Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Supreme Court of the United States (41)
- Judges (30)
- International Law (26)
- Criminal Law (25)
-
- Jurisprudence (25)
- Legislation (25)
- Criminal Procedure (21)
- Litigation (21)
- Legal History (18)
- Legal Profession (16)
- Jurisdiction (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- Evidence (13)
- Civil Procedure (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Family Law (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Legal Writing and Research (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Military, War, and Peace (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Torts (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (38)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (19)
- UIC School of Law (13)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (13)
-
- Cornell University Law School (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- New York Law School (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- Duke Law (6)
- University of San Diego (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- BLR (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- UC Law SF (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (18)
- Supreme Court advocacy (17)
- Supreme Court (16)
- First Supreme Court arguments (15)
- Judicial review (15)
-
- Problem-solving courts (12)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Congress (9)
- Federal government (9)
- Rehnquist Court (9)
- Judges (7)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Federalism (6)
- Marbury v. Madison (6)
- Treaties (6)
- Congressional Power (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Separation of powers (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Children (4)
- Community justice (4)
- Drug courts (4)
- Due process (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- Government (4)
- Judicial independence (4)
- Problem solving courts (4)
- Sixth Amendment (4)
- Publication
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (24)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Articles (14)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
-
- UIC Law Review (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (10)
- Faculty Publications (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Seattle University Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (5)
- San Diego International Law Journal (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Court Briefs (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (3)
- Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 255
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article argues that while specialized courts, such as drug courts, dealing with defendants charged with crimes are of critical importance, sole or primary reliance on specialized courts are not sufficient. Instead, centralized resources should be available as necessary to all courts in a county or city in which alternatives to incarceration are possible, although not automatic because not all defendants are serviced by specialized court.
Nullification At Work? A Glimpse From The National Center For State Courts Study Of Hung Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans
Nullification At Work? A Glimpse From The National Center For State Courts Study Of Hung Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans
Faculty Publications
In 1998, the National Institute of Justice awarded a grant to the National Center for State Courts ("NCSC") to examine the frequency and various causes of hung juries. One of the factors that the NCSC project staff investigated was jurors' perceptions of the fairness of the law they were asked to apply in felony trials as well as jury and case characteristics that are often associated with jury nullification. The project also asked judges and other court actors to rate the strength of the evidence in the case. Thus, the project enabled researchers to examine jurors' views, the evidence, and …
Sixth Circuit Federal Judicial Selection, Carl W. Tobias
Sixth Circuit Federal Judicial Selection, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Many of the 179 active federal appeals court judgeships authorized by Congress have remained vacant for protracted times. Over the last dozen years, the appellate system has experienced numerous openings, which have generally comprised ten percent of those seats. Particular tribunals' situations have been worse. At various times since 1996, the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits operated without a third of their judges. However, the most egregious and recent illustration is the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Almost half of that court's positions are now empty, while a number …
The Functions Of Justice And Anti-Justice In The Peace-Building Process, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
The Functions Of Justice And Anti-Justice In The Peace-Building Process, Paul Williams, Michael Scharff
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Recently, there has been increasing use of the tool of justice/accountability in the peace-building process. Yet, the norms of justice, while increasingly invoked, is seldom defined in the context of peace-building. To understand the role that justice has played and has the potential of playing in the peace-building process, it is important first to define the norm as well as articulate its functions. This article therefore serves as an introduction to The Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law’s “Role of Justice in Building Peace” Symposium Issue by providing a detailed definitional description of the justice norm. In addition, it …
The Political (Science) Context Of Judging, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Andrew D. Martin
The Political (Science) Context Of Judging, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Andrew D. Martin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Courts: Opportunities And Pitfalls, Donald L. Horowitz
Constitutional Courts: Opportunities And Pitfalls, Donald L. Horowitz
Faculty Scholarship
This memorandum considers how to design constitutional courts to be most effective. With reference to examples such as Hungary, Italy, and Russia, the article examines dimensions including jurisdiction, appointment and tenure, and the effect of judicial declarations of unconstitutionality. The article also examines how a carefully designed and properly limited constitutional court can aid the creation of the rule of law, with specific reference to Afghanistan.
The Dormant Commerce Clause And The Hormones Problem, Donald H. Regan
The Dormant Commerce Clause And The Hormones Problem, Donald H. Regan
Book Chapters
It is obvious that no anti-discrimination regime can stop at forbidding explicit discrimination of the relevant sort. If only explicit discrimination is forbidden, lawmakers who want to discriminate can hide their discriminatory intentions behind facially neutral classifications that are nonetheless chosen because they differentially burden the protected class. So, we must be prepared to invalidate some facially neutral laws that have "discriminatory effect" or, as American lawyers often call it, "disparate impact." On the other hand, we cannot possibly invalidate all laws which have a disparate impact on a protected class; many perfectly reasonable laws adopted for completely innocent purposes …
Thayerian Deference To Congress And Supreme Court Supermajority Rules: Lessons From The Past (Symposium: Congressional Power In The Shadow Of The Rehnquist Court: Strategies For The Future), Evan H. Caminker
Articles
Over the past eight years, the Supreme Court has been unusually aggressive in its exercise ofjudicial review over federal statutes challenged on federalism grounds. Eleven times the Court has invalidated provisions in federal statutes after determining that Congress exceeded the scope of its limited regulatory authority. In ten of the eleven cases, the vote was 5-4 with the identical five-Justice conservative majority (Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) controlling the decision.
How Much Do We Really Know About Race And Juries? A Review Of Social Science Theory And Research, Samuel R. Sommers, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
How Much Do We Really Know About Race And Juries? A Review Of Social Science Theory And Research, Samuel R. Sommers, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
The past decade has witnessed numerous high-profile criminal trials in which controversial verdicts have been attributed to racethe race of the defendant, the racial composition of a jury, an attorney "playing the race card," and so on. A predominantly Black jury's acquittal of O.J. Simpson and White jurors' leniency in the police brutality cases of Rodney King and Amadou Diallo not only sparked public debate, but also led to rioting and violence. In the wake of trials such as these, many have questioned the viability of the American jury system.' More specific questions regarding the influence of race on jury …
Reinforcing Representation: Enforcing The Fourteenth And Fifteenth Amendments In The Rehnquist And Waite Courts, Ellen D. Katz
Reinforcing Representation: Enforcing The Fourteenth And Fifteenth Amendments In The Rehnquist And Waite Courts, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
A large body of academic scholarship accuses the Rehnquist Court of "undoing the Second Reconstruction," just as the Waite Court has long been blamed for facilitating the end of the First. This critique captures much of what is meant by those generally charging the Rehnquist Court with "conservative judicial activism." It posits that the present Court wants to dismantle decades' worth of federal antidiscrimination measures that are aimed at the "reconstruction" of public and private relationships at the local level. It sees the Waite Court as having similarly nullified the civil-rights initiatives enacted by Congress following the Civil War to …
Avoid Bald Men And People With Green Socks? Other Ways To Improve The Voir Dire Process In Jury Selection, Valerie P. Hans, Alayna Jehle
Avoid Bald Men And People With Green Socks? Other Ways To Improve The Voir Dire Process In Jury Selection, Valerie P. Hans, Alayna Jehle
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
During jury selection, many courts adopt a minimal approach to voir dire questions, asking a small number of close-ended questions to groups of prospective jurors and requiring prospective jurors to volunteer their biases. This Article describes research evidence showing that limited voir dire questioning is often ineffective in detecting juror bias. To improve the effectiveness of voir dire, the authors make four recommendations: (1) increase the use of juror questionnaires; (2) incorporate some open-ended questions; (3) expand the types of questions that are asked; and (4) allow attorneys to participate in voir dire.
The Constitutionality Of An Executive Spending Plan, Paul E. Salamanca
The Constitutionality Of An Executive Spending Plan, Paul E. Salamanca
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Operation of government in the absence of appropriations has become relatively common in the United States, particularly when projected expenses exceed projected revenue, making adoption of a budget a difficult task for the legislature. This Article focuses on the budget crisis in the Commonwealth of Kentucky from 2002 through 2003. In Part I, this Article recapitulates the history of the spending plan, including the action filed in Franklin Circuit Court to affirm its constitutionality. In Part II, this Article discusses certain theoretical, historical, and legal principles that inform analysis of the plan. In Part III, it considers certain deviations and …
The Class Action Rule, John Bronsteen, Owen Fiss
The Class Action Rule, John Bronsteen, Owen Fiss
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Thermal Imaging And The Fourth Amendment: The Role Of The Katz Test In The Aftermath Of Kyllo V. United States, Gregory Gomez
Thermal Imaging And The Fourth Amendment: The Role Of The Katz Test In The Aftermath Of Kyllo V. United States, Gregory Gomez
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Advancing U.S. Interests With The International Criminal Court, David J. Scheffer
Advancing U.S. Interests With The International Criminal Court, David J. Scheffer
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
It is a great pleasure to be here in this beautiful lecture hall at Vanderbilt University Law School and to have the opportunity to speak to you this afternoon about the International Criminal Court (ICC). In recent months, one newspaper or magazine article after another, in examining the foreign policy of the current administration and the gulf (which seems to be so pronounced now) between the United States and even its closest allies throughout the rest of the world, has listed a basic set of treaties as being partly explanatory of that gulf. The Kyoto Protocol, for example, is always …
Civil Procedure: Class Certification And The Predominance Requirement Under Oklahoma Section 2023(B)(3), Steven S. Gensler
Civil Procedure: Class Certification And The Predominance Requirement Under Oklahoma Section 2023(B)(3), Steven S. Gensler
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
The Law Is Straight And Narrow, How American Courts Define Families, Elisa Laird
The Law Is Straight And Narrow, How American Courts Define Families, Elisa Laird
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that American law is inherently biased toward traditional heterosexual family structures, creating significant barriers for same-sex couples and non-traditional families seeking legal recognition and rights. The legal system's "straight and narrow" framework often excludes these families from accessing benefits and protections granted to heterosexual families, reflecting deeply entrenched religious and historical influences.
Which Wave Are You? Comments On The Collected Essays From The Seminar "To Do Feminist Legal Theory", Deborah W. Post
Which Wave Are You? Comments On The Collected Essays From The Seminar "To Do Feminist Legal Theory", Deborah W. Post
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article discusses the challenges and opportunities in teaching feminist legal theory to law students, particularly those who may be entering formal education later in life. It highlights the importance of engaging students through innovative teaching methods and fostering critical thinking skills. The author reflects on their own teaching strategies, including the use of Socratic methods and the integration of feminist sensibilities, while acknowledging the risks and criticisms associated with these approaches. The central argument emphasizes the need for a restorative and redistributive vision of justice in legal education.
American Servicemembers' Protection Act Of 2002, Lilian V. Faulhaber
American Servicemembers' Protection Act Of 2002, Lilian V. Faulhaber
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
On July 1, 2002, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ("ICC") entered into force, establishing the first permanent international criminal tribunal. Although seventy-six countries had ratified the Rome Statute by that date, the United States was not among them. Instead, Congress responded to the creation of the ICC by passing a bill sponsored by House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) that Republican legislators had been trying to get through the House and Senate for several years. On August 2, 2002, the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002 ("ASPA") became law. The Act was designed to prevent United States …
Tax Stories And Tax Histories: Is There A Role For History In Shaping Tax Law?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Tax Stories And Tax Histories: Is There A Role For History In Shaping Tax Law?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Reviews
The teaching of law is usually rather ahistorical. Teachers commonly focus on current doctrine and policy debates, discarding on the "garbage pile of history" any law that has been repealed or superseded. And yet, much of law teaching is still based on reading cases. And cases are by definition historical artifacts - they arise from a specific time and place, and reflect a frequently long-gone historical context. Thus, it is hard to imagine a modern law course completely devoid of history, even if the history gets short shrift. A constitutional law course, for example, will likely include some discussion of …
One Inspiring Jury, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
One Inspiring Jury, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Reviews
Americans love to complain about the jury. They complain about being called for jury duty. They complain about jury verdicts in highly publicized cases. They are outraged by the failure to convict "obviously guilty" criminals, such as the police officers in the cases of Rodney King and Amadou Diallo, the Menendez brothers in their first trial, and of course O.J. Simpson. In civil cases, they are appalled when plaintiffs win huge damage awards in "obviously frivolous" lawsuits. Juries are ignorant and uneducated, juries are gullible, juries are swayed by passion and prejudice rather than reason. Criticizing jury verdicts allows us …
Inmate Litigation, Margo Schlanger
Inmate Litigation, Margo Schlanger
Articles
In 1995, prison and jail inmates brought about 40,000 new lawsuits in federal court nearly a fifth of the federal civil docket. Court records evidence a success rate for inmate plaintiffs under fifteen percent. These statistics highlight two qualities long associated with the inmate docket: its volume and the low rate of plaintiffs' success. Then, in 1996, Congress enacted the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which dramatically altered the litigation landscape, restricting inmates' access to federal court in a variety of ways. This Article examines inmate litigation before and after the PLRA. Looking first at the litigation process itself, it …
What Does It Mean To Remain Silent?, Alexis Reed
What Does It Mean To Remain Silent?, Alexis Reed
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Pictures At A Global Exhibition, Noah Leavitt
Pictures At A Global Exhibition, Noah Leavitt
Michigan Journal of International Law
Review of We are the Poors by Ashwin Desai and In America's Court: How a Civil Lawyer Who Likes to Settle Stumbled Into a Criminal Trial by Thomas Geoghegan
Wrongful Convictions And The Accuracy Of The Criminal Justice System, H. Patrick Furman
Wrongful Convictions And The Accuracy Of The Criminal Justice System, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Goldwasser, The Telecom Act, And Reflections On Antitrust Remedies, Philip J. Weiser
Goldwasser, The Telecom Act, And Reflections On Antitrust Remedies, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
No abstract provided.
Protecting The Constitution From The People: Juricentric Restrictions On Section Five Power, Robert C. Post, Reva B. Siegel
Protecting The Constitution From The People: Juricentric Restrictions On Section Five Power, Robert C. Post, Reva B. Siegel
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Federalism And The Public Good: The True Story Behind The Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act, Marci A. Hamilton
Federalism And The Public Good: The True Story Behind The Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act, Marci A. Hamilton
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Cleveland State Law Review
This article focuses on the rules for determining finality and appealability of judgments under section 2505.02 and Ohio R. Civ. P. 54(B). To that end, this article addresses not only the various categories of "final orders" but also the procedural mechanisms by which interlocutory appeals are taken from judgments on one part of a case while the rest of the case remains pending. The objective of this article is two-fold. First and foremost, it provides a resource and guide to appellate practitioners and trial court judges for understanding the "final order rule" and for navigating its various provisions in the …
In Praise Of The Rule Of Law, The Role Of Judges, And The Right To Shop, Nadine Strossen
In Praise Of The Rule Of Law, The Role Of Judges, And The Right To Shop, Nadine Strossen
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.