Constitutional Law Commons^™

The Constitutional Parameters Of School Choice, Clint Bolick

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Against Freedom Of Commercial Expression, Tamara R. Piety

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

April 30, 2008: Healthy Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Healthy Secularism

The Tropicalization Of Proportionality Balancing: The Colombian And Mexican Examples, Luisa Conesa

Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers

In “The Tropicalization of Proportionality Balancing: the Colombian and Mexican Examples” the author analyzes how the German based proportionality balancing test was exported to Latin America, by studying the Colombian Constitutional Court and the Mexican Supreme Court. This work is guided by the following questions: what is proportionality balancing? How has it been used by the Colombian and Mexican jurisprudences and what are its influences? Do the Courts cite other jurisdictions when using the test? Have they imported a traditional European test? Or, have they “tropicalized” it?

The study of the Latin American examples leads to the conclusion that the …

April 29, 2008: Anti-Religion, Progressive Religion And Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Anti-Religion, Progressive Religion and Religion

April 26, 2008: The Holidays Of Hallowed Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The Holidays of Hallowed Secularism

April 22, 2008: The Power To Change The World, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The Power to Change the World

April 20, 2008: Eating Bread On Passover, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Eating Bread on Passover

April 18, 2008: Modern Arbitrariness, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Modern Arbitrariness

April 16, 2008: Global Warming And Carbon Taxes, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Global Warming and Carbon Taxes

April 14, 2008: Senator Barack Obama's San Francisco Comments, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Senator Barack Obama's San Francisco Comments

April 12, 2008: Amitai Etzioni And The Head Scarf Issue, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Amitai Etzioni and the Head Scarf Issue

April 10, 2008: The In-Finite, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The In-finite

April 8, 2008: Hallowed Secularism And The Dalai Lama, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Hallowed Secularism and the Dalai Lama

April 6, 2008: The Battle For Our Religions, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The Battle for Our Religions

April 4, 2008: Preparing For Passover, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Preparing for Passover

April 2, 2008: Death And Resurrection, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Death and Resurrection

The Constitutional Dimension Of Immigration Federalism, Clare Huntington

Vanderbilt Law Review

In Farmers Branch, Texas, the city council enacted a measure to fine landlords who rent their premises to unauthorized migrants,' and in Arizona, the state legislature passed a law imposing stiff penalties on employers who intentionally or knowingly hire unauthorized migrants. In San Francisco, the board of supervisors passed a measure that bars law enforcement officers from inquiring into the immigration status of an individual in the course of a criminal investigation. In Alabama and Florida, state officials have entered into agreements with the federal government permitting state law enforcement officers to arrest and detain non-citizens on immigration charges. Other …

The Right Ones For The Job: Divining The Correct Standard Of Review For Curtilage Determinations In The Aftermath Of Ornelas V. United States, Jake Linford

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.

The Monumental Ally: Chief Justice John Marshall And The Protection Of The United States Constitution, Mattea C. Carver

Mahurin Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects

The culmination of this particular research intends to analyze U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial opinions with historical perspectives. Special emphasis is placed upon Marshall's motives for promoting the interests of the national government over the interests of the individual states and their respective governments and the interests ofthe federal judiciary over its fellow branches. Overall, it can be successfully argued that Marshall's influence was not to promote the individual branch of the federal judiciary, but rather promote the necessity of a strong national government. The research utilizes primary and secondary sources including Marshall's judicial opinions, his personal …

Reviving The Subject Of Law, Penelope J. Pether

Working Paper Series

This essay is an advanced draft of work that will be published in On Philosophy and American Law (Francis J. Mootz III ed. forthcoming, Cambridge U.P., 2009). This edited collection includes responses by a wide range of scholars working in legal theory to Mootz’s challenge to respond to the current state of American legal philosophy, using Karl Llewellyn’s 1934 University of Pennsylvania law review account of the emergence of legal realism as a prompt. Drawing on the author’s recent scholarship on the emergence of a distinctive and impoverished model of “common law” judging in the U.S. since the mid- c20th, …

Introduction: Universities And The First Amendment, William P. Marshall

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

The Cross At College: Accomodation And Acknowledgment Of Religion At Public Universities, Ira C. Lupu, Robert W. Tuttle

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Free Expression And Education: Between Two Democracies, Stephen M. Feldman

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Does The Supreme Court Still Matter?, Timothy B. Dyk

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Free Speech And The Case For Constitutional Exceptionalism, Roger P. Alford

Michigan Law Review

Embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the evocative proposition that "[e]veryone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression." Beneath that abstraction there is anything but universal agreement. Modern democratic societies disagree on the text, content, theory, and practice of this liberty. They disagree on whether it is a privileged right or a subordinate value. They disagree on what constitutes speech and what speech is worthy of protection. They disagree on theoretical foundations, uncertain if the right is grounded in libertarian impulses, the promotion of a marketplace of ideas, or the advancement of participatory democracy. They …

Rethinking Child Advocacy After Roper V. Simmons: "Kids Are Just Different" And "Kids Are Like Adults" Advocacy Strategies, Elisa Poncz

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines the tension between two competing arguments in juvenile law: "kids are just different" and "kids are like adults." It critiques the binary approach often used in child advocacy and proposes a more nuanced, patchwork strategy that combines both perspectives to better serve the diverse needs of juveniles. The analysis focuses on key legal contexts, including the death penalty, life without parole, and minors' rights in medical decision-making, education, and internet access. The author argues that a balanced approach is essential to address the complexities of juvenile rights and responsibilities.

What's Left Of The Twenty-First Amendment?, Jonathan M. Rotter, Joshua S. Stambaugh

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines the evolving jurisprudence of the Twenty-first Amendment and its intersection with the Dormant Commerce Clause, arguing that the Supreme Court has increasingly adopted a balanced approach. This approach prioritizes preventing economic discrimination while respecting state regulatory authority over liquor. The analysis highlights a shift away from a broad interpretation of the Twenty-first Amendment, emphasizing that states must justify discriminatory liquor regulations under a strict scrutiny standard. The Court’s rulings, particularly in Granholm v. Heald, have opened markets to out-of-state producers, promoting a more uniform national liquor market.

Review: Voices Of American Law: Us Supreme Court Cases Meet The 21st Century, Lauren M. Collins

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

Review of documentary series Voices of American Law (Thomas B. Metzloff & Sarah Wood, producers)

The Politicization Of The Designation Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations: The Effect On The Separation Of Powers, Julie B. Shapiro

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article critiques the U.S. process for designating foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and subsequent amendments, arguing that the concentration of power in the Executive Branch undermines the separation of powers and risks politicization. The process, while intended to deter terrorism, often lacks transparency, adequate oversight, and judicial scrutiny, leading to potential misuse and unintended consequences, such as radicalizing targeted groups. The author advocates for reforms to restore constitutional principles and ensure the process remains effective and legitimate.