Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3524)
- Judges (3114)
- Criminal Law (2374)
- Criminal Procedure (2067)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2046)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2042)
- Jurisprudence (1661)
- Legal Profession (1656)
- Administrative Law (1513)
- Civil Procedure (1471)
- Litigation (1445)
- Legislation (1444)
- Jurisdiction (1299)
- Law and Society (1209)
- Civil Law (1192)
- Human Rights Law (1190)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1180)
- International Law (1158)
- Legal History (1138)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (963)
- Rule of Law (958)
- Business Organizations Law (942)
- Natural Resources Law (937)
- Law and Politics (930)
- Legal Education (902)
- Conflict of Laws (882)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (823)
- Internet Law (819)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (871)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
- University of Richmond (688)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (565)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (546)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (317)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (304)
- University of Georgia School of Law (287)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (257)
- American University Washington College of Law (233)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (152)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1038)
- Supreme Court (745)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (466)
- Judges (460)
-
- Constitution (380)
- Jurisdiction (303)
- Judicial review (302)
- State courts (285)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (194)
- Litigation (194)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- First Amendment (142)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Faculty Scholarship (682)
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
-
- Articles (521)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (426)
- Faculty Publications (402)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (261)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (191)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 15571 - 15600 of 16296
Full-Text Articles in Courts
The Johnson Amendment To The Judicial Code, Edwin C. Goddard
The Johnson Amendment To The Judicial Code, Edwin C. Goddard
Michigan Law Review
The so-called Johnson bill amending the Judicial Code was passed by Congress and signed by the President on May 14, 1934. The bill was the result of long agitation against the alleged pernicious interference by United States District Courts with rate regulations of the state utility commissions and the state courts. It was charged that the removal of cases from state to federal tribunals was burdening the District Courts and, what was far more serious, was favoring the public utilities and preventing their proper state regulation by submitting controversies to judges having life tenure and who were out of touch …
Administrative Tribunals-Notice And Hearing
Administrative Tribunals-Notice And Hearing
Michigan Law Review
The State Highway Commissioner proceeded against the defendant railroad under a Virginia statute empowering him to order the removal of any railroad grade crossing and the substitution of an elevated road when in his opinion public safety and convenience demanded it. No notice and hearing was given or required, and the only judicial recourse was an action in equity in the event of "arbitrary" action. Held, by a six-three decision, that although it is assumed that a state legislature might order the same action, it by no means follows that an administrative officer may be empowered to act with …
Bankruptcy-Debtor Proceedings-Power Of Court To Enjoin State Court Actions
Bankruptcy-Debtor Proceedings-Power Of Court To Enjoin State Court Actions
Michigan Law Review
A debtor proceeding was initiated in a Florida federal court and an ancillary proceeding was begun in a New York federal court. The latter court enjoined petitioner, who had obtained a tort judgment against the debtor in a New York state court, which judgment had been affirmed by the Appellate Division, from arguing the case as appellee in the New York Court of Appeals and from continuing to prosecute an action commenced by him (petitioner) against the sureties on an appeal bond filed by the debtor pending the appeal to the Appellate Division. Shares of stock had been pledged by …
Equity - Admissibility Of Evidence Arising Pendente Lite
Equity - Admissibility Of Evidence Arising Pendente Lite
Michigan Law Review
In equitable actions "the right to judgment is not limited to the facts as they existed at the commencement of the action, but the relief administered is such as the nature of the case, and the facts as they exist at the close of the litigation, demand." While this quotation may express the general rule regarding the admissibility of evidence arising pendente lite, the difficulties in its application are numerous.
Evidence - Admissibility Of Blood-Group Test
Evidence - Admissibility Of Blood-Group Test
Michigan Law Review
The old axiom, "blood will tell," has been given a new lease on life by the work of biochemists and hereditists in the last thirty years. At the beginning of the twentieth century a scientist, Karl Landsteiner, working on the means to make blood transfusions safe, discovered that the New Testament saying, the Almighty "hath made of one blood all nations of men," is not true. He found that human blood is divided into four groups, characterized by the possession or non-possession of certain substances in the serum and the corpuscles of the blood. If one puts a little blood …
Stare Decisis -The Retroactive Effect Of An Overruling Decision
Stare Decisis -The Retroactive Effect Of An Overruling Decision
Michigan Law Review
In 1923 the Supreme Court of Michigan ruled, in Kavanaugh v. Rabior, that property lying between the meander line and the waterline of the Great Lakes belonged to the State. The defendant, after this decision and upon the advice of the State Conservation Department, refused to pay rent to the plaintiff, the littoral proprietor. In 1930 the court, overruling the Kavanaugh case, held, in Hilt v. Weber, that such property belonged to the littoral proprietor. On the basis of this decision the plaintiff brought suit for use and occupation. Held, in the principal case, that the overruling …
The Legal Education Wilderness, Will Shafroth
The Legal Education Wilderness, Will Shafroth
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mortgagee Beneficiaries In The Federal Courts, Elvin E. Overton
Mortgagee Beneficiaries In The Federal Courts, Elvin E. Overton
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Challenge To The Lawyers Of The State, Earl King
A Challenge To The Lawyers Of The State, Earl King
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall, William T. Frierson
Chief Justice John Marshall, William T. Frierson
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tax Limitations Of Counties And Municipalities, M. P. O'Connor
Tax Limitations Of Counties And Municipalities, M. P. O'Connor
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Theory Of The Case, Bernard C. Gavit
Procedural Simplification, Arthur Crownover Jr.
Procedural Simplification, Arthur Crownover Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution Of The United States, Robert M. Jones
The Constitution Of The United States, Robert M. Jones
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tax Delinquency In Tennessee - Legislative Aspects, Charles P. White
Tax Delinquency In Tennessee - Legislative Aspects, Charles P. White
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Verdict--Juror's Assent--What Constitutes, Paul D. Farr
Verdict--Juror's Assent--What Constitutes, Paul D. Farr
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Practice And Procedure - Power Of The Court To Increase Inadequate Verdict
Practice And Procedure - Power Of The Court To Increase Inadequate Verdict
Michigan Law Review
With the development of the remittitur in the case of excessive verdicts, one would naturally expect the development of an analogous device for cases wherein the verdicts are inadequate. When the plaintiff moves for a new trial because of an inadequate verdict, a denial of the motion on the condition that the defendant agree to a certain increase in the verdict is perfectly analogous to the remittitur in form. But this device has not received the same wide acceptance as its counterpart. In cases in which the plaintiff has appealed this device has been condemned, while it has been approved …
Federal Practice -Appeal And Error - Review Of Denial Of Motion For New Trial
Federal Practice -Appeal And Error - Review Of Denial Of Motion For New Trial
Michigan Law Review
The federal appellate courts have, in a great many decisions, refused to review the denial of a motion for a new trial made in a lower federal court. The very recent case of Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. once again presents the problem, and Justice Brandeis, writing the majority opinion, follows the prior holdings. In this very excellent opinion the learned Justice presents the reasons for the result generally reached, and enumerates some of the exceptions in a manner which should tend to clarify much of the doubt which has existed in this field of appellate jurisdiction.
New Rules Of The Supreme Court, Bernard C. Gavit
New Rules Of The Supreme Court, Bernard C. Gavit
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pleading-Appeal And Error Reversal Because Of Erroneous Overruling Of Demurrer
Pleading-Appeal And Error Reversal Because Of Erroneous Overruling Of Demurrer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Prosecution Appeals In West Virginia, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Prosecution Appeals In West Virginia, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Dartmouth College Case -- Then And Now, Hugh Evander Willis
The Dartmouth College Case -- Then And Now, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. United States Supreme Court Service, Ralph F. Fuchs
Book Review. United States Supreme Court Service, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.