Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (890)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (788)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (299)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (218)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- University of Richmond (174)
- American University Washington College of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (114)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (86)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Southern Methodist University (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (461)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (100)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (85)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Faculty Scholarship (554)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (176)
- University of Richmond Law Review (138)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (127)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Scholarly Articles (95)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Scholarly Works (76)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (68)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6421 - 6450 of 7302
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Horton V. California: The Plain View Doctrine Loses Its Inadvertency, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 891 (1991), John A. Mack
Horton V. California: The Plain View Doctrine Loses Its Inadvertency, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 891 (1991), John A. Mack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Misconduct During Jury Deliberations, Bennett L. Gershman
Judicial Misconduct During Jury Deliberations, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The author considers the two principal types of improper judicial behavior that may occur during the jury deliberation process. Judicial conduct that attempts to place undue pressure on a jury to reach a verdict may include verdict-urging instructions, threats and intimidation, and inquiry into the numerical division of the jury on the merits of the verdict. Judicial participation in private, ex parte communications with jurors may also subvert orderly trial procedure and undermine the impartiality of the jury. Neither kind of judicial conduct may be allowed to compel a verdict from a jury.
Federal Habeas Review Of New York Convictions: Relieving The Tensions, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Habeas Review Of New York Convictions: Relieving The Tensions, Roger J. Miner '56
Bar Associations
No abstract provided.
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Criminal Law
No abstract provided.
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School Events and Publications
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past year, the Virginia Court of Appeals continued in its role as the most significant contributor to criminal case law. The court ruled on a myriad of issues; the recurring topics involved arrest and investigatory detention, self-defense, the execution of search warrants, double jeopardy, the admissibility of eye-witness identification, and the circumstances and admissibility of a police interrogation. Also, the court ruled on numerous trial and procedural questions regularly encountered by the circuit courts and criminal practitioners.
Habeas Corpus, Qualified Immunity, And Crystal Balls: Predicting The Course Of Constitutional Law, Kit Kinports
Habeas Corpus, Qualified Immunity, And Crystal Balls: Predicting The Course Of Constitutional Law, Kit Kinports
Faculty Scholarship
After describing the basic legal and policy issues surrounding the qualified immunity defense and the use of novelty to explain procedural defaults in habeas cases, Part I of this article advocates a standard for both types of cases that asks whether a person exercising reasonable diligence in the same circumstances would have been aware of the relevant constitutional principles. With this standard in mind, Part II examines the qualified immunity defense in detail, concluding that in many cases public officials are given immunity even though they unreasonably failed to recognize the constitutional implications of their conduct. Part III compares the …
Merciful Juries: The Resilience Of Jury Nullification, Alan W. Schefin, Jon M. Van Dyke
Merciful Juries: The Resilience Of Jury Nullification, Alan W. Schefin, Jon M. Van Dyke
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law 1991 Legislative Update, Philip A. Cherner, H. Patrick Furman
Criminal Law 1991 Legislative Update, Philip A. Cherner, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Great Writ In Action: Empirical Light On The Federal Habeas Corpus Debate, Larry Yackle
The Great Writ In Action: Empirical Light On The Federal Habeas Corpus Debate, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
The national debate regarding federal habeas corpus for state prisoners is fueled in the main by ideology. To some, the authority of the federal courts to entertain constitutional challenges to state criminal convictions is the embodiment of all that was right about the Warren Court and the vision that Court offered of a meaningful system of American liberty, underwritten by independent federal tribunals willing and able to check the coercive power of government. By this account, the Bill of Rights is the protean source of safeguards for individual freedom - commanding generous, imaginative, and insightful elaboration by federal courts at …
A Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Standard In Death Penalty Proceedings: A Neglected Element Of Fairness, Linda Carter
A Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Standard In Death Penalty Proceedings: A Neglected Element Of Fairness, Linda Carter
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lockett Paradox: Reconciling Guided Discretion And Unguided Mitigation In Capital Sentencing, Scott E. Sundby
The Lockett Paradox: Reconciling Guided Discretion And Unguided Mitigation In Capital Sentencing, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Self-Defense As A Justification For Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Self-Defense As A Justification For Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
There are few legal ideas as basic as the principle of legitimate self-defense. Every individual, it is said, has the right to defend his or her person, property or living space against wrongful aggression and, if necessary, to kill the aggressor. This principle is so deeply ingrained in our legal thinking that it is difficult to imagine a legal system that did not acknowledge it. The concept of having rights would be virtually toothless unless we could use force to vindicate our rights against aggression.
The notion of having rights is less well-accepted in Jewish law than are the ideas …