Courts Commons^™

"Federal Question" Jurisdiction -- A Snare And A Delusion, Ernest J. London

Michigan Law Review

Poorly defined criteria in the area of jurisdiction are especially wasteful, generating as they often do expensive and protracted litigation over threshold issues, rather than promoting the speedy determination of lawsuits on their merits. One of the most perplexing exercises in American law practice is the effort to define with certainty the original jurisdiction of the lower federal courts in matters where there is no diversity of citizenship. Although this general head of federal jurisdiction has persistently and pervasively been characterized as "federal question" jurisdiction, it is doubtful whether there is, in fact, original jurisdiction in the lower federal courts …

Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court (Pt. 2), Harry L. Wallace

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Advisory Opinions—Present Status And An Evaluation, George Neff Stevens

Washington Law Review

As the term is used in the United States today, an advisory opinion is a formal opinion by a judge or judges of a supreme court, or by a supreme court, in answer to a question of law, submitted by a legislative body or a governor, a council, or a governor and council, of a state, which question is not related to nor concerned with a case or controversy in actual litigation at the time, and which does not involve private rights.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Constitutional Law--Due Process of Law--Constitutionality of the Federal Youth Corrections Act in Its Application to Youthful Criminal Offenders

================================

Constitutional Law--Legislative Power--Infringement of Constitutional Guaranties by Demands of Legislative Investigating Committees for the Production of Membership Lists

================================

Courts--Process--Immunity of Nonresident Defendants in Federal Criminal Actions from Service of State Civil Process

================================

Damages--Installment Verdict in Tort Action

================================

Domestic Relations--Separation--Suit by Mentally Incompetent Wife

================================

Interstate Commerce--Hobbs Act--"Robbery" Provision Construed as Requiring Proof of Common Law Elements of Offense

================================

Taxation--Income--Determination of "Useful Life" of a Business Asset for Purposes of Depreciation

=================================

Taxation--Income--Full Payment of Tax Deficiency as …

Volume 26 (1958-1959)

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Warren Court Under Attack: The Role Of The Judiciary In A Democratic Society, J. Patrick White

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Historical Development Of The Kentucky Courts, William E. Bivin

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Michigan Supreme Court - An Analysis Of Recent Decisions, Frederic F. Brace Jr., James A. Park

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this comment to attempt to determine and evaluate just what the court's role has been. Attention will be directed to selected areas of non-statutory and statutory law, with specific emphasis placed upon the areas of contributory negligence and workmen's compensation.

University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court. Harry L. Wallace, Harry L. Wallace

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The History And Role Of A Supreme Court In A Federal System, Wencelas J. Wagner

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Federal Jurisdiction In Diversity And Related Cases, Wencelas J. Wagner

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Political Questions In The Federal Judiciary -- A Comparative Study, Wencelas J. Wagner

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Original Jurisdiction Of National Supreme Courts, Wencelas J. Wagner

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Foreward, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

The reception accorded the first number of the University of Richmond Law Notes, published last spring, has been most gratifying. It has encouraged the Faculty to prepare this second number, which also is being distributed to all alumni of the Law School through the courtesy of the University of Richmond Law School Association. There has been a modest volume of requests for copies of the first issue from non-alumni members of the bar and from many law libraries.

Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

Rule # 1. Where the injured person has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically unable to remove himself, the defendant is liable if he saw, or should have seen, him [and realized, or ought to have realized, his peril] in time to avert the accident by using reasonable care. 'Rule # 2. Where the plainfiff has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically able to remove himself, but is unconscious of his peril, the defendant is liable only if he saw the plaintiff and realized, or ought …

Recent Decisions, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Lawyers' Obligations To The Courts, Byron O. House

West Virginia Law Review

This paper will concern itself largely with the duty of lawyers to the courts. It is written from the viewpoint of a country lawyer suddenly catapulted from almost thirty years of practice to his state's court of last resort via eight months on the trial bench. These vantage points have afforded an opportunity to observe the lawyer's duty to the courts in various perspectives. With due respect to the learned scholars who have written on the subject, this small contribution is launched.

Constitutional Law - Right To Jury Trial In Indirect Criminal Contempts In Federal Courts, Denis T. Rice S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Should constitutional provisions for jury trial apply to contempts committed outside the physical presence of a federal court? The United States Supreme Court, in the recent case of Green v. United States, reviewed this long disputed question. The case involved two Communist Party leaders who had been convicted of Smith Act violations and then had "jumped bail" when they disappeared in violation of surrender orders requiring their presence in court for sentencing. After four and a half years as fugitives they surrendered in 1956 and were charged with criminal contempt of court. Following a so-called "summary" hearing (without the …

Habeas Corpus - Jurisdiction - Exhaustion Of State Remedies As Prerequisite To Federal Relief, John D. Kelly S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner, a prisoner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania convicted of armed robbery in 1947, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court after several efforts to secure the writ in a state court had been unsuccessful. Jurisdiction was based on exhaustion of available state remedies. The petition alleged that the Commonwealth had violated petitioner's rights under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him the right to be represented by counsel at his trial. The Commonwealth moved to dismiss on the ground that the petition on its face showed that state remedies …

Berman Et Al. V. Minister Of Interior, Moshe Silberg, Yoel Sussman, Alfred Witkon

Translated Opinions

The district of Nahlath Yitzhak consisting of 250 families had for very many years been part of Tel Aviv Municipality. Since 1949 a movement to sever this connection had gathered strength and in 1950 a petition to this end, signed by 353 residents, had been delivered to the Ministry of the Interior. Tel Aviv had claimed that the petitioners were not authorized to speak for all the residents and the matter was left in abeyance until 1956, when it once more became active on the delivery of a similar petition signed by 491 persons. The Minister then appointed a commission …

The Supreme Court: Constitutional Revolution In Retrospect, By Bernard Schwartz, Irving Dilliard

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court In The American Constitutional System: Foreword, Joseph O'Meara

Journal Articles

Our Symposium’s purpose is to examine the function of the Supreme Court and the conditions under which it necessarily operates, and in this way, we hope, to illuminate some of the far-reaching questions which are involved.

The Role Of The Courts In The Application Of The Requirement Of "Residence" For Naturalization

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federal Practice - Venue - Applicability Of General Venue Satute To Defendant Brought Into A Case After Removal From The State Court, Nick E. Yocca S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiffs, citizens of Missouri, originally brought suit in an Alabama state court against D1, a citizen of Virginia, and D2, a citizen of Minnesota, to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident which occurred in Alabama. After defendants had removed to the federal district court, plaintiffs amended their complaint to include D3, a citizen of Florida, service of process having been made in accordance with the Alabama nonresident motorist statute. By special appearance, D3 moved for dismissal because of improper venue. Held, motion granted and cause dismissed as to D3. While the original action was removed from the …

Administrative Law--Scope Of Judicial Review--Substantial Evidence Rule, J. O. F.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Jury - Pre-Trial Selection - Suggested Improvements, Edward B. Stulberg

Michigan Law Review

Over the course of the past twenty years, the desirability of trial by jury has been a subject of constant debate. In contrast, the matter of jury selection has been given little direct attention. Yet it is obvious that if consideration is given to improvements in selection procedure aimed primarily at raising the calibre of the jury panel, disappointment in the judicial process due to the general ineptness of jurors can be decreased. It is true that the fate of a litigant often is entirely within the discretion of the jury. This is not necessarily a reason for the abandonment …

Appellate Review By Extraordinary Writ In Indiana

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Scope Of Judicial Review Of Administrative Action In Washington, Cornelius J. Peck

Washington Law Review

The scope of judicial review of administrative action in the state of Washington is a subject to be approached with caution. The number and variety of statutory review provisions make the possibility of summarizing the law and drawing valid and useful conclusions seem near to impossible. Though some cases quite clearly discuss the factors which affect the scope or intensity of judicial review of particular types of administrative action, other cases in which such analysis is much needed fail to mention or discuss the problem. One is led to wonder whether the law is truly to be found in those …