Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (128)
- Criminal Law (115)
- Courts (85)
- Supreme Court of the United States (84)
- State and Local Government Law (61)
-
- Fourth Amendment (50)
- Judges (38)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (36)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Evidence (24)
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Law and Society (18)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (16)
- Law and Politics (11)
- Legislation (10)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Juvenile Law (9)
- Law and Race (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Civil Procedure (8)
- Family Law (8)
- First Amendment (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Legal History (7)
- Social Welfare Law (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Legal Education (6)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (112)
- University of Richmond (12)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
-
- St. John's University School of Law (6)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (107)
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Articles (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- University of Miami Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (1)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 207
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deciding The Stop And Frisk Cases: A Look Inside The Supreme Court's Conference, John Q. Barrett
Deciding The Stop And Frisk Cases: A Look Inside The Supreme Court's Conference, John Q. Barrett
Faculty Publications
In our system of constitutional decision-making, the Supreme Court makes law as an institution in its formal written opinions. The Court and its individual members make their official legal marks in the printed pages of the United States Reports. In June 1968, in Terry v. Ohio and Sibron v. New York, the two decisions that approved the constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment of police stop and frisk practices, the Court filled many official pages with rich discussion. Over the ensuing thirty years, these Court and individual opinions have shaped the course of constitutional analysis in our courts and guided the …
Will The Punishment Fit The Victims? The Case For Pre-Trial Disclosure, And The Uncharted Future Of Victim Impact Information In Capital Jury Sentencing, José F. Anderson
Will The Punishment Fit The Victims? The Case For Pre-Trial Disclosure, And The Uncharted Future Of Victim Impact Information In Capital Jury Sentencing, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
The United States Supreme Court decision in Payne v. Tennessee, upholding the use of victim impact statements in capital jury sentencing proceedings, marked one of the most dramatic reversals of a precedent in the history of United States constitutional jurisprudence. The decision in Payne expressly overruled Booth v. Maryland decided only four years earlier. The Booth case rejected the use of victim impact statements in capital sentencing cases that involved juries. In Payne, the Supreme Court made it clear that victims were entitled to offer, and juries were permitted to consider, the effect that a "death eligible" homicide had on …
Making Constitutional Doctrine In A Realist Age, Victoria Nourse
Making Constitutional Doctrine In A Realist Age, Victoria Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In this article the author considers three examples of modern constitutional doctrine that show how judges have stolen bits and pieces from popularized skepticisms about the job of judging and have molded this stolen rhetoric into doctrine. In the first example, she asks whether constitutional law's recent penchant for doctrinal rules based on "clear law" could have existed without the modern age's obsession with legal uncertainty. In the second, the author considers whether our contemporary rhetoric of constitutional "interests" and "expectations" reflects modern critiques of doctrine as failing to address social needs. In the third, she asks how an offhand …
Having It Both Ways: Proof That The U.S. Supreme Court Is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented, Christopher Slobogin
Having It Both Ways: Proof That The U.S. Supreme Court Is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
If the assertions that this essay makes about the Court's "unfair" prosecution-orientation withstand scrutiny," two further conclusions might follow. First, the highest court in the country is so fixated on ensuring that a particular side wins that it is willing with some frequency to sacrifice the most basic attribute of any court worthy of the name-the appearance of fairness. This conclusion is a much more fundamental challenge to the Court's integrity than is the simple acknowledgement that a majority of the Justices are biased in favor of the government. Second, to the extent the Court's unfairness becomes common knowledge, its …
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
(Adapted by permission from 84 Ky. L. J. 107 (1995)) This article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessiveness regarding prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportional to the crime punished. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, one finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is …
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing: The Supreme Court's Tortured Approach To Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Steven P. Grossman
Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing: The Supreme Court's Tortured Approach To Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessive prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportionate to the crime. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, this Article finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is confused, and what law can be discerned rests on weak foundations. …
Factors For Reasonable Suspicion: When Black And Poor Means Stopped And Frisked, David A. Harris
Factors For Reasonable Suspicion: When Black And Poor Means Stopped And Frisked, David A. Harris
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.