Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3524)
- Judges (3114)
- Criminal Law (2374)
- Criminal Procedure (2067)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2046)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2042)
- Jurisprudence (1661)
- Legal Profession (1656)
- Administrative Law (1513)
- Civil Procedure (1471)
- Litigation (1445)
- Legislation (1444)
- Jurisdiction (1299)
- Law and Society (1209)
- Civil Law (1192)
- Human Rights Law (1190)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1180)
- International Law (1158)
- Legal History (1138)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (963)
- Rule of Law (958)
- Business Organizations Law (942)
- Natural Resources Law (937)
- Law and Politics (930)
- Legal Education (902)
- Conflict of Laws (882)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (823)
- Internet Law (819)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (871)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
- University of Richmond (688)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (565)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (546)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (317)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (304)
- University of Georgia School of Law (287)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (257)
- American University Washington College of Law (233)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (152)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1038)
- Supreme Court (745)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (466)
- Judges (460)
-
- Constitution (380)
- Jurisdiction (303)
- Judicial review (302)
- State courts (285)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (194)
- Litigation (194)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- First Amendment (142)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Faculty Scholarship (682)
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
-
- Articles (521)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (426)
- Faculty Publications (402)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (261)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (191)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 15361 - 15390 of 16296
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Changes Suggested In Washington Practice And Procedure: Comparative Analysis Of State Rules And Statutes With New Federal Rules Points To Desirable Amendments, George Donworth, Laurence B. Hamblen, Elwood Hutcheson, John S. Robinson
Changes Suggested In Washington Practice And Procedure: Comparative Analysis Of State Rules And Statutes With New Federal Rules Points To Desirable Amendments, George Donworth, Laurence B. Hamblen, Elwood Hutcheson, John S. Robinson
Washington Law Review
In accordance with action taken at the July Convention of the Washington State Bar Association, the Board of Governors appointed a committee (Paul P. Ashley of Seattle, chairman) on Judicial Administration to concern itself with the matters considered and reported upon by the section on Judicial Administration of the American Bar Association. This committee divided itself into sections, and to each was assigned one of the subjects under consideration, including Pre-trial Procedure, Improvement in the Law of Evidence, Trial Practice and Administrative Agencies and Tribunals. Among other things the American Bar Association recommended that the State Bar Associations undertake to …
Principal And Agent - Extent To Which An Agent May Testify As To The Existence Of The Agency, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Principal And Agent - Extent To Which An Agent May Testify As To The Existence Of The Agency, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The legal concept that opinions of lay witnesses are not admissible evidence is of comparatively recent origin, and a matter of historical accident. The theory underlying the exclusion of opinions of laymen is not one of qualification, but of policy. If the witness testifies as to the facts, his opinion or inference is superfluous, as it is the function of the jury to draw the inferences. The testimony of the agent to the existence of the agency relation is limited by this general rule. It is the purpose of this discussion to determine the line of demarcation between opinion and …
Prohibition - Is The Writ Of Prohibition A Prerogative Writ?, Russel T. Walker
Prohibition - Is The Writ Of Prohibition A Prerogative Writ?, Russel T. Walker
Michigan Law Review
The writ of prohibition originally issued from the king's temporal courts to the ecclesiastical courts to prevent any usurpation of jurisdiction of the king's courts by the spiritual courts. Prohibition has been classed as one of the prerogative writs, that is, a writ issued by the extraordinary power of the sovereign to interfere with private rights in order to preserve the prerogatives and franchises of the state. The writ of prohibition differed historically from the other prerogative writs in that its issuance was not discretionary with the court, but rather it was held to issue as a matter of right …
International Law And Democracy, Wallace Mcclure
International Law And Democracy, Wallace Mcclure
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trials And New Trials Under The New Federal Rules, William H. Wicker
Trials And New Trials Under The New Federal Rules, William H. Wicker
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules Ii, Charles E. Clark
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules Ii, Charles E. Clark
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Friday Evening, October 28, 1939, Dinner And Evening Session
Friday Evening, October 28, 1939, Dinner And Evening Session
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pre-Trial Procedure, Edward R. Finch
Adaptation Of Program Of Procedural Reform To Tennessee Practice, Walter P. Armstrong
Adaptation Of Program Of Procedural Reform To Tennessee Practice, Walter P. Armstrong
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speeding Up The Courts, Edward R. Finch
Symposium On The Movement For The Simplification Of Legal Procedure, Charles S. Coffey
Symposium On The Movement For The Simplification Of Legal Procedure, Charles S. Coffey
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules I, Charles E. Clark
Fundamental Changes Effected By The New Federal Rules I, Charles E. Clark
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Versus Discretion In Government, Marvin B. Rosenberry
Law Versus Discretion In Government, Marvin B. Rosenberry
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Appellate Procedure, Burke G. Slaymaker
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Appellate Procedure, Burke G. Slaymaker
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law - Requirements Of "Full Hearing", Collins E. Brooks
Administrative Law - Requirements Of "Full Hearing", Collins E. Brooks
Michigan Law Review
The late Professor Ernst Freund once wrote, "A judicial hearing involves two things: that the party be heard as to his own case and that he hear the case against him." Were the words "quasi-judicial" to be substituted for the word "judicial" in Dr. Freund's definition, it would be difficult more concisely to paraphrase the two decisions of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Morgan v. United States. Fifty suits, later consolidated for purposes of trial, were started by certain market agencies of the Kansas City Stockyards to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the …
Work Of The Louisiana Supreme Court, 1937-38 Term: Criminal Law And Procedure, Jerome Hall
Work Of The Louisiana Supreme Court, 1937-38 Term: Criminal Law And Procedure, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Practice And Procedure In The Court Of Appeals, Richard C. Stoll, Henry E. Mcelwain, Harry B. Mackoy
Practice And Procedure In The Court Of Appeals, Richard C. Stoll, Henry E. Mcelwain, Harry B. Mackoy
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Courts - Federal Courts - Removal Of Causes - Amendment To Complaint After Removal Reducing Amount In Controversy To Less Than The Jurisdictional Amount, Robert E. Sipes
Courts - Federal Courts - Removal Of Causes - Amendment To Complaint After Removal Reducing Amount In Controversy To Less Than The Jurisdictional Amount, Robert E. Sipes
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant's timely petition the suit was removed to the United States District Court. Plaintiff then amended his pleadings by filing particulars of his claim which reduced the amount recoverable below the jurisdictional amount. On a writ of certiorari it was held that the jurisdiction of the district court was not defeated by the amendment reducing the amount claimed to below the jurisdictional amount. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 58 S. Ct. 586 (1938).
The Indiana Magistrates Court Act, James J. Robinson
The Indiana Magistrates Court Act, James J. Robinson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Proceedings Of The Fifty-Seventh Annual Session Of The Bar Association Of Tennessee
Proceedings Of The Fifty-Seventh Annual Session Of The Bar Association Of Tennessee
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Pre-Trial Procedure, Albert H. Cole
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Pre-Trial Procedure, Albert H. Cole
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Appeal And Error-Jury Trial-Power Of Appellate Court To Reverse And Enter Final Judgement Without Granting A New Trial
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Limitation Of Actions - Contempt Proceedings, Menefee D. Blackwell
Limitation Of Actions - Contempt Proceedings, Menefee D. Blackwell
Michigan Law Review
The application of statutes of limitation to proceedings for criminal or civil contempt involves some obscurity and confusion in the modern cases. Legislation has rarely provided expressly for the limitation of contempt proceedings, and their hybrid character has made it difficult to rely with confidence on analogies. The modern tendency of courts has been to differentiate between criminal and civil contempts for many purposes. While the tests for distinguishing civil and criminal proceedings are not yet clear, it seems that the application of limitation acts depends very largely on this distinction.
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Trial Procedure, Arthur L. Gilliom
Rules For Civil Procedure In The United States District Courts: Trial Procedure, Arthur L. Gilliom
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Briefs Improved Under New Rule: "Statements Of Questions Involved" Effectively Used During September Term, Although Some Misunderstanding Remains, Anon
Washington Law Review
A survey by this journal of briefs filed in the September term of court under this new subsection of Rule 16 indicates that while the purpose and effect of this rule are well understood and properly applied by the majority of appellants presenting briefs during the current term of the Supreme Court, a considerable number of brief writers did not employ this rule as properly and usefully in the interest of their clients and of the understanding of the court as might have been hoped. Some lawyers apparently did not make use of their opportunity to study the preliminary explanation …
The Development And Evaluation Of Judicial Review [Part 3], C. Perry Patterson
The Development And Evaluation Of Judicial Review [Part 3], C. Perry Patterson
Washington Law Review
This Is the concluding portion of Mr. Patterson's continued article. The first portion, in the Journal for January, 1938, covered the background of the theory of judicial review in the Federal Constitution. In the April issue he indicated the manner of incorporating the principle in the Constitution, and in the current installment he shows the wide use of judicial review and discusses its significance.
What Shall The Trial Judge Tell The Jury About Presumptions?, Charles T. Mccormick
What Shall The Trial Judge Tell The Jury About Presumptions?, Charles T. Mccormick
Washington Law Review
I have been asked to add a comment upon the subject of presumptions, comprehensively dealt with in a recent article in this review. My discussion will be summary and selective, and will be devoted to certain practical questions suggested by a late decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and by some recent cases in the Supreme Court of Washington. These questions relate to the manner in which the trial judge shall deal in his instructions with such presumptions as may have arisen from the evidence in the case.