Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

The Mansion That Disney Built: Revitalizing Antitrust Enforcement In The Film Industry, Drew Chandler

BYU Law Review

The Paramount Decrees, for over sixty years, barred the major film studios from anticompetitive practices like vertical integration and block-booking. The Department of Justice’s decision to sunset the Decrees in 2020 came prematurely, with the movie industry today rocked by major mergers, the advent of streaming, the pandemic, lessened output due to industry strikes, and changing consumer tastes. True, the industry has changed since 1948, but those very changes call for regulatory intervention to avoid repeating the problems of the past.

For example, Disney’s recent merger and acquisition activity, together with the dominance of its in-house streaming service Disney+, is …

Did Anderson V. Tiktok Get It Right? Holding Social Media Providers Accountable For Harm To Adolescents, Allison Mitton

BYU Law Review

When dangerous social media challenges go viral and cause harm to adolescents and young children, should the platform be held liable for pushing that content? As it currently stands, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1934 prevents this from happening. However, Anderson v. TikTok—a recent suit brought on behalf of a ten-year-old girl who died after asphyxiating herself while participating in the viral “Blackout Challenge”—seeks to change that.

The Third Circuit court in Anderson held that social media algorithms should be considered first-party speech, or the platform’s own expressive activity, rather than third-party speech, displaying its users’ expressive …

Saving Camelot? Nil And The Future Of Amateurism, William W. Berry Iii

BYU Law Review

This Article explores the future of intercollegiate athletics with a diminished (and perhaps even disappearing) amateurism model. Specifically, the Article argues that athletic conferences are in the best position to “save Camelot”—to preserve the aspects of college sports that make them beloved and distinctive—while at the same time realistically accounting for an evolving economic and legal landscape.

In Part I, the Article describes the economics of the NCAA’s current amateurism model. Part II explores the recent changes to the NCAA’s amateurism model in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alston v. NCAA and the widespread adoption of state name, …

Nil Tampering, Josh Lens

BYU Law Review

The college athletics landscape has experienced several recent dramatic and monumental changes. In 2018, its governing body, the NCAA, implemented the transfer portal to help universities and athletes manage the process by which athletes transfer to another university. In 2021, the NCAA allowed every athlete the freedom to accept compensation in exchange for the use of their name, image, and likeness (“NIL”). Booster collectives quickly formed to facilitate NIL arrangements and now exert significant financial influence in the athlete recruiting and retention process. Tens of thousands of athletes have used the portal since its inception, with many seeking more NIL …

Understanding Golf’S Civil War: An Antitrust Analysis And Discussion, Emma Hackett

BYU Law Review

For years, professional golf has been ruled by the PGA Tour. But in 2022, the PGA Tour’s monarchy started to crack when LIV Golf, a new Saudi-backed golf league, entered the scene and sued the PGA Tour for antitrust violations. Players and fans had to take sides: the legacy of the PGA Tour or the deep pockets of LIV Golf? The lawsuit resulted in a settlement between the entities, but the complaints exposed dealings engaged in by the PGA Tour that this Note argues are violations of the Sherman Act. Beyond illegality of the Tour’s acts, the dispute between LIV …

Scotus At The Bat: Touching Base With Baseball’S Antitrust Exemption, Porter Y. Schenewark

BYU Law Review

In the longstanding debate surrounding Major League Baseball’s exemption from federal antitrust laws, recent legal developments and Supreme Court dynamics call for a reexamination of the Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball decision. Drawing parallels between the Court’s landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the potential reconsideration of Baseball’s exemption, this paper explores the factors at play and the implications for the future of the sport.

Through the Court’s framework of five factors as used in Dobbs, the paper evaluates the nature of the Court’s error, the quality of reasoning, workability, effect on other areas of law, …

Expectation V. Reality: Practical Problems With The Right Of First Refusal As A Defense Against Eminent Domain, Aerin Christensen

BYU Law Review

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. New London, many states enacted new laws to protect property owners from eminent domain. One possible defense for property owners is a statutory right of first refusal. In theory, this is a common-sense protection that ensures that if property is not needed for a public use, it is returned to the original owner. Unfortunately, in practice a right of first refusal is not always an effective protection for property owners.

The plaintiff’s experience in the Utah case Cardiff Wales, LLC v. Washington County School District demonstrates Utah’s statutory …

Reshaping College Athlete Sports Betting Education, Becky Harris, John T. Holden

BYU Law Review

Legal sports wagering has been rapidly expanding across the United States since 2018. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Murphy decision, more than twenty five states have legalized sports betting and billions of dollars have followed the cascades of legalization. As the legal market continues to grow, professional sports leagues have been quick to embrace the regulated expansion, but the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has not changed their steadfast opposition. Despite the NCAA's vehement opposition, the organization has seemed to gain little traction in getting states to either wholly exclude wagering on collegiate sports or getting the federal …

Owning Nothingness: Between The Legal And The Social Norms Of The Art World, Guy A. Rub

BYU Law Review

Almost $8 million—that is what the Crystal Bridges Museum paid for one work of contemporary art in November 2015. What did that museum get for that hefty sum? From a legal perspective, absolutely nothing. The work it purchased was just an idea, and ideas of this kind escape legal protection.

Despite this lack of legal protection, the social norms of the art world lead large, sophisticated, experienced, and legally represented institutes to pay millions of dollars for this type of work. This Article is one of the first in legal scholarship to examine at depth those norms in this multibilliondollar …

Clark Memorandum: Fall 2019, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society

The Clark Memorandum

• In Essentials, Unity; in Nonessentials, Liberty; and in All Things, Charity
• Choose to Trust the Lord
• First Amendment Harms
• "To Do Justly, and to Love Mercy"

Read on Issuu

Between A Tomahawk And A Hard Place: Indian Mascots And The Ncaa, Stephanie Jade Bollinger

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Title Ix And The Dear Colleague Letter: An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure, Nick Rammell

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Modding: Amateur Authorship And How The Video Game Industry Is Actually Getting It Right, Ryan Wallace

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Keeping Score: How Universities Can Comply With Title Ix Without Eliminating Men's Collegiate Athletics Programs, Patrick J. Mcandrews

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The New Resident Evil? State Regulation Of Violent Video Games And The First Amendment, James Dunkelberger

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Piac (Pee In A Cup) – The New Standardized Test For Student-Athletes, Sara Young

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

How The United States Government Sacrifices Athletes' Constitutional Rights In The Pursuit Of National Prestige, Dionne L. Koller

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Day The (Digital) Music Died: Bridgeport, Sampling Infringement, And A Proposed Middle Ground, Joshua Crum

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Architecture As Art? Not In My Neocolonial Neighborhood: A Case For Providing First Amendment Protection To Expressive Residential Architecture, Janet Elizabeth Haws

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutionality Of Testing High School Male Athletes For Steroids Under Vernonia School District V. Acton And Board Of Education V. Earls, Thomas Proctor

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sain V. Cedar Rapids Community School District: Providing Special Protection For Student-Athletes?, Patricia Abbott

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Sixth Circuit Dropped The Ball: An Analysis Of Brentwood Academy V. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n In Light Of The Supreme Court's Recent Trends In State Action Jurisprudence, Josiah N. Drew

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Let's Be Reasonable Here: Why The Ada Will Not Ruin Professional Sports, Michael Waterstone

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Implementation And Modification Of Title Ix Standards: The Evolution Of Athletics Policy, Robert R. Hunt

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Sturrup V. Mahan And Its Progency: Is There A Constitutional Right To Play High School Basketball In Indiana?, Christopher D. Keeler

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Plan For Compensating Student-Athletes, Steve Murphy, Jonathan Pace

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Legal Issues In Secondary School Athletics, Jearlene Leishman

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Student-Athlete Crisis: Does The University Have A Duty To Educate?, Scott A. Broadhead

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Random Drug-Testing Of Public School Student Athletes: A Permissible Search Under The Fourth Amendment, Paul K. Madsen

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Can A Private Educational Association Ever Be Liable Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 For Depriving An Individual Of Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Rights After Ncaa V. Tarkanian?, Samuel Perry Swanberg

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.