Cases: A Misuse Of Disparate Impact Analysis, Stacey B. Babson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing Jan 1986

The Exclusionary Rule: A Disputation, Peter Lushing

Cardozo Law Review

Four-thirty p.m.: the lawyer's decompression hour. Court has just adjourned. The belligerents and (dare we say it) a judge or two recuperate in saloons close by the courthouse; their families can wait. In one tavern, a rear booth is about to be occupied by Mark earnest young county prosecutor. Mark is on the verge of that time when a criminal lawyer begins to doubt the sanity of the system and, perforce, his own integrity. He will be joined by Sam, a born defense counsel. Sam secretly worships America's criminal justice system for its holy commitment to procedural regularity. He has …