Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 991 - 1013 of 1013

Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

Patterns Of Bias In Mediation, Christopher Honeyman Jan 1985

Patterns Of Bias In Mediation, Christopher Honeyman

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The last few years' discussion of mediation is imbued with a certain "born again" quality. The enthusiasm is understandable in view of the attractive features of this process; but it has obscured the facts that no process works well for everyone, and that for some people, mediation is worse than useless. In view of the general tide of professional opinion that mediation is a "better" process for resolving disputes, qualifications and reservations are easily enough overlooked, and "better for whom?" is not a particularly popular question


Book Reviews , Robert Coulson Jan 1985

Book Reviews , Robert Coulson

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This is an important book for anyone who needs to understand how changes can be orchestrated in our increasingly complex society and how major economic disagreements can best be resolved. Too many books and papers on dispute resolution are written by academics and others who have little practical experience with the process. Perhaps that is why negotiation is often described in terms of two people bargaining across a table, sometimes with the help of a single, neutral mediator. In real life, each "party" consists of numerous contesting individuals expressing conflicting demands, some resisting any tendency to compromise, others willing to …


Table Of Contents Jan 1985

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Transformation Of Disputes By Lawyers: What The Dispute Paradigm Does And Does Not Tell Us, The, Carrie Menkel-Meadow Jan 1985

Transformation Of Disputes By Lawyers: What The Dispute Paradigm Does And Does Not Tell Us, The, Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In this essay I will examine the dispute paradigm and its critique through the prism of one of the agents of dispute processing--the lawyer. This is not a simple task because in some studies of dispute processing, the dispute is the independent variable and the lawyer (the agent of dispute transformation) is the dependent variable. In other studies the reverse is true or the relationship is unclear. Are divorces made worse because of lawyers' or do the dynamics of divorce disputes force lawyers to become particularly adversarial and antagonistic? I choose this prism because the transformation of disputes conception not …


Mediator Expectations And Professional Training: Implications For Teaching Dispute Resolution, Raymond Albert Jan 1985

Mediator Expectations And Professional Training: Implications For Teaching Dispute Resolution, Raymond Albert

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Thus, this study explores the following questions within the context of landlord-tenant disputes: What are mediator role expectations? Do these vary depending on the mediator's professional training? What are the implications for the teaching of disputes resolution?


Adr Paradigms And Intervenor Values, Joseph B. Stulberg Jan 1985

Adr Paradigms And Intervenor Values, Joseph B. Stulberg

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Mediators insist that they can be neutral intervenors when assisting parties reach a negotiated settlement. They view their role as that of facilitating the development of settlement terms that the parties find acceptable, irrespective of whether the mediator approves of them or if they are in the best interests of either the parties or the public.'


Title Page Jan 1985

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Dispute Resolution: The Fourth R, Albie Davis, Kit Porter Jan 1985

Dispute Resolution: The Fourth R, Albie Davis, Kit Porter

Journal of Dispute Resolution

What will be the consequences of a public skilled in dealing creatively with conflicts? Will universities and law schools be ready when these students enter their classrooms? Will community violence, particularly juvenile crime, decrease? Will suits cease to be the answer? Will lawyers change their style or go out of style? Will the foundations of our legal system be challenged? Will people who feel confident in handling their personal amd community disputes in a non-adversarial manner demand that governments solve international disputes without violence? We do not know the answers to these questions, but the impact of teaching dispute resolution …


Arbitration In The Securities Industry: Too Much Of A Good Thing, David A. Lipton Jan 1985

Arbitration In The Securities Industry: Too Much Of A Good Thing, David A. Lipton

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The study upon which this article is based was conducted in response to the explosive growth of the use of arbitration in the securities industry as a means of resolving broker/customer disputes. The study was designed to investigate whether the use that is being made of arbitration is efficient and, if inefficiencies were found, what procedures might be employed to screen out inefficient use


Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act Jan 1985

Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA)1 was proposed in 1955 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Since that time, well over half of the states have enacted statutes modeled after the UAA.2 This survey's purpose is to present and explain recent decisions interpreting the UAA, and assist in analyzing future cases.


Rhetoric And Reality In The Dispute Settlement Movement, Frederick E. Snyder Jan 1984

Rhetoric And Reality In The Dispute Settlement Movement, Frederick E. Snyder

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Efforts to demystify and simplify the way disputes are settled in American society seem to have congealed into a nationwide movement within less than a decade: neighborhood justice centers, arbitration, divorce mediation, no-fault auto insurance, do-it-yourself probate, "plain English" land and rental agreements, government ombudsmen, consumer hot lines, community mediation of minor criminal cases. A growth industry, if there ever was one


Training Lawyers To Be More Effective Dispute Preventers And Dispute Settlers: Advocating For Non-Adversarial Skills, Paul L. Tractenberg Jan 1984

Training Lawyers To Be More Effective Dispute Preventers And Dispute Settlers: Advocating For Non-Adversarial Skills, Paul L. Tractenberg

Journal of Dispute Resolution

After briefly recounting some milestones in the history of legal education, and especially efforts to train lawyers in non-Langdellian techniques, I will explore re-orientation of lawyer training, first globally and then more specifically. Most of the ideas in this article are not new. Many of them date back 50 years and more. Articles by Llewellyn and Frank in the 1920's and 1930's could be reprinted with modest changes and seem totally relevant. 3 This in itself bears serious pondering. We do have the advantage of some relatively recent studies which, in the main, tend to support Llewellyn's and Frank's intuitions. …


Federal Preemption Of Arbitration - Southland Corp. V. Keating, Ronald A. Conway Jan 1984

Federal Preemption Of Arbitration - Southland Corp. V. Keating, Ronald A. Conway

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Arbitration agreements have traditionally been viewed with disfavor.2 Many states have refused to enforce arbitration clauses to the same extent as other agreements, either under the common law or by statute.8 This hostility towards arbitration agreements was the result of an attempt to preserve the courts' jurisdiction. Any agreement which deprived courts of jurisdiction was frowned upon.' The United States Supreme Court recently held that the Federal Arbitration Act5 (FAA) preempts state law and must be applied in state courts. This decision is in accord with a trend throughout the nation to make arbitration agreements specifically enforceable.6 The effect of …


Lawyer's Skills In Negotiations: Justice In Unseen Hands, Jeffrey H. Hartje Jan 1984

Lawyer's Skills In Negotiations: Justice In Unseen Hands, Jeffrey H. Hartje

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this article is to identify and explore the processes and dynamics of lawyer negotiation at the skill level. Part I, Operational Skills in Preparation for Negotiation, examines processes and subprocesses of negotiation to develop a background for understanding the potential areas of lawyer skill involved in the operation of negotiation in Section A. Section B explores the preparation skills involved including the analysis and development of a negotiation theory of the case which requires an understanding of the substance of the negotiation, norms, precedent and power combined with fact management and effective characterization of the facts of …


Table Of Contents Jan 1984

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith Jan 1984

Alternative Means Of Dispute Resolution: Practices And Possibilities In The Federal Government, William French Smith

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In the early nineteenth century Alexis de Tocqueville predicted that the law would become a secular religion in the United States, and that every important political question would be turned into a matter for law and litigation.' History once again has proven de Tocqueville's remarkable prescience. Over the past two decades, there has been a staggering increase in litigation.2 Americans now are filing more lawsuits than ever before, and are litigating a wide variety of disputes that previously had been resolved through other means.


Arbitral Decisions: A Social Science Analog, John E. Drotning, Bruce Fortado Jan 1984

Arbitral Decisions: A Social Science Analog, John E. Drotning, Bruce Fortado

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This paper develops the idea that arbitral decision making has an analog in social science research.1 It asserts that the hypothesis testing procedure in social sciences is directly analogous to the arbitral process. The research format of an economist, sociologist, or psychologist might be as follows: 1. Generate the null (H.) and alternate (H) hypotheses to be tested. 2. Collect reliable and valid data relative to the hypothesis. 3. Evaluate and analyze this data by subjecting it to statistical tests. 4. Arrive at conclusions by accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis after statistical testing. 5. Explain and discuss findings


Title Page Jan 1984

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act Jan 1984

Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), 1 proposed by the National Conference on Uniform State Laws in 1955, has been adopted by slightly more than half the states.' The purpose of this survey is to explain the principles underlying court decisions interpreting the UAA, and provide a framework for analyzing future cases.


Preface By The Dean, Dale A. Whitman Jan 1984

Preface By The Dean, Dale A. Whitman

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Judicial Participation In Settlement, James A. Wall, Dale E. Rude, Lawrence F. Schiller Jan 1984

Judicial Participation In Settlement, James A. Wall, Dale E. Rude, Lawrence F. Schiller

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In the following pages, we will briefly delineate the settlement process, enumerate the techniques currently utilized by judges to facilitate settlement, and discuss the perceived ethics of these techniques. Finally, we will consider the circumstances under which judges typically participate in settlement.


Introduction, Leonard L. Riskin Jan 1984

Introduction, Leonard L. Riskin

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.


Guideposts For An Institutional Framework Of Consensual Dispute Processing, John S. Murray Jan 1984

Guideposts For An Institutional Framework Of Consensual Dispute Processing, John S. Murray

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this Article is to outline a set of characteristics which can serve as initial guideposts for the eventual development of a framework for a comprehensive institution to assist disputing parties in more effectively resolving their conflicts. Consensual dispute processing appears to be at the point in its growth where it needs to be liberated from its present "alternatives" status and allowed to mature as a separate, full-fledged institution.