Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Supreme Court of the United States (41)
- Judges (30)
- International Law (26)
- Criminal Law (25)
-
- Jurisprudence (25)
- Legislation (25)
- Criminal Procedure (21)
- Litigation (21)
- Legal History (18)
- Legal Profession (16)
- Jurisdiction (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- Evidence (13)
- Civil Procedure (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Family Law (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Legal Writing and Research (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Military, War, and Peace (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Torts (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (38)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (19)
- UIC School of Law (13)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (13)
-
- Cornell University Law School (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- New York Law School (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- Duke Law (6)
- University of San Diego (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- BLR (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- UC Law SF (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (18)
- Supreme Court advocacy (17)
- Supreme Court (16)
- First Supreme Court arguments (15)
- Judicial review (15)
-
- Problem-solving courts (12)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Congress (9)
- Federal government (9)
- Rehnquist Court (9)
- Judges (7)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Federalism (6)
- Marbury v. Madison (6)
- Treaties (6)
- Congressional Power (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Separation of powers (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Children (4)
- Community justice (4)
- Drug courts (4)
- Due process (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- Government (4)
- Judicial independence (4)
- Problem solving courts (4)
- Sixth Amendment (4)
- Publication
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (24)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Articles (14)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
-
- UIC Law Review (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (10)
- Faculty Publications (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Seattle University Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (5)
- San Diego International Law Journal (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Court Briefs (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (3)
- Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 180 of 255
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Crawford V. Washington, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford V. Washington, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
On June 9, by granting certiorari in Crawford v. Washington, 02-9410, the Supreme Court signaled its intention to enter once again into the realm of the Confrontation Clause, in which it has found itself deeply perplexed. This time there was a difference, however, because the grant indicated that the Court might be willing to rethink its jurisprudence in this area. Crawford, like Lee v. Illinois, 476 U.S. 530 (1986), and Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999), presents a classic case of what might be called station-house testimony. Michael Crawford was accused of stabbing another man. His wife, Sylvia, was …
Helping The Pro Se Litigant: A Changing Landscape, Paula Hannaford-Agor
Helping The Pro Se Litigant: A Changing Landscape, Paula Hannaford-Agor
Faculty Publications
This article describes how the influx of self-represented litigants has forced many within the court and legal communities to reconsider some of the fundamental premises on which the civil justice system is based and to respond in new and creative ways to changing litigant demands on existing court and legal resources. It focuses on changes to the delivery of legal services to low- and moderate-income people, especially the emergence of “unbundled” legal services, and addresses the practical implications related to the distinction between legal information and legal advice. Finally, it describes how judges and court staff are rethinking the conceptual …
Research On Self-Represented Litigation: Preliminary Results And Methodological Considerations, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Nicole Mott
Research On Self-Represented Litigation: Preliminary Results And Methodological Considerations, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Nicole Mott
Faculty Publications
As various programs for self-represented litigants proliferate and costs increase, funding agencies are beginning to demand that programs demonstrate their effectiveness through empirical evaluation. This article recounts some of the lessons learned from a National Center for State Courts' research project on improving access to justice for self-represented litigants. First, the article briefly describes the problems faced by courts as a result of the influx of self-represented litigants. The article then describes automated case-level data and litigant self-reported data from five jurisdictions and some preliminary findings. We conclude with a discussion of problems that we encountered in analyzing those data.
Abandoning The Pia Standard: A Comment On Gila V, Galen Lemei
Abandoning The Pia Standard: A Comment On Gila V, Galen Lemei
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Part I of this Note examines the development of Indian reserved water rights, and the practicably irrigable acreage method of quantifying those rights, as defined by the Court. Part II describes the arguments of state and private interests that oppose broad Indian water rights. Part III discusses Gila V, including the Arizona Supreme Court's rationale for abandoning the standard set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court and the standard for quantifying Indian reserved rights that the court applied in its place. Part IV analyzes the Arizona Supreme Court's justifications for abandoning the standard, and considers alternate grounds for the …
Voting And Electoral Politics In The Wisconsin Supreme Court, Jason J. Czarnezki
Voting And Electoral Politics In The Wisconsin Supreme Court, Jason J. Czarnezki
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article examines criminal cases decided by the Wisconsin Supreme Court over a fifteen-year period in an effort to discern whether judicial elections undercut judicial independence by affecting the ways justices vote. Wisconsin was chosen for this study because the state's mix of appointed and elected judges allows a researcher to control for different judicial selection systems. Specifically, this Article questions whether voting patterns may be affected by a justice's proximity to judicial elections, election margins, and whether a justice was appointed or elected in the initial term, since the governor may appoint a justice to fill a vacancy on …
Assessing Clashes And Interplays Of Regines From A Distributive Perspective: Ip Rights Under The Strengthened Embargo Against Cuba And The Agreement On Trips, Robert Dufresne
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article examines the clash of the two regulatory frameworks from the angle of distributive justice. By doing so, I suggest that in addition to the important issues of legitimacy, substantive norms, and hierarchy of legal orders, clashes between potential regulatory frameworks should also be conceptualized in the way in which they allocate goods (here the rights associated with IP) or recognize claims to or interests in such goods. The reasons for being concerned with distributive justice are threefold.
The Creativity Of The Common-Law Judge: The Jurisprudence Of William Mitchell, Charles J. Reid Jr.
The Creativity Of The Common-Law Judge: The Jurisprudence Of William Mitchell, Charles J. Reid Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
Mitchell's presence graced the Minnesota Supreme Court for nearly nineteen years, from 1881 to 1900. His output was prodigious. He produced nearly 1600 judicial opinions. It has been estimated “that excluding Sundays, and allowing a month in each year for vacation, Judge Mitchell wrote one opinion in every three days for nineteen years.” Indeed, “[i]n point of numbers, his opinions exceed those of any other justice of the Supreme Court of his state, or the nation.” It is one aspect, perhaps the central aspect, the unifying theme of this prolific body of work, that is the focus of this essay: …
Foreword, Sam Hanson
Foreword, Sam Hanson
William Mitchell Law Review
Introduction to issue of Recent Decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court (from 2002-03 term).
Alarmism Versus Moderation In Responding To The Rehnquist Court, Mark Tushnet
Alarmism Versus Moderation In Responding To The Rehnquist Court, Mark Tushnet
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Electing The Supreme Court, Barry Friedman, Anna Harvey
Electing The Supreme Court, Barry Friedman, Anna Harvey
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Environmental Law, Congress, And The Court's New Federalism Doctrine, Christopher H. Schroeder
Environmental Law, Congress, And The Court's New Federalism Doctrine, Christopher H. Schroeder
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Congruence And Proportionality For Congressional Enforcement Powers: Cosmetic Change Or Velvet Revolution?, Elisabeth Zoller
Congruence And Proportionality For Congressional Enforcement Powers: Cosmetic Change Or Velvet Revolution?, Elisabeth Zoller
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922), Janet Butler Munch
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922), Janet Butler Munch
Publications and Research
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922) was a judge and NY gubernatorial candidate.
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process And Problem Solving Courts, Eric Lane
Due Process And Problem Solving Courts, Eric Lane
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article addresses the model of the problem-solving courts, beginning with the 1989 Dade County, Florida drug court and the role of the pro-active problem solving judge as presented by Judge Lederman of the Dade County drug court. The article reviews the role of the pro-active problem-solving judge in light of the defendants due process rights. After reviewing several case studies, transcripts, and literature on the issue, the article concludes that problem-solving judging and lawyering need not be in conflict with due process standards.
Theorizing Community Justice Through Community Courts, Jeffrey Fagan, Victoria Malkin
Theorizing Community Justice Through Community Courts, Jeffrey Fagan, Victoria Malkin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article reports on research conducted on the Red Hook Community Justice Center in Brooklyn, New York. It theorizes the structure and process of community justice, focusing on the model offered by community courts and examining how the Red Hook Community Justice Center's development and implementation are products of its immersion in the intersection of societal, spatial, and political dynamic within the Red Hook neighborhood. The article begins by reviewing the sociological perspectives that converge in the historical development of "community justice." It continues by setting forth a framework of social regulation and control that shapes the internal workings of …
Approaches To Statutory Interpretation And Legislative History In France, Claire M. Germain
Approaches To Statutory Interpretation And Legislative History In France, Claire M. Germain
UF Law Faculty Publications
In France, Justice Jackson's question about where to look for the meaning of a statute would be phrased in broader terms and would not be limited to the question of whether to look only at the words of a statute or also at the legislative intent. French law starts from the premise that statutes and codes are the foundations of the legal system in the same way that cases are the foundation of the common-law system. Because of the primacy of written law in France, statutory interpretation lies at the heart of French law. Statutory interpretation is very flexible, and …
Introduction To The Congressional Power In The Shadow Of The Rehnquist Court: Strategies For The Future Symposium
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Sovereignty And Democracy: The States' Obligations To Their Citizens Under Federal Statutory Law, Lauren K. Robel
Sovereignty And Democracy: The States' Obligations To Their Citizens Under Federal Statutory Law, Lauren K. Robel
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Ronald Reagan And The Rehnquist Court On Congressional Power: Presidential Influences On Constitutional Change, Dawn E. Johnsen
Ronald Reagan And The Rehnquist Court On Congressional Power: Presidential Influences On Constitutional Change, Dawn E. Johnsen
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability, And The Role Of Constitutional Norms In Congressional Regulation Of The Courts, Charles G. Geyh
Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability, And The Role Of Constitutional Norms In Congressional Regulation Of The Courts, Charles G. Geyh
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Constricting Remedies: The Rehnquist Judiciary, Congress, And Federal Power, Judith Resnik
Constricting Remedies: The Rehnquist Judiciary, Congress, And Federal Power, Judith Resnik
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Getting Off The Dole: Why The Court Should Abandon Its Spending Doctrine, And How A Too-Clever Congress Could Provoke It To Do So, Lynn A. Baker, Mitchell N. Berman
Getting Off The Dole: Why The Court Should Abandon Its Spending Doctrine, And How A Too-Clever Congress Could Provoke It To Do So, Lynn A. Baker, Mitchell N. Berman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Dialectic And Revolution: Confronting Kelsen And Gadamer On Legal Interpretation, Hans Lindahl
Dialectic And Revolution: Confronting Kelsen And Gadamer On Legal Interpretation, Hans Lindahl
Cardozo Law Review
This paper examines the general structure and conditions of legal interpretation that arise from confronting Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics with a determinate conception of legal interpretation suggested by Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. The Gadamerian question, "What defines legal interpretation as interpretation?", suggests that Kelsen's reference to legal norms as "schemes of interpretation" must be radicalized: a hermeneutic circularity or dialectic is at work in the law, such that the legal interpretation of reality also changes, to a lesser or greater extent, the principle of interpretation - the legal norm. The Kelsenian question, "What defines interpretation as legal interpretation?", suggests …
Danger At The Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior In A Post-Daubert World, Erica Beecher-Monas, Edgar Garcia-Ril
Danger At The Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior In A Post-Daubert World, Erica Beecher-Monas, Edgar Garcia-Ril
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Thayerian Deference To Congress And Supreme Court Supermajority Rule: Lessons From The Past, Evan H. Caminker
Thayerian Deference To Congress And Supreme Court Supermajority Rule: Lessons From The Past, Evan H. Caminker
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held at Indiana University Law School, February 1-2, 2002.
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article argues that while specialized courts, such as drug courts, dealing with defendants charged with crimes are of critical importance, sole or primary reliance on specialized courts are not sufficient. Instead, centralized resources should be available as necessary to all courts in a county or city in which alternatives to incarceration are possible, although not automatic because not all defendants are serviced by specialized court.
Just The (Unweildy, Hard To Gether, But Nonetheless Essential) Facts, Ma'am: What We Know And Don't Know About Problem-Solving Courts, Greg Berman, Anne Gulick
Just The (Unweildy, Hard To Gether, But Nonetheless Essential) Facts, Ma'am: What We Know And Don't Know About Problem-Solving Courts, Greg Berman, Anne Gulick
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article asses what is known and what remains to be understood about problem-solving courts. Specifically, the article asserts that drug courts serve a needy population, court mandated treatment programs have higher retention rates, those who participate longer have better outcomes, those in drug courts had lower rates of recidivism, drug use, and that graduated sanctions have statistically significant impact on offenders behavior, sanctions are crucial to the model's effectiveness, post-program studies are sparse, drug courts are less costly than traditional adjudication, but cost savings for jail and prison beds are less clear. The article also addresses questions that remain …
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Specialized Courts: Not A Cure-All, Phylis Skloot Bamberger
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article argues that while specialized courts, such as drug courts, dealing with defendants charged with crimes are of critical importance, sole or primary reliance on specialized courts are not sufficient. Instead, centralized resources should be available as necessary to all courts in a county or city in which alternatives to incarceration are possible, although not automatic because not all defendants are serviced by specialized court.
Nullification At Work? A Glimpse From The National Center For State Courts Study Of Hung Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans
Nullification At Work? A Glimpse From The National Center For State Courts Study Of Hung Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans
Faculty Publications
In 1998, the National Institute of Justice awarded a grant to the National Center for State Courts ("NCSC") to examine the frequency and various causes of hung juries. One of the factors that the NCSC project staff investigated was jurors' perceptions of the fairness of the law they were asked to apply in felony trials as well as jury and case characteristics that are often associated with jury nullification. The project also asked judges and other court actors to rate the strength of the evidence in the case. Thus, the project enabled researchers to examine jurors' views, the evidence, and …