Courts Commons^™

The Continuing Diminished Availability Of Federal Habeas Corpus Review To Challenge State Court Judgments: Lehman V. Lycoming County Children's Servies Agency, Ira P. Robbins, Susan M. Newell

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Hearings On Jury Bias Or Misconduct, Ronald J. Bacigal

Law Faculty Publications

In the recent cases of Smith v. Phillips, and Rushen v. Spain, the United States Supreme Court recognized that judicial review of ex parte contacts with a sitting jury may raise a number of separate but interrelated constitutional rights: (1) the right to an impartial jury; (2) the right to a due process post-trial hearing on jury bias; (3) a possible due process right to a mid-trial hearing on jury bias; (4) the defendant's right to be present at such mid· trial hearings; and (5) the right to be represented at such mid-trial hearings. As Justice Stevens noted in his …

Legal Barriers To Worker Participation In Management Decision Making, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Articles

Collective bargaining lies at the heart of the union-management relationship. It is the end and purpose of the whole effort to protect employees against reprisals when they form an organization to represent them in dealing with their employers. Collective bargaining is grounded in the belief that industrial strife will be checked, and the workers' lot bettered, if workers are given an effective voice in determining the conditions of their employment. My thesis is that federal law, even while placing the force of government behind collective bargaining, has so artificially confined its scope that the process has been seriously impeded from …

Rethinking The Substantive Rules For Custody Disputes In Divorce, David L. Chambers

Articles

A few states, mostly in the West and South, still retain a preference in custody disputes for placing young children with their mothers. In most other states, legislatures or courts have replaced the maternal presumption with a rule directing courts to be guided solely by the child's "welfare" or "best interests." A few legislatures have created a new preference for joint custody, directing courts to consider favorably requests by a parent for such arrangements, even over the objection of the other parent. This Article argues that the trend away from the maternal presumption is sensible, but that the current best-interests …

Legislative Formality, Administrative Rationality, Harold H. Bruff

Publications

No abstract provided.

Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun

Publications

No abstract provided.

Playing With Numbers: Determining The Majority Of Judges Required To Grant En Banc Sittings In The United States Court Of Appeals, James J. Wheaton

Faculty Publications

This note addresses the effects that these two interests -- majority control of circuit law and judicial integrity -- have on the appropriate definition of majority. Neither legislative history nor Supreme Court constructions of section 46(c) provide an unambiguous rule, and interpretation of the majority requirement remains within the authority of each circuit. The Judicial Conference of the United States, at its meeting in September 1984, recommended that each circuit clearly describe its en banc voting procedures. This note delineates considerations that may assist the circuit courts in their efforts to outline the method by which they should order en …

Book Review Of Money And Justice: Who Owns The Courts? By Lois G. Forer, Jethro K. Lieberman

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

Records And Archives In Court, Anthony F. Sheppard

All Faculty Publications

In an increasingly litigious society, records and archives frequently become evidence in court. What are the criteria for admitting records in court as evidence, and how might records keepers be called upon to testify in court? These matters will be discussed in the context of federal and provincial law. The author's comments are directed towards these two central issues: The criteria for admitting records in court as evidence, and the status of records keepers called upon to testify in court.

Gates, 'Probable Cause', 'Good Faith', And Beyond, Yale Kamisar

Articles

Illinois v. Gates1 was the most eagerly awaited constitutional-criminal procedure case of the 1982 Term. I think it fair to say, however, that it was awaited a good deal more eagerly by law enforcement officials and the Americans for Effective Law Enforcement than by defense lawyers and the American Civil Liberties Union. As it turned out, of course, the Gates Court, to the disappointment of many, did not reach the question whether the exclusionary rule in search and seizure cases should be modified so as not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment when …

The Place Of Agencies In Government: Separation Of Powers And The Fourth Branch, Peter L. Strauss

Faculty Scholarship

For the past few years the Supreme Court has been struggling with issues of government structure so fundamental that they might have been thought textbook simple, yet with results that seem to imperil the everyday exercise of law-administration. Under what circumstances can Congress assign the adjudication of contested issues in the first instance to tribunals that are not article III courts? The past century has witnessed the profuse growth of legislation assigning to special adjudicative tribunals – administrative agencies and other article I courts – the power to hold trial-type hearings that might otherwise have been placed in the article …

What To Do With The Supreme Courts Burgeoning Calendars?, Milton Handler

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A "Home Run" Application Of Established Principles Of Statutory Construction: U.C.C. Analogies, Donald J. Rapson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Proof Of Injury And Damages In Non-Standardized Product Price-Fixing Class Actions, Nancy R. Heller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court's "Resolution" Of The Tax Accrual Workpapers Controversy, Diana Gillett Plotkin

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Depublication Practice Of The California Supreme Court, Joseph R. Grodin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization Of Disputes And An Empirical Investigation, Neil Vidmar

Faculty Scholarship

In this paper disputes are seen as varying along a dimension of admitted liability, that is, the extent to which defendants admit some obligation to plaintiffs; they may admit no liability, partial liability, or full liability. This conceptualization was used in an empirical study of a small claims court. The results paint a portrait of the court that is at variance with most of the previous literature. Consumer issues constitute a substantial portion of the court caseload. On average, defendants, including individual consumers, do well when they dispute claims. Among disputed cases, small rather than large businesses predominate. Prior literature …

Can Mother Vote In The Union Election? The Board's Authority To Define The Appropriate Bargaining Unit: An Analysis Of Nlrb V. Action Automotive, Inc., Barbara J. Fick

Journal Articles

This article previews the Supreme Court case NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 469 U.S. 490 (1985). The author expected the Court to address whether the NLRB can exclude from the bargaining unit an employee-relative of the owners/managers of a closely held corporation when that employee does not enjoy any special work benefits because of that relationship.

Labor Racketeering And Labor Law: State Regulation V. Federal Rights: An Analysis Of Brown V. Hotel And Restaurant Employees Union Local 54, Barbara J. Fick

Journal Articles

This article previews the Supreme Court case Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, 468 U.S. 491 (1984). The author expected the Court to decide which interest prevails where there is a conflict between New Jersey's regulation of labor unions in order to reduce the influence of organized crime in the labor sector and federally granted rights to organize and bargain collectively.

Withdrawing Jurisdiction From Federal Courts, Charles E. Rice

Journal Articles

Courts today accept two incorrect assumptions when interpreting the federal constitution. First, they assume that the judiciary is the sole branch with the definitive power in interpreting the Constitution. Second, they assume that the Supreme Court's decisions on constitutional interpretation are the law of the land and equal to the language of the Constitution itself. This Article proposes that Congress ought to exercise its removal power of appellate jurisdiction from the federal courts in certain areas of law to limit the Supreme Court’s power in creating law that expands the Constitution, which is mistakenly viewed today with equal stature as …

The Work Of The Court Of Appeals: A Statistical Miscellany

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conflicts Among Circuits And Transfers Within The Federal Judicial System, Richard L. Marcus

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Right Against Self-Incrimination -- "Public Safety" Exception, David C. Williams

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Book Review. From Swift To Erie: An Historical Perspective, Gene R. Shreve

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of The Constitution, The Courts, And Human Rights, Milton R. Konvitz

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Hawaii Tax Held Invalid: Court Decides First Case Of The Term, Patricia D. White

Articles

Aloha Airlines, Inc.

v.

Director of Taxation, State of Hawaii (Docket No. 82-585)

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

v.

Director of Taxation, State of Hawaii (Docket No. 82-566)

Argued October 4. 1983. Decided November 1, 1983

Helicoptieros Nationales De Colombia, S.A. V. Hall, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United States V. Leon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Bose Corp. V. Consumers Union Of United States, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Notice To Class Members Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Representative Action Provision, Thomas Ashby

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Federal courts currently apply different standards concerning the permissibility of notice. Although the Ninth Circuit forbids notice and the Seventh Circuit grants plaintiffs a right to send notice, the Second Circuit permits notice only in appropriate cases. This Note advocates that plaintiffs in FLSA and ADEA actions should be allowed to notify potential class members in appropriate cases. Part I analyzes inherent court powers, statutes, legislative history, and federal policies relating to notice. It concludes that enactment of FLSA and ADEA remedies did not alter the inherent power of federal courts to permit or prohibit notice. On the contrary, only …