Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Christopher Kozlow And John Sullivan, Jane's Facility Security Handbook (Jane's Information Group 2000)., Richard Gonzalez

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Terrorism And The Law (Yonah Alexander And Edgar H. Brenner, Eds., Transnational Publishers 2001). , Fara Gold

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gender And Politics In Palestine: Discourse Analysis Of The Palestinian Authority & Islamists, Nahda Y. Sh'hada

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conflicts In The Regulation Of Hostile Business Takeovers In The United State And The European Union, Barbara Ann White

All Faculty Scholarship

This essay focuses on hostile business takeovers to illustrate the significance that cultural differences among nations can play in developing a harmonized European Union law. After 12 years of development, the EU Directive regulating hostile takeovers, to everyone’s surprise, was voted down in the EU Parliament in 2001. The EU Parliament consists of the member nations and the movement to defeat the Directive was led by Germany, which had just suffered a brutal hostile takeover of its largest company by British raiders.

The “harmonization” efforts within the EU (i.e., establishing uniform laws among the member nations) mirrors the federalism movement …

Individual Rights Versus Collective Security: Assessing The Constitutionality Of The Usa Patriot Act, Tracey Topper Gonzalez

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Economic Sanctions, Justin D. Stalls

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fredrick Sidell, M.D., Et Al., Jane's Chem-Bio Handbook (Alexandria: Jane's Information Group 1999). Super Terrorism: Biological, Chemical, And Nuclear (Yonah Alexander And Milton Hoenig Eds., Transnational Publishers 2001)., Ian Illych Martinez

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Oral Judgment Practice In The Canadian Appellate Courts, J. E. Côté

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

No abstract provided.

The Connotation/Denotation Distinction In Constitutional Interpretation, Christopher Birch

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

No abstract provided.

A Miscarriage Of Justice In Massachusetts: Eyewitness Identification Procedures, Unrecorded Admissions, And A Comparison With English Law, Stanley Z. Fisher, Ian K. Mckenzie

Faculty Scholarship

Like many other states, Massachusetts has recently known a number of acknowledged miscarriages of justice. This article examines one of them, the Marvin Mitchell case, in order to ask two questions: "What went wrong?" and "What systemic reforms might have prevented this injustice?" In seeking ideas for reform, we look to English law.

In 1990 Marvin Mitchell was convicted of rape in Massachusetts. Seven years later he became the first Massachusetts prisoner to be exonerated by DNA testing. In this article we describe the two key factors leading to Mitchell's wrongful conviction: faulty eyewitness identification procedures, and inadequate safeguards surrounding …

The New Japanese Law Schools, James R. Maxeiner

ExpressO

Japan is in the process of implementing a comprehensive reform of its justice system. At the heart of the reform is a complete overhaul of the system of legal education. The new system is intended to increase substantially the number of lawyers in the country. On April 1, 2004 as many as 72 new law schools are to come into existence. Japanese legal education is shifting from a German-inspired law faculty approach to an American-style law school system. Based on first-hand observations, this article discusses the present and future system of Japanese legal education with reference to its foreign counterparts.

Canadian Fundamental Justice And American Due Process: Two Models For A Guarantee Of Basic Adjudicative Fairness, David M. Siegel

ExpressO

This paper traces how the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States have each used the basic guarantee of adjudicative fairness in their respective constitutions to effect revolutions in their countries’ criminal justice systems, through two different jurisprudential models for this development. It identifies a relationship between two core constitutional structures, the basic guarantee and enumerated rights, and shows how this relationship can affect the degree to which entrenched constitutional rights actually protect individuals. It explains that the different models for the relationship between the basic guarantee and enumerated rights adopted in Canada and the United States, an “expansive …

Universal Jurisdiction And Drug Trafficking: A Tool For Fighting One Of The World's Most Pervasive Problems , Anne H. Geraghty

ExpressO

Universal jurisdiction allows any state to exercise jurisdiction to prosecute a suspect wherever he is found, regardless of the location of his crimes, his nationality, or any other contacts with the prosecuting state. This article proposes that the United States and the international community should take two major steps toward embracing universal jurisdiction as a possible means of combatting drug trafficking. First, states should adopt an additional protocol to the 1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances clearly establishing universal jurisdiction for drug trafficking and thereby filling jurisdictional gaps in existing treaty law. Second, …

Bioterrorism, Biodefense, And Biotechnology In The Military: A Comparative Analysis Of Legal And Ethical Issues In The Research, Development, And Use Of Biotechnological Products On American And British Soldiers., Ashley R. Melson

ExpressO

Despite the legal and ethical concerns raised, biotechnology continues to offer countless opportunities for enhancing military capabilities. As such, the research, development and utilization of biotechnological products are present realities in the U.S. and abroad, both within and outside of the defense context. However, testing and usage, as well as effective collaboration between Allies, calls for the resolution of complex and pressing issues presented by this intersection of science, technology, and human lives. Resolutions must take into account the history of abuses in military research, existing domestic and international legal and ethical safeguards, and a special respect for those serving …

The New Afghan Constitution: "Equal Rights" For Women, Ann Davey

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

France: Human Rights, Religious Freedoms & A Secular Society?, Kristen Walder

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Violation Of Human Rights Through State Tolerance Of Street-Level Bribery: Case Study, Slovakia, Jarmila Lajcakova

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Death Penalty, Extradition, And The War Against Terrorism: U.S. Responses To European Opinion About Capital Punishment, Kathryn F. King

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is The End Of The War In Sight: An Analysis Of Canada's Decriminalization Of Marijuana And The Implications For The United States "War On Drugs", Kara Godbehere Goodwin

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Perils Of "Consensus": Hans Kelsen And The Legal Philosophy Of The United Nations, J. Peter Pham

ExpressO

Recently the United States and a number of its traditional allies have clashed over a variety of foreign policy issues that are profoundly juridical: the authority for war and peace, the International Criminal Court, etc. The source of these recent tensions is to be located at a level deeper than that of narrow national interests and specific policies. Rather, they arise from significant differences concerning the nature of "consensus" and, ultimately, legal philosophy. While the United Nations and many other international organizations derive their legal visions from the philosophy of law of Hans Kelsen (1881-1973), one of the most important …

Alternative Forms Of Judicial Review, Mark Tushnet

Michigan Law Review

The invention in the late twentieth century of what I call weak-form systems of judicial review provides us with the chance to see in a new light some traditional debates within U.S. constitutional law and theory, which are predicated on the fact that the United States has strong-form judicial review. Strong- and weak-form systems operate on the level of constitutional design, in the sense that their characteristics are specified in constitutional documents or in deep-rooted constitutional traditions. After sketching the differences between strong- and weak-form systems, I turn to design features that operate at the next lower level. Here legislatures …

Comparative Constitutionalism In A New Key, Paul W. Kahn

Michigan Law Review

Law is a symbolic system that structures the political imagination. The "rule of law" is a shorthand expression for a cultural practice that constructs a particular understanding of time and space, of subjects and groups, as well as of authority and legitimacy. It is a way of projecting, maintaining, and discovering meaning in the world of historical events and political possibilities. The rule of law - as opposed to the techniques of lawyering - is not the possession of lawyers. It is a characterization of the polity, which operates both descriptively and normatively in public perception. Ours, we believe, is …

Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review - And Why It May Not Matter, Alec Stone Sweet

Michigan Law Review

In this Article, I explore the question of why constitutional review, but not American judicial review, spread across Europe. I will also argue that, despite obvious organic differences between the American and European systems of review, there is an increasing convergence in how review actually operates. I proceed as follows. In Part I, I examine the debate on establishing judicial review in Europe, focusing on the French. In Parts II and III, I contrast the European and the American models of review, and briefly discuss why the Kelsenian constitutional court diffused across Europe. In Part IV, I argue that despite …

Civilization And The Two Faces Of Law: J. M. Coetzee's Waiting For The Barbarians, Sinkwan Cheng

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

This Is Not Like Any Other Legal Question: A Brief History Of Nazi Law Before British And American Courts, David Fraser

ExpressO

No abstract provided.

The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage In Canada: Law And Policy Considerations, Jane Adolphe

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Some Wrongs And (Human) Rights In The English Same-Sex Marriage Debate, John Murphy

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

The Enforcement Of Local Judgments In Mexico: An Analysis Of The Quantitative & Qualitative Perceptions Of The Judiciary & Legal Profession, Rfobert M. Kossick Jr., Marcelo Bergman

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pesification And Economic Crisis In Argentina: The Moral Hazard Posed By A Politicized Supreme Court, Becky L. Jacobs

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Approaches To Statutory Interpretation And Legislative History In France, Claire M. Germain

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.