Criminal Law Commons^™

Covert Contingencies In The Right To The Assistance Of Counsel, Abraham S. Blumberg

Vanderbilt Law Review

On the basis of a sociological survey showing that a very large percentage of guilty pleas are induced by defense counsel, Professor Blumberg concludes that criminal justice is not structured on the adversary model which the Supreme Court's right to counsel decisions presuppose. He submits that the primary loyalty of defense counsel is to the criminal court "system," the informal organization of court officials on which they depend for their professional existence. He suggests further that the additional attorneys which will be required to implement the right to counsel decisions will simply serve to make the"system" more efficient in utilizing …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust-Section 2(b) of the Robinson-Patman Act Permits Seller To Use a Pricing System To Meet the Prices of Competing Goods of Equal Saleability

==========================

Constitutional Law--First Amendment--State Legislature May Not Require Local School Boards To Lend Textbooks to Pupils of Parochial Schools

==========================

Constitutional Law--Imports Shipped Directly to Dealer Under Consignment Contracts With the Importer Are Not Immune to State Taxation Under the Import-Export Clause

==========================

Constitutional Law--Reapportionment--One Man-One Vote Principle Applies to Popularly Elected Local School Boards

==========================

Criminal Law--Admissibility in Evidence of Blood Tests Over Defendant's Objection

==========================

Criminal Law--Resentencing--Court Has Duty To Make Known Reasons for Increased …

Miranda--Some History, Some Observations, And Some Questions, Karl P. Warden

Vanderbilt Law Review

At this writing Miranda v. Arizona' is less than four months old. Although its place in the annals of leading constitutional decisions is assured, its meaning for, and influence upon, the criminal law process in the United States is not at all certain. It will require years of data accumulation and analysis to determine how profound an effect it will have and to evaluate that effect in terms of social impact. It is too soon to know whether the Miranda case has started a new revolution in the administration of criminal justice or has merely ended an old one. Is …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust Law--Conspiracy To Eliminate Discounters From Automobile Market a Per Se Violation of Sherman Act

===========================

Antitrust Law--Merger of Two Major Competitors in Industry with History of Concentration Violates Section 7 of Clayton Act

===========================

Criminal Law--Future Confessions Will Be Inadmissible Unless Specified Pre-trial Procedures Are Followed

===========================

Juvenile Courts--Juvenile Delinquent Entitled to Hearing On Question of Waiver of Jurisdiction

===========================

Labor Law--Public Carrier Can Make Unnegotiated Unilateral Changes in Collective Agreements When "Reasonably Necessary" To Maintain Service

============================

Labor Law--In Future NLRB Elections, Employer Must Furnish List of Employees' Names and Addresses

=============================

Taxation--Thin Incorporation Not Tantamount to Disqualification …

Federal Habeas Corpus And The State Court Criminal Defendant, Frank W. Wilson

Vanderbilt Law Review

Federal habeas corpus for state prisoners is one of the most controversial and emotion-ridden subjects in the entire field of criminal law. Considering the period over which this controversy has continued, it is surely one of the oldest unresolved disputes between the state and federal courts. The removal of an action from a state to a federal court may sometimes cause ruffled feelings, but few judges remain long offended at being relieved of trying a lawsuit. On the other hand, when a federal judge reverses a state judge who has been affirmed by the state appellate courts, forcing him to …

Preclusion/Res Judicata Variables: Criminal Prosecutions, Allen D. Vestal, John C. Coughenour

Vanderbilt Law Review

In criminal litigation, similar doctrines have been invoked. Double jeopardy has precluded a second prosecution of an individual because of a single group of operative facts. This is parallel to claim preclusion which bars relitigation of a claim. When sequential prosecutions for different crimes occur there has been a bar against relitigation of a specific issue. This is issue preclusion. Issue preclusion has also been invoked where civil and criminal proceedings are involved serially. With some frequency the courts have been willing to use preclusion/res judicata where the precluding judgment is criminal and the precluded litigation is civil. On the …

Federal Double Jeopardy Policy, Jay A. Sigler

Vanderbilt Law Review

The fifth amendment provision against double jeopardy is one of the basic protections afforded defendants by the United States Constitution. Its roots are found in early common law,' and the policies which it represents have been gradually defined by federal courts to meet various situations of inequality in the position of a criminal defendant confronted by federal prosecuting attorneys. Presently the double jeopardy provision is not incorporated by the fourteenth amendment as a restriction upon state action, but this condition may not prevail much longer. Should double jeopardy become incorporated into the "due process" clause of the fourteenth amendment, states …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Advertising--Use of "Free," a Deceptive Practice Under the Federal Trade Commission Act

================================

Anti-Trust Law--Conspiracy To Subvert Competitor's Employees and Customers Violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act

=================================

Conflict of Laws--Depositor's Request That Disposition of Foreign-Owned Funds Deposited In New York Bank Be Governed By New York Law Upheld as a Matter of Public Policy

=================================

Constitutional Law--Applicability of Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 to Wheat Grown On State-Owned Farms

=================================

Corporations--Dissolution of Close Corporation Not Granted On Mere Showing of Low Profits Insufficient To Provide Minority Shareholder With Adequate Return on Invested Capital

=================================

Criminal Law--Illegal Searches and …

Compensation For Victims Of Crimes, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

The steadily increasing number of crimes in the United States and other Western countries brings about not only the destruction of property and the expenditure of money and effort to apprehend and punish the criminals, but also physical injury to thousands of innocent victims.' Although our society has established elaborate safe-guards for the rights of the accused criminal, the injured victim is left to shoulder the responsibility of paying his own medical bills and providing for his own living expenses while he is unable to work. Because of the extremely high cost of medical and hospital care, even a well …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Conflict of Laws--Mexican Bilateral Divorce Decree Recognized Even Though Neither Party was a Mexican Domiciliary At Time of Divorce

=============================

Constitutional Law--Section 504 of LMRDA a Bill of Attainder

=============================

Corporations--DeFacto Merger--Dissenters' Rights--Construction of Merger and Amendment Statutes

=============================

Criminal Law--Search and Seizure--Standing Granted for Dyer Act Prosecutions Without Allegation of Possession

=============================

Damages--Restitutionary Relief for Breach of Contract Granted Under the Tucker Act to a Government Contractor

=============================

Federal Employers' Liability Act--Applicability of "In Whole or in Part" Rule of Proximate Cause to Employer's Efforts To Prove Contributory Negligence Plaintiff brought suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act'

============================= …

The Right To Effective Counsel In Criminal Cases, Ernest G. Kelly, Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

Under the Constitution of the United States as well as the laws of many states, a defendant in a criminal action is entitled not merely to the formality of representation by any counsel but also to some degree of efficacy in this representation. Determining whether this right to effective counsel has been violated is a difficult problem. One source of difficulty is the potential conflict between two strong public policy considerations: the desire to spare a defendant the injustices which can result from ineffective representation as opposed to the need for finality of judgments and the orderly functioning of the …

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, Graham Parker, Robert E. Kendrick

Vanderbilt Law Review

The substantive criminal law receives little attention from the Tennessee appellate courts. No doubt this observation would be equally true of most jurisdictions. To one who received his legal training in a common law system of criminal law and who yet has had some experience with Canada's federal code of criminal law, the emphasis on criminal procedure is surprising. Does this mean that the state codes of substantive law have reached such heights of perfection and expertise that the efforts of the Model Penal Code draftsmen are unnecessary or, at best, academic? It is unlikely. The position rather reflects a …

Justice William 0. Douglas And The Concept Of A "Fair Trial", Helen S. Thomas

Vanderbilt Law Review

This article seeks briefly to demonstrate the ways in which this basic commitment of Justice Douglas bear on particular constitutional issues, particularly with regard to criminal cases. The article treats these issues under five general headings: detention; the right to counsel; bail; the right to trial by jury; and trial procedures. Some overlapping between sections cannot be avoided; but it is hoped that this organization will bring the problems more sharply into focus.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust--Consignment Agreements To Fix Retail Prices

=============================

Constitutional Law--Fifth Amendment-Denial of Passport

==============================

Constitutional Law--State Procedure To Determine The Voluntariness of a Confession

==============================

Criminal Law--Statutory Rape-Good Faith, Reasonable Belief That Female Has Reached Age of Consent as a Defense

==============================

Insurance--Validity of Policy Provision Permitting Insured To Choose Forum for Determination, of Disputes Under the Policy

==============================

Labor Law-Closing of Plant Due to Unionization

===============================

Labor Law--National Labor Relations Act--Strike by Minority of Union as Protected Concerted Activity When in Support of Union Position

================================

Labor Law--National Labor Relations Act--Union's Duty of Fair Representation Not Implicit in Section 7--Discrimination …

Immunity Through Confession?, John A. Spanogle Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

Does this advice from Judge Leonard P. Moore sound fanciful? Could it ever profit a criminal to confess his guilt? The advisability of such action may not be as improbable as it sounds. In order to determine whether it is fanciful or not it is necessary to review several cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, which this article will undertake to do.

Legislation, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Budget Planners--Regulation To Protect Debtors

=====================================

Criminal Law--Taxation of Court Costs

=====================================

Statute of Limitations--Professional Negligence--Foreign Objects Left in Patient's Body

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick

Vanderbilt Law Review

1. Homicide. A number of years ago the Tennessee Supreme Court adopted the common law principle that one is justified in taking life in defense of his habitation when actually or apparently necessary to repel an attempt by another to enter forcibly or violently under circumstances creating a reasonable apprehension that the assailant's design is imminently to commit a felony therein or to assault or offer personal violence or inflict personal injury on an inmate so that there are reasonable grounds for concluding that life is endangered or great bodily harm is threatened thereby.'

Flippen v. State, a homicide case, …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust--FTC Proceeding Will Not Toll the Statute of Limitations in an Action Under Section 4(b) of the Clayton Act

============================

Conflict of Laws--Where None of the Beneficiaries Reside in Forum State, Limitation on Amount of Recovery Imposed by State Where Tort Occurred Governs

============================

Criminal Law--Double Jeopardy--Conviction of Greater Degree of Offense on Retrial

============================

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--No Requirement that Agent Appointed To Receive Service of Process be Expressly Bound To Give Notice to Principal

============================

Labor Law--NLRA--Union's Duty To Represent Fairly

============================

Labor Law-Walsh--Healey Act--Secretary of Labor Not Authorized To Set More Than One Prevailing Wage

============================= …

Book Reviews, Richard C. Allen, Lawrence D. Gaughan

Vanderbilt Law Review

In this little book, Leon Radzinowicz, Wolfson Professor of Criminology and Director of the Institute of Criminology at the University of Cambridge, presents a brief survey of criminology in England, the United States, and eight countries of continental Europe. His perspective is historical as well as geographical: in discussing each nation, he begins with a sketch of the concepts and personalities that lent vitality to the development of its criminological teaching and research and concludes with an analysis of the contemporary scene, based on his own first-hand observations during a recent world tour "in search of criminology."With so vast a …

Hart And Honore, Causation In The Law, John H. Mansfield

Vanderbilt Law Review

It is scarcely necessary at this date to give notice of the publication of Causation in the Law. Since its appearance four years ago the book has become widely known and has been much discussed by legal scholars, particularly in the fields of torts and criminal law. Doubtless it has received similar attention from philosophers, for it is a work that seeks to achieve something which is seldom attempted, and then with little success, namely, to combine legal and philosophical thinking in a way that secures the understanding and approval of both philosophers and lawyers by satisfying the analytical rigor …

Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Attorneys--Violation of Canon 27 by Encouraging or Permitting Favorable Publicity

============================

Constitutional Law--Dismissal of Criminal Charges Because of Deprivation of Right to Effective Counsel by Eavesdropping

============================

Criminal Law--Credit Card Invoice as a "Security" under National Stolen Property Act

============================

Criminal Law--Rights of Alleged Parole Violator at Revocation Hearing

============================

Labor Law--Federal Procedure--Right to Jury Trial under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act

============================

Labor Law--Representation. Elections--Provision on Ballot Allowing Vote for "No Representation"

============================

Labor Law--Unfair Labor Practice--Availability of Injunction Prior to Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

============================

Taxation--Federal Estate Tax--Survivor's Annuity as Insurance Under Section 2039 a …

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1962 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick

Vanderbilt Law Review

The American states have generally codified in one form or other the common law "felony murder rule" to the effect that homicide committed while perpetrating or attempting a felony, and as a consequence thereof, is murder. Tennessee's statute in this regard, which largely follows the most widely adopted version of the rule in limiting it to specified felonies and in classifying homicides committed in connection therewith as first degree murder, was applied in two cases decided by the state supreme court during the survey period.

Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Conflict of Laws--Full Faith and Credit--Prior Conflicting Divorce Decrees

=================

Conflict of Laws--Tax Claims of One State Held Not Enforceable in Another State

=================

Constitutional Law--Discrimination--Statute Prohibiting Racial Discrimination in Renting of Private Apartment Houses Does Not Violate Due Process

=================

Constitutional Law--Establishment of Religion--Recitation of State Composed Prayer in Public Schools Held Unconstitutional

=================

Criminal Law--Narcotics-Criminal Prosecution for Addiction Is a Cruel and Unusual Punishment Violating Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

=================

Damages--Collateral Source Rule--Value of Medical Services Plaintiff Received as a Gratuity Not Allowed as Special Damages

=================

Due Process--Taxation of Insurance Premiums Paid to Foreign Insurers on Property …

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1961 Tennessee Survey (Ii), Robert E. Kendrick

Vanderbilt Law Review

In reviewing Cowan v.State, the Tennessee Supreme Court noted the following facts: Defendant, seeing an automobile stop at an isolated spot on a so-called "lovers' lane," approached it by way of a woods, being unseen by the two teen-age couples in the automobile until he was quite nearby. The occupants' attempt to drive away was thwarted by the defendant's exhibiting and threatening to use a pistol, warning against further escape attempts, and demanding and receiving the ignition key. He then insisted that the girls have sexual intercourse with him; and when they refused, he stated that he would not "take …

Book Reviews, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Decision at Law

By David W. Peck.

New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.,1961. Pp. vii, 303.

==============================

Corporation Lawyer: Saint or Sinner? By Beryl Harold Levy.

Philadelphia and New York: Chilton Co., 1961. Pp. x, 175.

reviewer: Elliott E. Cheatham

================================

Criminal Psychology Edited by Richard W. Nice. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc., 1962. Pp. 284.

reviewer: J. Paschall Davis

=================================

Symposium on the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 Edited by Ralph Slovenko. Baton Rouge: Claitor's Bookstore, 1961. Pp. xliv, 1237. $20.00.

reviewer: Robert N. Covington

==================================

Handling Accident Cases, Vol. 3

By Albert Averbach.

Rochester: The Lawyers …

The Dilemma Of The Directed Acquittal, Richard H. Winningham

Vanderbilt Law Review

Some of the worst abuses of state criminal due process, the author believes, result from anachronistic and artificial restraints which prevent the trial judge from directing acquittals. Therefore,he advocates for all states a uniform policy and practice recognizing and authorizing directed acquittals where the evidence is legally insufficient to support a conviction.

The Companion Of The New Hampshire Doctrine Of Criminal Insanity, John Reid

Vanderbilt Law Review

The problem of criminal responsibility is one of the most difficult in criminal law. Of the various solutions that have been devised, the author suggests that the New Hampshire-Scottish approach--with its emphasis on insanity as a question of fact for the jury--is the most desirable.

Subnormal Mentality As A Defense In The Criminal Law, John E.V. Pieski

Vanderbilt Law Review

Although little is left of the theory which ascribed to mental deficiency causative force in criminal conduct, the entire episode taught at least two valuable lessons to modem criminologists. First, it served as a warning against superficial research and hasty conclusions, thus inducing subsequent scholars to take a more scientific approach to similar problems. Second, it aided in alerting others that, although not all or even most criminals are mentally deficient, there are an appreciable number of criminals who possess a subnormal mentality, and who must be reckoned within the criminal law. Notwithstanding that the legal profession has utilized the …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Rights--Civil Rights Act of 1871--"Under Color of Law" Defined

=============================

Conflict of Laws--Characterization--Amount of Damages in Wrongful Death Action Held to be Procedural and thus Controlled by Law of the Forum

=============================

Criminal Law-Insanity--Third Circuit Adopts A New Test for Criminal Responsibility

=============================

Criminal Law--Smith Act--Membership Clause Requiring Active Membership in Communist Party and Specific Intent To Use Violence Held Not To Violate the First or Fifth Amendments

==============================

Criminal Procedure--Evidence-States May Not Constitutionally Use Evidence Obtained by Illegal Search and Seizure in Criminal Cases

==============================

Evidence--Hearsay--Old Newspaper Article Admitted as Evidence of Facts Contained on Grounds of Necessity …

The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell

Vanderbilt Law Review

To crystallize in a few words the motif of a career as varied and comprehensive as that of Eddie Morgan would in any event be difficult, but it is doubly so for a life devoted, as his has been, to stuff as vital and dynamic as procedure and evidence. For me, his work most fundamentally is to be characterized as a quest for greater rationality in the adjudicative process. Whether one thinks of his analysis of the hearsay rule,' or his rationale of the admissions exception to it, or his treatment of the dead man's statute, or his study of …