Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (106)
- Criminal Procedure (99)
- Constitutional Law (45)
- Jurisprudence (42)
- Courts (35)
-
- Law and Society (34)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (31)
- Science and Technology Law (26)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (23)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (22)
- Intellectual Property Law (21)
- Communications Law (19)
- Judges (19)
- Legal Profession (19)
- International Law (18)
- Law and Gender (18)
- Legislation (18)
- Torts (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (15)
- First Amendment (15)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (14)
- Medical Jurisprudence (13)
- Legal History (12)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Labor and Employment Law (10)
- Legal Remedies (10)
- Sexuality and the Law (10)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (96)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (41)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (23)
- Testimony (14)
- Proof (13)
-
- Courts (12)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Law and Society (10)
- Parents and Children (10)
- Science and Technology Law (10)
- Hearsay (9)
- Judges (9)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Politics (General) (8)
- Scientific Evidence (8)
- Scientific Research (8)
- Law Enforcement (7)
- Ethics (6)
- Remedies (6)
- Witnesses (6)
- Child Welfare (5)
- Children (5)
- Data Processing and Use (5)
- Gender and the Law (5)
- Penology (5)
- Police (5)
- Statistics (5)
- Child Abuse (4)
- Computers (4)
- Economics Law (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (38)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (31)
- Articles (28)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (17)
-
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (13)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (10)
- Translated Opinions (9)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (8)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (5)
- 2023 Event Invitations (1)
- 2023–2024 Flyers (1)
- Cardozo Law News Archive (1)
- Cardozo News 2023 (1)
- Perlmutter Center Reports (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 270 of 374
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
What Is True? Perspectives Of A Former Prosecutor, Steven M. Cohen
What Is True? Perspectives Of A Former Prosecutor, Steven M. Cohen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Prosecutors Prepare Cooperators, Joel Cohen
When Prosecutors Prepare Cooperators, Joel Cohen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding The Evidentiary Frame For Cooperating Witnesses, Daniel Richman
Expanding The Evidentiary Frame For Cooperating Witnesses, Daniel Richman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Closing Remarks, Barry Scheck
When Is A Parent Not A Parent? On Doma, Civil Unions, And Presumptions Of Parenthood, Mark Strasser
When Is A Parent Not A Parent? On Doma, Civil Unions, And Presumptions Of Parenthood, Mark Strasser
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Counselor, Proceed With Caution": The Use Of Integrated Evidence Presentation Systems And Computer-Generated Evidence In The Courtroom, Elan E. Weinreb
"Counselor, Proceed With Caution": The Use Of Integrated Evidence Presentation Systems And Computer-Generated Evidence In The Courtroom, Elan E. Weinreb
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Saving Desdemona, Ron A. Shapira
Alternative Views Of Argument Construction From A Mass Of Evidence, David A. Schum
Alternative Views Of Argument Construction From A Mass Of Evidence, David A. Schum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Explaining Relevance, Paolo Garbolino
Models Of Data Generation Vs. Models Of Events That Generate Data, Ward Edwards
Models Of Data Generation Vs. Models Of Events That Generate Data, Ward Edwards
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
Cardozo Law Review
"Inference to the best explanation" - here called "abduction" - is a distinctive and recognizable pattern of evidential reasoning. It is ubiquitous at or near the surface of typical arguments offered in judicial and scientific contexts, and in ordinary life. It is part of "commonsense logic." An abductive argument is open to attack in characteristic ways, and may be defended in characteristic ways by supporting arguments. Abductive arguments are fallible, but there are only a small number of ways in which they can go wrong. This analysis provides a framework for justification, criticism, and dialogue concerning the evaluation of evidence. …
Species Of Abductive Reasoning In Fact Investigation In Law, David A. Schum
Species Of Abductive Reasoning In Fact Investigation In Law, David A. Schum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Logical Argumentation, Abduction And Bayesian Decision Theory: A Bayesian Approach To Logical Arguments And Its Application To Legal Evidential Reasoning, David Poole
Cardozo Law Review
There are good normative arguments for using Bayesian decision theory for deciding what to do. However, there are also good arguments for using logic where we want formal semantics for a language, and where we want to use the structure of logical argumentation with logical variables to represent multiple individuals (things). This Article shows how decision theory and logical argumentation can be combined into a coherent framework. The Independent Choice Logic ("ICL") can be viewed as a first-order representation of belief networks with conditional probability tables represented as first-order rules, or as a abductive/argument-based logic with probabilities over assumables. Intuitively …
Structured Deliberation For Dynamic Uncertain Inference, Paul Snow, Marianne Belis
Structured Deliberation For Dynamic Uncertain Inference, Paul Snow, Marianne Belis
Cardozo Law Review
Dynamic uncertain inference is the formation of opinions based upon evidence or argument whose availability is neither disclosed to the analyst in advance nor disclosed all at once. Normative accounts of belief change, which work well when the analyst has prior notice of well-designed experiments and their possible outcomes, may not be applicable to less tidy occasions of inference. In addition, there is the clerical challenge of keeping track of what has been observed, what relates to what, and how. This Article begins with a discussion of subjective valuation in general. An approach to deliberation, similar to what is practiced …
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Cardozo Law Review
The process of judicial proof accrues evidence to confirm or deny hypotheses about world events relevant to a legal case. Software applications that seek to support this process must provide the user with sophisticated capabilities to manipulate evidential reasoning for legal cases. This requires computational techniques to represent the actors, entities, events, and context of world situations to structure alternative hypotheses interpreting evidence and to execute processes that draw inferences about the truth of hypotheses by assessing the relevance and weight of evidence to confirm or deny the hypotheses. Bayesian inference networks are combined with knowledge representations from artificial intelligence …
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Liability For Increased Risk Of Harm: A Lawyer's Response To Professor Shafer, Melanie B. Leslie
Liability For Increased Risk Of Harm: A Lawyer's Response To Professor Shafer, Melanie B. Leslie
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keynote: Cultural Property, International Trade And Human Rights, John Henry Merryman
Keynote: Cultural Property, International Trade And Human Rights, John Henry Merryman
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Costs Of Confidentiality And The Purpose Of Privilege, Melanie B. Leslie
The Costs Of Confidentiality And The Purpose Of Privilege, Melanie B. Leslie
Articles
No abstract provided.
When Is A Cd Factory Not Like A Dance Hall?: The Difficulty Of Establishing Third-Party Liability For Infringing Digital Music Samples, Rebecca Morris
When Is A Cd Factory Not Like A Dance Hall?: The Difficulty Of Establishing Third-Party Liability For Infringing Digital Music Samples, Rebecca Morris
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Who Needs An Evidence Code?: The New York Court Of Appeals's Radical Re-Evaluation Of Hearsay, Steven Zeidman
Who Needs An Evidence Code?: The New York Court Of Appeals's Radical Re-Evaluation Of Hearsay, Steven Zeidman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Et Lex Perpetua: Dying Declarations & Mozart's Requiem, Desmond Manderson
Et Lex Perpetua: Dying Declarations & Mozart's Requiem, Desmond Manderson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Second Circuit's Attack On Jury Nullification In United States V. Thomas: In Disregard Of The Law And The Evidence, Ran Zev Schijanovich
The Second Circuit's Attack On Jury Nullification In United States V. Thomas: In Disregard Of The Law And The Evidence, Ran Zev Schijanovich
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Secret Knowledge Of Genocide: British Failure To Disclose The Killing Of Jews In 1941, Kent Greenawalt
Secret Knowledge Of Genocide: British Failure To Disclose The Killing Of Jews In 1941, Kent Greenawalt
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.