Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3555)
- Judges (3115)
- Criminal Law (2405)
- Criminal Procedure (2095)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2047)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2042)
- Jurisprudence (1663)
- Legal Profession (1656)
- Administrative Law (1542)
- Civil Procedure (1472)
- Litigation (1446)
- Legislation (1444)
- Jurisdiction (1299)
- Civil Law (1220)
- Human Rights Law (1218)
- Law and Society (1210)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1208)
- International Law (1158)
- Legal History (1139)
- Rule of Law (986)
- Business Organizations Law (970)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (965)
- Natural Resources Law (965)
- Law and Politics (931)
- Legal Education (930)
- Conflict of Laws (910)
- Internet Law (847)
- International Trade Law (830)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (871)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
- University of Richmond (688)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (593)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (546)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (317)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (304)
- University of Georgia School of Law (287)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (257)
- American University Washington College of Law (238)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (152)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1038)
- Supreme Court (746)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (466)
- Judges (460)
-
- Constitution (380)
- Jurisdiction (303)
- Judicial review (302)
- State courts (285)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (194)
- Litigation (194)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- First Amendment (142)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Faculty Scholarship (682)
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
-
- Articles (521)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (454)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Faculty Publications (403)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (261)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (191)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 14251 - 14280 of 16331
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Larry Taylor V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0340
Larry Taylor V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0340
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Attorney's Responsibilities: Adversaries At The Bar Of The Sec, Roberta S. Karmel, Joseph C. Daley
Attorney's Responsibilities: Adversaries At The Bar Of The Sec, Roberta S. Karmel, Joseph C. Daley
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
James Riley Scrivener V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0426
James Riley Scrivener V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0426
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Stella Faye Buckler V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0427
Stella Faye Buckler V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0427
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Wise Steak House V. Emma Goodman And Workmen's Compensation Board, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0352
Wise Steak House V. Emma Goodman And Workmen's Compensation Board, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0352
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Edward F. Thompson, Jr. V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0359
Edward F. Thompson, Jr. V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0359
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Ex El, Department For Natural Resources And Environmental Protection, Et Al V. Morris Stephens, Et Al And Morris Stephens, Et Al V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Ex El, Department For Natural Resources And Environmental Protection, Et Al, Brief 1975-Sc-1050
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Symposium: The Use Of Videotape In The Courtroom, Tom C. Clark
Symposium: The Use Of Videotape In The Courtroom, Tom C. Clark
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Critique - Data In Search Of Theory In Search Of Policy: Behavioral Responses To Videotape In The Courtroom, Gordon Bermant
Critique - Data In Search Of Theory In Search Of Policy: Behavioral Responses To Videotape In The Courtroom, Gordon Bermant
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Opening Pandora's Box: Asking Judges And Attorneys To React To The Videotape Trial, Robert J. Grow, Robert A. Johnson
Opening Pandora's Box: Asking Judges And Attorneys To React To The Videotape Trial, Robert J. Grow, Robert A. Johnson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Larry Taylor V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0340
Larry Taylor V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0340
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Judicial Reform At The Lowest Level: A Model Statute For Small Claims Courts, Robert H. Brownlee, Charles L. Lewis, Gregory J. Moonie, William H. Pickering, Paul C. Deemer, Iii Special Projects Editor
Judicial Reform At The Lowest Level: A Model Statute For Small Claims Courts, Robert H. Brownlee, Charles L. Lewis, Gregory J. Moonie, William H. Pickering, Paul C. Deemer, Iii Special Projects Editor
Vanderbilt Law Review
The purpose of this Special Project is to analyze the development of procedures for adjudicating small claims, with particular emphasis on the State of Tennessee, and to suggest statutory revisions that may be of value in improving the quality of justice at the lowest level of the judicial system. The Project study commences with an historical survey of the origins of small claims theory and the various court attempts to apply the theory that have been made in the United States during the last half-century. The result of this analysis will be a characterization of a model small claims court.The …
The Utah Federal Court's Ban On Sketching Of Courtroom Scenes, M. Dallas Burnett
The Utah Federal Court's Ban On Sketching Of Courtroom Scenes, M. Dallas Burnett
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commonwealth Of Kentucky Department Of Revenue V. Kuhlman Corporation And Kentucky Board Of Tax Appeals, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0113
Commonwealth Of Kentucky Department Of Revenue V. Kuhlman Corporation And Kentucky Board Of Tax Appeals, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0113
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Lee Lawless V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0802
Lee Lawless V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0802
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Post-Conviction Review In The Federal Courts For The Service-Member Not In Custody, Michigan Law Review
Post-Conviction Review In The Federal Courts For The Service-Member Not In Custody, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the availability of nonhabeas federal court review for those convicted by courts-martial. Part I discusses the function of such review and suggests a scope of review that would serve that function without unduly burdening the federal courts; Part II sketches the evolution of nonhabeas review and analyzes the jurisdictional problems surrounding its present status; Part III recommends statutory and judicial changes to make the review of courts-martial more equitable and efficient.
Photographic Evidence: Or, Is A Picture Really Worth A Thousand Words In North Carolina Courtrooms, Robert J. Hensley Jr.
Photographic Evidence: Or, Is A Picture Really Worth A Thousand Words In North Carolina Courtrooms, Robert J. Hensley Jr.
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contribution To An Explication Of The Activity Of The Warren Majority Of The Supreme Court, Mitchell Franklin
Contribution To An Explication Of The Activity Of The Warren Majority Of The Supreme Court, Mitchell Franklin
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Change Of Venue And Statutory Limitations, Curtis O. Harris
Change Of Venue And Statutory Limitations, Curtis O. Harris
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commonwealth Of Kentucky Department Of Revenue V. Kuhlman Corporation And Kentucky Board Of Tax Appeals, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0113
Commonwealth Of Kentucky Department Of Revenue V. Kuhlman Corporation And Kentucky Board Of Tax Appeals, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-0113
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Uncovering "Nondiscernible" Differences: Empirical Research And The Jury-Size Cases, Richard O. Lempert
Uncovering "Nondiscernible" Differences: Empirical Research And The Jury-Size Cases, Richard O. Lempert
Michigan Law Review
My point is not that verdict differences associated with jury size cannot be revealed through careful empirical investigation. Indeed, at several places in this article I will suggest research strategies likely to reveal such differences. Rather, it is that typical strategies of legal-impact research, such as those utilized in the Colgrove real-world studies, are unlikely to uncover differences associated with jury size however well they control for those plausible rival hypotheses that form the usual threats to the validity of impact research. The reason lies in the unamenability of the jury-size problem to the usual techniques of aggregate data analysis.
The Juvenile Court And Emotional Neglect Of Children, James B. Stoetzer
The Juvenile Court And Emotional Neglect Of Children, James B. Stoetzer
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
A primary function of the Juvenile Court is to assist in the protection of children from abuse and neglect. Juvenile court acts, child abuse reporting statutes, and child protective services legislation have incorporated provisions dealing with physical abuse and physical neglect of children. Such legislation enables state intervention into family life for the protection of children exposed to harmful environments. Statutory definitions of abuse and neglect provide a basis on which the community, frequently through the juvenile court, may pass judgment on the existence of child neglect and offer services or coerce family members to accept them. A few states, …
The Expanding Role Of The Juvenile Court In Child Custody Disputes, Katharine T. Bartlett
The Expanding Role Of The Juvenile Court In Child Custody Disputes, Katharine T. Bartlett
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Limiting The Criminal Contempt Power: New Roles For The Prosecutor And The Grand Jury, Richard B. Kuhns
Limiting The Criminal Contempt Power: New Roles For The Prosecutor And The Grand Jury, Richard B. Kuhns
Michigan Law Review
This article will briefly describe the development and scope of the law of criminal contempt, and then tum to the question of whether the current exercise of the power is consistent with the rationale for its existence. The analysis will suggest not only that the answer to this question in many instances is negative, but also that substantial benefits would result from requiring that criminal contempts be treated as ordinary criminal prosecutions.
Administration Of Supporting Services In The Trial Court, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Administration Of Supporting Services In The Trial Court, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judicial Reasoning And Social Change, David Dittfurth
Judicial Reasoning And Social Change, David Dittfurth
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Delinquent And Unruly Proceedings In Ohio: Unconstitutional Adjudications, Patricia Simia Kleri
Juvenile Delinquent And Unruly Proceedings In Ohio: Unconstitutional Adjudications, Patricia Simia Kleri
Cleveland State Law Review
This article will focus on the constitutional defects of juvenile court adjudications under Ohio juvenile law. The arguments presented, however, are equally applicable in other jurisdictions since every state has some type of legislation granting juvenile court jurisdiction over both criminals and noncriminal misconduct of children.
Juvenile Court And Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Juvenile Court And Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Recognizing the near impossibility of changing societal views toward juvenile offenders, many legislators have at- tempted instead to combat the harmful effects of a delinquency adjudication by providing for concealment of juvenile records, on the grounds that such concealment will aid the child's reintegration into society.