Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (4032)
- Courts (3555)
- First Amendment (3421)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3250)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3200)
-
- Criminal Procedure (3077)
- State and Local Government Law (2714)
- Administrative Law (2678)
- Law and Philosophy (2202)
- Legal History (2169)
- Jurisprudence (2125)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2078)
- Law and Politics (2060)
- Law and Society (2032)
- Human Rights Law (1970)
- Legislation (1935)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1913)
- International Law (1744)
- Judges (1489)
- Natural Resources Law (1436)
- Civil Law (1353)
- Election Law (1332)
- Religion Law (1292)
- Health Law and Policy (1241)
- Fourth Amendment (1233)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1138)
- Law and Race (1127)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1104)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (2298)
- William & Mary Law School (1816)
- Duquesne University (1736)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1346)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1297)
-
- UC Law SF (1261)
- Universitas Indonesia (1102)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (990)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (943)
- American University Washington College of Law (824)
- Duke Law (721)
- Georgetown University Law Center (644)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (596)
- University of Colorado Law School (573)
- Columbia Law School (572)
- Seattle University School of Law (566)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (560)
- The University of Akron (537)
- West Virginia University (535)
- University of Georgia School of Law (525)
- Notre Dame Law School (508)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (505)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (504)
- University of Kentucky (482)
- Fordham Law School (460)
- University of Richmond (439)
- Brigham Young University Law School (438)
- BLR (423)
- Pepperdine University (414)
- UIC School of Law (400)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2415)
- Constitutional law (2338)
- Constitution (1734)
- Philosophy (1670)
- Theology (1596)
-
- Supreme Court (1493)
- Hallowed Secularism (1395)
- American Religious Democracy (1377)
- First Amendment (1154)
- Politics (996)
- Law (919)
- Due process (706)
- Federalism (702)
- United States Supreme Court (684)
- Religion (599)
- United States (537)
- History (519)
- Fifth Amendment (468)
- Fourth Amendment (466)
- Separation of powers (460)
- Judicial review (457)
- Government (445)
- Equal protection (443)
- Democracy (437)
- Congress (423)
- Fourteenth Amendment (420)
- Discrimination (395)
- New York (394)
- Originalism (387)
- Abortion (377)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (2009)
- Michigan Law Review (1622)
- Hallowed Secularism (1395)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (1245)
- Touro Law Review (1105)
-
- Faculty Publications (851)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (748)
- Articles (629)
- Scholarly Works (625)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (596)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (585)
- William & Mary Law Review (576)
- West Virginia Law Review (519)
- Indiana Law Journal (498)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (493)
- Cardozo Law Review (456)
- Seattle University Law Review (454)
- ExpressO (395)
- Kentucky Law Journal (394)
- Supreme Court Case Files (371)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (366)
- Buffalo Law Review (363)
- BYU Law Review (358)
- Publications (357)
- UIC Law Review (355)
- Journal Articles (348)
- Pepperdine Law Review (332)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (309)
- Scholarly Articles (286)
- University of Richmond Law Review (266)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1321 - 1350 of 34615
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Religious Conflicts In Disguise: The Limits Of The Law In Tackling Conflicts With Religious Dimensions, Yael Efron
Religious Conflicts In Disguise: The Limits Of The Law In Tackling Conflicts With Religious Dimensions, Yael Efron
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
In previous publications, we have established the crucial differences between conflicts with religious dimensions (CRDs) and other types of conflicts. We claim that a legal solution to CRDs is rarely sufficient to terminate the conflict and often might lead to further damage to communities and persons, sometimes even harsher than the original dispute. Since not all CRDs are similar, a theorized model of their distinguishing elements—time, intensity, and proximity to core values—assists us in differentiating them. By analyzing the elements of CRDs in accordance with the TIV model, we can more easily determine which conflicts are suitable for legal process …
Pursuing Restorative Justice For The Legacy Of Federal Indian Boarding Schools, Jilly Horowitz
Pursuing Restorative Justice For The Legacy Of Federal Indian Boarding Schools, Jilly Horowitz
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note examines the United States’ federal boarding school policy, designed to eliminate Native populations, and the federal government’s efforts from June 2021 to December 2024 to acknowledge and address its harms. For 150 years, Native children were subjected to this brutal policy and were removed from their communities and placed in boarding schools. These schools were focused less on providing education and opportunity for Native students, and instead were tools to carry out a concentrated federal policy of cultural assimilation and forcible removal from Native lands. The federal government implemented this policy throughout the country, operating or funding 451 …
Blazing A New Path: How Regulatory Negotiation Can Resolve Cannabis Legalization’S Shortcomings, Natalie Pearson
Blazing A New Path: How Regulatory Negotiation Can Resolve Cannabis Legalization’S Shortcomings, Natalie Pearson
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
New York’s ambitious cannabis legalization effort has fallen short of its promises, burdened by regulatory confusion, industry roadblocks, and an unchecked illicit market. Despite state-level approval, legalization remains riddled with contradictions and obstacles, leaving businesses and policymakers struggling to navigate an unstable framework. This Note explores how regulatory negotiation, an alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) mechanism, can address key industry challenges, particularly those arising from conflicting federal and state laws.
The Roberts Court Paradox, John C. P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
The Roberts Court Paradox, John C. P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Fordham Law Review
As perhaps the most conservative Supreme Court of the past century, the Roberts Court regularly touts its commitment to traditional ideals, including the rule of law. Yet Trump v. United States seems ready to place presidents entirely or largely above the law by granting them absolute or near absolute immunity from criminal prosecutions for official conduct. And Trump is not a one-off: from judicial recusal to qualified immunity to due process decisions, the Court frequently seems to display indifference to values of accountability and impartiality that have long been thought integral to the rule of law. What is going on? …
Emotionally Unstable: Addressing Emotional Distress As A Concrete Injury In Data Breach Cases Post-Transunion, Anna P. Cox
Emotionally Unstable: Addressing Emotional Distress As A Concrete Injury In Data Breach Cases Post-Transunion, Anna P. Cox
Fordham Law Review
Data breaches and data breach litigation are exponentially on the rise. Plaintiffs whose information is stolen in a data breach often claim emotional distress for fear of future harm the data breach may cause. However, plaintiffs who bring suit in federal court must show that they have suffered an injury in fact for purposes of Article III standing before a federal court will exercise jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez requires that plaintiffs who seek money damages under a theory of risk of future harm show that they have suffered a present concrete injury to …
Fixing The Fix: The Case For Unifying The Remedial Framework Of Apa Rulemaking Challenges, Dea Devlin
Fixing The Fix: The Case For Unifying The Remedial Framework Of Apa Rulemaking Challenges, Dea Devlin
Fordham Law Review
Vacatur is the default remedy for successful administrative rulemaking challenges brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Yet its broad and sweeping effects raise critical questions regarding its appropriateness as a one-size-fits-all remedy. Unlike injunctive relief, which is subject to a rigorous heightened standard, and remand without vacatur, which has a comparable standard of its own, vacatur is routinely awarded without similar scrutiny, leading to inconsistencies in the judicial application of remedies in APA challenges.
Although vacatur can provide a plaintiff with relief, its award conflicts with underlying principles of equity and proportionality. In rulemaking challenges, vacatur can create regulatory …
The Evolution Of The Second Amendment And The American Gun Violence Epidemic: A Historical Analysis Of Political Self-Sabotage, Amanda Tureaud
The Evolution Of The Second Amendment And The American Gun Violence Epidemic: A Historical Analysis Of Political Self-Sabotage, Amanda Tureaud
Senior Theses
From the conception of the Bill of Rights until the 21st century, the Second Amendment was read and understood by the American population, both ordinary citizens and government officials, branches, and agencies inclusively, to allow the nation to have an armed military but not for private citizens to own and/or carry firearms. Since 2008, however, the Second Amendment has been interpreted as an absolute freedom for private citizens to own and carry semiautomatic assault weapons in the name of personal protection. This thesis holds that the evolution of society’s attitude on guns and gun control is specifically denoted by the …
Much Ado About Critical Race Theory, Matthew Patrick Shaw
Much Ado About Critical Race Theory, Matthew Patrick Shaw
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article offers novel observation and critical intervention in the challenge to state laws which have been adopted, allegedly, to prevent the teaching of critical race theory
(CRT) in public schools. Against the trend of recent scholarship that understands these laws as curricular censorship of topical subjects and seeks to contest their validity on those grounds, this Article more accurately identifies them as pedagogical censorship: Limits on teaching methods, which raise different, potentially more dispositive questions about the states’ educational decision-making authority—questions that the U.S. Supreme Court has long sought to avoid. But exposing these so-called “anti-CRT” laws as neither …
Splitting The Statute: Severability As A Canon Of Construction Or Constitutional Concern?, Amy L. Moore
Splitting The Statute: Severability As A Canon Of Construction Or Constitutional Concern?, Amy L. Moore
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the Supreme Court’s evolving severability doctrine and interrogates whether severability is best understood as a canon of statutory construction or as a constitutional limitation on judicial power. Tracing the doctrine from Marbury v. Madison through modern cases such as Champlin Refining Co., Carter Coal, INS v. Chadha, Alaska Airlines, Booker, and Seila Law, the Article demonstrates that the Court has oscillated between an interpretive presumption favoring preservation of legislative enactments and a structural concern about judicial lawmaking. It distinguishes between textual severability—excising unconstitutional statutory provisions—and application severability—limiting unconstitutional applications while preserving …
Interpreting The Private‑ And Public‑Sector Service Criteria For Singapore’S Aspiring Presidential Candidates, Benjamin Joshua Ong
Interpreting The Private‑ And Public‑Sector Service Criteria For Singapore’S Aspiring Presidential Candidates, Benjamin Joshua Ong
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The Singapore President's role is not only ceremonial: from 1991, it has encompassed the substantive function of serving as a guardian of public reserves and the integrity of the public service. A person must meet certain qualifying criteria in order to run in a Presidential election. This article focuses on one set of qualifying criteria, namely, the "service criteria": the requirement that candidates have had certain experience in serving in certain roles in the public sector or the private sector. The service criteria were last amended in 2016, and came to the fore in the 2023 Presidential Election following George …
Do Civil Penalties Punish? The Fbar Penalty And The Case For An Emboldened Excessive Fines Clause, Scott Oatkin
Do Civil Penalties Punish? The Fbar Penalty And The Case For An Emboldened Excessive Fines Clause, Scott Oatkin
Cardozo Law Review
The Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) regime authorizes the IRS to impose severe penalties—up to the greater of $100,000 or fifty percent of the account balance—for failure to report foreign bank accounts exceeding $10,000. While the Eighth Amendment protects Americans from “excessive fines,” circuit courts are split on whether the FBAR penalty constitutes a fine and is subject to constitutional scrutiny. Some courts have found that the FBAR penalty is wholly remedial and beyond the reach of the Excessive Fines Clause, but this Note argues that such an interpretation is inconsistent with the history and case law …
Criminal Court's Disability, Zohra Ahmed
Criminal Court's Disability, Zohra Ahmed
Faculty Scholarship
Do criminal courts meaningfully accommodate psychiatric disability? A review of competency proceedings across the United States suggests not. In competency to stand trial proceedings, criminal court actors offer a narrow vision of psychiatric disability that excludes many defendants. Ultimately, the institutional context of criminal court undermines even the meagre accommodations that the competency framework provides.
Competency proceedings are the constitutional accommodations available to disabled defendants if they can establish that they are unable to consult with their lawyers or if they do not have a rational or factual understanding of the proceedings against them. After a finding of incompetency, the …
Scotus Term Preview, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Kate Levine, Alexander Reinert
Scotus Term Preview, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Kate Levine, Alexander Reinert
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Rights In The Eyes Of The Beholder: The Lived Hierarchy Of Rights In India's Democracy, Sehar Abdullah, Keerthana Satheesh, Prashant Narang
Rights In The Eyes Of The Beholder: The Lived Hierarchy Of Rights In India's Democracy, Sehar Abdullah, Keerthana Satheesh, Prashant Narang
Socio-Legal Review
This paper examines how citizens in India perceive and prioritise fundamental rights, with particular attention to the six freedoms under Article 19(1) and the property right. While the freedoms of Article 19(1) remain central to democratic citizenship, the Forty-Fourth Constitutional Amendment of 1978 reclassified the right to property as a constitutional right under Article 300A. This shift prompts an important question: Does the diminished constitutional rank of property correspond to its place in popular hierarchies of rights? Our in-depth interviews with 26 respondents, whose livelihoods make them especially sensitive to changes in both categories of rights, reveal that citizens continue …
Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right: The Fourth Circuit Sidesteps Supreme Court Precedent In Upholding An Assault Weapon Ban In Bianchi V. Brown, Gabriella Mudd
Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right: The Fourth Circuit Sidesteps Supreme Court Precedent In Upholding An Assault Weapon Ban In Bianchi V. Brown, Gabriella Mudd
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Section 32(1) Analysis: Clarifying Eldridge In Light Of York Region District School Board, Kate Glover Berger
The Section 32(1) Analysis: Clarifying Eldridge In Light Of York Region District School Board, Kate Glover Berger
All Papers
The Eldridge framework, a stable feature of Canadian Charter jurisprudence for decades, sets out part of the framework for determining when entities or activities qualify as “government” under section 32(1), the Charter’s application section. In light of this stability, the Supreme Court of Canada’s analysis of the section 32(1) issue in York Region District School Board v Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario was surprising. It raised the question: Why did the Court in York Region deviate from well-settled law on the Eldridge framework and, in the process, seemingly change the framework’s thresholds? This question arises because the Court in …
Coffee & Constitutions, Office Of Student Services
Coffee & Constitutions, Office Of Student Services
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Absolute Authority Or Accountability, Kekek Jason Stark
Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Absolute Authority Or Accountability, Kekek Jason Stark
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In the wake of the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Trump v. United States, the Court determined that the President as Chief Executive is immune from conduct associated with official acts.3 The question that emanates from this opinion is how will this decision affect Indian Country and tribal court determinations of tribal sovereign immunity? This article will attempt to address this question. I begin with the Anishinaabe story of Bebaamosed miinawaa Gawigoshko’iweshiinh (The Trickster and the Little Scary Bird)5 in an attempt to understand the complicated nature of tribal sovereign immunity.
Discovering The Doctrine Of Discovery, Douglas Lind
Discovering The Doctrine Of Discovery, Douglas Lind
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The doctrine of discovery is a concept in crisis. A principle of public international law associated with the so-called Age of Discovery, the doctrine of discovery is commonly said to have authorized European nations to claim the lands of indigenous peoples and establish settlements on the basis of “discovery” alone. Today, with good reason, the doctrine is widely condemned. The United Nations has denounced it as “the very foundation of genocide.” Describing its manifest injustices against indigenous cultures, dominion, and sovereignty as “devastating, far-reaching and intergenerational,” the UN Economic and Social Council has called for the doctrine to be categorically …
Uses And Abuses Of Johnson V. M’Intosh In Native American Land Rights Cases: Investigative Insights From The Indian Law Justice Files, John P. Lavelle
Uses And Abuses Of Johnson V. M’Intosh In Native American Land Rights Cases: Investigative Insights From The Indian Law Justice Files, John P. Lavelle
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The 200th anniversary of the foundational Indian law decision Johnson v. M’Intosh has come and gone, with many scholars contributing criticism and commentary. The dominant focus has been the case’s notorious embrace of the so-called “doctrine of discovery,” an odious theory for rationalizing European nations’ claims of superior rights to lands occupied by Indigenous Native American peoples. Commanding less attention, however, is the Johnson decision’s core protective legal feature, i.e., its reinforcing the United States government’s duty to guard against the alienation of Indian lands through private, unauthorized acquisitions.
Indian Casinos Under The Big Sky: Why Tribes In Other States Have Been More Successful With Gaming And The Path Forward For Montana’S Tribes, Trevor Funseth
Indian Casinos Under The Big Sky: Why Tribes In Other States Have Been More Successful With Gaming And The Path Forward For Montana’S Tribes, Trevor Funseth
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The most successful method of economic development for many Indian tribes in the United States has been gaming. Tribes across the country have risen out of poverty through their casino operations and have been able to use the profits to diversify their investments and improve tribal infrastructure, education, and social programs.
Damned If You Do, Dammed If You Don’T: Solutions For The Snake River And The Nez Perce Tribe, Meridian S. Wappett
Damned If You Do, Dammed If You Don’T: Solutions For The Snake River And The Nez Perce Tribe, Meridian S. Wappett
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indian Water Rights Settlements And The Animas-La Plata Project: A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Of Dependency, Sidney Paulina Williams
Indian Water Rights Settlements And The Animas-La Plata Project: A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Of Dependency, Sidney Paulina Williams
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Scholars For The Advancement Of Children’S Constitutional Rights In Support Of Defendants-Appellants: Roy V. Darren Patterson Christian Academy, Catherine Smith, Tanya M. Washington, Robin Walker Sterling, Jeremiah Chin, Sara S. Hildebrand
Brief Of Amici Curiae Scholars For The Advancement Of Children’S Constitutional Rights In Support Of Defendants-Appellants: Roy V. Darren Patterson Christian Academy, Catherine Smith, Tanya M. Washington, Robin Walker Sterling, Jeremiah Chin, Sara S. Hildebrand
Scholarly Articles
Amici are scholars of children and the law, education law, family law, and anti-discrimination law. Amici draw this Court’s attention to the harms that four-year-olds in the LGBT community – LGBT children and children with LGBT parents – would bear should state-funded religious schools be granted a license to discriminate against them. An exemption to the Colorado Universal Preschool Program’s equal opportunity requirement would allow plaintiffs to discriminate against these children and raise unfair barriers in their paths to a high-quality education. An exemption would also inflict dignitary, psychological, and familial harms upon an entire class of young people – …
Restoring Chevron Deference By Statute, Scott Dodson
Restoring Chevron Deference By Statute, Scott Dodson
Duke Law Journal Online
This paper details a solution for legislatively restoring Chevron deference: amend the APA to direct lower federal courts to give deference to reasonable agency decisions but retain nondeferential judicial review by the U.S. Supreme Court. This solution restores most of the practical benefits of Chevron by giving agencies flexibility to implement congressional policy directives with the expertise they have acquired, by maintaining stability in administrative regulation, and by relieving lower federal courts of the burdens of nondeferential review. And retaining nondeferential judicial review in the Supreme Court will preserve the constitutional role of the judicial branch to say what the …
Chapter 9 Bankruptcy: The Solution That Causes Problems, Peter C. Alexander
Chapter 9 Bankruptcy: The Solution That Causes Problems, Peter C. Alexander
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
There is a little-known form of bankruptcy called a “Chapter 9,” reserved for insolvent cities, villages, and other municipalities. Occasionally, one reads about a city or a county that has filed for Chapter 9 relief, like Detroit, Michigan, or Orange County, California; however, it is very hard to file a Chapter 9 case, in part, because existing law requires a municipality to obtain permission from its home state before it can file for relief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. An additional constraint is that the only option municipalities have when seeking bankruptcy relief is to file a Chapter 9 because …
Wine Unwelcome: The Constitutional Contours Of Wine Regulation, Alexander Fallone
Wine Unwelcome: The Constitutional Contours Of Wine Regulation, Alexander Fallone
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Wine retail shops face a dizzying labyrinth of state laws that severely restrict their ability to ship wine to out-of-state consumers. While the dormant Commerce Clause would normally strike down laws that impose restrictions on interstate commerce, wine (and alcoholic beverages) must contend with Section Two of the Twenty-first Amendment, which gives the states control over the importation and distribution of wine intending to be consumed within their borders. Court of Appeals cases interpreting Supreme Court precedent on the tension between the dormant Commerce Clause and Section Two have practically stripped the dormant Commerce Clause of any power. This Note …
Who Owns Your Adventure? A Need For Legislative Clarity For Streamed Performances Of Video Games, Harrison Busalacchi
Who Owns Your Adventure? A Need For Legislative Clarity For Streamed Performances Of Video Games, Harrison Busalacchi
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Video games contain copyrighted material that could easily be infringed upon by people streaming a performance of them playing the game. However, the streamers can protect themselves from infringement liability by transforming the content in some form or fashion such that their performance constitutes “fair use” of the copyrighted material. This is often accomplished by the streamer providing commentary while playing the game or adding a small video of themselves in the corner of the stream so that the viewers can see the streamers’ reactions to the content. With artificial intelligence seeing exponential growth in the past couple of years …
Emission Impossible: Challenging The Imposition Of New York City’S Local Law 97, Daniel Lopiccolo
Emission Impossible: Challenging The Imposition Of New York City’S Local Law 97, Daniel Lopiccolo
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
New York City’s Local Law 97 was passed by the City Council in 2019 with the goal of reducing citywide carbon emissions. The law imposes civil penalties on property owners whose buildings fail to comply with carbon emissions limits stipulated by the city. While the law admirably aims to minimize New York’s carbon footprint, its present burden is excessive and disproportionate to the offense committed, making the cost of affording lower and middle-class housing units increasingly untenable for many New Yorkers, especially for property owners in co-op and condo communities. Many such as Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc., the plaintiffs …
Compelled Contraception, Lars Noah
Compelled Contraception, Lars Noah
West Virginia Law Review
Can the federal government insist that people use contraceptives? It may come as a surprise to learn that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has done just that as a condition for allowing access to some pharmaceutical products that create a serious risk of birth defects. Over the last few decades, the agency has demanded that patients using certain teratogenic agents—now numbering over a dozen drugs prescribed for a variety of conditions, ranging from severe acne and psoriasis to multiple myeloma and pulmonary hypertension—agree to avoid becoming pregnant, sometimes for years after completing their course of treatment. Undoubtedly the …