Courts Commons^™

A Rule 11 For Prosecutors, Yuri R. Linetsky

Tennessee Law Review

This Article suggests a novel approach to allow victims of frivolous prosecutions to hold prosecutors accountable. Unique among American lawyers, prosecutors enjoy absolute immunity from civil suits alleging professional misconduct. In cases of frivolous prosecutions, where charges are dismissed by the judge or the defendants are acquitted, the former defendants are prevented from seeking damages. This is so despite former defendants often suffering significant consequences-from legal fees to loss of employment. Victims of frivolous prosecutions should be afforded a mechanism to seek redress against prosecutors who bring or maintain meritless actions.

By enacting a rule of criminal procedure that mirrors …

Uberizing Discrimination: Equal Employment And Gig Workers, Minna J. Kotkin

Tennessee Law Review

What does the growth of online gig work mean for the future of employment discrimination law? While customers may not care about the sex and race of their Uber driver, elements of explicit and implicit bias can be expected when it comes to personal, home-based services like TaskRabbit or Care.com, or professional business services such as Catalant. In fact, the ubiquity of photographs and other personal data on these apps facilitates discrimination, as some empirical data suggests. Since predictions indicate that gig workers may soon account for 40% of the workforce, the goals of our employment discrimination laws-ensuring equal access …

A Shift In The Preemption Landscape, Douglas G. Smith

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Represent, Teri Dobbins Baxter

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On Being A Small Part Of The Year Of The Woman, Jamie Ballinger

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Are Literary Agents (Really) Fiduciaries?, Jacqueline B. Lipton

Tennessee Law Review

2018 was a big year for "bad agents" in the publishing world. In July, children's literature agent Danielle Smith was exposed for lying to her clients about submissions and publication offers. In December, major literary agency Donadio & Olson, which represented a number of bestselling authors, including Chuck Palahniuk (Fight Club), filed for bankruptcy in the wake of an accounting scandal involving their bookkeeper, Darin Webb. Webb had embezzled over $3 million of client funds. Around the same time, Australian literary agent Selwa Anthony lost a battle in the New South Wales Supreme Court involving royalties she owed to her …

Wannacry, Ransomware, And The Emerging Threat To Corporations, Lawrence J. Trautman, Peter C. Ormerod

Tennessee Law Review

The WannaCry ransomware attack began on May 12, 2017, and is unprecedented in scale-quickly impacting nearly a quarter-million computers in over 150 countries. The WannaCry virus exploits a vulnerability to Microsoft Windows that was originally developed by the U.S. National Security Agency and operates by encrypting a victim's data and demanding payment of a ransom in exchange for data recovery. Security experts have indicated that a North Korea linked group of hackers-who have also been implicated in cyberattacks against Sony Pictures in 2014, the Bangladeshi Central Bank in 2016, and Polish banks in February 2017-is behind the attack.

Ransomware threatens …

And Then There Were Yellow Roses, Penny J. White

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Suffrage To Citizenship: The Battle For Gender Equality At The Citadel, Valorie K. Vojdik

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Cases

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

She Stands On Her Own, Amongst Many: The Women Of The Tennessee Supreme Court, Bernice B. Donald, Emily T. Brait

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Author Index

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Contents

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Contents

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sovereign Speech In Troubled Times: Prosecutorial Statements As Extrajudicial Admissions, Amir Shachmurove

Tennessee Law Review

On its face, Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2) is elegantly simple. Distinguishing between neither private persons nor public entities, it renders admissible out-of-court statements made by an agent "authorized to make a statement on the subject" and by an agent or employee "on a matter within the scope of. . . [its] relationship" to the party per subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively. More colloquially, Evidence Rule 801(d)(2)(C) permits the introduction of an authorized representative's statements into a case's evidentiary record, and Evidence Rule 801(d)(2)(D) does the same for statements uttered by certain agents and employees. History partly vindicated the former, …

Foreword: From Suffrage To The Era, Wanda G. Sobieski

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Subdivision And Conserved Farmland, Jess R. Phelps

Tennessee Law Review

Limiting subdivision of conserved farmland is often a critical component of an agricultural conservation easement project's design. These restrictions are critical for ensuring that a protected farm remains of sufficient size and scale to continue to be viable for agricultural use. This form of restriction, however, is often undervalued by courts reviewing agricultural conservation easements as being secondary or incidental to the agricultural conservation easement's stated goal of preventing this land from being developed or converted to non-agricultural use. The purpose of this Article is to place subdivision restrictions in their appropriate context and to consider options for increasing their …

One Wotus, Two Potus: The Clean Water Act And The Economic Impact, Brad Finney

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Subject Index

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mixed Signals: What Can We Expect From The Supreme Court In This Post-Ada Amendments Act Era?, Nicole Buonocore Porter

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Federal Circuit As An Institution, Ryan G. Vacca

Law Faculty Scholarship

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a unique institution. Unlike other circuit courts, the Federal Circuit’s jurisdiction is bound by subject area rather than geography, and it was created to address a unique set of problems specific to patent law. These characteristics have affected its institutional development and made the court one of the most frequently studied appellate courts. This chapter examines this development and describes the evolving qualities that have helped the Federal Circuit distinguish itself, for better or worse, as an institution.

This chapter begins with an overview of the concerns existing before creation of …

The Justice System Is Criminal, Raven Delfina Otero-Symphony

2020 Award Winners

No abstract provided.

Licensing Paralegals To Practice Law: A Path Toward Bridging The Justice Gap In Minnesota, Conner Suddick

Departmental Honors Projects

There are few legal avenues for low-income and other marginalized groups in the United States to seek civil justice. A lack of legal assistance in civil issues can be detrimental to a person’s health and wellbeing. Given this reality, the legal profession must broaden its capacity to serve these needs, and one path is to embrace the aid of paralegals. In 2016, the legal community of Minnesota had conversations about whether the state should provide limited licenses to paralegals. To study models from across the country, the Minnesota State Bar Association (MSBA) formed the Alternative Legal Models Task Force. In …

Taxing Combat, Kan Samuel

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Conversion Therapy: A Brief Reflection On The History Of The Practice And Contemporary Regulatory Efforts, Tiffany C. Graham

Scholarly Works

This brief symposium essay offers a broad-stroke sketch of the history of conversion therapy, its current status as a locus of regulation, and some preliminary questions about the direction the law might take to protect individuals who elect or are forcibly subjected to the practice.

An Analysis And Critique Of Mental Health Treatment In American State Prisons And Proposal For Improved Care, Shelby Hayne

Scripps Senior Theses

Mental health treatment in state prisons is revealed to be highly variable, under-funded, and systematically inadequate. Existing literature exposes this injustice but fails to provide a comprehensive proposal for reform. This paper attempts to fill that gap, outlining a cost-effective, evidence-based treatment proposal, directly addressing the deficits in care revealed through analysis of our current system. In addition, this paper provides historical overviews of the prison system and mental health treatment, utilizing theoretical perspectives to contextualize this proposal in the present state of affairs. Lastly, the evidence is provided to emphasize the potential economic and social benefits of improving mental …

Disgorging Emoluments, Caprice L. Roberts

Marquette Law Review

This Article is about unjust enrichment. It includes a theory of an unjust

enrichment cause of action against executive actors who receive unlawful

emoluments. Interpretations of the boundaries of unlawful emoluments range

from receipt of a gift or benefit because of the position of power held to quid

pro quo exchanges of a thing of value in exchange for government information

or advantage. Wherever the proper line, the purpose of the law of unjust

enrichment is to prevent and undo benefits one has no right to retain. It

achieves those goals with the use of restitution remedies including

disgorgement of …

Dying Constitutionalism And The Fourteenth Amendment, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

The notion of a “living Constitution” often rests on an implicit assumption that important constitutional values will “grow” in such a way as to make the Constitution more attractive over time. But there are no guarantees: What can grow can also wither and die. This essay, presented as the 2018 Robert F. Boden Lecture at Marquette University Law School, marks the sesquicentennial of the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification as a powerful charter of liberty and equality for black Americans. But for much of its early history, the Fourteenth Amendment’s meaning moved in reverse, overwhelmed by the end of Reconstruction, the gradual …

Visiting Judges, Marin K. Levy

Faculty Scholarship

Despite the fact that Article III judges hold particular seats on particular courts, the federal system rests on judicial interchangeability. Hundreds of judges “visit” other courts each year and collectively help decide thousands of appeals. Anyone from a retired Supreme Court Justice to a judge from the U.S. Court of International Trade to a district judge from out of circuit may come and hear cases on a given court of appeals. Although much has been written about the structure of the federal courts and the nature of Article III judgeships, little attention has been paid to the phenomenon of “sitting …

Has Shoe Run Its Course?, David W. Ichel

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.