Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (941)
- Seattle University School of Law (292)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (214)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (207)
- University of Michigan Law School (179)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (175)
- UIC School of Law (100)
- American University Washington College of Law (88)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (82)
- University of Maine School of Law (70)
- BLR (68)
- Roger Williams University (56)
- Florida State University College of Law (52)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- Fordham Law School (46)
- Pepperdine University (42)
- Georgetown University Law Center (41)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (41)
- The University of Akron (41)
- Pace University (40)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (39)
- West Virginia University (38)
- William & Mary Law School (37)
- Columbia Law School (36)
- Brooklyn Law School (35)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (34)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (31)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (31)
- New York Law School (28)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (287)
- Criminal law (204)
- Criminal Law (179)
- Constitutional law (163)
- Constitution (136)
-
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Death penalty (129)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (125)
- Supreme Court (124)
- Sixth Amendment (110)
- Due process (108)
- Eighth Amendment (107)
- Evidence (106)
- Fifth Amendment (97)
- Criminal procedure (85)
- Federal (83)
- New York (79)
- Sentencing (79)
- Right to counsel (78)
- Capital punishment (77)
- Criminal Procedure (72)
- Privacy (64)
- Law (62)
- Police (62)
- Due Process (60)
- Fourth amendment (60)
- State (59)
- Defendant (56)
- Punishment (54)
- Criminal (53)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (665)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (253)
- Seattle University Law Review (246)
- Touro Law Review (179)
- Michigan Law Review (131)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (121)
- Supreme Court Case Files (98)
- UIC Law Review (95)
- Cardozo Law Review (75)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (73)
- Maine Law Review (68)
- ExpressO (65)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Articles (50)
- Pepperdine Law Review (41)
- Faculty Publications (40)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (39)
- West Virginia Law Review (38)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (37)
- American University Law Review (36)
- Akron Law Review (34)
- Scholarly Publications (33)
- Fordham Law Review (32)
- Habeas Corpus Committee (30)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (29)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (28)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (27)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (25)
- Buffalo Law Review (23)
- Scholarly Articles (23)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3541 - 3570 of 4004
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Estelle V. Smith, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Edwards V. Arizona, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Edwards V. Arizona, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Michael M. V. Superior Court Of Sonoma County, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Michael M. V. Superior Court Of Sonoma County, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Michigan V. Summers, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Michigan V. Summers, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Cortez, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Cortez, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1979
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1979
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Student Representation Of Indigent Defendants And The Sixth Amendment: On A Collision Course, Robert M. Hardaway
Student Representation Of Indigent Defendants And The Sixth Amendment: On A Collision Course, Robert M. Hardaway
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
This article will review the parallel patterns of development of clinical education and the sixth amendment, highlighting areas in which the practices of the former either conflict, or contain the potential for conflict with the latter. An analysis will be made of the present legal status of law student representation of indigent criminal defendants, with reference primarily to constitutional and sixth amendment considerations, but also to such related matters as the confidentiality of student-client communications, law student professional responsibility, and the applicability to students of state bar disciplinary rules. Finally, guidelines will be proposed regarding the proper scope of student …
5. Social Inquiry: Instructional Manual To Accompany 'Mark', Matthew Lipman, Ann Margaret Sharp
5. Social Inquiry: Instructional Manual To Accompany 'Mark', Matthew Lipman, Ann Margaret Sharp
Secondary School Curriculum
The task of social studies as a discipline is to focus students’ already developed thinking skills upon the conceptual foundation of the social sciences. Students will think about these underlying concepts if they can talk about them, and they will talk about what they perceive as controversial or problematic. This, then, is what Mark and Social Inquiry aim to do: to identify selected root issues in the social sciences and expose to students the conflicting concepts at the heart of each issue.
Antitrust Law - The Requirement Of An Instruction On Intent In Per Se Criminal Violations Of Section 1 Of The Sherman Act, Andy Susko
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - First Amendment - The Public And Press Have A Right Of Access To Criminal Trials Absent An Overriding Interest Articulated In Findings, Bucky Mansuy
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
4. Mark (Novel), Matthew Lipman
4. Mark (Novel), Matthew Lipman
Secondary School Curriculum
The high school has been vandalized, and Mark is arrested at the scene of the crime. He claims he is a “victim of society.” But what is society? What forces hold it together or work to pull it apart? These are questions to which Mark and his classmates address themselves. What they seek are ways of evaluating social institutions, rules and values, so as to determine how well society is able to live up to the ideals which, at one time or another, have been set for it. They pay particular attention to the nature of law and crime, tradition, …
Harmless Error: Constitutional Sneak Thief, Steven H. Goldberg
Harmless Error: Constitutional Sneak Thief, Steven H. Goldberg
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
"Harmless constitutional error" is among the most insidious of legal doctrines. Since its promulgation by the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, it has determined as many criminal appeals as have some of the more well-known and hotly debated decisions of the 1960s. Despite the frequency of its use in determining criminal appeals-possibly as high as ten percent of all criminal appeals during the last thirteen years it has received comparatively little critical attention. The reason for the inattention? It's a sneak thief. Its appearance does not raise apprehension, and its application does not leave concentrated areas of …
Constitutional Law-Criminal Law-Pretrial Detainees May Be Subjected To Conditions Of Confinement Reasonably Related To Legitimate Government Objectives-Bell V. Wolfish, 99 S. Ct. 1861 (1979).
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Payton V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Payton V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Crews, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Crews, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Rawlings V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Rawlings V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Adams V. Texas, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Reid V. Georgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Ybarra V. Illinois, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Ybarra V. Illinois, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Lewis V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Lewis V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-MISTRIAL DECLARATION-OVER DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION, PROSECUTION MUST DEMONSTRATE HIGH DEGREE OF MANIFEST NECESSITY OR REPROSECUTION WILL BE BARRED
Criminals-Turned-Authors: Victims' Rights V. Freedom Of Speech, Barbara Freedman Wand
Criminals-Turned-Authors: Victims' Rights V. Freedom Of Speech, Barbara Freedman Wand
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Do Defendants Have An Attorney When They Have A Public Defender, James Eisenstein
Do Defendants Have An Attorney When They Have A Public Defender, James Eisenstein
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Counsel for the Poor: Criminal Defense in Urban America by Robert Hermann, Eric Single, and John Boston
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1978
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1978
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-SELF-INCRIMINATION-FLORIDA SUPREME COURT SIGNALS POSSIBLE RETREAT IN PROTECTION AGAINST COMPULSORY PRODUCTION OF INCRIMINATING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.
Escape From Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Theory Of Constitutional Necessity, Cynthia R. Farina
Escape From Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Theory Of Constitutional Necessity, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The inmate who escapes from a federal or state prison and seeks to introduce evidence of unconstitutionally cruel and unusual confinement conditions to defend her action is barred by the well-established rule that prison conditions alone, no matter how intolerable or inhumane, neither justify nor excuse escape. If she attempts to use the defense of necessity—a limited exception to this rule—the prisoner will be required to show that a specific, imminent threat of death or serious injury prompt her escape. Evidence of prolonged or repeated deprivation and mistreatment sufficient to prove a violation of the eighth amendment may not be …