Courts Commons^™

Out Of The Morass: The Move To State Funding Of The Arkansas Court System, James D. Gingerich

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Separation Of Law And Equity And The Arkansas Chancery Courts: Historical Anomalies And Political Realities, Morton Gitelman

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Division Of Labor Between Arkansas's Appellate Courts, John J. Watkins

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judges And Legislators: Enhancing The Relationship L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Deanell Reece Tacha

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Grand Jury

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar

Articles

I grieve for my country to say that the administration of the criminal law in all the states in the Union (there may be one or two exceptions) is a disgrace to our civilization.

How To Think About The Federal Commerce Power And Incidentally Rewrite United States V. Lopez, Donald H. Regan

Articles

Almost sixty years after the "revolution" of 1937, we still do not have an adequate theory of the commerce power. The Court was right to abandon the theory of dual federalism epitomized by Carter v. Carter Coal Co.;' and it has got the right results in the major cases decided since then. But our post-1937 theory, whether before or after Lopez, is a mess. On the one hand, we have a collection of doctrinal rules that, if we take them seriously, allow Congress to do anything it wants under the commerce power. On the other hand, we continue to pay …

The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross

Articles

On Feb. 17, 1992, Jeffrey Dahmer was sentenced to fifteen consecutive terms of life imprisonment for killing and dismembering fifteen young men and boys. Dahmer had been arrested six months earlier, on July 22, 1991. On Jan. 13 he pled guilty to the fifteen murder counts against him, leaving open only the issue of his sanity. Jury selection began two weeks later, and the trial proper started on Jan. 30. The jury heard two weeks of horrifying testimony about murder, mutilation and necrophilia; they deliberated for five hours before finding that Dahmer was sane when he committed thos crimes. After …

Re-Evaluating Federal Civil Justice Reform In Montana,, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

Part I of this piece initially affords an update of relevant developments relating to civil justice reform nationally and in the Montana Federal District Court. It emphasizes the congressional decision to extend the deadlines governing analysis of experimentation in the pilot districts and recent developments that led the Montana district to delay the preparation of a written annual assessment. Part II of this paper then glances into the future.

A Salute To Judge William W. Schwarzer, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

Tribute to Senior United States District Judge William W. Schwarzer upon his retirement as Director of the Federal Judicial Center

The Judicial Amendments Act Of 1994, Carl W. Tobias, Margaret L. Sanner

Law Faculty Publications

This 1995 essay briefly examines the Judicial Amendments Act of 1994 in an attempt to familiarize federal court judges, lawyers and parties, as well as other individuals and entities that may be interested in the operations of the courts, with the enactment.

Political Correctness In Jury Selection, George P. Fletcher

Faculty Scholarship

The values of equality and freedom are in constant tension, or so some think. The more society stresses equality, the less freedom people have. For example, Bruce Ackerman would abolish inheritance in his utopian society to insure that every generation begins on an equal footing. Many commentators have advocated restrictions on pornography and hate speech in order to protect the likely targets of these traditionally protected uses of free speech. Additionally, Catharine MacKinnon has invoked the principle of equality in the form of protecting disempowered minorities to argue for a restriction on liberty and freedom. Conversely, the more economic freedom …

The Identity Of The Constitutional Subject, Michel Rosenfeld

Cardozo Law Review

The identity of the constitutional subject is elusive and problematic as uncontroverted foundations are hard to come by in contemporary constitutional regimes. The notion of the constitutional subject is itself ambiguous because it is not clear whether it refers to those subject to the constitution, or to the makers of the constitution, or to the subject matter of the constitution. Moreover, even if the who or what of the constitutional subject were settled, the concept of constitutional identity would still be fraught with difficulties. Not only is constitutional identity likely to change over time, but it is also likely to …

Politcs And The Courts: A Positive Theory Of Judicial Doctrine And The Rule Of Law, Mathew D. Mccubbins, Roger G. Noll, Barry R. Weingast

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Are Litigating Attorneys Debt Collectors Under The Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?, Tang Thi Thanh Trai Le

Journal Articles

In 1986 Congress amended the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to include attorneys under the definition of debt collector. Now the Supreme Court is asked to determine if the law applies to attorneys suing debtors on behalf of clients, not just when they conduct debt-collection activities.

If the Supreme Court affirms the decision of the Seventh Circuit, thus finding for Jenkins, attorneys who litigate cases involving collection of debts may find themselves subject to liability for communications with the consumer or the consumer's attorney regarding the litigation. Furthermore, these attorneys would face personal liability for any violations of the Act …

An Independent Contractor Speaks His Mind: Can He Lose His Government Contract? An Analysis Of Heiser V. Umbehr, Barbara J. Fick

Journal Articles

This article previews the Supreme Court case Heiser v. Umbehr, 515 U.S. 1172 (1995). The author expected the Court to consider whether, and to what extent, a governmental unit can take into account an independent contractor's poltical speech in making decisions regarding the award or termination of government contracts.

Judiciary Reform: Recent Improvements In Federal Judicial Administration L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Harlington Wood, Jr.

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Caseload In U.S. District Courts: More Than Meets The Eye L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , David L. Cook, Steven R. Schlesinger, Thomas J. Bak, William T. Rule

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Study In Contrasts: The Ability Of The Federal Judiciary To Change Its Adjudicative And Administrative Structures, A L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Charles W. Nihan

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Playing The Zone And Controlling The Board: The Emerging Jurisdictional Consensus And The Court Of International Trade A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Court , Scott H. Segal, Stephen J. Orava

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Loyalty, Gratitude, And The Federal Judiciary , Laura E. Little

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tax Cases Of The Federal Circuit In 1994 A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Court , Janet Spragens

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Review. The Supreme Court And Constitutional Theory: 1953-1993, Donald H. Gjerdingen

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Stuck Inside The Heartland With Those Coastline Clerking Blues Again, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, Circuit Judge Edward Becker, and Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi deserve kudos for helping to craft, implement, and publicize an efficacious solution to the increasing difficulties engendered by the selection of federal judicial law clerks. The jurists' essay, The Federal Judicial Law Clerk Hiring Problem and the Modest March 1 Solution, which recently appeared in the Yale Law Journal, is a must read for all those who participate in the process of law clerk hiring.

The concerted efforts of Justice Breyer and Judges Becker and Calabresi have apparently succeeded in bringing considerable order out of chaos, …

The Impoverished Idea Of Circuit-Splitting, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

Senators representing every state in the latest iteration of the projected Twelfth Circuit recently revived the idea by introducing Senate Bill 956, a proposal that closely resembles a measure debated by Congress in 1990. The new bill's sponsors contend that certain factors, principally the Ninth Circuit's substantial size and burgeoning docket, have now made division of the court imperative.

This Article initially describes the origins and development of the proposed legislation. It then assesses the measure and arguments for and against dividing the Ninth Circuit. I find that there is no greater need for bifurcation now than before and that …

Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

In President Bill Clinton's first year of service, he nominated unprecedented numbers and percentages of highly qualified women and minorities to the federal judiciary. The Clinton Administration correspondingly employed an effective process for choosing potential jurists that generated relatively little controversy.

Some wondered whether President Clinton could improve his first year judicial selection record during his second year in office, especially given the number of international conflicts and pressing domestic matters that faced the Administration. These complications threatened to deflect the Administration's attention from naming judges.

Now that the 103d Congress has adjourned and President Clinton has reached mid-term, the …

From Advocacy To Management In Divorce: A Women's Issue?, Mavis Maclean

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article examines the shift in the role of law in divorce proceedings in the U.K., arguing that divorce is increasingly moving away from legal advocacy and toward administrative and managerial processes. This transformation raises critical questions about the implications for women, particularly regarding their access to justice, financial rights, and the role of legal professionals. The article highlights the growing influence of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and the Child Support Agency (CSA), which are reshaping how divorce, child support, and property disputes are handled, often reducing the involvement of courts and lawyers.

The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil

LLM Theses and Essays

Under the American approach to criminal justice, freedom of the individual is of the utmost importance. The American criminal justice system reflects a distrust of abuse of power and an emphasis on protection of personal freedom. However, the French take a contrary approach; under French law, freedom is achieved through the State. This paper examines the protection of individuals’ rights in American and French criminal procedure. Focus will be given to tracking the police investigatory powers in each country through searches and seizures, and the impact that those powers have on individuals’ rights. This paper will assert that the police …

Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi

Publications

No abstract provided.

Lesnick V. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. - The Pure Stream Of Commerce No Longer Flows Through The Fourth Circuit, Lori Elizabeth Jones

University of Richmond Law Review

Personal jurisdiction over nonresidents in a forum state has been problematic in our federal system for quite some time. Today, in order to establish personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, the nonresident must have minimum contacts with the forum state. While the test may be stated succinctly, determining whether a person or corporation has minimum contacts with the forum state is an extremely complex process, as seen in the line of personal jurisdiction cases following International Shoe Co. v. Washington.