Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Using The Terms Integrative And Distributive Bargaining In The Classroom: Time For Change?, Rishi Batra

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The terms “integrative bargaining” and “distributive bargaining” have been with us in the dispute resolution literature since at least the 1960's, when A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations was first published in 1965 by Richard Walton and Robert McKersie. While the terms were popularized by these two authors, the authors themselves acknowledged the long line of predecessors, including Mary Parker Follett, who led them to promote these categories. Since that time, “integrative” and “distributive” have been with us, and have captured the imagination of scholars, trainers, and practitioners, while remaining popular in the dispute resolution literature today. Despite the proliferation …

Novel Negotiation, Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Over the past half-century, the study of negotiation has blossomed into a robust discipline – negotiation and conflict resolution are recognized fields, with dedicated courses of study, experts, and institutional capital. The field has been inherently interdisciplinary from the outset, combining elements from fields including, but not limited to, economics, political science, law, psychology, anthropology, and sociology. At the University of Missouri Law School’s Tower of Babel symposium in the fall of 2016, the program focused on whether it is possible or even desirable to unify a discipline that is ineluctably diverse. Furthermore, if unification is a desired goal, how …

The Definition Of Negotiation: A Play In Three Acts, Noam Ebner, John Lande, David Matz, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article is based on a conversation between Andrea, Noam, and David as they drove to the airport following the Tower of Babel symposium. Then, John metaphorically joined the ride and participated in the quest to find a good definition of negotiation.

A “Grand” Unified Negotiation Theory . . . In Context, Adrian Borbély, Noam Ebner, Chris Honeyman, Sanda Kaufman, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Negotiation research began in the 20th century and is continuing apace. It is pursued from the perspectives of several disciplines including psychology, organizational behavior, labor relations, decision sciences, game theory, communications, legal studies, international relations, public policy, and others. Added to these are best practices from several fields engaged in intervention in conflicts. By now we have accumulated a considerable volume of wisdom regarding what drives people and entities to negotiate, how they behave when doing so, how they should handle negotiations to obtain specific results, and how to help disputants resolve to come to joint, mutually satisfactory decisions. However, …

Building Negotiation Theory From Real-Life Negotiations, John Lande

Journal of Dispute Resolution

For this symposium on improving negotiation theory, Professors David Matz and Adrian Borbély wrote an excellent article advocating the use of full-length accounts of actual negotiations to develop more realistic negotiation theory. They propose using “full-length accounts databases against which to measure good practice prescriptions.” Their article illustrates how we can use rich data from actual negotiations to build and ultimately test negotiation theories. Based on their reading of full-length accounts of negotiations, they suggest five key variables that are critical in understanding negotiation: “ghosts,” history, interactions, uncertainty, and power. Their observations provide a useful framework for further analysis and …

How To Learn About Negotiation From Full Length Descriptions Of Real Events, Adrian Borbély, David Matz

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article discusses book-length accounts of real negotiations and their value for understanding the process of negotiation. We focus much attention on an excellent example, Thirteen Days in September by Lawrence Wright, which is a rich account of the negotiation in 1978 involving US President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. We are interested in the usefulness and challenges of using such detailed accounts of historical negotiations to build theory. We find it significant that book length detailed accounts of single negotiations have not been on any of the many negotiation syllabi we had …

Negotiation Is Changing, Noam Ebner

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Many changes – those we notice, and those that escape our attention until we are quite a ways down a new path – are only the tip of the iceberg of the change that individuals and society are experiencing as a result of the technological developments of the past couple of decades. Introducing technology into every area of our lives, every aspect of our work, and every pocket of our clothes has far-reaching effects, which researchers are only just now uncovering.

We are not only changing our behaviors; we are being changed by our new behaviors: We now conduct our …

Arbitration For The “Afflicted” — The Viability Of Arbitrating Defamation And Libel Claims Considering Ipso’S Pilot Program, Emma Altheide

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Filing suit for defamation or libel is signing up for an expensive and time-consuming endeavor. If it proceeds to trial, this type of litigation comes with high costs for both sides: potentially millions of dollars in legal fees, and years of court battles. Average judgments against defendant publishers are high, often because uncapped punitive damages are available. Plaintiffs may wait years to receive a judgment, only to spend a significant portion on attorneys’ fees. Given the inefficiency of the courts in handling defamation and libel claims, how might an alternative forum provide for a quicker process, with lower costs for …

Should They Listen To Us? Seeking A Negotiation / Conflict Resolution Contribution To Practice In Intractable Conflicts, Chris Honeyman, Sanda Kaufman, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Conflict resolution (CR) has had its successes, particularly in what has become common negotiation and mediation practice in divorce, civil litigation, and small to medium scale public policy disputes. Yet despite these practical inroads and increasingly successful dissemination of the ideas of our field, CR practitioners in politics and policy (and other fields) are still conspicuous by their absence in the largest, most consequential conflicts. Negotiation remains the vehicle for addressing international conflicts nonviolently. However, as of 2007 when we first questioned the relative lack of practical impact (at the highest levels) of negotiation scholarship, the international relations practitioners did …

Mindful “Judging” 1.5: The Science Of Attention, “Lie Detection,” And Bias Reduction – With Kindness, Clark Freshman, Shauna Shapiro, Sarah De Sousa

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This article addresses two overlapping audiences. We’ve written this article partly as a kind of manual like Mindfulness 1.0 for those who suspect they know little and as a resource to convince skeptical others, and the curious or even skeptical parts of ourselves, that mindfulness deserves its newfound, albeit shaky, respect. What is mindfulness and how can mindfulness help us judge, advocate, and negotiate? Judge Fogel’s writing and his position carry weight with many. This Article adds some of the latest research, including brain imaging and carefully controlled studies. We highlight multiple types of data from dramatic increases in working …

The Faa Vs. The Nlra And The Flsa: Have Courts Given The Faa Too Much Deference?, Nikki Clark

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will discuss whether courts have given too much weight to the FAA at the cost of making other federal laws such as the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) less effective. The NLRA and the FLSA are not the only federal laws that stand to be affected by the expanding application of the FAA. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) has also been affected by the FAA.

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

An Innovative Matrix For Dispute Resolution: The Dubai World Tribunal And The Global Insolvency Crisis, Jayanth K. Krishnan, Harold Koster

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This study examines a legal experiment that occurred during the height of the global financial crisis. As markets from the United States to Europe to the Global South shook, one country – the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) – found itself on the brink of economic collapse. In particular, in 2009 the U.A.E.’s Emirate of Dubai (Emirate) was contemplating defaulting on $60 billion of debt it had amassed. Recognizing that such a default would have cataclysmic reverberations across the globe, Dubai’s governmental leaders turned to a small group of foreign lawyers, judges, accountants, and business consultants for assistance. Working in a …

State Legislative Update, M. Katherine Kerbs, Katherine E. Mcmurtrey, Courtney Lauer, Theresa Mullineaux

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Mediation is a non-binding type of dispute resolution. Mediation is a process where a neutral, third party with no authoritative decision-making power assists parties in a dispute to voluntarily reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The legal community has encouraged alternative dispute resolution, including mediation. With mediation as the primary alternative dispute resolution type in the federal district courts, it is now even more important that legislation surrounding mediation and confidentiality is created. In fact, over half of the ninety-four federal court districts now offer, and in most instances, require mediation.

Dispute Resolution Tools In Patent Infringement Cases: Aoki V. Gilbert, No. 2:11-Cv02787-Tln-Cnd, 2015 Wl 5734626 (E.D. Cal. 2015), Brandon Craig

Journal of Dispute Resolution

While arbitration has become a widely accepted alternative to litigation, the role it should play in patent disputes has been widely debated. Issued by the federal government, patents confer a temporary monopoly on the production, use, and sale of new innovations. The government may have an interest in keeping such disputes out of the private realm of arbitration, at least when the dispute is over the validity of the patent. For other patent issues such as licensing, which is essentially a private contract, arbitration may serve as a useful and cost-effective alternative. Even when arbitration is not warranted, other useful …

The English Inheritance—What The First American Colonists Knew Of Mediation And Arbitration, Derek Roebuck

Journal of Dispute Resolution

It seems fair to assume that the first American colonists took with them attitudes and practices from home, including the ways in which they routinely resolved disputes. For example, on November 11, 1647 the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony authorized the purchase of Edward Coke’s Reports, First and Second Institutes and Book of Entries, “to the end we may have the better light for making and proceedings about laws.” But does that mean it was natural then for parties with differences to look to litigation for an answer? This Article provides ample evidence of a preference for other …

Professor Roebuck’S Lessons For Mediators, Arbitrators, And Historians, Douglas E. Abrams

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Professor Roebuck’s biographical essay on Nathaniel Bacon, the centerpiece of his historical article, delivers a timely lesson about how adherence to solid personal standards can elevate a mediator or arbitrator above the rest of the pack. With an eye toward future national direction, the article closes by summoning American historians to chronicle the development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) since the nation’s colonial days.

Introduction: Judicial Education, Dispute Resolution, And The Life Of A Judge: A Conversation With Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director Of The Federal Judicial Center, Jeremy Fogel Hon., S. I. Strong

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In January and June 2016, Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sat down with Professor S.I. Strong to discuss a variety of issues ranging from the civil rules amendments and the case management process to judicial education, mediation and the role of the Federal Judicial Center. Judge Fogel also gave his views on what lawyers, academics and the public need to know about the federal judiciary and the task of judging, thereby providing important and unique insights into the judicial process.

Seeking Justice For Grandma: Challenging Mandatory Arbitration In Nursing Home Contracts, Andi Alper

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment advocates against the use of mandatory arbitration in nursing home admission contracts and discusses various legal theories available to refute such clauses. Part II discusses mandatory arbitration in general and its use in nursing home admission contracts. Part III summarizes some of the common arguments made in favor of and against arbitration in nursing home admission contracts. Finally, Part IV addresses how courts analyze these agreements and possible approaches to avoid arbitration of disputes arising out of the nursing home contract.

Mediators Without Borders And The Efficacy Of Community Mediation Centers In Israel And Palestine, Jenna Homeyer

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will also discuss whether using specific techniques from each center can help restore relations between the people of Israel and Palestine. “[C]ulture is not posited as the cause of conflict, instead, it is intertwined with conflict and the processes of resolution.” What makes each center successful is that they embrace cultural differences. Instead of viewing cultural differences as an obstacle to peace they use cultural norms like Sulha, a traditional Arab way to resolve conflict, to invite peace. Each of these processes maintains a person’s dignity through the resolution process, and helps each party see the opposing party …

Masthead

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

The Evolution Of Interstate Arbitration And The Peaceful Resolution Of Transboundary Freshwater Disputes, Tamar Meshel

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article sets out to examine the potential for arbitration to be effectively employed by states in the resolution of transboundary freshwater disputes. Part II will describe the unique nature of TFDs, briefly examine the international law principles governing such disputes as well as the main mechanisms used for their resolution, and evaluate their adequacy. Part III will suggest a new approach to interstate arbitration, intended to ‘revive’ it in the context of TFD resolution. The first element of this approach calls for a return to the original purpose and true nature of arbitration, which rather than constituting a purely …

Exploring The Federal Arbitration Act Through The Lens Of History Symposium, Imre Stephen Szalai

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The United States Arbitration Act (known today as the Federal Arbitration Act, or FAA) is a relatively short and deceptively cryptic statute. The heart of the statute, section 2, is one sentence, and this key provision simply declares that arbitration agreements are generally “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable.” There is not much traditional legislative history surrounding this statute because much of the development of the bill that became the FAA occurred through organizations outside of Congress, like the American Bar Association and the New York Chamber of Commerce.3 As a result, to understand the FAA at a deeper level, it is …

Robbing The Cradle: The Use Of Mediation In Parental Rights Termination With Evidence Of Drug Abuse By The Mother, M. Katherine Kerbs

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will explore the use of mediation in termination of parental rights proceedings where there is evidence of drug abuse by the parents. First, this Comment will give an overview of termination proceedings and examine a specific statute’s guidelines for termination. Then, this Comment will provide an overview of mediation and its uses in family law. Finally, this Comment will argue for increased use of mediation in termination of parental rights cases where there is evidence of drug abuse by the mother.

The Historically Shifting Sands Of Reasons To Arbitrate Symposium, James Oldham

Journal of Dispute Resolution

It is well established that for many centuries, arbitration has been a regular, even frequent, method of dispute settlement in the Western World. Derek Roebuck has done path breaking research demonstrating this in his recent book covering the middle ages (1154-1558)1 and in his contribution to this symposium, “The English Experience: What the First American Colonists Knew of Mediation and Arbitration.”2 My own work, with the excellent help of co-authors Henry Horwitz and Su Jin Kim, has explored English patterns from the late 17th century into the 1800s, also tracing the English approach into the American colonies and the early …

A User's Guide To Easier Flood Insurance: A Look Into The History Of Flood Insurance Claims Dispute Processing And Suggestions For Improvement, Courtney Lauer

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In 2012, Superstorm Sandy alone produced 144,484 claims for federal flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The NFIP was created under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and was designed to limit the impact of flooding on both private and public structures. The NFIP’s self-stated goal was to decrease the socioeconomic effects of natural disasters by encouraging the purchase of flood insurance and general risk insurance.

Masthead

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Beyond The Faa: Arbitration Procedure, Practice, And Policy In Historical Perspective Symposium: Introduction, Carli N. Conklin

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this symposium edition of the Journal of Dispute Resolution is to widen the focus of our present-day discourse on arbitration by exploring the broader histories of arbitration in America, considering not only what arbitration procedure, practice, and policy looked like in early America (and in the earlier legal, cultural, or religious systems from which American arbitration was adopted), but also how those broader histories might contribute to important discussions and developments in arbitration procedure, practice, and policy today. To that end, we brought together scholars in law and history whose combined works restore breadth and depth to …

For Eschewing Of Trouble And Exorbitant Expense: Arbitration In The Early Modern British Isles Symposium, Margo Todd

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The history of binding arbitration in British customary law is very long, and in scope, very broad. In Scotland and in England, in settings both urban and rural, commercial and ecclesiastical, and across a broad range of social estates, from craftsmen to lords, alewives to merchant princes, it had by the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries become the default mechanism to avoid costly litigation, and to resolve disputes likely otherwise to end in bloodshed.1 It was often a device to avoid the courts, since litigation was always expensive and time-consuming; however, in a great number of cases it occurred in cooperation …