Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (128)
- Criminal Law (115)
- Courts (85)
- Supreme Court of the United States (84)
- State and Local Government Law (61)
-
- Fourth Amendment (50)
- Judges (38)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (36)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Evidence (24)
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Law and Society (18)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (16)
- Law and Politics (11)
- Legislation (10)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Juvenile Law (9)
- Law and Race (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Civil Procedure (8)
- Family Law (8)
- First Amendment (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Legal History (7)
- Social Welfare Law (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Legal Education (6)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (112)
- University of Richmond (12)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
-
- St. John's University School of Law (6)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (107)
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Articles (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- University of Miami Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (1)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 207 of 207
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Doctrine Of Inevitable Discovery: A Plea For Reasonable Limitations, Steven P. Grossman
The Doctrine Of Inevitable Discovery: A Plea For Reasonable Limitations, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
In reinstating the Iowa murder conviction of Robert Williams, the Supreme Court accepted explicitly for the first time the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Applied for some time by state and federal courts, the doctrine of inevitable discovery is a means by which evidence obtained illegally can still be admitted against defendants in criminal cases. Unfortunately, the Court chose to adopt the doctrine without any of the safeguards necessary to insure that the deterrent impact of the exclusionary rule would be preserved, and in a form that is subject to and almost invites abuse.
This article warns of the danger to …
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Risk Arbitrage And Insider Trading: A Functional Analysis Of The Fiduciary Concept Under Rule 10b-5, Laurence A. Steckman
Risk Arbitrage And Insider Trading: A Functional Analysis Of The Fiduciary Concept Under Rule 10b-5, Laurence A. Steckman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Do The United States Sentencing Guidelines Deprive Defendants Of Due Process?, Bradford Mank
Do The United States Sentencing Guidelines Deprive Defendants Of Due Process?, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
It is difficult to determine whether due process requires individualized sentencing because sentencing goals and practices have varied greatly during the course of this nation's history. A court applying Judge Bork's original intent doctrine of constitutional interpretation would probably reach a result different from that reached by a court employing a more liberal view of due process protections.1o It is likely that liberals and conservatives on the current Supreme Court would disagree on whether the Guidelines violate due process.
This article argues that the Guidelines can be saved and can satisfy due process requirements if the Supreme Court interprets the …
Appealability, Under The Collateral Order Doctrine, Of Orders Denying Motions For Appointment Of Counsel In Federal Civil Litigation After Richardson-Merrell, Inc. V. Koller, Kevin G. Dumbach
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Improper Use Of Presumptions In Recent Criminal Law Adjudication, Charles W. Collier
The Improper Use Of Presumptions In Recent Criminal Law Adjudication, Charles W. Collier
UF Law Faculty Publications
This note argues that, in developing the contemporary mandatory-permissive standard, the Supreme Court has misunderstood the effects of presumptions on juries. Presumptions that are ‘permissive’ in theory may nevertheless be ‘mandatory’ in fact, thereby leading some juries to convict regardless of their beliefs and inclinations. Thus, these legal presumptions may undermine the moral sense and political function of the jury.
Part I of this note shows, through doctrinal analysis, that the mandatory-permissive distinction is an anomaly in the Court's jurisprudence. Part II shows that this distinction is at variance with a substantial body of empirical social science research. This part …
The "Good Faith Exception" Cases: Reasonable Exercises In Futility, Craig M. Bradley
The "Good Faith Exception" Cases: Reasonable Exercises In Futility, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Suppression Hearing Testimony To Impeach, Morgan G. Graham
The Use Of Suppression Hearing Testimony To Impeach, Morgan G. Graham
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine At Constitutional Crossroads, Nelson E. Roth, Scott E. Sundby
The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine At Constitutional Crossroads, Nelson E. Roth, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As the culmination of a decade of rulemaking, in 1975 Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence, which include in rule 804(b)(3) an exception to the hearsay rule that allows federal courts to admit statements against penal interest. Having reviewed previously unpublished memoranda and nonpublic tape recordings of the deliberations of the Advisory and Standing Committees to the Judicial Conference and the Special Subcommittee on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws of the House Judiciary Committee, Professor Tague explores the development of rule 804(b)(3), one of the more controversial rules that emerged from that rulemaking process. After analyzing rule 804(b)(3) and …
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article explores the ramifications of Wainwright v. Sykes, a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States in 1977. The broad question before the Court in Sykes concerned the extent to which state prisoners should have access to federal court by use of the writ of habeas corpus. The narrow issue before the Court concerned the impact on a prisoner's claim for habeas relief of procedural defaults (such as a failure to object to evidence, a failure to perfect an appeal, etc.) that occur in the state proceeding under attack. In considering these important issues Justice …
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The availability of federal habeas corpus relief for state criminal defendants has always borne a complex relationship to state rules barring defendants from litigating constitutional claims in state court because of procedural defaults in raising those claims. The Warren Court's landmark attempt to resolve this relationship was the 1963 decision in Fay v. Noia, which asserted that a state procedural forfeiture rule could not bar federal habeas review of a constitutional claim unless the defendant had "deliberately bypassed" the procedural opportunity to raise the claim; the Court defined "deliberate bypass" in terms of a defendant's intentional and voluntary relinquishment of …
Foreword: Waiver Of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet In The Citadel, Michael E. Tigar
Foreword: Waiver Of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet In The Citadel, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
Foreword to Harvard Law Review review of Supreme Court 1969 Term
From Escobedo To Miranda: The Anatomy Of A Supreme Court Decision, By Richard J. Medalie
From Escobedo To Miranda: The Anatomy Of A Supreme Court Decision, By Richard J. Medalie
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
New Rules Of The Supreme Court, Bernard C. Gavit
New Rules Of The Supreme Court, Bernard C. Gavit
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.