Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Legal Education (4)
- Family Law (3)
-
- Insurance Law (3)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (144)
- Mediation (99)
- Alternative dispute resolution (43)
- Dispute resolution (39)
- Adr (35)
-
- International (30)
- Legal education (28)
- Arbitration act (23)
- Arbitration agreements (23)
- Negotiation (23)
- Litigation (22)
- FAA (19)
- Uaa (19)
- Uniform arbitration act (19)
- Settlement (17)
- Employment (15)
- Federal arbitration act (15)
- Legislation (13)
- Mediator (13)
- Confidentiality (12)
- ADR (11)
- Contract (11)
- Disputes (11)
- Judicial review (11)
- Uniform mediation act (11)
- Union (11)
- Arbitrator (10)
- Conflict (10)
- Conflict resolution (10)
- Damages (10)
- Publication Year
Articles 991 - 1013 of 1013
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Patterns Of Bias In Mediation, Christopher Honeyman
Patterns Of Bias In Mediation, Christopher Honeyman
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The last few years' discussion of mediation is imbued with a certain "born again" quality. The enthusiasm is understandable in view of the attractive features of this process; but it has obscured the facts that no process works well for everyone, and that for some people, mediation is worse than useless. In view of the general tide of professional opinion that mediation is a "better" process for resolving disputes, qualifications and reservations are easily enough overlooked, and "better for whom?" is not a particularly popular question
Book Reviews , Robert Coulson
Book Reviews , Robert Coulson
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This is an important book for anyone who needs to understand how changes can be orchestrated in our increasingly complex society and how major economic disagreements can best be resolved. Too many books and papers on dispute resolution are written by academics and others who have little practical experience with the process. Perhaps that is why negotiation is often described in terms of two people bargaining across a table, sometimes with the help of a single, neutral mediator. In real life, each "party" consists of numerous contesting individuals expressing conflicting demands, some resisting any tendency to compromise, others willing to …
Transformation Of Disputes By Lawyers: What The Dispute Paradigm Does And Does Not Tell Us, The, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Transformation Of Disputes By Lawyers: What The Dispute Paradigm Does And Does Not Tell Us, The, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In this essay I will examine the dispute paradigm and its critique through the prism of one of the agents of dispute processing--the lawyer. This is not a simple task because in some studies of dispute processing, the dispute is the independent variable and the lawyer (the agent of dispute transformation) is the dependent variable. In other studies the reverse is true or the relationship is unclear. Are divorces made worse because of lawyers' or do the dynamics of divorce disputes force lawyers to become particularly adversarial and antagonistic? I choose this prism because the transformation of disputes conception not …
Mediator Expectations And Professional Training: Implications For Teaching Dispute Resolution, Raymond Albert
Mediator Expectations And Professional Training: Implications For Teaching Dispute Resolution, Raymond Albert
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Thus, this study explores the following questions within the context of landlord-tenant disputes: What are mediator role expectations? Do these vary depending on the mediator's professional training? What are the implications for the teaching of disputes resolution?
Adr Paradigms And Intervenor Values, Joseph B. Stulberg
Adr Paradigms And Intervenor Values, Joseph B. Stulberg
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Mediators insist that they can be neutral intervenors when assisting parties reach a negotiated settlement. They view their role as that of facilitating the development of settlement terms that the parties find acceptable, irrespective of whether the mediator approves of them or if they are in the best interests of either the parties or the public.'
Dispute Resolution: The Fourth R, Albie Davis, Kit Porter
Dispute Resolution: The Fourth R, Albie Davis, Kit Porter
Journal of Dispute Resolution
What will be the consequences of a public skilled in dealing creatively with conflicts? Will universities and law schools be ready when these students enter their classrooms? Will community violence, particularly juvenile crime, decrease? Will suits cease to be the answer? Will lawyers change their style or go out of style? Will the foundations of our legal system be challenged? Will people who feel confident in handling their personal amd community disputes in a non-adversarial manner demand that governments solve international disputes without violence? We do not know the answers to these questions, but the impact of teaching dispute resolution …
Arbitration In The Securities Industry: Too Much Of A Good Thing, David A. Lipton
Arbitration In The Securities Industry: Too Much Of A Good Thing, David A. Lipton
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The study upon which this article is based was conducted in response to the explosive growth of the use of arbitration in the securities industry as a means of resolving broker/customer disputes. The study was designed to investigate whether the use that is being made of arbitration is efficient and, if inefficiencies were found, what procedures might be employed to screen out inefficient use
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA)1 was proposed in 1955 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Since that time, well over half of the states have enacted statutes modeled after the UAA.2 This survey's purpose is to present and explain recent decisions interpreting the UAA, and assist in analyzing future cases.
Rhetoric And Reality In The Dispute Settlement Movement, Frederick E. Snyder
Rhetoric And Reality In The Dispute Settlement Movement, Frederick E. Snyder
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Efforts to demystify and simplify the way disputes are settled in American society seem to have congealed into a nationwide movement within less than a decade: neighborhood justice centers, arbitration, divorce mediation, no-fault auto insurance, do-it-yourself probate, "plain English" land and rental agreements, government ombudsmen, consumer hot lines, community mediation of minor criminal cases. A growth industry, if there ever was one
Training Lawyers To Be More Effective Dispute Preventers And Dispute Settlers: Advocating For Non-Adversarial Skills, Paul L. Tractenberg
Training Lawyers To Be More Effective Dispute Preventers And Dispute Settlers: Advocating For Non-Adversarial Skills, Paul L. Tractenberg
Journal of Dispute Resolution
After briefly recounting some milestones in the history of legal education, and especially efforts to train lawyers in non-Langdellian techniques, I will explore re-orientation of lawyer training, first globally and then more specifically. Most of the ideas in this article are not new. Many of them date back 50 years and more. Articles by Llewellyn and Frank in the 1920's and 1930's could be reprinted with modest changes and seem totally relevant. 3 This in itself bears serious pondering. We do have the advantage of some relatively recent studies which, in the main, tend to support Llewellyn's and Frank's intuitions. …
Federal Preemption Of Arbitration - Southland Corp. V. Keating, Ronald A. Conway
Federal Preemption Of Arbitration - Southland Corp. V. Keating, Ronald A. Conway
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Arbitration agreements have traditionally been viewed with disfavor.2 Many states have refused to enforce arbitration clauses to the same extent as other agreements, either under the common law or by statute.8 This hostility towards arbitration agreements was the result of an attempt to preserve the courts' jurisdiction. Any agreement which deprived courts of jurisdiction was frowned upon.' The United States Supreme Court recently held that the Federal Arbitration Act5 (FAA) preempts state law and must be applied in state courts. This decision is in accord with a trend throughout the nation to make arbitration agreements specifically enforceable.6 The effect of …
Lawyer's Skills In Negotiations: Justice In Unseen Hands, Jeffrey H. Hartje
Lawyer's Skills In Negotiations: Justice In Unseen Hands, Jeffrey H. Hartje
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The purpose of this article is to identify and explore the processes and dynamics of lawyer negotiation at the skill level. Part I, Operational Skills in Preparation for Negotiation, examines processes and subprocesses of negotiation to develop a background for understanding the potential areas of lawyer skill involved in the operation of negotiation in Section A. Section B explores the preparation skills involved including the analysis and development of a negotiation theory of the case which requires an understanding of the substance of the negotiation, norms, precedent and power combined with fact management and effective characterization of the facts of …
Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith
Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In the early nineteenth century Alexis de Tocqueville predicted that the law would become a secular religion in the United States, and that every important political question would be turned into a matter for law and litigation.' History once again has proven de Tocqueville's remarkable prescience. Over the past two decades, there has been a staggering increase in litigation.2 Americans now are filing more lawsuits than ever before, and are litigating a wide variety of disputes that previously had been resolved through other means.
Arbitral Decisions: A Social Science Analog, John E. Drotning, Bruce Fortado
Arbitral Decisions: A Social Science Analog, John E. Drotning, Bruce Fortado
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This paper develops the idea that arbitral decision making has an analog in social science research.1 It asserts that the hypothesis testing procedure in social sciences is directly analogous to the arbitral process. The research format of an economist, sociologist, or psychologist might be as follows: 1. Generate the null (H.) and alternate (H) hypotheses to be tested. 2. Collect reliable and valid data relative to the hypothesis. 3. Evaluate and analyze this data by subjecting it to statistical tests. 4. Arrive at conclusions by accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis after statistical testing. 5. Explain and discuss findings
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), 1 proposed by the National Conference on Uniform State Laws in 1955, has been adopted by slightly more than half the states.' The purpose of this survey is to explain the principles underlying court decisions interpreting the UAA, and provide a framework for analyzing future cases.
Preface By The Dean, Dale A. Whitman
Preface By The Dean, Dale A. Whitman
Journal of Dispute Resolution
No abstract provided.
Judicial Participation In Settlement, James A. Wall, Dale E. Rude, Lawrence F. Schiller
Judicial Participation In Settlement, James A. Wall, Dale E. Rude, Lawrence F. Schiller
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In the following pages, we will briefly delineate the settlement process, enumerate the techniques currently utilized by judges to facilitate settlement, and discuss the perceived ethics of these techniques. Finally, we will consider the circumstances under which judges typically participate in settlement.
Introduction, Leonard L. Riskin
Guideposts For An Institutional Framework Of Consensual Dispute Processing, John S. Murray
Guideposts For An Institutional Framework Of Consensual Dispute Processing, John S. Murray
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The purpose of this Article is to outline a set of characteristics which can serve as initial guideposts for the eventual development of a framework for a comprehensive institution to assist disputing parties in more effectively resolving their conflicts. Consensual dispute processing appears to be at the point in its growth where it needs to be liberated from its present "alternatives" status and allowed to mature as a separate, full-fledged institution.