Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3704)
- Judges (3118)
- Criminal Law (2551)
- Criminal Procedure (2238)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2051)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2043)
- Administrative Law (1688)
- Jurisprudence (1668)
- Legal Profession (1656)
- Civil Procedure (1474)
- Legislation (1448)
- Litigation (1448)
- Human Rights Law (1364)
- Civil Law (1363)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1350)
- Jurisdiction (1300)
- Law and Society (1218)
- International Law (1161)
- Legal History (1146)
- Rule of Law (1130)
- Business Organizations Law (1112)
- Natural Resources Law (1106)
- Legal Education (1071)
- Conflict of Laws (1051)
- Internet Law (988)
- International Trade Law (971)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (970)
- Energy and Utilities Law (941)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (872)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
- Universitas Indonesia (734)
-
- University of Richmond (688)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (547)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (318)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (305)
- University of Georgia School of Law (288)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (258)
- American University Washington College of Law (238)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (160)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (152)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1039)
- Supreme Court (746)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (467)
- Judges (460)
-
- Constitution (381)
- Judicial review (303)
- Jurisdiction (303)
- State courts (286)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (195)
- Litigation (194)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- First Amendment (142)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Faculty Scholarship (687)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (595)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
- Articles (522)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Faculty Publications (404)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (262)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (192)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7441 - 7470 of 16493
Full-Text Articles in Courts
The International Criminal Court Does Not Have Complete Jurisdiction Over Customary Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 603 (2010), Jordan J. Paust
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment On Victor's Justice & The Viability Of Ex Ante Standards, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (2010), Rod Rastan
Comment On Victor's Justice & The Viability Of Ex Ante Standards, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (2010), Rod Rastan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
International Criminal Courts And The Making Of Public International Law: New Roles For International Organizations And Individuals, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 603 (2010), Kenneth S. Gallant
International Criminal Courts And The Making Of Public International Law: New Roles For International Organizations And Individuals, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 603 (2010), Kenneth S. Gallant
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The International Criminal Court And Proximity To The Scene Of The Crime: Does The Rome Statute Permit All Of The Icc's Trials To Take Place At Local Or Regional Chambers?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 715 (2010), Stuart K. Ford
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Nuremberg Tribunal V. The Tokyo Tribunal: Designs, Staffs, And Operations, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (2010), Zachary D. Kaufman
The Nuremberg Tribunal V. The Tokyo Tribunal: Designs, Staffs, And Operations, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (2010), Zachary D. Kaufman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protecting Human Rights Without A Bill Of Rights, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 769 (2010), Robert French
Protecting Human Rights Without A Bill Of Rights, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 769 (2010), Robert French
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Avoid The Constraints Of Rule 10b-5(B): A First Circuit Guide For Underwriters, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 931 (2010), Eric H. Franklin
How To Avoid The Constraints Of Rule 10b-5(B): A First Circuit Guide For Underwriters, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 931 (2010), Eric H. Franklin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forgotten Namesake: The Illinois Good Samaritan Act's Inexcusable Failure To Provide Immunity To Non-Medical Rescuers, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1097 (2010), David Weldon
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hobbs Act Through The Rivera-Rivera Looking Glass: A Mere Intrusion Upon Basic Fundamental Federalism Principles?, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 237 (2010), Patrick Goodwin
The Hobbs Act Through The Rivera-Rivera Looking Glass: A Mere Intrusion Upon Basic Fundamental Federalism Principles?, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 237 (2010), Patrick Goodwin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Updates From The International And Internationalized Criminal Courts, Ivan Carpio, Lindsay Roberts, Zsofia Young, Christopher Tansey, Paul Rinefierd, Slava Kuperstein
Updates From The International And Internationalized Criminal Courts, Ivan Carpio, Lindsay Roberts, Zsofia Young, Christopher Tansey, Paul Rinefierd, Slava Kuperstein
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
Updates From The Regional Human Rights Systems, Sarira Sadeghi, Christopher Tansey, Michael Becker, Emilyrose Johns, Carson Osberg
Updates From The Regional Human Rights Systems, Sarira Sadeghi, Christopher Tansey, Michael Becker, Emilyrose Johns, Carson Osberg
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Sophisticated Use Of Digs, Rafael Gely, Michael E. Solimine
The Supreme Court And The Sophisticated Use Of Digs, Rafael Gely, Michael E. Solimine
Faculty Publications
In this article, we extend this literature in several ways. In part II, we provide a brief overview of the certiorari and DIG process, and explore the possible motivations for the Court to DIG a case. In Part III we describe our data, and in Part IV we discuss our results. Part V concludes the paper.
Introductory Note To The Supreme Court Of The United States: Noriega V. Pastrana, Kenneth Anderson
Introductory Note To The Supreme Court Of The United States: Noriega V. Pastrana, Kenneth Anderson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Defending The Majoritarian Court, Amanda Frost
Defending The Majoritarian Court, Amanda Frost
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Why Did China Reform Its Death Penalty?, Kandis Scott
Why Did China Reform Its Death Penalty?, Kandis Scott
Faculty Publications
China recently reformed its death penalty laws, and as a result the government has executed fewer prisoners. The author explores possible reasons and policy concerns behind China's legal reform. These influences include international forces and domestic factors, such as the media, changed circumstances, compassion, and politics. Although hardly transparent, the underlying motivations for the revisions suggest that eventually China may abolish capital punishment, perhaps even before the United States does so.
Redemption Song: Graham V. Florida And The Evolving Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, Robert Smith, G. Ben Choen
Redemption Song: Graham V. Florida And The Evolving Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, Robert Smith, G. Ben Choen
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
In Graham v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentence of life without parole ("LWOP") for a juvenile under eighteen who commits a non-homicide offense. For Terrance Graham, who committed home-invasion robbery at seventeen, the decision does not mean necessarily that he someday will leave the brick walls of Florida's Taylor Annex Correctional Institution. Unlike previous Eighth Amendment decisions, such as Roper v. Simmons, where the Court barred the death penalty for juveniles, this new categorical rule does not translate into automatic relief for members of the exempted class: "A State need not guarantee the …
Lorain, Aspen, And The Future Of Section 2 Enforcement, Xiao Jeff Liu
Lorain, Aspen, And The Future Of Section 2 Enforcement, Xiao Jeff Liu
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The Sherman Antitrust Act § 2 makes monopolizing or attempting to monopolize a particular trade or aspects of a trade a federal felony. More specifically, Section 2 of the Act addresses a firm's unilateral conduct. Under the administration of former President George W. Bush, a comprehensive guideline titled Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act ("Bush Guidelines") was adopted in September of 2008 for enforcing Section 2 violations. Under President Barack Obama's administration, however, the enforcement of antitrust laws is expected to undergo a radical transformation. On May 11, 2009, Christine A. Varney, the Assistant …
Not So Technical: An Analysis Of Federal Circuit Patent Decisions Appealed From The Itc, Holly Lance
Not So Technical: An Analysis Of Federal Circuit Patent Decisions Appealed From The Itc, Holly Lance
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
A widespread perception among the patent law community is that the patent system would be more effective if judges with technical backgrounds and patent law experience decided patent disputes. Proponents believe that if judges all had similar baseline knowledge of technological analysis, there would be more consistency in decision-making, leading to more predictability for parties. Some district courts have unofficially become semi-specialized in patent law disputes, and Congress is debating whether to institute a more formalized Patent Pilot Program in which district court judges specialize in patent law cases. This Note joins the debate and examines patent law cases at …
Rawls And Reparations, Martin D. Carcieri
Rawls And Reparations, Martin D. Carcieri
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
In the past two years, four related events have sharpened debates on race in the U.S.: President Obama's election, the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, that Court's ruling in Ricci v. DeStefano, and the arrest of Obama's friend, Harvard professor Henry Gates. The President has spoken of a "teaching moment" arising from these events. Moreover, his writings, speeches and lawmaking efforts illustrate the contractual nature of Obama's thinking. The President (and all concerned citizens) should thus find useful an analysis of racial policy and justice in light of the work of John Rauls. Rawls may …
Law Clerking: My Favorite Year, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
The Art Of Statutory Interpretation: Identifying The Interpretative Theory Of The Judges Of The United States Court Of Appeals For Veterans' Claims And The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, Linda Jellum
Articles
No abstract provided.
Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under The Due Process Clause, Dmitry Bam
Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under The Due Process Clause, Dmitry Bam
Faculty Publications
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. without hearing some variant of the following response: “I can’t believe it was as close as it was.” And it does not matter whether you are chatting with your next-door neighbor who had never thought about judicial ethics in his life or discussing the case with a judicial-recusal expert. Nearly everyone seems to agree: Caperton was an “easy” case and that four justices dissented is an indication that there is something terribly wrong. Not only has Caperton elevated the issue of judicial impartiality …
A Call For Judicial Scrutiny: How Increased Judicial Discretion Has Led To Disparity And Unpredictability In Federal Sentencings For Child Pornography, Loren Rigsby
Seattle University Law Review
The United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) has made child pornography related crimes among the most harshly punishable federal offenses. Nevertheless, sentencing judges have regained the right to depart from the recommended Federal Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). The Guideline range for child pornography reflects sound and clear congressional intent to impose harsh penalties on defendants to deter, and ultimately eliminate, the market for child pornography. For this reason, this Comment argues that sentences that fall outside the Guidelines range should be reviewed with much greater scrutiny and should not be used solely to reflect a judge’s view that the advised sentence is …
Cost And Fee Allocation In Civil Procedure, James Maxeiner
Cost And Fee Allocation In Civil Procedure, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser ("loser pays") as elsewhere in the civilized world. As Theodor Sedgwick, America's first expert on damages opined, it is matter of inherent justice that the party found in the wrong should indemnify the party in the right for the expenses of litigation. Yet attorneys' fees are not allocated this way in the United States: they are allowed to fall on the party that incurs them (the ''American rule," better, the American practice). According to Albert Ehrenzweig, Austrian judge, emigre and then prominent American law professor, the American practice is …
The Federal Circuit: A Model For Reform?, Paul D. Carrington, Paulina Orchard
The Federal Circuit: A Model For Reform?, Paul D. Carrington, Paulina Orchard
Faculty Scholarship
Are our federal courts organized suitably to perform their mission of assuring coherent administration of our national law? Maybe not. The senior author of this Article, along with many others, argued to the contrary forty years ago. Now, experience with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit tends to confirm that an alternative structure of the federal judiciary could better serve the need for coherent national law, and without serious adverse consequences. Perhaps, therefore, it is now time for Congress to reconsider the matter. We here suggest the possibility that the United States replicate the structure of …
Further Reflections On Not Being “Not An Originalist”, H. Jefferson Powell
Further Reflections On Not Being “Not An Originalist”, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Dispute Regarding Navigational And Related Rights (Costa Rica V. Nicaragua), Coalter G. Lathrop
Dispute Regarding Navigational And Related Rights (Costa Rica V. Nicaragua), Coalter G. Lathrop
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Domestication Of International Criminal Law: A Proposal For Expanding The International Criminal Court's Sphere Of Influence, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2010), Lisa J. Laplante
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In God We Trust: The Judicial Establishment Of American Civil Religion, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 869 (2010), James J. Knicely, John W. Whitehead
In God We Trust: The Judicial Establishment Of American Civil Religion, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 869 (2010), James J. Knicely, John W. Whitehead
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second-Class Citizenship: The Tension Between The Supremacy Of The People And Minority Rights, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 963 (2010), Adam H. Morse
Second-Class Citizenship: The Tension Between The Supremacy Of The People And Minority Rights, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 963 (2010), Adam H. Morse
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.