Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3844)
- Judges (3123)
- Criminal Law (2687)
- Criminal Procedure (2373)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2054)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2046)
- Administrative Law (1823)
- Jurisprudence (1674)
- Legal Profession (1657)
- Civil Law (1499)
- Human Rights Law (1499)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1486)
- Civil Procedure (1481)
- Litigation (1450)
- Legislation (1449)
- Jurisdiction (1304)
- Rule of Law (1267)
- Business Organizations Law (1246)
- Natural Resources Law (1240)
- Law and Society (1223)
- Legal Education (1206)
- Conflict of Laws (1185)
- International Law (1161)
- Legal History (1150)
- Internet Law (1122)
- International Trade Law (1105)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1075)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1048)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1724)
- University of Kentucky (1389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (872)
- Universitas Indonesia (870)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (834)
-
- University of Richmond (688)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (559)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (549)
- University of Colorado Law School (447)
- Pepperdine University (382)
- Seattle University School of Law (362)
- William & Mary Law School (328)
- Notre Dame Law School (318)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (305)
- University of Georgia School of Law (288)
- UIC School of Law (277)
- Brigham Young University Law School (259)
- Duke Law (258)
- American University Washington College of Law (240)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (230)
- Georgetown University Law Center (217)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (199)
- New York Law School (195)
- Roger Williams University (163)
- Cleveland State University (160)
- Fordham Law School (160)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (156)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (150)
- West Virginia University (147)
- Brooklyn Law School (145)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (1042)
- Supreme Court (746)
- United States Supreme Court (488)
- Federal courts (467)
- Judges (461)
-
- Constitution (381)
- Jurisdiction (305)
- Judicial review (303)
- State courts (286)
- Federal (280)
- Constitutional law (255)
- New York (242)
- Congress (227)
- Due process (195)
- Litigation (195)
- Constitutional Law (193)
- Jurisprudence (178)
- Court (177)
- United States (177)
- Juries (175)
- Evidence (168)
- Federal Courts (167)
- State (163)
- Separation of powers (153)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (144)
- Judiciary (143)
- Law (143)
- Law reform (143)
- Discrimination (139)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (981)
- Michigan Law Review (879)
- Tennessee Law Review (830)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (731)
- Faculty Scholarship (687)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
- Articles (524)
- Touro Law Review (521)
- University of Richmond Law Review (432)
- Faculty Publications (406)
- 1980-1989 (327)
- Seattle University Law Review (288)
- Pepperdine Law Review (269)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (262)
- Law Faculty Publications (237)
- Cardozo Law Review (221)
- UIC Law Review (220)
- Scholarly Works (192)
- BYU Law Review (188)
- Journal Articles (187)
- Faculty Articles (179)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (163)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (149)
- Publications (148)
- West Virginia Law Review (143)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Maine Law Review (128)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (126)
- All Faculty Scholarship (125)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 10591 - 10620 of 16644
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Right To Talk: Has Justice Antonin Scalia Compromised His Objectivity With A Public Remark?, Lloyd B. Snyder
Right To Talk: Has Justice Antonin Scalia Compromised His Objectivity With A Public Remark?, Lloyd B. Snyder
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
With two assisted suicide cases scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court this term, Justice Antonin Scalia already has publicly staked out his position on the issue. While sentiments he expressed in 1990 in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261, are well-known, Scalia told an audience at Catholic University late last year that it is "absolutely plain there is no [constitutional] right to die." Is it proper for sitting judges to make such statements? While no one would deny Scalia his First Amendment right to say what he pleases, that hardly quells concerns about the advisability …
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
History Of The Court Reporter In The Appellate Courts Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
History Of The Court Reporter In The Appellate Courts Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
Law Faculty Publications
States have traditionally published the decisions of their intermediate and highest courts.1 Legal historians, in recent years, have written extensively on the history of court reporting and court reports.2 These historical accounts have revealed that many famous judges and lawyers throughout the country gained prominent reputations stemming from the publishing of their decisions.3 In the "nineteenth century, the development of court reports received attention from the legal community through reviews in many of the leading periodicals of the day."4 By 1900, however, the periodical literature contained only a small number of reviews of individual state reports. …
Please Senator, I Want Some More: The General Assembly Gets An F Form The Derolph Court , Ronald M. Mcmillan
Please Senator, I Want Some More: The General Assembly Gets An F Form The Derolph Court , Ronald M. Mcmillan
Cleveland State Law Review
On March 24, 1997, the Ohio Supreme Court took an important stand against the impoverishment of our state's schools. In DeRolph v. State, the court ruled that a state school funding system violates state constitutional provisions because the state school funding system fails to meet the constitutional mandate to provide a "thorough and efficient" system of public schools. Part II of this Comment will describe the procedural history of the DeRolph matter. Part III will discuss the majority opinion and its rulings on the justiciability of the matter, the inadequacies of Ohio's school funding system, and the history of the …
Federal Courts, Tribal Courts, And Comity: Developing Tribal Judiciaries And Forum Selection, Raymond L. Niblock
Federal Courts, Tribal Courts, And Comity: Developing Tribal Judiciaries And Forum Selection, Raymond L. Niblock
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Peanut Butter And Politics: An Evaluation Of The Separation-Of-Powers Issues In Section 802 Of The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Jennifer A. Puplava
Peanut Butter And Politics: An Evaluation Of The Separation-Of-Powers Issues In Section 802 Of The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Jennifer A. Puplava
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Establishing An International Criminal Court, Michael P. Scharf
The Politics Of Establishing An International Criminal Court, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
Any substantive evaluation of the plan for an international criminal court requires first an understanding of the political currents that underlie the competing proposals. This piece briefly explores the politics of creating a permanent international criminal court. In particular, this comment examines three related issues: (1) the need for an international criminal court, (2) the political obstacles involved in creating such an institution, and (3) the prospects for success in light of these obstacles.
Public Welfare, Supreme Court Monroe County, Brown V. Wing
Public Welfare, Supreme Court Monroe County, Brown V. Wing
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Things Judges Do: State Statutory Interpretation, Judith S. Kaye
Things Judges Do: State Statutory Interpretation, Judith S. Kaye
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Doubts About Our Processes": Richard D. Simons And The Jurisprudence Of Restraint In State Constitutional Analysis, David E. Mccraw
"Doubts About Our Processes": Richard D. Simons And The Jurisprudence Of Restraint In State Constitutional Analysis, David E. Mccraw
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Ballentine V. Koch (Decided October 22, 1996)
Court Of Appeals Ballentine V. Koch (Decided October 22, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dedication To The Honorable Richard D. Simons, Patrick M. Connors
Dedication To The Honorable Richard D. Simons, Patrick M. Connors
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brown V. State Of New York: Judge Simons Says New York State Can Be Held Liable For Money Damages, Eric J. Stockel
Brown V. State Of New York: Judge Simons Says New York State Can Be Held Liable For Money Damages, Eric J. Stockel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gift Or Loan Of State Money, Court Of Appeals Gagliardo V. Dinkins
Gift Or Loan Of State Money, Court Of Appeals Gagliardo V. Dinkins
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ex Post Facto Laws: Supreme Court New York County People V. Griffin (Decided December 5, 1996
Ex Post Facto Laws: Supreme Court New York County People V. Griffin (Decided December 5, 1996
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Trial By Jury, Court Of Appeals People V. Knowles
Right To Trial By Jury, Court Of Appeals People V. Knowles
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Trial By Jury, Court Of Appeals People V. Page
Right To Trial By Jury, Court Of Appeals People V. Page
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Trial By Jury, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Fourth Department People V. Perkins
Right To Trial By Jury, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Fourth Department People V. Perkins
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Gonzalez
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Gonzalez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department, People V. Taylor
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department, People V. Taylor
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Court Of Appeals People V. Siegel
Self-Incrimination, Court Of Appeals People V. Siegel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department People V. Hendricks
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department People V. Hendricks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Centralized Wisdom - Derolph V. State And The Rise Of Judicial Paternalism, Joseph P. Rodgers, John F. Rodgers
Centralized Wisdom - Derolph V. State And The Rise Of Judicial Paternalism, Joseph P. Rodgers, John F. Rodgers
Cleveland State Law Review
This Comment critically evaluates DeRolph v. State and asserts that the supreme court's decision is dangerous precedent, inasmuch as it dispirits the sacrosanct role a legislature assumes in a democratic society and overtly legitimizes judicial policymaking. This Comment suggests the court's vision of a thorough and efficient school system, via more economic parity, ultimately undermines the General Assembly of the State and will not extricate Ohio schools. Part II explores the current system of financing public schools in the State of Ohio. This section will not delve into the minutia that have come to define school finance, but will instead …
Book Review Of Reclaiming The Federal Courts, By Larry W. Yackle., Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Book Review Of Reclaiming The Federal Courts, By Larry W. Yackle., Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Why Mandatory Arbitration May Benefit Workers, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Why Mandatory Arbitration May Benefit Workers, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Would employees-including union employees-be better off with mandatory arbitration, even of statutory employment claims? The answer to this important question should depend less on abstract notions about the importance of statutory claims and the sanctity of the right to a jury trial, and more on a pragmatic assessment of what is likely to be best for the great majority of workers. Employing this type of analysis, which would take into account an overworked, underfunded Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, backlogged court dockets and other practical problems, my view is that most employees might well be better off with mandatory arbitration, provided …
Why Civil Cases Go To Trial: Strategic Bargaining And The Desire For Vindication, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Why Civil Cases Go To Trial: Strategic Bargaining And The Desire For Vindication, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Articles
When negotiations break down and a dispute cannot be settled, attorneys commonly blame their adversaries, often questioning their ethics or their judgment. After interviewing many attorneys, we have come to believe much of the criticism is directed at strategic moves in negotiation. But strategic ploys are not the only reason dispute resolution fails. Rather, our research also suggest that a genuine desire for vindication through trial or other formal process may be very significant in some types of cases where bargaining breaks down.
Choosing Federal Judges In The Second Clinton Administration, Carl W. Tobias
Choosing Federal Judges In The Second Clinton Administration, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
One of the critical responsibilities that the Constitution entrusts to the President of the United States is the appointment of federal judges. The Chief Executive nominates, and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints these officials who enjoy lifetime tenure and must resolve disputes implicating the basic freedoms of America's citizens. President Clinton's careful discharge of this crucial duty may well have yielded the foremost success of his first term in office. When then-Governor Clinton campaigned for the presidency in 1992, he promised to name intelligent judges who possess balanced judicial temperament and evince a commitment to protecting …
Dear President Clinton, Carl W. Tobias
Dear President Clinton, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Professor Tobias offers advice on judicial selection philosophy for the newly reelected President Bill Clinton.