Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7840)
- Legal Studies (7212)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (7088)
- Sociology (7048)
- Criminal Procedure (6958)
-
- Criminology (6864)
- Constitutional Law (3998)
- Courts (2374)
- International Law (2242)
- Human Rights Law (1786)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1636)
- Law and Society (1612)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1605)
- Evidence (1442)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1420)
- Administrative Law (1414)
- State and Local Government Law (1341)
- Civil Law (1270)
- Legislation (1135)
- Law and Gender (1076)
- Jurisprudence (970)
- Business Organizations Law (946)
- Law and Race (945)
- Internet Law (921)
- Natural Resources Law (908)
- Rule of Law (906)
- Juvenile Law (891)
- Legal History (879)
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6832)
- University of Michigan Law School (1134)
- Universitas Indonesia (1036)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (863)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (668)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (654)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (504)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (493)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (463)
- Seattle University School of Law (453)
- Fordham Law School (409)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (384)
- University of Georgia School of Law (355)
- Columbia Law School (354)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (350)
- University of Kentucky (347)
- William & Mary Law School (345)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (342)
- University of Richmond (337)
- Illinois State University (335)
- UIC School of Law (325)
- West Virginia University (300)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (293)
- Cleveland State University (286)
- Brooklyn Law School (284)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (268)
- Pace University (264)
- Southwestern Oklahoma State University (263)
- Roger Williams University (236)
- BLR (223)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (1604)
- Criminal Law (769)
- Criminal justice (739)
- Crime (574)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (540)
-
- Death penalty (492)
- Sentencing (475)
- Evidence (465)
- Criminal procedure (461)
- Justice (430)
- Capital punishment (384)
- Punishment (369)
- Criminology (337)
- Constitutional Law (308)
- Corrections (308)
- Law (289)
- Criminal (269)
- Qc (263)
- Qualitative criminology (263)
- Due process (251)
- Crimes (240)
- Fourth Amendment (240)
- Police (240)
- Supreme Court (236)
- Criminal Procedure (210)
- Constitutional law (196)
- Race (193)
- Rape (193)
- Sixth Amendment (187)
- Eighth Amendment (177)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (6672)
- Faculty Scholarship (1291)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (688)
- Michigan Law Review (636)
- Faculty Publications (395)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (340)
- Articles (338)
- Cardozo Law Review (330)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (317)
- Scholarly Works (294)
- Touro Law Review (294)
- West Virginia Law Review (288)
- Kentucky Law Journal (263)
- Qualitative Criminology (QC) (263)
- War Crimes Memoranda (258)
- UIC Law Review (254)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (253)
- Indiana Law Journal (241)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (234)
- Buffalo Law Review (228)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (227)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (225)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (211)
- University of Richmond Law Review (210)
- Cleveland State Law Review (204)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (203)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (202)
- Scholarly Articles (199)
- ExpressO (198)
- All Faculty Scholarship (183)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1591 - 1620 of 27546
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Formalizing Fairness: Statistical Measures Of Parity For Recidivism Prediction Instruments, Joshua Song
Formalizing Fairness: Statistical Measures Of Parity For Recidivism Prediction Instruments, Joshua Song
Michigan Technology Law Review
Recidivism prediction instruments (RPI) are increasingly employed as an algorithmic arm of the criminal justice system to assist in bond, sentencing, and probation determinations. Due process and ethics guidelines require that RPIs, such as the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS), apply a fair assessment in making recidivism predictions. To establish fair RPIs, we must first define standards of fairness and methods to measure bias in RPI outputs. However, defining algorithmic fairness can be cryptic and context-dependent. Scholars have proposed different criteria for what defines a fair RPI. Unfortunately, these criteria are conflicting and mutually exclusive; it is …
Innocence Lost: The Dangers Of Life Imprisonment For Children At Whose Pleasure: D.B. (A Juvenile) V. The People [2024] Zmca 339 (18 December 2024), Samantha Smit, Louis Koen
Innocence Lost: The Dangers Of Life Imprisonment For Children At Whose Pleasure: D.B. (A Juvenile) V. The People [2024] Zmca 339 (18 December 2024), Samantha Smit, Louis Koen
SAIPAR Case Review
This piece examines the Zambian Court of Appeal's decision to overturn a life imprisonment sentence imposed on juvenile offenders, replacing it with detention ‘at the President's pleasure.’ The commentary explores the legal implications of this discretionary sentence, drawing parallels with similar controversies in other African jurisdictions, particularly Kenya, where such sentences have been criticized for undermining constitutional rights and the doctrine of separation of powers. The authors argue that ‘detention at the President's pleasure’ can effectively amount to an indefinite sentence, raising concerns about the uncertainty of imprisonment duration for child offenders. They suggest that the Zambian court missed an …
Sydney Mwansa V. Director Of Public Prosecutions (Appeal No. 276/2012) (Dpp) And Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture Orders: A Case Comment, Muna Ndulo
SAIPAR Case Review
This piece critically analyses the Zambian Court of Appeal's decision regarding a non-conviction-based forfeiture order. The Court allowed the appeal, insisting on the need to identify a specific offence and establish a clear connection between the offence and the tainted property. The author argues that this decision is legally flawed as it misconstrues the fundamental principle of non-conviction forfeiture, which does not require proof of a criminal conviction or a specific offence. The commentary emphasises that unexplained wealth, where authorities show a disparity between legitimate earnings and accumulated assets, should be sufficient to trigger forfeiture, with the burden of proof …
An Examination Of Ghana’S Implementation Of Maritime Single Window(Msw) : Prospects And Challenges, Pamela Maaleka Puowele Karbo
An Examination Of Ghana’S Implementation Of Maritime Single Window(Msw) : Prospects And Challenges, Pamela Maaleka Puowele Karbo
World Maritime University Dissertations
No abstract provided.
Reconstructing Citizenship, Jenny E. Carroll, James Jeter
Reconstructing Citizenship, Jenny E. Carroll, James Jeter
Faculty Scholarship
In our republican democracy, voting is a central right of citizenship. Yet millions of voters are routinely disenfranchised as a result of convictions or because their carceral status creates barriers to voting. In the past decade, academic scholarship has focused on the impact of disenfranchisement based on conviction. This work has mapped the legal and social implications of policies that deny voting rights to over five million otherwise eligible voters nationwide. Yet this work has some gaps. First, by focusing solely on conviction-based disenfranchisement, the existing scholarship has largely ignored fatal barriers to voting created (and at times perpetuated) by …
Artificial Intelligence & Criminal Justice: A Primer, Benjamin Perrin
Artificial Intelligence & Criminal Justice: A Primer, Benjamin Perrin
All Faculty Publications
The UBC Artificial Intelligence & Criminal Justice Initiative empowers students and scholars to explore the opportunities and challenges at the intersection of AI and criminal justice through teaching, research, public engagement, and advocacy.
Facial Recognition Technology And The Dire Need To Regulate It, Michael Mellon
Facial Recognition Technology And The Dire Need To Regulate It, Michael Mellon
SMU Law Review Forum
Facial recognition technology enables the identification of subjects in digital recordings through the use of biometrics. This technology is increasingly used by both state and private actors for crime prevention, criminal investigations, crowd monitoring, and more. Its use continues despite the fact that the technology itself has been shown to have a propensity for bias and misidentification. The flaws inherent in the technology are not the only cause for concern either. There is reason to believe that nefarious actors could intentionally use facial recognition technology to achieve illegitimate ends. Meanwhile, facial recognition technology remains unregulated at the federal level in …
Punishing Individuals Who Complied With Intolerably Unjust 'Laws' In Predecessor Regimes, Seow Hon Tan
Punishing Individuals Who Complied With Intolerably Unjust 'Laws' In Predecessor Regimes, Seow Hon Tan
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Suppose a 'law' required individuals to report neighbours of a certain race for extermination. If individuals complied with such a 'law' to avoid the penal sanction of a death sentence, should a tribunal involved in the process of transitional justice in a successor regime punish them? Radbruch suggests that intolerably unjust 'laws' are not legally valid. According to Radbruch's Formula, reporting the neighbour would not be justified by law. The logical implication of this Formula is that the act of reporting was, in substance, abetment to murder (or possibly, genocide). Yet, punishing individuals who complied with the purported 'law' in …
Transcript: The Intersection Of Race And Poverty In Criminal Justice, Stephen B. Bright
Transcript: The Intersection Of Race And Poverty In Criminal Justice, Stephen B. Bright
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
Transcript of the lecture given by Bright at the University of Tennessee College of Law Summers-Wyatt Lecture given on September 27, 2010.
Panel Four: Finding A Silver Lining In The Darkest Clouds: How Today's Economic Crisis Creates Opportunities For Reform And Cost Savings In The Administration Of The Death Penalty, Tony Mauro, Jean Faria, Jon B. Gould, Elizabeth (Libby) Sykes, Malcolm R. Hunter
Panel Four: Finding A Silver Lining In The Darkest Clouds: How Today's Economic Crisis Creates Opportunities For Reform And Cost Savings In The Administration Of The Death Penalty, Tony Mauro, Jean Faria, Jon B. Gould, Elizabeth (Libby) Sykes, Malcolm R. Hunter
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Panel Three: Unique Ethical Dilemmas In Capital Representation, Penny J. White, Sean O'Brien, Mary Ann Green, Ann Short-Bowers
Panel Three: Unique Ethical Dilemmas In Capital Representation, Penny J. White, Sean O'Brien, Mary Ann Green, Ann Short-Bowers
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
National Public Defense Symposium: Achieving The Promise Of The Sixth Amendment: Non-Capital And Capital Defense Services, Laurie Robinson
National Public Defense Symposium: Achieving The Promise Of The Sixth Amendment: Non-Capital And Capital Defense Services, Laurie Robinson
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Fear Of Motion, Cardozo Criminal Defense Clinic, Filmmakers Legal Clinic (Flc), Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Josh Dubin
Fear Of Motion, Cardozo Criminal Defense Clinic, Filmmakers Legal Clinic (Flc), Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Josh Dubin
2024 Event Invitations
“A young man on the grip of his probation, attending a therapy session to navigate his survivor guilt after getting his best friend incarcerated. The film explores familiar themes in black politics, regarding the struggles and circumstances of people under maximum sentences. It includes the stigmatization and ineffective rehabilitation that contributes to the corruption of the probation system.”
Rehabilitation Over Retribution: Rethinking Juvenile Justice For Traumatized Youth, Brian L. Traub
Rehabilitation Over Retribution: Rethinking Juvenile Justice For Traumatized Youth, Brian L. Traub
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers, Guns, And Marijuana: How N.Y. State Rifle And Pistol Ass'n V. Bruen Is Shaping Federal Marijuana Law, Mia Cordle
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Legal Landscape After Roe's Reversal, Rachel Rebouché
The Legal Landscape After Roe's Reversal, Rachel Rebouché
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Defendant's Right To Counsel In Commitment Hearings For Nonpayment Of A Criminal Fine, Barbara A. Appleby
A Defendant's Right To Counsel In Commitment Hearings For Nonpayment Of A Criminal Fine, Barbara A. Appleby
Maine Law Review
The federal constitutional right of an indigent defendant to appointed counsel in state court proceedings derives from two constitutional provisions. First, the sixth amendment, as incorporated by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, provides the basis for an absolute right to counsel in criminal prosecutions leading to actual imprisonment. Second, the due process clause, as an independent source of individual rights, provides the basis for the right to counsel in civil proceedings. Both the sixth amendment and the due process rights may be implicated in a hearing for non-payment of a criminal fine. Title 17-A, section 1304 of …
Disparity And The Need For Sentencing Guidelines In Maine: A Proposal For Enhanced Appellate Review, Daniel E. Wathen
Disparity And The Need For Sentencing Guidelines In Maine: A Proposal For Enhanced Appellate Review, Daniel E. Wathen
Maine Law Review
Perhaps in no other field of judicial endeavor is diversity and variety more apparent than when a sentencing judge considers the circumstances presented by a defendant convicted of a criminal offense. In each case, the sentencing judge confronts an individual who has no exact counterpart in any defendant previously appearing before the court for sentencing. The sentence imposed is primarily a matter of judicial discretion and is based upon consideration of the nature of the offense, the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, and the circumstances of the defendant. The sentencing judge formulates a specific sentence within broad statutory …
Maine's Unintentional Murder Statute: Depraved Indifference On Trial, Louis B. Butterfield
Maine's Unintentional Murder Statute: Depraved Indifference On Trial, Louis B. Butterfield
Maine Law Review
Perhaps nowhere in the law is the demand for reason and justice more compelling than in the penal law, and nowhere in the penal law is the need for fairness greater than in the law defining murder. The notion of fairness in Anglo-American criminal law is embodied in the concept of mens rea. For over three hundred years, the basic tenet of penal law has been that "actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea." A mens rea element serves to define a crime in positive terms and also provides the basis for defenses that negate the subjective culpability element. …
State V. Cloutier: Implied Invitees, Pretext And Plain View Under The Fourth Amendment, Dennis M. Doiron
State V. Cloutier: Implied Invitees, Pretext And Plain View Under The Fourth Amendment, Dennis M. Doiron
Maine Law Review
Law enforcement officers often have occasion to follow the path to the front door of a residence in order to speak to its occupant. Upon answering the door, the occupant may hear a complaint about his barking dog, a query as to whether he witnessed the burglary next door, or a plea seeking support for the police department's Christmas charity drive. Occasionally, a police officer follows the path to a person's door and unexpectedly observes incriminating evidence or activities. In such cases, the police officer's conduct generates the issue of whether his observation implicates the fourth amendment's prohibition against unreasonable …
The Problem Of Third-Party Consent In Fourth Amendment Searches: Toward A "Conservative" Reading Of The Matlock Decision, Robert Deschene
The Problem Of Third-Party Consent In Fourth Amendment Searches: Toward A "Conservative" Reading Of The Matlock Decision, Robert Deschene
Maine Law Review
In United States v. Matlock, the United States Supreme Court delivered its most recent and comprehensive statement on the doctrine of third-party consent. Under the doctrine, police may search a defendant's home or effects without first obtaining a judicially issued search warrant. Instead of this traditional prerequisite for a valid fourth amendment search, the police need only have the voluntary consent of a third person who possesses "common authority" over or a "sufficient relationship" to the area to be searched. At that point, the defendant's own consent becomes largely irrelevant. Both the United States and Maine constitutions provide protection against …
Stephen Bright's Demand For Equal Justice: Book Talk With Professors Robert Tsai And Betsy Ginsberg, American Constitution Society (Acs)
Stephen Bright's Demand For Equal Justice: Book Talk With Professors Robert Tsai And Betsy Ginsberg, American Constitution Society (Acs)
2024–2025 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Unfenced: The Fourth Circuit Gives Geofencing Its First Appellate Go-Ahead In United States V. Chatrie, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Unfenced: The Fourth Circuit Gives Geofencing Its First Appellate Go-Ahead In United States V. Chatrie, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
In United States v. Chatrie, the Fourth Circuit issued the first federal appellate opinion on the Fourth Amendment status of geofencing queries. The opinion is significant because geofences present a conceptual challenge to the framework of Carpenter v. United States, the reigning Supreme Court precedent on the Fourth Amendment status of digital searches. That opinion held that long-term tracking of a target individual was a search. However, geofencing reveals information about an indeterminate number of individuals for only a short time, in virtue of their being at a target location during a target span of time. Does the …
State V. Cloutier: Implied Invitees, Pretext And Plain View Under The Fourth Amendment, Dennis M. Doiron
State V. Cloutier: Implied Invitees, Pretext And Plain View Under The Fourth Amendment, Dennis M. Doiron
Maine Law Review
Law enforcement officers often have occasion to follow the path to the front door of a residence in order to speak to its occupant. Upon answering the door, the occupant may hear a complaint about his barking dog, a query as to whether he witnessed the burglary next door, or a plea seeking support for the police department's Christmas charity drive. Occasionally, a police officer follows the path to a person's door and unexpectedly observes incriminating evidence or activities. In such cases, the police officer's conduct generates the issue of whether his observation implicates the fourth amendment's prohibition against unreasonable …
The Child Witness In Sexual Abuse Cases In Maine: Presentation, Impeachment, And Controversy, Kermit V. Lipez
The Child Witness In Sexual Abuse Cases In Maine: Presentation, Impeachment, And Controversy, Kermit V. Lipez
Maine Law Review
In any sexual abuse trial, the entry of the child into the courtroom is a dramatic moment. The large door to the courtroom opens. A small child enters, accompanied by a victim advocate who walks with the child toward the witness stand. At the end of the public seats, the child is turned over to a court officer who escorts the child to the witness stand. In the typically high-ceilinged, expansive courtroom where we conduct our jury trials, the small child looks even smaller. Some children slouch in the witness chair, as if they were trying to hide. The jurors …
The Obvious Violation Exception To Qualified Immunity: An Empirical Study, Bailey D. Barnes
The Obvious Violation Exception To Qualified Immunity: An Empirical Study, Bailey D. Barnes
Washington Law Review
Qualified immunity shields government officials from civil suits for discretionary actions, as long as the violated right is not clearly established. A right is deemed established when every reasonable official would understand it based on precedent, placing it beyond debate, such that only the plainly incompetent may be held liable. Consequently, even when an act infringes on one’s civil rights, a court may deny relief owing to a lack of factually comparable precedent. However, in 2020, the Supreme Court indicated its distrust for overreliance on precedent in certain contexts. In Taylor v. Riojas, the Court held that prison officials …
Shocking Sentences, John B. Meixner Jr.
Shocking Sentences, John B. Meixner Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
Harsh recidivist sentencing penalties, like three-strikes laws, have been criticized heavily among both academics and practitioners on a number of different grounds. Most arguments focus on how sentences arising from these penalties are disproportionate—that there is no sensible relationship between the wrong committed and the sentence imposed. Those critiques are valid, but there’s another important problem with recidivist sentencing penalties that has been overlooked: They lead to sentences that are totally unexpected—indeed, shocking—to the defendants who face them. Many recidivist sentencing penalties cause large leaps in sentencing exposure that amount to exponential growth when compared with a defendant’s prior sentences. …
Command Responsibility And The War In Ukraine: Can Customary International Law Hold Russian Commanders Accountable For War Crimes?, Nicholas J. Nizinski
Command Responsibility And The War In Ukraine: Can Customary International Law Hold Russian Commanders Accountable For War Crimes?, Nicholas J. Nizinski
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Currently, neither Ukraine’s Constitution nor its criminal code establish the principle of command responsibility as a mode of criminal liability within the country. Key international statutes like Article 28 of the International Criminal Court and international case law, like the recently decided Case of Milanković v. Croatia, have firmly established the doctrine of command responsibility as a fundamental principle of customary international law applicable in the context of an armed conflict. Furthermore, the Milanković court affirmed a conviction based on command responsibility even in the absence of a clear domestic governing statute at the time the crime was committed, …
Chilling Victims’ Rights: The Supreme Court Creates A “Pride Of Place” For True Threats, Ana Maria Matovic
Chilling Victims’ Rights: The Supreme Court Creates A “Pride Of Place” For True Threats, Ana Maria Matovic
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Living in the Information Age means that information is literally always at our fingertips. This also means that keeping tabs on one another is as easy as a tap on a screen. The effortless ability to follow another’s life on the internet has led to a sinister phenomenon: cyberstalking. Prosecuting cyberstalking cases poses complex constitutional challenges. Specifically, prosecuting these cases may clash with a perpetrator’s First Amendment right to free speech. However, the First Amendment does not protect all categories of speech. One of those unprotected categories is the category of “true threats.” If a perpetrator’s conduct constitutes a “true …
Grasping The Third Rail: Restorative Justice And Violent Crime, Olwyn Conway
Grasping The Third Rail: Restorative Justice And Violent Crime, Olwyn Conway
Washington and Lee Law Review
Restorative justice is a means of responding to harm— including criminal offenses—through active accountability and repair, rather than through passive punishment and isolation. While restorative justice has demonstrated potential to meaningfully improve processes and outcomes for individuals and communities, the implementation of restorative justice programs to address crime—both within and alongside the American criminal system—has been slow, limited, and misplaced. Programs are often directed at low-level, nonviolent offenses that involve little if any cognizable harm. This approach creates two problems. One, it risks net-widening: bringing more citizens under criminal surveillance and carceral control for minor offenses—further diluting the constitutional and …