Courts Commons^™

Federal Courts - Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure - Rule 12(E) - Motion For Bill Of Particulars, Oliver B. Crager

Michigan Law Review

The United States brought an action against defendants, movie distributors and producers, for alleged conspiracies and monopolies in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Defendants moved for a more definite statement or a bill of particulars under federal rule 12 (e). Held, bill of particulars allowed as to demands seeking ultimate facts, denied as to demands seeking evidentiary matter. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, (D. C. N. Y. 1940) 1 F. R. D. 205.

Evidence - Photographs - Admission To Show Physical Condition Of Person, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff's daughter was killed by the wrongful act of defendant. In a suit to recover for pecuniary injury through loss of financial aid, a photograph of decedent (a pretty girl) was introduced and admitted over objections of defendant that the photograph could serve no purpose relative to the issues, but would excite the sympathy of the jury to the prejudice of the defendant. Held, that no error was committed in admitting the photograph since the decedent's probable contributions for the benefit of her parents depended largely upon "the kind of a girl she was" and the photograph was some …

Criminal Law And Procedure - Remedies Available To Convicted Defendant When New Facts Are Found, Smith Warder

Michigan Law Review

Due to its haphazard growth and evolution, the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence occasionally left gaping defects in its general contours. Many of these defects have been and are being filled, both by statute and by the continuing development of the common law. However, there is one case which re-occurs with distressing frequency where no satisfactory remedy has been developed and where this lack of remedy can have unjust or even barbaric results.

Courts Power To Compensate Attorneys

Indiana Law Journal

Notes and Comments: Constitutional Law

"The Syllabus Is The Law"--Another Word, Thomas P. Hardman

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In Local Procedure, Leo Carlin

West Virginia Law Review

The Supreme Court of Appeals of this state, in three recent eases, two at law and one in equity, has prescribed or suggested what many West Virginia practitioners may consider innovations affecting three very ordinary matters of practice in this jurisdiction. Two of these cases, dealing, respectively, with the manner in which failure of consideration may be asserted as a defense and the necessity of process upon a cross-bill answer, are actual adjudications. One, indicating certain circumstances under which it is deemed the Statute of Frauds should be pleaded specially, contains only dicta so far as that particular question is …

Federal Courts - Decisions Of State Intermediate Courts As State Law To Be Applied By Federal Courts, Spencer E. Irons

Michigan Law Review

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a federal district court in Ohio was not bound by a decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals to the effect that in a case of wrongful transfer of shares of stock, a demand and refusal was necessary to start the statute of limitations running. On certiorari, held, that, in ascertaining what the state law is, lower state court decisions are data which are not to be disregarded by a federal court, unless it is convinced by other persuasive data that the highest court of the state …

The Doctrine Of Judicial Review And Its Relation To A Declared Purpose Or Policy Of A Statute, Theodore S. Cox

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The University Of Tennessee College Of Law, James D. Hoskins

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Lawyer's Responsibility In A National Emergency, Louis B. Nichols

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legal Service For The Indigent, John S. Bradway

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Proceedings Of The Law Institute On The Economic Status Of The Legal Profession

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Uncovered Needs For Legal Service, Karl N. Llewellyn

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Problem Of Overcrowding: A Call For Imagination, Experimentation And Organization, Lloyd K. Garrison

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Students Section - Notes And Recent Cases

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legal Economics And The Press, Edward J. Meeman

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Regulating Procedure By Rules Of Court In West Virginia, Harry Scherr Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Contempt--Power Of Chancery To Punish, W. H. S.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Appeal And Error - Order Granting A New Trial As An Appealable Order, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict was returned plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial claiming misconduct on the part of the jury. The trial court granted the motion and the defendant appealed. Held, the granting of a motion for a new trial is not a final order and, therefore, not subject to review, except in cases where it clearly appears from the record that the trial court has abused its discretion in granting the motion. Petro v. Donner, 137 Ohio St. 168, 28 N. E. …

Some Public Reactions To Procedural Methods, Michael L. Fansler

Indiana Law Journal

An address delivered by Judge Michael L. Fansler of the Indiana Supreme Court at the mid-winter meeting of the Indiana State Bar Association, January 25, 1941.

"The Syllabus Is The Law", Thomas P. Hardman

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Appeal And Error - Bad Faith Of Counsel As A Basis For Granting A New Trial Where Fact That Defendant Was Insured Was Brought To Attention Of Jury, Raymond H. Rapaport

Michigan Law Review

It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the defendant is covered by indemnity insurance. The reasons for the rule are that the matter of insurance is irrelevant, and that the exposition of its existence is prejudicial. The jury is likely to grant more and larger verdicts for the plaintiff when it is known that an insurance company, rather than the individual defendant being tried, will have to pay the judgment. However, the fact that the defendant is insured reaches the jury in a multitude of ways. While direct evidence of …

Volume 16 (1939-1941)

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Courts - Rules Of Federal Procedure - Production Of Designated Documents And Things Under Rule 34, William C. Wetherbee Jr.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued for damages and loss of profits caused by the unlawful acts of the defendant beginning in January, 1937. Under rule 34 of the new federal rules the defendant moved that the court order the plaintiff to produce its books showing the company's commercial results for the period prior to January 1, 1936; its duplicate federal income tax returns for the years 1934 to 1938; and all copies of statements furnished to any bank or credit company over a period of some five years. Held, motion granted in regard to books of account and duplicate income tax returns …

Jurisdiction Of Employee Suits Under The Fair Labor Standards Act, George W. Crockett Jr.

Michigan Law Review

The statutory authority for employee suits under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is found in section 16(b). Suits under this section have been instituted in both state and federal courts. In practically every case the defendant has, by a motion to dismiss, challenged the jurisdiction of the court. The usual ground for the challenge in the state courts is that such suits seek to recover penalties incurred under a statute of the United States, and are, therefore, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States. The jurisdiction of the federal district courts is generally …

Supreme Court Justice Appointments: Ii, John P. Frank

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Iii, John P. Frank

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles And Politics, John P. Frank

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Advent Of The Administrative Process And Its Future, Thomas Frank Konop

Journal Articles

Every government exercises three governmental powers E that are necessary for its existence. They are Taxation, Police Power, and the Power of Eminent Domain. Every government, however crude, or whatever we may call it, must have the power first to make the law, which is called the legislative power; second, it must have the power to declare what the law is, which is the judicial power; and third, it must have the power to enforce the law and this is called the executive power.

In the very early governments such as the government of the clan or tribe, these three …