Law Commons^™

Laws Intentionally Favoring Mainstream Religions: An Unhelpful Comparison To Race , Gary J. Simson

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Putting The People Back Into The Fourth Amendment, Ronald J. Bacigal

Law Faculty Publications

This Article attempts to answer such questions by examining the evolution of search-and-seizure law in America. Although the structural nature of decision making embodied in the Bill of Rights has far-ranging implications for that entire document, I limit my consideration to the unique aspects of the Fourth Amendment. In doing so I have followed the suggestion that constitutional interpretation considers a threefold question: "Does the Constitution mean what it was meant to mean, or what it has come to mean, or what it ought to mean?" Part I examines the historical involvement of juries in search-and-seizure cases; Part II considers …

Oil Over Troubled Waters: The Constitutional Implications Of A Presidential Pre-Trial Pardon In Trinidad And Tobago, Albert K. Fiadjoe

Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms Under The Tennessee Constitution: A Case Study In Civic Republican Thought, Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Scholarly Works

State constitutional rights to arms are of considerable interest, both for their own sake and as sources of insight into the meaning of the Federal Constitution's right to keep and bear arms. This article examines the origins and scope of the right to arms provided in the Tennessee Constitution, including Tennessee cases that, interestingly, were cited as authority by the United States Supreme Court in the 1939 case of United States v. Miller, one of the Supreme Court's few cases to address Second Amendment issues in any depth.

The Regimes For States Of Emergency In Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutions, Margaret Demerieux

Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Cuban Property Rights And The 1940 Constitution, Ignacio E. Sanchez

Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Despite Anti-Stalking Laws, Stalkers Continue To Stalk: Are These Laws Constitutional And Effective, Lisa I. Steinman

St. Thomas Law Review

This Note evaluates the national stalking laws, examines Florida's current anti-stalking law, and develops appropriate direction for the state anti-stalking statutes in the future. Part II describes four case histories. Part III discusses the federal legislation to stop stalking. Part IV discusses the Florida anti-stalking law, its constitutionality, and compares it to the stalking laws of the other states. Part V discusses the effectiveness of the Florida stalking law. Part VI discusses present and future alternatives to these anti-stalking statutes. Part VII contains a proposal of a model statute providing lawmakers with an example of a constitutional and effective law …

Fundamental Rights In The "Gray" Area: The Right Of Privacy Under The Minnesota Constitution, Michael K. Steenson

Faculty Scholarship

This Article explores the constitutional aspects of Minnesota privacy law. Part II briefly explains federal privacy law to provide a baseline for consideration of privacy law in Minnesota. Part III examines the right of privacy as it has evolved in the Minnesota common law. Part IV evaluates the Minnesota Supreme Court's application of federal privacy standards and then examines the court's decisions that outline the right of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution. Part V concludes by raising questions concerning the potential application of the court's concept of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution as applied to two areas: same-sex marriages and …

The Disabled, The Ada, And Strict Scrutiny, James B. Miller

St. Thomas Law Review

This Note argues that Congress has statutorily overturned City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc.'s holding of "rational basis" review for the disabled, through its enactment of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. The argument focuses upon the fact that the United States Supreme Court affords Congress substantial deference in both its fact-finding capacity and in its lawmaking capacity in constitutional matters, especially in the realm of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. This Note will distinguish Heller v. Doe by arguing that although it was a proper decision, the Court failed to state that the correct standard …

The "Wrap" On Probable Cause: The Fourth Amendment Contained, Paul L. Kaminsky

St. Thomas Law Review

Part I of this Note begins by exploring the meaning of probable cause, briefly tracing its development. Part I continues with an examination of how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and the probable cause requirement relates to searches and seizures of containers, specifically, containers that may fall within the Sanders' footnote "exception." The relationship between the Sanders doctrine and that of the "plain view" doctrine will also be examined. In Part II, this Note presents the case of United States v. Prandy-Binett as an example of the above-mentioned doctrinal exceptions to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment …

Trial By Tabloid, Mercy Hermida

St. Thomas Law Review

An intense conflict has persisted throughout legal history between the practical application of the First and Sixth Amendments. The controversy between these two guarantees has been a constant debate for decades. On the one hand, the First Amendment guarantees the media the Constitutional right to report the news via their right to freedom of expression. Alternatively, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the criminally accused the right to a fair trial decided by an impartial jury. Although these two guarantees are not seemingly contradictory, they ultimately collide when the media, in asserting its First Amendment right, so intrudes and disrupts a criminal …

Is The Death Knell Sounding For Animal Rights - The Sacrifice Of Animals For Religious Purposes Under The Guise Of The First Amendment Right To The Free Exercise Of Religion, Mercedes A. Sanchez

St. Thomas Law Review

As a result of several Supreme Court decisions and a recent legislative enactment, it has become increasingly more difficult to protect animal rights through legislation. This is particularly true when the legislation is challenged as unduly encroaching upon the free exercise of religion. This comment questions the Court's most recent application of the strict scrutiny standard in free exercise challenges which effectively swept away the rights of animals. First, this comment discusses the evolution of animal legal rights. Next, this comment provides an overview of free exercise jurisprudence with particular emphasis on the test articulated in Employment Division, Department of …

Clergy Sexual Misconduct: Confronting The Difficult Constitutional And Institutional Liability Issues, James T. O'Reilly, Joann M. Strasser

St. Thomas Law Review

Sexual misconduct among clergy members is a rare but troubling societal phenomenon, made more evident in the 1990s by dramatic news reporting and high-profile litigation demands. Revelation is no longer just an uplifting part of the New Testament; revelation is a tabloid tactic for uplifting television ratings and newspaper sales by assailing massive sexual scandals in the churches. This article focuses on a clash of doctrines that is developing in tort cases, when institutional churches are sued for failure to adequately oversee and control their errant ministers and priests. The clash arises because the religious doctrines of faith, responsibility and …

The First Amendment Distinction Between Conduct And Content: A Conceptual Framework For Understanding Fighting Words Jurisprudence, Aviva O. Wertheimer

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Annual Federal Deficit Spending: Sending The Judiciary To The Rescue, Ondrea D. Riley

Santa Clara Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hate Speech, Offensive Speech, And Public Discourse In America, Edward J. Eberle

Law Faculty Scholarship

In this article, Professor Eberle discusses several limitations on governmental power to regulate public discourse. After examining the United States Supreme Court decisions of R.A.V. v. City of St. Paula nd Wisconsin v. Mitchell, Professor Eberle concludes that government should refrain from regulating speech itself. Rather, any restrictions should focus strictly on the problematic conduct underlying the speech which justifies regulation. Professor Eberle also concludes that the Court has implicitly recognized two distinct subcategories of "content" discrimination and viewpoint discrimination. Both subcategories are presumptively unconstitutional and nominally subject to conventional strict scrutiny. The Court, however, finds viewpoint discrimination more dangerous …

The Constitutional Case Against Precedent, Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

A recent, and characteristically illuminating, article by Professor Henry Monaghan confidently announces that "[p] recedent is, of course, part of our understanding of what law is."1 As a descriptive matter, Professor Monaghan is entirely correct. Legal analysis-by lawyers, courts, and academics-typically begins and ends with precedent. Law students are meticulously trained in the art of reading, applying, and distinguishing cases. Court pinions, including Supreme Court opinions, on constitutional matters frequently consist entirely of discussions of past decisions, without so much as a reference to the Constitution itself.' Even in this era of law-and-metatheory, case analysis is still the mainstay of …

Different Religions, Different Politics: Evaluating The Role Of Competing Religious Traditions In American Politics And Law, Daniel O. Conkle

Articles by Maurer Faculty

In addressing the role of religion in politics and law, American political theory has strongly embraced the principle of religious equality. In this article, I explain how this principle has evolved and how it has nourished the privatization of religion and the secularization of public discourse by generating the view that public evaluations of religion are inappropriate. Under this view, religion is a private good that lacks public significance. As matters merely of private taste, matters that cannot be evaluated publicly, religious positions on political issues are not to be "imposed" on other citizens.

I challenge this reading of the …

Why Cases Under The Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciable, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Gender Law, Katharine T. Bartlett

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy

The inauguration of the DUKE JOURNAL OF GENDER LAW & POLICY represents an exciting step in the institutionalization of a subject area in academic law formerly found only at the fringe of legal scholarship and law school curriculums. Often shunned as a political activity inappropriate to institutions committed to academic rigor, objectivity, and neutrality, gender law has begun to lay down roots as a disciplined set of inquiries that enhance the rigor of conventional legal study and offer tools for improving the objectivity and neutrality of law, even as it challenges the conventional meanings of those concepts. There are two …

From Betrayal To Power, Elizabeth Debold, Marie Wilson, Idelisse Malave

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy

Resistance is the secret of joy! --Alice Walker Possessing the Secret of Joy What does it mean to love a daughter in a culture that is hostile to her integrity? In a culture where power equals dominance and superiority, men's control of public life--the world of political and economic power that shapes the desires of private life--places mothers in a double bind as their daughters approach womanhood. The common ways that mothers have of guiding daughters--what we call "the paths of least resistance" in chapter two 1 --ask girls to make deep psychological sacrifices to straddle the cultural division of …

Race And Gender Discrimination: A Historical Case For Equal Treatment Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Sandra L. Rierson

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy

It was we, the people, not we, the white male citizens, nor yet we, the male citizens, but we, the whole people, who formed this Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people--women as well as men. --Susan B. Anthony 1 Under the common law of both England and the United States, a married woman enjoyed a legal status only slightly better than that of a slave. Until the mid-nineteenth century, in no state could …

A Heterodox Catechism, Paul Campos

Publications

No abstract provided.

Terminator 2, Robert F. Nagel

Publications

No abstract provided.

Voice In Government: The People, Emily Calhoun

Publications

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law And International Law In The United States Of America, Lung-Chu Chen

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Facing The Challenge: A Lawyer's Response To Anti-Gay Initiatives, Suzanne B. Goldberg

Faculty Scholarship

We are living in an extraordinary period of gay and lesbian history. As lesbian and gay civil rights gain increasing recognition throughout the country – through small but growing numbers of laws prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination, court rulings protecting lesbian and gay parents' custody of their children, and a historically unprecedented level of positive media coverage – our struggles also have escalated enormously. Not only must we litigate and negotiate for equal opportunity in employment, housing, and parenting rights as always, but also we face a nationally organized and terrifically well-funded assault on our fundamental rights as citizens.

This nationwide …

Of Laws And Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View Of Criminal Procedure, Daniel C. Richman, Bruce A. Green

Faculty Scholarship

As a general rule, criminal defendants whose cases made it to the Supreme Court between 1967 and 1991 must have thought that, as long as Justice Thurgood Marshall occupied one of the nine seats, they had one vote for sure. And Justice Marshall rarely disappointed them – certainly not in cases of any broad constitutional significance. From his votes and opinions, particularly his dissents, many were quick to conclude that the Justice was another of those "bleeding heart liberals," hostile to the mission of law enforcement officers and ready to overlook the gravity of the crimes of which the defendants …

Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

The “Proper” Scope Of Federal Power: A Jurisdictional Interpretation Of The Sweeping Clause, Gary Lawson, Patricia B. Granger

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.