Courts Commons^™

Passion For Justice, Martha L. Minow, Elizabeth V. Spelman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Justice's Passion, David Cole

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Court Review Of Arbitrary State Court Decisions, David T. Azrin

Michigan Law Review

Part I of this Note argues that the Thompson, Logan, and Hicks cases can be read narrowly to deal primarily with concern about protecting specific constitutional guarantees such as criminal procedural protections, equal protection guarantees, and first amendment freedoms. Arguably, in order to avoid dealing explicitly with the broader constitutional questions raised by the state decisions, the Court reversed the state decisions as arbitrary interpretations of state law. Part II argues that the rule against arbitrary state decisions suggested by Thompson, Logan, and Hicks is incompatible with federalism because it interferes with states' ability to develop law over state …

Compensation For Regulatory Takings: Finality Of Local Decisionmaking And The Measure Of Compensation, David A. Arrensen

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Family Court: An Historical Survey, Merril Sobie

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

The New York Family Court this year celebrates its twenty-fifth anniversary. Hailed as an "experimental" tribunal, designed to resolve society's most intractable problems, including family dissolution, delinquency and child neglect, the court has been perceived as a radical development which altered the then existing legal rules governing family affairs. The Family Court Act indeed incorporates several creative provisions. But the court's foundations were built upon solid jurisprudential underpinnings, principles which had evolved over the course of the preceding century. Establishment of the court was neither radical nor experimental; in reality, Family Court represents the latest increment in the development of …

Vanessa Redgrave V. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.: A Breach Of Constitutional Dimension, Maria O'Brien

Faculty Scholarship

In Vanessa Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 399 Mass. 93 (1987), the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued an important ruling on the parameters of the Commonwealth's relatively new Civil Rights Act (MCRA)' by answering two questions certified to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The SJC held that MCRA is essentially the state equivalent of 42 U.S.C. §1983 without the federal "state action" requirement.' This article briefly examines the SJC's decision in Redgrave in light of Massachusetts precedent and the vast federal experience with §1983 actions (Section I) and then considers the …

Debating The Constitution, 1787-1788: "This Plan Is Only Recommended', Second Circuit Steering Committee On The Bicentennial Of The U.S. Constitution

Committees

No abstract provided.

Survey Of Recent Developments In Indian Water Law: Litigation And Negotiations, Jeanne S. Whiteing

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

104 pages.

The Wind River Litigation: Quantification And Implementation, Gordon W. Fassett

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

19 pages.

The Wind River Litigation: Effects Of The Wyoming Supreme Court’S Decision On The Wind River Reservation’S Water Use And Implications For Other Reservations’ Water Rights, David M. Dornbusch

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

11 pages.

Instream Flows And Tribal Management Goals: The Flathead Indian Reservation Litigation, Daniel F. Decker

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

6 pages.

Off-Reservation Marketing Of Indian Water, Steven J. Shupe

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

12 pages.

The Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission, Marcia Beebe Rundle

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

27 pages.

Contains references.

Joint Statement Of Department Of Water Resources Of Arizona, Colorado River Board Of California, And Colorado River Commission Of Nevada On House Bill 2642 Before The Committee On Interior And Insular Affairs House Of Representatives, Myron B. Holbert

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

43 pages.

The Industry Perspective: The Pros And Cons Of Mineral Development In Indian Country, William A. White

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

17 pages.

Mineral Leasing In Indian Country, Reid Peyton Chambers

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

9 pages.

Contains footnotes.

Resources Development On Navajo: The Dineh Power Project, Donald R. Wharton

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

42 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Cooperative Agreements Between Tribes And The States, Bernard P. Becker

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

36 pages.

Wildlife Management: State And Tribal Jurisdiction At Umatilla, Douglas Nash

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

11 pages.

Federal Taxation Of Resort Development, Commercial Fishing, And Reindeer, Steven C. Moore

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

5 pages.

Contains references.

Fisheries Management In The Regional And International Contexts: Columbia River Basin, Howard G. Arnett

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

7 pages.

Contains references.

Environmental Regulation On Indian Reservations, B. Kevin Gover

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

45 pages.

Agenda: Natural Resource Development In Indian Country, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Charles F. Wilkinson, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Richard B. Collins.

Indian reservations constitute about 2.5% of all land in the country and 5% of all land in the American West. During the last two decades, Indian natural resources issues have moved to the forefront as tribal governments have dramatically expanded their regulatory programs, judicial systems. and resource development activities. This major symposium will address current developments and assess likely future directions in the areas of tribal, federal, and state regulation; tribal-state intergovernmental agreements; financing; mineral …

The Governmental Context For Development In Indian Country: Modern Tribal Institutions And The Bureau Of Indian Affairs, Susan M. Williams

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

26 pages.

Taxation In Indian Country, Richard B. Collins

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

11 pages.

The Process Of Decision-Making In Tribal Courts, Tom Tso

Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

11 pages.

Beware The Solutions, H. Lee Sarokin

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Appellate Justice Bureaucracy And Scholarship, William M. Richman, William L. Reynolds

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholarship can have an enormous impact on the development of legal doctrine. This Article differs in two respects. First, it focuses not on a single seminal work, but rather on a developing literature authored by a large group of scholars. Second, it attempts to assess the impact of that literature not on the growth of legal theory, but on the development of a single legal institution-the United States Courts of Appeals.

Clarifying A "Pattern" Of Confusion: A Multi-Factor Approach To Civil Rico's Pattern Requirement, Ethan M. Posner

Michigan Law Review

In an attempt to provide some needed definitional clarity and redirect civil RICO toward its intended focus, this Note argues that the federal judiciary should interpret the pattern requirement narrowly, focusing on four basic factors that best demonstrate a prolonged, continuing example of criminal activity. By emphasizing (1) the presence of multiple victims, (2) the duration of the RICO defendant's criminal activity, (3) the number of illicit commercial transactions, and (4) the existence of independent criminal decisions, courts could consistently limit civil RICO to the most pernicious offenders. Part I of this Note will examine judicial interpretations of RICO and …

Substantive Due Process Challenges: Are They Creeping Into Education Under A New Standard Of Review?, Keith Hendricks

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.