Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (890)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (788)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (299)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (218)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- University of Richmond (174)
- American University Washington College of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (114)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (86)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Southern Methodist University (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (461)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (100)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (85)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Faculty Scholarship (554)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (176)
- University of Richmond Law Review (138)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (127)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Scholarly Articles (95)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Scholarly Works (76)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (68)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6451 - 6480 of 7302
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Donald F. Samuel, Kathleen V. Duffield
Criminal Law And Procedure, Donald F. Samuel, Kathleen V. Duffield
Mercer Law Review
In many respects, this was a quiet year in the area of criminal law and procedure. Though the appellate courts reviewed nearly as many criminal cases as all other types of cases combined, there were few major developments that marked a departure from settled precedent. Perhaps the most significant developments involved two areas of substantive law: the Georgia Supreme Court staked out new territory in the area of bribery,1 holding that a "campaign contribution" may amount to a bribe if the donor expects a specific quid pro quo;2 and the court held that in future murder cases involving self-defense, the …
The Most Fundamental Change In The Criminal Justice System: The Role Of The Prosecutor In Sentence Reduction, Bennett L. Gershman
The Most Fundamental Change In The Criminal Justice System: The Role Of The Prosecutor In Sentence Reduction, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
As every lawyer knows, the prosecutor is the most powerful figure in the American criminal justice system. The prosecutor decides whom to charge, what charges to bring, whether to permit a defendant to plead guilty, and whether to confer immunity. In carrying out this broad decision-making power, the prosecutor enjoys considerable independence. Indeed, one of the most elusive and vexing subjects in criminal justice has been to define the limits of the prosecutor’s discretion.
The Self-Incrimination Debate, Mark Berger
The Ultimate Injustice: When A Court Misstates The Facts, Anthony D'Amato
The Ultimate Injustice: When A Court Misstates The Facts, Anthony D'Amato
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speaking And Writing Against Hate, Martha Minow
Speaking And Writing Against Hate, Martha Minow
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Name Of The Law, Samuel Weber
In Case Of Confession, Andrea Lyon
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The most ominous recent development affecting the balance of forces in the adversary system is the unprecedented attack by prosecutors on criminal defense lawyers themselves. Grand jury subpoenas to attorneys, law office searches, disqualification motions, fee forfeiture proceedings, and, most recently, IRS attempts to enforce currency-reporting regulations do not seem to be isolated occurrences or mere happenstance. Rather, perhaps inspired by Shakespeare's injunction in Henry VI to "kill all the lawyers," some prosecutors appear to have concluded that the most effective way to prevail in the battle against crime is to cripple the defense lawyers, particularly those who represent defendants …
The Admission Of Government Fact Findings Under Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(8)(C): Limiting The Dangers Of Unreliable Hearsay, Steven P. Grossman, Stephen J. Shapiro
The Admission Of Government Fact Findings Under Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(8)(C): Limiting The Dangers Of Unreliable Hearsay, Steven P. Grossman, Stephen J. Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C), an exception to the rule against admission of hearsay, permits introduction of public records or reports containing the fact findings of the reporter without requiring the reporter to appear at trial. These fact findings can be based upon the reporter's own observations and calculations or information imparted to the reporter from sources having no connection to any public agency whatsoever. Rule 803(8)(C) has also been used as the vehicle for presenting juries with fact findings from hearings conducted by public officials. The rule would seem to allow these fact findings even though the opponent had …
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.