Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3844)
- Judges (3123)
- Criminal Law (2687)
- Criminal Procedure (2373)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2053)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2046)
- Administrative Law (1823)
- Jurisprudence (1674)
- Legal Profession (1657)
- Human Rights Law (1499)
- Civil Law (1498)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1486)
- Civil Procedure (1480)
- Legislation (1449)
- Litigation (1448)
- Jurisdiction (1303)
- Rule of Law (1267)
- Business Organizations Law (1246)
- Natural Resources Law (1240)
- Law and Society (1223)
- Legal Education (1206)
- Conflict of Laws (1185)
- International Law (1161)
- Legal History (1149)
- Internet Law (1122)
- International Trade Law (1105)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1075)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1048)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (872)
- Universitas Indonesia (870)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
-
- University of Richmond (688)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (549)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (318)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (305)
- University of Georgia School of Law (288)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (258)
- American University Washington College of Law (238)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (160)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (156)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1042)
- Supreme Court (746)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (467)
- Judges (461)
-
- Constitution (381)
- Jurisdiction (305)
- Judicial review (303)
- State courts (286)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (195)
- Litigation (195)
- Constitutional Law (193)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (144)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (731)
- Faculty Scholarship (687)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
- Articles (524)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Faculty Publications (406)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (262)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (192)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 10831 - 10860 of 16641
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can New York's New Commercial Division Resolve Business Disputes As Well As Anyone?, Robert L. Haig
Can New York's New Commercial Division Resolve Business Disputes As Well As Anyone?, Robert L. Haig
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The More Things Change…: Superficial State Constitutional Analysis At The New York Court Of Appeals, James A. Gardner
The More Things Change…: Superficial State Constitutional Analysis At The New York Court Of Appeals, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
A plurality on the Supreme Court seeks to establish a state-sovereignty based theory of federalism that imposes sharp limitations on Congress's legislative powers. Using history as authority, they admonish a return to the constitutional "first principles" of the Founders. These "first principles," in their view, attribute all governmental authority to "the consent of the people of each individual state, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole." Because the people of each state are the source of all governmental power, they maintain, "where the Constitution is silent about the exercise of a particular power-that is, …
Federal Use Of State Institutions In The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Paul D. Carrington
Federal Use Of State Institutions In The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Paul D. Carrington
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Double Jeopardy Dilemma: Does Criminal Prosecution And Civil Forfeiture In Separate Proceedings Violate The Double Jeopardy Clause?, Jimmy Gurulé
Journal Articles
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics dealer filed a motion to dismiss his criminal sentence on the grounds that it had violated the double jeopardy clause because he had already received a civil forfeiture judgment for the same crime. The second case, US v. $405,089.23, involves a similar situation, with a convicted felon filing a motion to dismiss his civil forfeiture case on the grounds that he had received a criminal sentence for the same crime earlier. The article argues that the two cases are significant because the …
How To Count To Fifteen: Determining The Jurisdictional Scope Of Title Vii: An Analysis Of Walters V. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises Inc., Barbara J. Fick
How To Count To Fifteen: Determining The Jurisdictional Scope Of Title Vii: An Analysis Of Walters V. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises Inc., Barbara J. Fick
Journal Articles
This article previews the Supreme Court case Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc., 519 U.S. 202 (1997). The author expected the Court to consider how the number of employees of a particular employer should be counted for for purposes of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Shopping For A Venue: The Need For More Limits On Choice, Kimberly Jade Norwood
Shopping For A Venue: The Need For More Limits On Choice, Kimberly Jade Norwood
Scholarship@WashULaw
In an earlier article, Professor Norwood questioned the wisdom of the Supreme Court's decision in Ferens v. John Deere Co., which allows plaintiffs to double forum-shop, i.e., to file a lawsuit in one jurisdiction and then, while retaining the advantages of that jurisdiction's laws, to transfer the lawsuit to the geographically preferred jurisdiction. There, Professor Norwood assumed that having choices about where to file lawsuits was a necessary component of America's judicial system. Below, however, Professor Norwood explores that assumption and concludes that parties should not have the unrestricted choices seemingly provided by most venue laws.
Service Of U.S. Punitive Damages Complaint Passes Constitutional Muster In Germany, Ingrid L. Lenhardt
Service Of U.S. Punitive Damages Complaint Passes Constitutional Muster In Germany, Ingrid L. Lenhardt
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In today's global market, disputes between U.S. and foreign parties have become a common occurrence. Courts in the United States, as well as other nations, frequently face new and complex international litigation problems. A common problem for many courts centers on the practical, mechanical requirements of bringing a lawsuit.
In this Article, the author examines the service of process of U.S. complaints for punitive damages to residents of Germany. In particular, Ms. Lenhardt analyzes the recent German Constitutional Court's ruling on international service of process. In addition, the author reviews the requirements of the Hague Convention on Service Abroad and …
Corrections Day, John Copeland Nagle
Corrections Day, John Copeland Nagle
Journal Articles
In July 1995, the House of Representatives established a Corrections Day procedure for fixing statutory mistakes. This article traces the history of the corrections day idea, beginning with suggestions offered by Justices Cardozo and Ginsburg many years apart. The article also recounts the early applications of Correction Day by the House. This article describes the problem of statutory mistakes: what they are, and who makes them. It explains that statutory mistakes do exist, regardless of how one defines mistake. Congress, agencies, and the courts all make mistakes, though the responsibility for them ultimately resides with Congress, the author of the …
Don't Try: Civil Jury Verdicts In A System Geared To Settlement, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Don't Try: Civil Jury Verdicts In A System Geared To Settlement, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Articles
If it is true, as we often hear, that we are one of the most litigious societies on earth, it is because of our propensity to sue, not our affinity for trials. Of the hundreds of thousands of civil lawsuits that are filed each year in America, the great majority are settled; of those that are not settled, most are ultimately dismissed by the plaintiffs or by the courts; only a few percent are tried to a jury or a judge. This is no accident. We prefer settlements and have designed a system of civil justice that embodies and expresses …
The Myth Of Testamentary Freedom, Melanie B. Leslie