Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Jurisprudence (94)
- Criminal Law (75)
- Criminal Procedure (75)
- Legal History (61)
- Courts (60)
-
- Human Rights Law (50)
- Law and Society (46)
- Fourteenth Amendment (45)
- Judges (43)
- First Amendment (38)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (30)
- Legislation (29)
- Jurisdiction (25)
- Evidence (24)
- Communications Law (20)
- International Law (19)
- State and Local Government Law (19)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- Law and Gender (18)
- Law and Race (18)
- Fourth Amendment (17)
- Immigration Law (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (16)
- Education Law (15)
- Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Torts (12)
- Legal Profession (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (153)
- Jurisprudence (34)
- Legal History (30)
- Courts (24)
- Judges (23)
-
- Legal Practice and Procedure (21)
- Politics (General) (21)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Supreme Court of the United States (17)
- Human Rights Law (16)
- Legislation (14)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (13)
- Due Process (13)
- First Amendment (13)
- Civil Rights (11)
- Business and the Law (10)
- Gender and the Law (10)
- Government (General) (10)
- Judiciary Branch (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Race and Ethnicity Issues (10)
- Robert H. Bork (10)
- Biography (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (8)
- Democracy (8)
- Evidence (8)
- Political Systems and Governments (8)
- Slavery (8)
- Publication Year
Articles 31 - 60 of 456
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
I Choose, You Decide: Checking The Judiciary From Within, Jeremy N. Sheff
I Choose, You Decide: Checking The Judiciary From Within, Jeremy N. Sheff
Cardozo Law Review
Efforts to rein in partisanship (or the perception thereof) on the Supreme Court tend to focus either on what Ryan Doerfler and Samuel Moyn call “personnel reforms”—changes to the selection, appointment, or tenure of Justices—or on what they call “disempowering reforms”—changes that divert some of the judiciary’s authority to the political branches, for example via jurisdiction stripping. I propose a different—and perhaps complementary—reform, which would achieve some of the goals of both types of reform without requiring a constitutional amendment. I propose that the selection of a case for the Supreme Court’s discretionary appellate docket should be performed by a …
The Article Iii Publication Power And The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, John Langford
The Article Iii Publication Power And The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, John Langford
Cardozo Law Review
The Framers vested “the judicial Power of the United States” in independent courts so that they may protect individual liberty and serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches. The judicial power, however, is narrow and not self-executing. As Chief Justice Marshall put it, it is merely the power “to say what the law is.” Federal courts cannot raise armies or pay money to enforce their decrees. Having neither force nor will, courts must instead rely on cultivating public support to secure the authoritative legitimacy necessary to effectuate their judgments.
But what happens when the executive branch asserts …
Deceive, Profit, Repeat: Public Deception Schemes To Conceal Product Dangers, Wes Henricksen
Deceive, Profit, Repeat: Public Deception Schemes To Conceal Product Dangers, Wes Henricksen
Cardozo Law Review
Companies in numerous industries have misled the public by hiding the dangers posed by their products. Sugar manufacturers hid the dangers of high fructose corn syrup and misdirected the public’s attention to fat, causing an epidemic of diabetes, obesity, and heart disease. Opioid manufacturers hid the dangers and addictiveness of opioid painkillers, leading to the opioid crisis. Fossil fuel companies misled the public about the causes, certainty, and effects of global warming, resulting in massive unregulated CO2 emissions and causing one of the greatest threats to humankind. This Article identifies all such schemes as belonging to a category of wrongs …
Legalizing Undocumented Work, Jennifer J. Lee
Legalizing Undocumented Work, Jennifer J. Lee
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Inadequacy Of The Impossible: Obtaining Post-Conviction Dna Testing In Alabama, Trena Riley
The Inadequacy Of The Impossible: Obtaining Post-Conviction Dna Testing In Alabama, Trena Riley
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom From Thirst: A Right To Basic Household Water, Martha F. Davis
Freedom From Thirst: A Right To Basic Household Water, Martha F. Davis
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case For Environmental Human Rights: Recognition, Implementation, And Outcomes, James R. May
The Case For Environmental Human Rights: Recognition, Implementation, And Outcomes, James R. May
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nationalism, Populism, Religion, And The Quest To Reframe Fundamental Rights, Susanna Mancini, Michel Rosenfeld
Nationalism, Populism, Religion, And The Quest To Reframe Fundamental Rights, Susanna Mancini, Michel Rosenfeld
Cardozo Law Review
The article examines how nationalism and populism have increasingly utilized religion to challenge the principles of institutional secularism, which is foundational to liberal constitutional democracies. It argues that these forces exploit the interplay between religion and secularism to undermine pluralism and promote exclusionary agendas. The analysis highlights the tension between institutional secularism, which seeks to separate state and religion, and the contemporary repoliticization of religion, which threatens the pluralistic ethos essential to liberal constitutionalism.
"And The Oscar Goes To . . .": Why The Academy Awards May Create Antitrust Drama With Proposed Eligibility Rule Changes, Armando Marin Iii
"And The Oscar Goes To . . .": Why The Academy Awards May Create Antitrust Drama With Proposed Eligibility Rule Changes, Armando Marin Iii
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
"What Makes You Think You Can Do That?": How Venue Restrictions Prevent Access To Abortion For Minors In Arkansas, Bella Mancini Pori
"What Makes You Think You Can Do That?": How Venue Restrictions Prevent Access To Abortion For Minors In Arkansas, Bella Mancini Pori
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Claim Preclusion And The Problem Of Fictional Consent, Lindsey D. Simon
Claim Preclusion And The Problem Of Fictional Consent, Lindsey D. Simon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
When A Picture Is Not Worth A Thousand Words: Why Emojis Should Not Satisfy The Statute Of Frauds' Writing Requirement, Moshe Berliner
When A Picture Is Not Worth A Thousand Words: Why Emojis Should Not Satisfy The Statute Of Frauds' Writing Requirement, Moshe Berliner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patents As Property: Oil States And Its Implications On The Takings Clause, Jordan T. Owens
Patents As Property: Oil States And Its Implications On The Takings Clause, Jordan T. Owens
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Third-Party Doctrine For Digital Metadata, H. Brian Holland
A Third-Party Doctrine For Digital Metadata, H. Brian Holland
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Children's Equality Rights: Every Child's Right To Develop To Their Full Capacity, Nancy E. Dowd
Children's Equality Rights: Every Child's Right To Develop To Their Full Capacity, Nancy E. Dowd
Cardozo Law Review
Children are born equal. Yet as early as eighteen months, hierarchies emerge among children. These hierarchies are not random butfall into patterns by race, gender, and class. They are not caused nor voluntarily chosen by children or their parents. The hierarchies grow, persist, and are made worse by systems and policies created by the state, perpetuating the position of the privileged and continuing the disadvantage of the subordinated. Children's equal right to develop to their capacity is severely undermined by policies and structures that hamper and block the development of some by creating barriers and challenges or failing to support …
Implied Presidential And Congressional Powers, David M. Driesen, William C. Banks
Implied Presidential And Congressional Powers, David M. Driesen, William C. Banks
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supervisory Liability And Ashcroft V. Iqbal, Alexander A. Reinert
Supervisory Liability And Ashcroft V. Iqbal, Alexander A. Reinert
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Janus-Faced Rulemaking, Brooke Coleman
From Decarceration To E-Carceration, Chaz Arnett
From Decarceration To E-Carceration, Chaz Arnett
Cardozo Law Review
Each year, millions of Americans experience criminal justice surveillance through electronic ankle monitors. These devices have fundamentally altered our understanding of incarceration, punishment, and the extent of the carceral state, as they are increasingly offered as moderate penal sanctions and viable solutions to the problem of mass incarceration. They purportedly enable decarceration, albeit with enhanced surveillance in the community as the compromise. Proponents of the devices tout the public safety and cost benefits while stressing the importance of depopulating prisons and returning individuals to theircommunities. In recent years, an oppositional movement has developed, focused on highlighting the social harms of …
The Right To Stay: The Suspension Clause, Constitutional Avoidance, And Federal District Court Jurisdiction To Grant Stays Of Removal Despite 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252(G), Yael Ben Tov
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Appointed Counsel: The Case For Unaccompanied Immigrant Children, Amanda Kavita Sewanan
The Right To Appointed Counsel: The Case For Unaccompanied Immigrant Children, Amanda Kavita Sewanan
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Normativity Of Possibilities And Ideals, Tvsi Blanchard
The Normativity Of Possibilities And Ideals, Tvsi Blanchard
Cardozo Law Review
To begin, Arthur, I want to say to you, that it's privilege for me to be a part of this event that honors you. We've known each other for a long time and I, as all of us here, have always recognized your intellectual capability and deep insight. But I also want to add here that you are at the same time a very kind, caring person. In many ways, you are the embodiment of what I would hold the most important Jewish value of Chesed, loving-kindness. For me it is an inspiration to know you.
We The People: These United Divided States, Catherine Powell
We The People: These United Divided States, Catherine Powell
Cardozo Law Review
In the wake of President Trump's announcement that he will withdraw the United States from the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, then-California Governor Jerry Brown called on the President to fight climate change or to "get out of the way" while the rest of the world works to reduce emissions and invest in clean energy. Similarly, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg-now a United Nations (U.N.) Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change-said, "If Washington won't lead, then mayors and governors will." Indeed, Trump's threat to withdraw has not only been met with widespread criticism and derision abroad …
State Constitutional General Welfare Doctrine, Gerald S. Dickinson
State Constitutional General Welfare Doctrine, Gerald S. Dickinson
Cardozo Law Review
It is black-letter law that the U.S. Supreme Court's takings doctrine presupposes exercises of eminent domain are in pursuit of valid public uses that require just compensation. But, neither federal doctrine nor the text of the Takings Clause offers any additional constraints. The story of the Supreme Court's takings jurisprudence is, in other words, incomplete and deserves reexamination. However, the usual protagonists, such as the Supreme Court or federal courts, are not central 'to this Article's reexamination. Instead, this Article's narrative is federalism, its characters are state courts, and its script is state constitutions.
In the post-Kelo v. New London …
The Special Norms Thesis: Why Congress's Constitutional Decisionmaking Should Be Disciplined By More Than The Usual Norms Of Politics, Mark D. Rosen
The Special Norms Thesis: Why Congress's Constitutional Decisionmaking Should Be Disciplined By More Than The Usual Norms Of Politics, Mark D. Rosen
Cardozo Law Review
Even if we accept that the most basic rules of fair play do not apply to our nation's political representatives when they battle one another in the ordinary lawmaking process, we should demand more when they engage in constitutional decision-making. This Article explains why our constitutional system demands different rules of engagement when constitutional questions are at issue, and exactly what we should expect of members of Congress in these situations.
Child Marriage In America: An Interim Solution Pending A Total Ban, Raquel Wildes Genet
Child Marriage In America: An Interim Solution Pending A Total Ban, Raquel Wildes Genet
Cardozo Law Review
This Note explores child marriage in the United States. Part I considers the scope of child marriage and provides legal and historical background on marital age restrictions (also known as nonage statutes). Part II considers arguments for and against a total ban of child marriage that would create a blanket eighteen-plus-to-marry age requirement in states. Part III concludes that a total ban is not yet a perfect fit for all states. Instead, it argues that no marriage should be permitted when a party is under seventeen, with increasing flexibility and deference to the parties as the child ages so long …
The Magic Of Arthur Jacobson, Paul Verkuil
The Magic Of Arthur Jacobson, Paul Verkuil
Cardozo Law Review
I have always held Arthur in affectionate regard. When I first arrived at Cardozo as Dean over 20 years ago (parachuted in really), I was anxious to get to know the faculty. (Monroe Price had been my only deep contact: in 1982 we spent several weeks in Israel as part of a group of law deans when I was at Tulane.) At Cardozo, Arthur was among the first to welcome me and make me feel comfortable (wonderful qualities many have also experienced, I'm sure). Arthur is a kind of charm machine, and at his best, while he is no climate …
The Sec's Part 205.3(D)(2) And Wadler V. Bio-Rad Labs. Should Be Revisited: The Sec Exceeded Authority In Creating A Reporting Out Provision For In-House Attorneys, Briana Sheridan
Cardozo Law Review
This Note proceeds in three parts. Part I introduces relevant statutory law. Part I discusses federal law, notably Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the SEC's Part 205.3(d)(2), as well as the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules and conflicting state law. Part II first examines case law involving the preemption of state ethics laws, including Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, which concluded broadly that Part 205 preempts California law.23 Part II then examines the doctrine of federal preemption, which is followed by a preemption analysis of Part 205.3(d)(2). Part III recommends that Part 205.3(d)(2) should be revisited, as the …
Sex Segregation In Sports As A Public Health Issue, Nancy Leong, Emily Bartlett
Sex Segregation In Sports As A Public Health Issue, Nancy Leong, Emily Bartlett
Cardozo Law Review
This Article contributes to the growing debate about the merits of sex segregation in sports by approaching sex segregation in sports as a public health issue. Participation in sports has profound consequences for women's health. Engagement in athletics affects physical fitness, disease prevention, self-esteem, mental wellness, eating disorders, and many other health-related issues.
Sex segregation in sports reduces women's participation in sports and changes the nature of the sports in which women participate. Both of these issues have implications for the myriad health issues we discuss. The Article argues that analysis under the Equal Protection Clause of governmentally-imposed sex segregation …
Too Big For Personal Jurisdiction? A Proposal To Hold Companies Accountable For In-State Conduct In Accordance With Due Process Principles, Polina Pristupa
Too Big For Personal Jurisdiction? A Proposal To Hold Companies Accountable For In-State Conduct In Accordance With Due Process Principles, Polina Pristupa
Cardozo Law Review
This Note discusses the potential negative effects that BMS can have on future plaintiffs' ability to sue large corporations in states where the corporations have a major presence but in which they are neither incorporated nor headquartered. Part I outlines the history of personal jurisdiction case law. Part II looks to the different approaches that the majority and dissenting opinions in BMS took in examining the question of jurisdiction. It also looks at the sliding scale test that the California Supreme Court used to allow the nonresident plaintiffs to sue within the state's courts. Section II.B then considers the effect …