Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (541)
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (145)
- University of Michigan Law School (138)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (98)
- UIC School of Law (70)
- University of Richmond (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- American University Washington College of Law (36)
- Pepperdine University (31)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Georgetown University Law Center (28)
- St. Mary's University (28)
- University of Maine School of Law (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (24)
- BLR (22)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Florida International University College of Law (18)
- University of Miami Law School (18)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (17)
- Cornell University Law School (16)
- New York Law School (16)
- Notre Dame Law School (15)
- Pace University (15)
- Cleveland State University (14)
- Georgia State University College of Law (14)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (128)
- Criminal law (88)
- Supreme Court (81)
- Federal (79)
- Constitution (69)
-
- Sentencing (69)
- International Criminal Court (61)
- New York (61)
- State (56)
- Evidence (52)
- Defendant (51)
- Criminal Law (49)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (49)
- Court (48)
- Jury (46)
- Capital punishment (43)
- Due process (43)
- Criminal (41)
- Jurisdiction (40)
- Law (40)
- Criminal justice (37)
- Criminal procedure (36)
- Judges (36)
- Sixth Amendment (36)
- Police (35)
- Constitutional law (34)
- Death penalty (34)
- Crime (32)
- ICC (32)
- Trial (32)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (419)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
- Touro Law Review (131)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (73)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (69)
- UIC Law Review (63)
- Michigan Law Review (58)
- University of Richmond Law Review (44)
- Articles (40)
- Cardozo Law Review (39)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (34)
- Scholarly Works (34)
- Maine Law Review (28)
- Scholarly Articles (28)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (27)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (25)
- ExpressO (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (20)
- Faculty Articles (18)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (17)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Georgia State University Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 2041 - 2070 of 2374
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Double Jeopardy—Civil Forfeitures And Criminal Punishment: Who Determines What Punishments Fit The Crime, Barbara A. Mack
Double Jeopardy—Civil Forfeitures And Criminal Punishment: Who Determines What Punishments Fit The Crime, Barbara A. Mack
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applicable to parallel civil and criminal proceedings, that takes into account the history of double jeopardy, recent changes in statutory law, and the contemporary chaotic state of parallel civil and criminal proceedings. Under current law, double jeopardy protects against three abuses: (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. This Article will show that the multiple punishments prong has little basis in law, other than reliance …
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
Seattle University Law Review
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that "[a]ll persons charged with crimes shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident, or the presumption great." Despite seemingly unequivocal language that this constitutional provision is applicable to "all persons," the Washington Supreme Court, in Estes v. Hopp, declared that juveniles do not have a constitutional right to bail. The Estes court engaged in little constitutional analysis, but instead, reasoned that juvenile proceedings are civil in nature and that article 1, section 20 applies only in criminal proceedings. Central to the Estes …
Federal Use Of State Institutions In The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Paul D. Carrington
Federal Use Of State Institutions In The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Paul D. Carrington
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Mistake Of Federal Criminal Law: A Study Of Coalitions And Costly Information, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Richard S. Murphy
Mistake Of Federal Criminal Law: A Study Of Coalitions And Costly Information, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Richard S. Murphy
Scholarly Publications
This article analyzes Supreme Court and other federal court cases, to explain the seemingly disparate incorporation of mistake of law excuses into federal criminal statutes. Most of the cases can be explained from an information cost perspective. If an easily separable subset of the regulated population cannot be induced to learn their legal obligations given credibly low prior probabilities and high information costs, they are excused from criminal liability. Moreover, when criminal statutes are vulnerable to constituent protest, courts require that enforcers increase awareness of the law through information subsidies rather than convicting the ignorant. At least with mistake of …
Quality Of Mercy Must Be Restrained, And Other Lessons In Learning To Love The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Quality Of Mercy Must Be Restrained, And Other Lessons In Learning To Love The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
In the remarks that follow, I do four things. First, for those unfamiliar with the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, I begin by explaining briefly how the Guidelines work. Second, I endeavor to show why Judge Cabranes is wrong, absolutely wrong in declaring the Guidelines a failure, and mostly wrong in the specific criticisms he and others level against the Guidelines. Third, after jousting with Judge Cabranes a bit, I discuss some problems with the current federal sentencing system, most notably the sheer length of narcotics sentences. Finally, I comment briefly on some of the implications of the Guidelines, and the principles …
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward The Abolition Of The Death Penalty, Shigemitsu Dando
Toward The Abolition Of The Death Penalty, Shigemitsu Dando
Indiana Law Journal
This Article was delivered by Justice Dando as the Jerome Hall Lecture at Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington on April 14, 1996.
Cruelty And Original Intent: A Socratic Dialogue, Kent Greenfield
Cruelty And Original Intent: A Socratic Dialogue, Kent Greenfield
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Double Jeopardy Implications Of In Rem Forfeiture Of Crime-Related Property: The Gradual Realization Of A Constitutional Violation, Andrew L. Subin
The Double Jeopardy Implications Of In Rem Forfeiture Of Crime-Related Property: The Gradual Realization Of A Constitutional Violation, Andrew L. Subin
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past decade, the government has escalated its "war on drugs." Although the "war" has not decreased drug use or limited the availability of drugs on the street, the government continues to sacrifice the constitutional rights of its citizens in an effort to escalate the hostility. Since the "zero tolerance" policy of the Reagan Administration, the government has relied heavily on the forfeiture of property related to drug crimes as a tool to deter and punish the illegal distribution of drugs. The federal forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 881, allows the government to seize any property used to facilitate …
Rule 609: Impeachment By Evidence Of Conviction Of Crime
Rule 609: Impeachment By Evidence Of Conviction Of Crime
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Victim-Plaintiff In Criminal Trials And Civil Law Responses To Sexual Violence, Alexandra Goy
The Victim-Plaintiff In Criminal Trials And Civil Law Responses To Sexual Violence, Alexandra Goy
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the role of the victim-plaintiff in German criminal trials, particularly in cases involving sexual violence. It highlights the unique procedural rights granted to victim-plaintiffs, such as the ability to participate actively in trials and present evidence. However, the analysis reveals significant practical and systemic barriers that limit the effectiveness of this institution, including restrictive evidentiary rules, financial challenges, and gender biases within the judiciary. The article argues that while the victim-plaintiff institution offers opportunities for victims to seek justice, its impact is undermined by these obstacles, raising concerns about the protection of sexual autonomy and gender equality …
“A One Way Ticket To Palookaville”: Supreme Court Takings Jurisprudence After Dolan And Its Implication For New York City’S Waterfront Zoning Resolution, Jill Illan Berger Inbar
“A One Way Ticket To Palookaville”: Supreme Court Takings Jurisprudence After Dolan And Its Implication For New York City’S Waterfront Zoning Resolution, Jill Illan Berger Inbar
Cardozo Law Review
This Note will use the Waterfront Ordinance as a vehicle for examining the new heightened scrutiny standard introduced in Dolan. Part I provides an overview of takings jurisprudence and the traditional pre-Nollan and pre-Dolan standards, which were applied to determine whether an exercise of police power oversteps its bounds and interferes with private property rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment. Part II reviews the new standards espoused by the Supreme Court in Nollan and Dolan. Part III describes the purpose of New York City's 1993. Waterfront Zoning Ordinance and discusses its history, objectives, and provisions. Part …
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Taking Capital Jurors Seriously, Craig Haney
Taking Capital Jurors Seriously, Craig Haney
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
How Juries Decide Death: The Contributions Of The Capital Jury Project, Valerie P. Hans
How Juries Decide Death: The Contributions Of The Capital Jury Project, Valerie P. Hans
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Discretion In Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided Or Misguided?, James Luginbuhl, Julie Howe
Discretion In Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided Or Misguided?, James Luginbuhl, Julie Howe
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Legal And Political Hermeneutics, Or Principles Of Interpretation And Construction In Law And Politics, With Remarks On Precedents And Authorities, Francis Lieber
Cardozo Law Review
The second edition of the Hermeneutics was published in 1839, and has now been out of print for almost forty years. In 1860 Dr. Lieber carefully revised it, and made additions to both text and notes, expecting to publish a third edition, with a second part, of "Special Hermeneutics, or Legal Rules of Interpretation and Construction," by an eminent member of the New York Bar, Mr. William Curtis Noyes. This plan, however, was not carried out, and Mr. Noyes died December 25, 1863, without having written his proposed part. The text of the present edition, and Dr. Lieber's own notes, …
Opening The Door To The Grand Jury: Abandoning Secrecy For Secrecy's Sake, George Edward Dazzo
Opening The Door To The Grand Jury: Abandoning Secrecy For Secrecy's Sake, George Edward Dazzo
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
The grand jury in the United States is hailed by its proponents as an indispensable buffer of protection from malicious and unfounded prosecution by the State. Critics, however, liken the investigatory body to a rubber stamp of the prosecutor, analogous to early English grand jurors who were subject to the influences of the Monarch. Criticism of the grand jury often focuses on the grand jury's potential for oppression rather than protection of the individual.' In particular, it is the secrecy of the grand jury that sparks the most debate.'
Judicial Decisions And Linguistic Analysis: Is There A Linguist In The Court?, Lawrence Solan
Judicial Decisions And Linguistic Analysis: Is There A Linguist In The Court?, Lawrence Solan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.