Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1497)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1046)
- Courts (746)
- Judges (457)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (325)
-
- Jurisprudence (268)
- First Amendment (263)
- State and Local Government Law (255)
- Criminal Law (237)
- Criminal Procedure (207)
- Legal History (201)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (181)
- Fourteenth Amendment (177)
- Law and Politics (165)
- Law and Society (153)
- Legislation (153)
- Law and Philosophy (135)
- Litigation (120)
- Fourth Amendment (119)
- Law and Race (117)
- Administrative Law (116)
- Civil Procedure (103)
- Intellectual Property Law (103)
- Election Law (98)
- Law and Gender (87)
- Jurisdiction (86)
- Environmental Law (82)
- Health Law and Policy (79)
- Political Science (79)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (618)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (202)
- Georgetown University Law Center (136)
- University of Richmond (123)
- Duquesne University (120)
-
- Columbia Law School (96)
- New York Law School (82)
- St. Mary's University (82)
- St. John's University School of Law (78)
- University of Georgia School of Law (73)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (71)
- Fordham Law School (70)
- Pepperdine University (69)
- Boston University School of Law (65)
- Duke Law (62)
- American University Washington College of Law (59)
- Emory University School of Law (57)
- Notre Dame Law School (57)
- University of Baltimore Law (56)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (54)
- The University of Akron (53)
- University of Miami Law School (44)
- University of Colorado Law School (42)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (42)
- Cleveland State University (38)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (35)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (31)
- University of Kentucky (31)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (29)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (28)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (493)
- Faculty Scholarship (291)
- Indiana Law Journal (177)
- Scholarly Works (150)
- Hallowed Secularism (116)
-
- Faculty Articles (110)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (102)
- Law Faculty Publications (80)
- Faculty Publications (79)
- All Faculty Scholarship (70)
- Pepperdine Law Review (66)
- Journal Articles (56)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (56)
- University of Richmond Law Review (53)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (41)
- NYLS Law Review (37)
- Fordham Law Review (32)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (30)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (28)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (28)
- Articles & Chapters (27)
- Articles (26)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (25)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (25)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (21)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (21)
- University of Miami Law Review (21)
- Nevada Law Journal (20)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (19)
- Supreme Court Overviews (19)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2611 - 2640 of 3331
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Original Intent And Article Iii, Michael L. Wells, Edward J. Larson
Original Intent And Article Iii, Michael L. Wells, Edward J. Larson
Scholarly Works
Article III of the United States Constitution sets limits on the ability of the legislature to expand or contract the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The Supreme Court has generally held that Article III's restraints on the power of the legislature to restrict the jurisdiction of the federal courts are few and extremely permissive. Many scholars, however, argue that Article III imposes some strong limitations on the legislature's ability to define federal jurisdiction. Strangely, both sides of the debate rely on originalist arguments. This Article argues that reliance on the Framers' intent to resolve issues of federal courts law is …
Abdication Can Be Fun, Join The Orgy, Everyone: A Simpleton’S Perspective On Abdication Of Federal Land Management Responsibilities, George Cameron Coggins
Abdication Can Be Fun, Join The Orgy, Everyone: A Simpleton’S Perspective On Abdication Of Federal Land Management Responsibilities, George Cameron Coggins
Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)
14 pages.
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop V. Amos, Matthew David Dimick
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop V. Amos, Matthew David Dimick
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review
The Supreme Court has long sought for a consistent principle in constitutional theory that will "be a master principle that can guide the interpretation of both religion clauses" (Tushnet, 1691). Indeed, at times both the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause seem to contradict. Such an instance arose in Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. Amos. In this case the Court applied the religious accommodation principle to allow a religious group the right to remain an autonomous entity thereby maintaining protection guaranteed under the Free Exercise Clause, also recognizing "that the government may (and sometimes must) accommodate religious practices …
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Sustainable Use Of Natural Resources: A Native American Perspective, Ted Strong
Sustainable Use Of Natural Resources: A Native American Perspective, Ted Strong
Sustainable Use of the West's Water (Summer Conference, June 12-14)
27 pages.
Contains footnotes.
No Striped Pants And Morning Coat: The Solicitor General In The State And Lower Federal Courts, Drew S. Days
No Striped Pants And Morning Coat: The Solicitor General In The State And Lower Federal Courts, Drew S. Days
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Moral Relativism A Constitutional Command?, Steven G. Gey
Is Moral Relativism A Constitutional Command?, Steven G. Gey
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In Search Of The Post-Positivist Jury, Mark Cammack
In Search Of The Post-Positivist Jury, Mark Cammack
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Coping With Phantom Risks In The Courts, Peter W. Huber
Coping With Phantom Risks In The Courts, Peter W. Huber
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Dr. Huber describes "phantom" risks as those tending to hover indefinitely, never to crystallize. He argues that legal procedures should optimally lead' to closure and eliminate unwarranted fears.