Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (46)
- Courts (42)
- State and Local Government Law (40)
- Supreme Court of the United States (27)
- Criminal Procedure (14)
-
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Judges (9)
- Civil Law (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (6)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (5)
- Social Welfare Law (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Administrative Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Land Use Law (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (43)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Scholarly Works (2)
-
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Brigham Young University Prelaw Review (1)
- Correspondence (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (1)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Supreme Court's Use Of Per Curiam Dispositions: The Connection To Oral Argument, Stephen L. Wasby, Steven Peterson, James Shubert, Glendon Shubert
The Supreme Court's Use Of Per Curiam Dispositions: The Connection To Oral Argument, Stephen L. Wasby, Steven Peterson, James Shubert, Glendon Shubert
Northern Illinois University Law Review
This study is an empirical examination of a set of the Supreme Court's per curiam rulings issued after oral argument between 1969 and 1981. The authors use transcripts of Supreme Court oral argument and the Court's opinions to untangle relationships between oral argument and dispositions, particularly when the Court does not reach the merits. The authors note that oral argument clarifies issues and helps the justices narrow them. The Court's comments in its per curiam dispositions indicate that oral argument is relevant for the Court's dispositions and at times it has been more determinative of outcomes, for example, when counsel's …
"The Right Of Privacy", Fernando Bustos
"The Right Of Privacy", Fernando Bustos
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review
The concept of a right of privacy is one that is currently the focal point of the argument for legalized abortion, and for women's rights in general. By examining the history of this issue, along with its influence upon the U.S. Constitution, and the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, we will be better enabled to understand the legal debate at hand.
Letter To Rjm From Craig Isaacs, Criag Isaacs
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
No Harm, No Foul: Pornography (Violent And Otherwise), Victoria M. Mather
No Harm, No Foul: Pornography (Violent And Otherwise), Victoria M. Mather
Faculty Articles
At the heart of the entire pornography debate is the lack of understanding or agreement of what is regulated. Society does not agree about what pornography means, what is hardcore or softcore, what is obscene, or what is "adult." The disagreement tends to derive from two very different viewpoints—the liberal view, and the feminist view. On the liberal side of the debate, pornography should be protected speech but on the feminist side, society should take into account the feminist perspective and the harmful effects of these graphic depictions.
Applying the Miller-Roth test, liberals believe that pornography is protected speech until …
Free Trade And Environmental Protection In An Integrated Market: A Survey Of The Case Law Of The United States Supreme Court And The European Court Of Justice, Damien Geradin
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
When “Special Needs” Meet Probable Cause: Denying The Devil Benefit Of Law, Gerald S. Reamey
When “Special Needs” Meet Probable Cause: Denying The Devil Benefit Of Law, Gerald S. Reamey
Faculty Articles
Removing laws to pursue the lawbreaker may be well intentioned, but the result is that society is susceptible to the evils those laws protect against. The traditional Fourth Amendment safeguards--probable cause and warrants--have been abandoned due to the development of a reasonableness standard because of the presence of “special needs” that were used to justify searches. The adoption of this alternative approach to Fourth Amendment interpretation was signalled by the truly landmark case of Terry v. Ohio.
By adopting the “reasonableness” analysis, the Supreme Court altered the impact of the exclusionary rule without directly modifying the rule. After Griffin v. …
Comptroller And Attorney-General
Gift Or Loan Of Property Or Credit Of Local Subdivisions Prohibited
Gift Or Loan Of Property Or Credit Of Local Subdivisions Prohibited
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Medical-Legal Dilemma: When Can "Inappropriate" Nutrition And Hydration Be Removed In Indiana?, Kathleen M. Anderson
A Medical-Legal Dilemma: When Can "Inappropriate" Nutrition And Hydration Be Removed In Indiana?, Kathleen M. Anderson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Matter Of "Governing' Importance": Providing Business Defamation And Product Disparagement Defendants Full First Amendment Protection, Lisa Magee Arent
A Matter Of "Governing' Importance": Providing Business Defamation And Product Disparagement Defendants Full First Amendment Protection, Lisa Magee Arent
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Gender Gap: Separating The Sexes In Public Education, Sharon K. Mollman
The Gender Gap: Separating The Sexes In Public Education, Sharon K. Mollman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Paradox Of United State Democracy, C. A. Gearty
The Paradox Of United State Democracy, C. A. Gearty
University of Richmond Law Review
This program is about a paradox at the heart of American democracy. We take it for granted that elected officials, like President Bush and members of Congress, run America. In fact, many of the country's most important decisions are taken by nine unelected lawyers accountable to no one. It is a paradox which is increasingly under scrutiny as more and more Americans are coming to question the power of their Supreme Court.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Law Enforcement And Other Officers
The Right Of Privacy And The New York State Constitution: An Analytical Framework, Edward R. Alexander
The Right Of Privacy And The New York State Constitution: An Analytical Framework, Edward R. Alexander
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox
Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Election And Term Of City And County Officers