Constitutional Law Commons^™

The Terrorist Is A Star!: Regulating Media Coverage Of Publicity-Seeking Crimes, Michelle Ward Ghetti

Federal Communications Law Journal

Publicity-seeking crimes, including terrorism, almost by definition depend on the media for their effectiveness. Twenty-five years ago, when the bulk of this article was written, critics both within and outside the news industry had begun to voice an awareness, if not a concern, for the ease with which such criminals obtained publicity on both a national and international platform and it looked as if something might be done within the media establishments to thwart this manipulation of the press. Today, it is possible to look back and see that, in fact, nothing has been done and, so, individuals such as …

As A Negative Right, Article 25 Can Have A Positive Effect Combating Japan's Poverty, Amelia S. Kegan

Washington International Law Journal

Article 25 of the Showa Constitution guarantees everyone in Japan a minimum standard of “wholesome and cultured living.” Contrary to the force originally envisioned by the Constitution’s framers, the Supreme Court of Japan has interpreted the provision as merely a programmatic declaration that guides the legislature rather than as an enforceable right under which an individual may sue. As a result, individuals cannot seek relief from the judiciary for Article 25 violations. The Supreme Court should recognize Article 25 also as a negative, concrete right, allowing individuals to seek judicial relief when the government fails to appropriately apply laws intended …

The Emergence Of Transnational Constitutionalism: Its Features, Challenges And Solutions, Jiunn-Rong Yeh, Wen-Chen Chang

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Foreword: Left Out In The Cold - Welcome Remarks, Nadine Strossen

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

May 29, 2008: Austin Dacey: The Secular Conscience, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Austin Dacey: The Secular Conscience “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 27, 2008: Environmentalism As The New Religion Of Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Environmentalism as the New Religion of Secularism “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 21, 2008: For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “For the Establishment of Religion “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Eliahu V. Government Of Israel, Edmond E. Levy, Salim Joubran, Yoseph Elon

Translated Opinions

These petitions concern the Government’s general policy decision to reduce the number of non-Israelis employed in the ethnic restaurant industry. The Petitioners challenge a line of decisions reducing the number of permits for the employments of foreign cooks in ethnic and fusion restaurants, and later the requirement of a higher pay for the employee – which would reflect the expertise at the foundation of the restaurant’s wishes to employ that person – in order to secure a permit.

The High Court of Justice (in an opinion written by Justice Levy, with Justices Joubran and Elon joining) rejected the petitions and …

May 22, 2008: Christianity As Counter-Cultural, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Christianity as Counter-Cultural“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 18, 2008: C.S. Lewis And Hallowed Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “C.S. Lewis and Hallowed Secularism“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 15, 2008: David Brooks--The Neural Buddhists, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “David Brooks--The Neural Buddhists“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Haifa University V. Oz, Esther Hayut, Miriam Naor, Dorit Beinisch

Translated Opinions

Facts:  The petitioner employed respondents 1-3 (hereinafter – the respondents) as lecturers in the Theatre Department. Against the background of complaints concerning the management of the department, an Investigative Committee was established, which decided not to renew the employment of respondents 2-3 and to transfer respondent 1 to another department. The Regional Labour Court rejected the respondent's request to order the petitioner to provide them with all of the material relied upon by the Committee, including protocols and testimony, ruling that the material they had received sufficed to allow for an adequate response on the respondents' part to the claims. …

May 13, 2008: The Future Of Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Future of Secularism“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

An Evaluation Of The Need For And Functioning Of The Federal Sentencing Guidelines In The United States And Nigeria, Victoria T. Kajo

Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers

The United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines, in use since 1987, was set up to reduce disparity in sentencing and its application was made mandatory. Though there are a few who are in favor of the guidelines, the guidelines as mandatory have been severely criticized and many have called for their abolition. Consequently, in the twin cases of United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan (2005) 125 S.Ct. 738, the US Supreme Court delivered judgment that had the effect of making the guidelines discretionary.

While the Nigerian legal system shares a Common Law background with the United States, Nigeria …

May 11, 2008: When Bad Theology Happens To Good People, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “When Bad Theology Happens to Good People“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 8, 2008: Church-State Talk To Pittsburgh Aclu, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Church-State Talk to Pittsburgh ACLU“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

May 6, 2008: The Need For Religious Training For The Young, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The Need for Religious Training for the Young

May 4, 2008: The May 7 Evangelical Manifesto, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The May 7 Evangelical Manifesto

May 2, 2008: The Hatred Of Islam, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

The Hatred of Islam

The Court, The Constitution, And The History Of Ideas, Scott D. Gerber

Vanderbilt Law Review

Several of the nation's most influential constitutional law scholars have been arguing for the better part of a decade that judicial review should be sharply limited, or eliminated altogether. The list includes such prominent thinkers as Professor Mark V. Tushnet of Harvard Law School, Professor Cass R. Sunstein of the University of Chicago Law School, and Dean Larry D. Kramer of Stanford Law School. In place of the doctrine made famous by Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, these leading voices of the legal academy call for "popular constitutionalism": a constitutional law that is defined outside of the …

Differentiating Church And State (Without Losing The Church), Patrick Mckinley Brennan

Working Paper Series

There is an ongoing debate about whether the U.S. Constitution includes -- or should be interpreted to include -- a principle of "church autonomy." Catholic doctrine and political theology, by contrast, clearly articulated a principle of "libertas ecclesiae," liberty of the church, when during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the Church differentiated herself from the state. This article explores the meaning and origin of the doctrine of the libertas ecclesiae and the proper relationship among churches, civil society, and government. In doing so, it highlights the points at which church and state should cooperate and the points at which …

“We Are At War And You Should Not Bother The President”: The Suffrage Pickets And Freedom Of Speech During World War I, Catherine J. Lanctot

Working Paper Series

The story of Alice Paul’s National Woman’s Party and its 1917 picketing campaign onbehalf of woman suffrage is almost unknown in legal circles. Yet the suffrage pickets were among the earliest victims of the suppression of dissent that accompanied the entry of the United States into World War I. Nearly forty years before the modern civil rights movement brought the concept of nonviolent civil disobedience to the forefront of American political discourse, the NWP conducted a direct action campaign at the very doorstep of the President of the United States, and they did so during a time of war.

In …

How The Signing Statement Thought It Killed The Veto; How The Veto May Have Killed The Signing Statement, Jeremy M. Seeley

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Confronting The Limits Of The First Amendment: A Proactive Approach For Media Defendants Facing Liability Abroad, Michelle A. Wyant

San Diego International Law Journal

This Article confronts the limits this issue imposes on the First Amendment in four parts. Part I described the potential for conflicting defamation laws and forum shopping to undermine the American media's speech protections in the context of the Internet and global publications and outlines the Article's overall method of analysis. Part II first orients these conflicting defamation laws with respect to their development from the common law. It then frames them in terms of the underlying structural and policy differences that have produced their substantive divergence. This frame provides the analytical perspective through which this Article examines the varying …

Excluding Religion, Nelson Tebbe

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

This Article considers whether government may single out religious actors and entities for exclusion from its support programs. The problem of selective exclusion has recently sparked interest in lower courts and in informal discussions among scholars, but the literature has not kept pace. Excluding Religion argues that government generally ought to be able to select religious actors and entities for omission from support without offending the Constitution. At the same time, the Article carefully circumscribes that power by delineating several limits. It concludes by drawing out some implications for the question of whether and how a constitutional democracy ought to …

Religion At A Public University, Gerard V. Bradley

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why Church And State Should Be Separate, Erwin Chemerinsky

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Arbitration And Article Iii, Peter B. Rutledge

Scholarly Works

Does arbitration violate Article III? Despite the critical need for a coherent theory to answer this question, few commentators or courts have made serious attempts to provide one. For much of the country's history, federal courts conveniently could avoid this nettlesome question. Prior to the twentieth century, courts simply declined to enforce pre-dispute arbitration agreements as unenforceable attempts to appropriate their jurisdiction. From the early decades of the twentieth century (with the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) in 1925) through the 1960s, the non-arbitrability doctrine prevented arbitrators from resolving issues of federal statutory law. Notably, while both of …

State Constitutionality And Adequacy: Signposts Of Concern On Utah's Path Toward Developing Vouchers, Scott Ellis Ferrin, Pamela R. Hallam

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Insignificance Of The Blaine Amendment, Steven K. Green

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.