Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (541)
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (145)
- University of Michigan Law School (138)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (98)
- UIC School of Law (70)
- University of Richmond (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- American University Washington College of Law (36)
- Pepperdine University (31)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Georgetown University Law Center (28)
- St. Mary's University (28)
- University of Maine School of Law (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (24)
- BLR (22)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Florida International University College of Law (18)
- University of Miami Law School (18)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (17)
- Cornell University Law School (16)
- New York Law School (16)
- Notre Dame Law School (15)
- Pace University (15)
- Cleveland State University (14)
- Georgia State University College of Law (14)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (128)
- Criminal law (88)
- Supreme Court (81)
- Federal (79)
- Constitution (69)
-
- Sentencing (69)
- International Criminal Court (61)
- New York (61)
- State (56)
- Evidence (52)
- Defendant (51)
- Criminal Law (49)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (49)
- Court (48)
- Jury (46)
- Capital punishment (43)
- Due process (43)
- Criminal (41)
- Jurisdiction (40)
- Law (40)
- Criminal justice (37)
- Criminal procedure (36)
- Judges (36)
- Sixth Amendment (36)
- Police (35)
- Constitutional law (34)
- Death penalty (34)
- Crime (32)
- ICC (32)
- Trial (32)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (419)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
- Touro Law Review (131)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (73)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (69)
- UIC Law Review (63)
- Michigan Law Review (58)
- University of Richmond Law Review (44)
- Articles (40)
- Cardozo Law Review (39)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (34)
- Scholarly Works (34)
- Maine Law Review (28)
- Scholarly Articles (28)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (27)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (25)
- ExpressO (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (20)
- Faculty Articles (18)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (17)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Georgia State University Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 2071 - 2100 of 2374
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Sentencing And Cultural Differences: Banishment Of The American Indian Robbers, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 239 (1995), Stephanie J. Kim
Sentencing And Cultural Differences: Banishment Of The American Indian Robbers, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 239 (1995), Stephanie J. Kim
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Use" And The Irresistible Impulse To Legislate, Robert C. Dorf
"Use" And The Irresistible Impulse To Legislate, Robert C. Dorf
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
What's Happening With Respect To The Second Circuit, Hon. George C. Pratt
What's Happening With Respect To The Second Circuit, Hon. George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Eye On Justice, Roger J. Miner '56
Considering Copyright Crimes, Roger J. Miner '56
The Emerging Role Of The Quid Pro Quo Requirement In Public Corruption .Prosecutions Under The Hobbs Act, Peter D. Hardy
The Emerging Role Of The Quid Pro Quo Requirement In Public Corruption .Prosecutions Under The Hobbs Act, Peter D. Hardy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note discusses the quid pro quo requirement under the Hobbs Act, a federal criminal statute which applies to bribery by public officials. The author first describes two recent decisions by the Supreme Court, McCormick v. United States and Evans v. United States, which established slightly different versions of a quid pro quo requirement in public corruption prosecutions under the Hobbs Act. The author then explains that the lower federal courts interpreting McCormick and Evans have molded the quid pro quo requirement so that a prosecutor must prove in all public corruption cases under the Hobbs Act that the …
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's Son Of Sam Law: Alive And Well Today, Steven P. Vargas
New York's Son Of Sam Law: Alive And Well Today, Steven P. Vargas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Counsel
"Mixture Or Substance": Continuing Disparity Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines Section 2d1.1, Eric J. Stockel
"Mixture Or Substance": Continuing Disparity Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines Section 2d1.1, Eric J. Stockel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Fault As Per The Lamer Court And The Ghost Of William Mcintyre, Michael J. Bryant
Criminal Fault As Per The Lamer Court And The Ghost Of William Mcintyre, Michael J. Bryant
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Contrary to recent criticisms to the effect that the Supreme Court of Canada favours the rights of criminal defendants and shuns the interests of the community, the Lamer Court has in fact championed the moral requisites of the community in its constitutional jurisprudence on criminal fault. By viewing rights and responsibilities as inextricably linked, the Lamer Court implicitly borrows from natural law traditions espoused by the Dickson Court's most conspicuous dissenter on criminal fault issues-Mr. Justice William McIntyre. This article argues that the tradition or philosophy underlying criminal fault as per the Lamer Court contrasts with the individualist, rights-oriented tendency …
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
LLM Theses and Essays
Under the American approach to criminal justice, freedom of the individual is of the utmost importance. The American criminal justice system reflects a distrust of abuse of power and an emphasis on protection of personal freedom. However, the French take a contrary approach; under French law, freedom is achieved through the State. This paper examines the protection of individuals’ rights in American and French criminal procedure. Focus will be given to tracking the police investigatory powers in each country through searches and seizures, and the impact that those powers have on individuals’ rights. This paper will assert that the police …
Youth Justice In A Unified Court: Response To Critics Of Juvenile Court Abolition, Janet Ainsworth
Youth Justice In A Unified Court: Response To Critics Of Juvenile Court Abolition, Janet Ainsworth
Faculty Articles
In this article, Professor Ainsworth argues that a unified criminal justice system is preferable to our present two-tiered adult-juvenile court system. In fact, she contends that the cultural and ideological assumptions that underpin the current two-tiered justice system not only engender many of the serious shortcomings of the juvenile justice system, but also serve to exacerbate the very policies and practices of the adult criminal justice system that make it so abhorrent to defenders of the juvenile court. Critics of juvenile court abolitionists thus miss the point when they argue that juveniles would be worse off than they are at …
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
On Feb. 17, 1992, Jeffrey Dahmer was sentenced to fifteen consecutive terms of life imprisonment for killing and dismembering fifteen young men and boys. Dahmer had been arrested six months earlier, on July 22, 1991. On Jan. 13 he pled guilty to the fifteen murder counts against him, leaving open only the issue of his sanity. Jury selection began two weeks later, and the trial proper started on Jan. 30. The jury heard two weeks of horrifying testimony about murder, mutilation and necrophilia; they deliberated for five hours before finding that Dahmer was sane when he committed thos crimes. After …
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I grieve for my country to say that the administration of the criminal law in all the states in the Union (there may be one or two exceptions) is a disgrace to our civilization.
The Criminal Defense Lawyer's Reliance On Bias And Prejudice, Eva Nilsen
The Criminal Defense Lawyer's Reliance On Bias And Prejudice, Eva Nilsen
Faculty Scholarship
This Article is divided into three parts. Part I examines both the many contexts in which criminal defense lawyers and clinical students encounter bias and prejudice,12 and the commonly-raised objections to its exploitation. Part II looks at the way the tactical use of bias relates to a lawyer's duty of zealous advocacy. Here, the Article focuses on whether existing ethics rules provide guidance for a lawyer's use of bias and whether proposed rules aimed at eliminating such advocacy would improve or diminish justice. This article argues against such efforts because they impinge on legitimate lawyering, and they may distract …
The Partial Republican, John O. Mcginnis
Losing The Right To Confront: Defining Waiver To Better Address A Defendant's Actions And Their Effects On A Witness, David J. Tess
Losing The Right To Confront: Defining Waiver To Better Address A Defendant's Actions And Their Effects On A Witness, David J. Tess
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this Note examines the current legal landscape regarding a defendant's waiver of the right to confrontation. This Part explores the justifications courts have provided for finding a waiver of the confrontation right, both through the use of the traditional "intentional relinquishment of a known right" standard and the less precise formulations of waiver found in cases of defendant misconduct. Part II offers a critique of the reasoning courts employ to find waiver of the right to confrontation. In the process, the analysis explores general theories of waiver which have been advanced by other commentators. In so doing, …
The New Law Of Murder, Daniel Givelber