Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3517)
- Judges (3112)
- Criminal Law (2367)
- Criminal Procedure (2061)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2045)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2042)
- Jurisprudence (1660)
- Legal Profession (1655)
- Administrative Law (1507)
- Civil Procedure (1471)
- Legislation (1444)
- Litigation (1443)
- Jurisdiction (1299)
- Law and Society (1209)
- Civil Law (1187)
- Human Rights Law (1185)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1175)
- International Law (1158)
- Legal History (1137)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (963)
- Rule of Law (953)
- Business Organizations Law (937)
- Natural Resources Law (932)
- Law and Politics (930)
- Legal Education (897)
- Conflict of Laws (877)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (823)
- Internet Law (814)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1722)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (871)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
- University of Richmond (688)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (560)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (545)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (316)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (304)
- University of Georgia School of Law (287)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (257)
- American University Washington College of Law (233)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (152)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1038)
- Supreme Court (745)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (466)
- Judges (461)
-
- Constitution (380)
- Jurisdiction (303)
- Judicial review (302)
- State courts (285)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (253)
- New York (242)
- Congress (225)
- Due process (194)
- Litigation (194)
- Constitutional Law (192)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (168)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- First Amendment (142)
- Judiciary (142)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Faculty Scholarship (682)
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
-
- Touro Law Review (521)
- Articles (518)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (421)
- Faculty Publications (402)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (261)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (191)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (178)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 16285
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Ulayat Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Yeni Oktafia
Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Ulayat Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Yeni Oktafia
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Under Article 1457 of the Indonesian Civil Code, a sale and purchase agreement creates reciprocal rights and obligations between the parties. In Indonesian land law practice, however, transactions involving customary land (tanah ulayat) present legal complexities due to its communal nature and governance by indigenous law communities, coupled with the absence of explicit regulation in the Civil Code and the plurality of customary law systems. This research examines the legal position and juridical implications of tanah ulayat sale and purchase agreements within Indonesian civil law while acknowledging the continued applicability of customary law. Employing a normative legal research method with …
Pelanggaran Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Pada Wilayah Perairan Pesisir, Chikita Handriana
Pelanggaran Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Pada Wilayah Perairan Pesisir, Chikita Handriana
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
The construction of sea barriers in several coastal waters has revealed the issuance of land titles within certain areas designated for such development, which were subsequently annulled due to procedural and substantive defects in their issuance. This phenomenon reflects administrative disorder in the management of coastal areas and poses a potential risk of state losses. The issue warrants thorough examination, as violations in the granting of land rights not only affect governance and administrative order but may also escalate into corruption offenses where abuse of authority or financial loss to the state is involved. The primary objective of this research …
Support The Icc As A Vital Court Of Last Resort For Victims Of Grave International Crimes, Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum, Gabor Rona
Support The Icc As A Vital Court Of Last Resort For Victims Of Grave International Crimes, Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum, Gabor Rona
Online Publications
This public statement, issued on International Justice Day (July 17, 2026), affirms support for the International Criminal Court (ICC) as an independent judicial institution and a court of last resort for victims of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. Signed by more than 100 organizations and individuals, including legal scholars, practitioners, human rights advocates, and civil society organizations, the statement expresses concern over efforts to undermine the ICC's independence and functioning. It calls on the United States to reaffirm its longstanding commitment to the rule of law, judicial independence, and international accountability, emphasizing the importance …
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
اكتساب الأحكام الأجنبية قوة القضية المحكمة في لبنان, عبده غصوب
اكتساب الأحكام الأجنبية قوة القضية المحكمة في لبنان, عبده غصوب
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
اختصاص المجلس الأعلى في محاكمة رئيس الوزراء والوزراء في التشريعين اللبناني والفرنسي, دريد بشراوي
اختصاص المجلس الأعلى في محاكمة رئيس الوزراء والوزراء في التشريعين اللبناني والفرنسي, دريد بشراوي
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
Betschart V. Oregon: A Seven-Day Standard For Maine, Henry Gates
Betschart V. Oregon: A Seven-Day Standard For Maine, Henry Gates
Maine Law Review
Maine lacks a clear standard for ensuring the right to counsel for indigent defendants. The State’s public defense system is struggling to meet Maine’s constitutional mandate: To provide indigent defense services in rural areas and across the state. An aging bar with few new attorneys working in rural areas—where there are often higher relative prosecution rates and a corresponding increased need for legal services—is contributing to the problem. This has resulted in a legal system that negatively impacts rural communities and indigent defendants to the point that one court concluded the state is violating the Sixth Amendment. Following the Ninth …
One Year's Seeding: Looking Back On The Last Seven Years Of Maine's Progress Toward Rural Justice, Christopher Northrop, Seth Main
One Year's Seeding: Looking Back On The Last Seven Years Of Maine's Progress Toward Rural Justice, Christopher Northrop, Seth Main
Maine Law Review
Nationally, the crisis in access to legal services in rural areas continues to grow despite significant attention and efforts to reverse this troubling trend. This Article explores Maine’s efforts to address our legal deserts. The Article’s starting point is a retrospective look at our 2019 national symposium on rural justice and accompanying Maine Law Review issue. We will try to measure successes and failures, while also addressing the significant impact caused by the intervening pandemic. The Article will then shift to an analysis of the current landscape, focusing on the role of the University of Maine School of Law. We …
The Other Right To Counsel: The Civil Guarantee In State Constitutions, Dmitry Bam
The Other Right To Counsel: The Civil Guarantee In State Constitutions, Dmitry Bam
Maine Law Review
When most people speak of the right to counsel, they speak in the singular. After the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, the right to counsel in criminal prosecutions has become one of our most cherished fundamental rights. It is a right ingrained in our culture. Even children can recite the mantra that the accused have the right to a lawyer, and if they can’t afford a lawyer, one will be provided to them free of charge. It is no surprise, then, that our constitutional focus is trained on the criminal defendant’s right to counsel. After all, there …
Foreword, Adam Fortier-Brown
Foreword, Adam Fortier-Brown
Maine Law Review
Access to legal services in America has emerged as one of the most pressing structural challenges facing the legal community. As attorneys increasingly concentrate in metropolitan areas, large areas are left with few practicing attorneys and challenging prospects of attracting many more. The consequences of this challenge reach across nearly every aspect of life in these communities—from housing and family stability, to starting or winding down businesses, and critically, to the constitutional guarantees that attach when someone is charged with a crime. Yet, these challenges have also generated a period of genuine creativity and collaboration between communities and different institutions. …
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
Procedural Drift: How Judicial Restraint Enables Legalized Backsliding, Dessie Otachliska
Procedural Drift: How Judicial Restraint Enables Legalized Backsliding, Dessie Otachliska
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Article introduces Procedural Drift, a new theory of constitutional erosion in which legality itself enables democratic decline. Legal forms remain intact, but their constraining force quietly recedes as procedural doctrines withdraw courts from sites of contestation. Executive power expands not by defying law, but by strategically complying with it—exploiting judicial restraint to evade review.
Building on Bruce Ackerman’s theory of constitutional moments and Kim Lane Scheppele’s concept of autocratic legalism, this Article develops a U.S.-specific account of democratic backsliding that is lawful, gradual, and institutionally embedded. It traces how judicial restraint—operating amid partisan alignment and epistemic fragmentation—erodes legal checks …
Konstitusionalitas Kebijakan Penanaman Modal Asing Sebagai Penerapan Konsep Hak Menguasai Negara Menurut Uud Nri 1945, Rico Novianto, Satya Arinanto, Fatmawati Fatmawati
Konstitusionalitas Kebijakan Penanaman Modal Asing Sebagai Penerapan Konsep Hak Menguasai Negara Menurut Uud Nri 1945, Rico Novianto, Satya Arinanto, Fatmawati Fatmawati
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi
This article analyzes how the state position in foreign investment as an instrument for realizing public prosperity. Throughout the history of Indonesian governance, foreign capital has been a tool that can be used and has its own constitutional basis. However, if it is too large and the lack of adequate regulation of foreign investment to maintain the investment climate, it has become one of the causes of the economic and multidimensional crisis, especially around 1998 in Indonesia. In fact, the constitution has mandated an economic system based on the concept of state control, the principles of economic democracy, and the …
A Bone To Pick: Back To The Basics In Food Product Liability With A Necessary Reformation Of The "Hybrid" Negligence Standard, Clay Cutteridge
A Bone To Pick: Back To The Basics In Food Product Liability With A Necessary Reformation Of The "Hybrid" Negligence Standard, Clay Cutteridge
Cleveland State Law Review
Ohio does not use the traditional negligence standard in determining negligence in food product liability cases. Instead, Ohio uses what is called the hybrid test. The hybrid test analyzes what a consumer would reasonably expect to find in their food, and Ohio courts consider the naturalness of an object to the food it is in to be the determinative factor: natural objects should be reasonably expected and cannot give rise to successful claims of negligence. This hybrid test fails to consider that food is complex, and consumers often cannot know what to reasonably expect in the food they buy. The …
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
Le Rôle Du Juge Constitutionnel Libanais Dans La Sauvegarde Des Droits Processuels Fondamentaux, Salim Jreissati
Le Rôle Du Juge Constitutionnel Libanais Dans La Sauvegarde Des Droits Processuels Fondamentaux, Salim Jreissati
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
Felony Murder: What Courts Ignore In Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.02(B), Richard S. Walinski
Felony Murder: What Courts Ignore In Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.02(B), Richard S. Walinski
Et Cetera
Ohio has two levels of felony murder. One is aggravated felony murder, 2903.01(b). It is an approximate equivalent of the common-law felony-murder rule. The other is a felony-murder rule for the lesser offence of simple murder, 2903.02(B). In felony-murder cases prosecuted under Ohio Revised Code § 2903.02(B), the nearly universal practice among the lower courts in Ohio is to ignore certain explicit text in the statute.
To warrant a conviction, 2903.02(B) requires that death have occurred as a proximate result of the defendant’s having committed or having attempted to commit one of many predicate offenses that the General Assembly labeled …
Correcting A Carry-On Conundrum: A Proposal To Expand The Dot’S Ability To Regulate Unfair And Deceptive Practices In The Airline Industry, Antonio Linek
Et Cetera
This Note examines the Department of Transportation’s attempt to regulate airline ancillary fees through 89 F.R. 34620. The Rule required airlines to disclose certain ancillary fees in an obvious manner, early on in the booking process. Airlines for America challenged the Rule in the Fifth Circuit in Airlines for Am. v. Dep’t of Transp. The court held that 49 U.S.C. § 41712 allows the DOT to prohibit unfair and deceptive practices, but not to impose prescriptive rules. This holding conflicts with older Seventh Circuit authority approving similar agency action, creating a circuit split. This Note argues that the Fifth …
Child Abuse In The Foster Care System: Articulating A New Standard Of Negligence For Civil Actions Against State Foster Agencies, Isabel Loughlin
Child Abuse In The Foster Care System: Articulating A New Standard Of Negligence For Civil Actions Against State Foster Agencies, Isabel Loughlin
Brooklyn Law Review
The foster care system falls under the domain of each state’s family courts. State foster care agencies oversee the removal of children from their homes, the placement of children in temporary foster homes, and the process of reunification with the birth family if possible. This system is meant to protect children from abuse, but far too often foster care agencies fail in their duty to monitor the wellbeing of children after they are placed in a foster home. There is a crisis of child abuse within the foster care system, and the only avenue for recourse for children who have …
Tenuous Appointments: The President's Claimed Power To Remove Court-Appointed Interim United States Attorneys, Jonathan S. Ross
Tenuous Appointments: The President's Claimed Power To Remove Court-Appointed Interim United States Attorneys, Jonathan S. Ross
Brooklyn Law Review
Section 546(d) of Title 28 of the United States Code authorizes a district court to appoint an interim United States Attorney during any vacancy of more than 120 days. The provision has been in place since 1863 and, for most of that time, Presidents have made no attempt to remove court-appointed interim U.S. Attorney through means other than the nomination and confirmation of a replacement. That changed initially in 2020, when President Trump attempted to remove Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York. In 2025, the President went further, removing nine court-appointed interim U.S. Attorneys. These moves, unprecedented, …
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej
الإجتهاد اللبناني, Poej