Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2344)
- Supreme Court of the United States (271)
- Courts (255)
- First Amendment (255)
- Legal History (246)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (235)
- Jurisprudence (223)
- Criminal Law (196)
- Law and Society (161)
- Judges (153)
- State and Local Government Law (146)
- International Law (140)
- Law and Politics (130)
- Criminal Procedure (125)
- Fourteenth Amendment (117)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (115)
- Administrative Law (114)
- Religion Law (97)
- Health Law and Policy (94)
- Jurisdiction (85)
- President/Executive Department (80)
- Legislation (79)
- Law and Gender (78)
- Education Law (77)
- Human Rights Law (72)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (72)
- Fourth Amendment (65)
- Property Law and Real Estate (65)
- Labor and Employment Law (61)
- Institution
-
- Duke Law (350)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (305)
- University of Colorado Law School (140)
- The University of Akron (134)
- Boston University School of Law (120)
-
- Columbia Law School (119)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (117)
- Fordham Law School (109)
- University of Georgia School of Law (99)
- Pepperdine University (94)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (92)
- American University Washington College of Law (81)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (81)
- West Virginia University (78)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (70)
- Georgetown University Law Center (67)
- Notre Dame Law School (64)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (59)
- University of South Carolina (59)
- William & Mary Law School (58)
- Cornell University Law School (50)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (49)
- Cleveland State University (43)
- Association of American Law Schools (42)
- University of Miami Law School (42)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (39)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (38)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (36)
- University of Maine School of Law (34)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (519)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (191)
- Publications (131)
- Scholarly Works (119)
- Fordham Law Review (87)
-
- West Virginia Law Review (77)
- Pepperdine Law Review (76)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (74)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (66)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (64)
- ConLawNOW (63)
- Journal Articles (63)
- Akron Law Review (62)
- Faculty Publications (61)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (59)
- Touro Law Review (58)
- Maryland Law Review (52)
- South Carolina Law Review (52)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (47)
- Duke Law Journal (46)
- St. Thomas Law Review (43)
- Journal of Legal Education (42)
- American University Law Review (38)
- Law Faculty Publications (38)
- Cornell Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (37)
- Faculty Working Papers (36)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (36)
- All Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (34)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2701 - 2730 of 3541
Full-Text Articles in Law
Are You My Mother?: Conceptualizing Children’S Identity Rights In Transracial Adoptions, Barbara Bennett Woodhouse
Are You My Mother?: Conceptualizing Children’S Identity Rights In Transracial Adoptions, Barbara Bennett Woodhouse
Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy
I. Adoption and the Clash of Rights Perspectives Adoption law in the United States, depending on whom you ask, is either at a turning point or hopelessly gridlocked. 1 Many issues seem to defy consensus. Media reports of high profile adoption cases 2 have attracted enormous attention, not only because of their inherent drama, but also because they implicate highly contested definitions of what makes a family. Many of the most volatile adoption issues are couched in terms of rights: the birth mother's right to confidentiality; the adoptive parent's right to be treated equally without regard to race, ethnicity, religion, …
The Size Of A Government Body Is Not Subject To A Vote Dilution Challenge Under Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act Of 1965., Peter J. Beverage
The Size Of A Government Body Is Not Subject To A Vote Dilution Challenge Under Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act Of 1965., Peter J. Beverage
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Holder v. Hall, the Court held the size of a government body is not subject to a vote dilution challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Act consists of two primary components, Sections 2 and 5, designed to eliminate and prevent subtle voting practices and procedures utilized to obstruct minority voter participation. Section 5 requires states with a history of discriminatory voting practices to obtain federal preclearance before changing a voting standard, practice, or procedure. Section 2 addresses the existing methods utilized to deny or abridge a citizen’s right to vote. In Holder, the …
Flow Control Ordinances That Require Disposal Of Trash At A Designated Facility Violate The Dormant Commerce Clause., Laura Gabrysch
Flow Control Ordinances That Require Disposal Of Trash At A Designated Facility Violate The Dormant Commerce Clause., Laura Gabrysch
St. Mary's Law Journal
In C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, the Court held flow control ordinances that require disposal of trash at a designated facility violate the Dormant Commerce Clause. In the absence of congressional action, the Court has recognized—the Dormant Commerce Clause—restrictions on states’ ability to regulate interstate commerce. The Dormant Commerce Clause doctrine does not emanate directly from the Constitution, but instead flows from the body of Commerce Clause jurisprudence that has gained legitimacy throughout the years. In Carbone, the Court elevated the economic interests of one local waste processor over Clarkstown’s environmental and public protection. This type …
Forty Years In The Desert, Paul F. Campos
Forty Years In The Desert, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The author uses Brown v. Board of Education and the volumes of commentary it has provoked to illustrate that coherent constitutional interpretation is a useless exercise. He argues that the decision should be accepted as political reality and moral necessity and that we should cease debating its merit as constitutional interpretation.
A Comment On "Constitutional Rights As Public Goods", Robert F. Nagel
A Comment On "Constitutional Rights As Public Goods", Robert F. Nagel
Publications
Discussion of T. W. Merrill, Dolan v. City of Tigard: Constitutional Rights as Public Goods, 72 Denv. U. L. Rev. 859 (1995).
Affirmative Action As A Women's Issue, Helen Norton
Affirmative Action As A Women's Issue, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
A Holistic Approach To Criminal Justice Scholarship, William T. Pizzi
A Holistic Approach To Criminal Justice Scholarship, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
What's Quality Got To Do With It?: Constitutional Theory, Politics, And Education Reform, Phil Weiser
What's Quality Got To Do With It?: Constitutional Theory, Politics, And Education Reform, Phil Weiser
Publications
No abstract provided.
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
An American Perspective On Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection And Sexual Orientation, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Equal Protection And Sexual Orientation, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Equality is the thread running through the fundamental liberties enshrined in our Constitution. ... Equality, expressed in Art 12 of the [Singapore] Constitution, is also a specific right enforceable by the court. The difficulty comes in applying this deceptively simple concept to real-life situations. ... In considering the validity of legislation, Singapore and Malaysian courts have generally favored rational review, a modest conception of equal protection, unlike their American counterparts which have adopted a more expansive reading in the form of strict and intermediate review. This article examines how these three levels of equal protection review operate, and argues that …
Beyond The Historical Justice Debate: The Incorporation Of International Law And The Impact On Constitutional Structures And Rights In Hungary, Duc V. Trang
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In 1993, the Hungarian Constitutional Court upheld a draft law that would allow the prosecution of crimes committed during the 1956 uprising, despite the expiration of statutes of limitations. In reaching this result, the Court raised international law to the level of a constitutional standard by which Hungary's domestic laws would be judged. In this Article, the author examines the impact of the Court's decision to transform international law into domestic law. The author explores the implications of adopting international law on the relationship between the Court and other branches of the government, the development of domestic law, the growth …
Judicial Jurisdiction In The Conflict Of Laws Course: Adding A Comparative Dimension, Linda J. Silberman
Judicial Jurisdiction In The Conflict Of Laws Course: Adding A Comparative Dimension, Linda J. Silberman
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In this Article, Professor Silberman suggests that comparative law materials can usefully be introduced in the conflict of laws course. She proposes the subject of adjudicatory jurisdiction as a good place to start. She argues that a comparison of the U.S. approach with the English and European approaches (particularly under the Brussels Convention) is evidence of the desirability of a jurisdictional system grounded more on rules and/or discretion rather than on a constitutional standard of reasonableness. She takes issue with the contention of her colleague Professor Andreas Lowenfeld that "reasonableness" has been accepted as an international standard for the assertion …
The Supreme Court And Local Government Law 1993-94 Term: Introduction, Howard A. Glickstein
The Supreme Court And Local Government Law 1993-94 Term: Introduction, Howard A. Glickstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rediscovering The Constitution, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Rediscovering The Constitution, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The fundamental liberties in our Constitution involve a study of tensions: between an individual's rights and the community's interests, between the role of the judiciary on the one hand and the executive and legislature on the other. How we should interpret them depends on where we think equilibrium should be established. This depends on two main factors. The first is the proper function of the judiciary as laid down by our Constitution, which is discussed in Part I of this article. The second is the nature of our fundamental liberties, for they are worded with varying degrees of generality. ... …
Mistakes Precedent And The Rise Of The Administrative State: Toward A Constitutional Theory Of The Second Best , Peter B. Mccutchen
Mistakes Precedent And The Rise Of The Administrative State: Toward A Constitutional Theory Of The Second Best , Peter B. Mccutchen
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law, Seann G. Hazzard, Joshua M. Henderson, Alicia A. Richardson, Michael R. Sullivan
Constitutional Law, Seann G. Hazzard, Joshua M. Henderson, Alicia A. Richardson, Michael R. Sullivan
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federalism In The Americas In Comparative Perspective, Keith S. Rosenn
Federalism In The Americas In Comparative Perspective, Keith S. Rosenn
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Care Reform And The Constitutional Limits On Private Accreditation As An Alternative To Direct Government Regulation, Michael J. Astrue
Health Care Reform And The Constitutional Limits On Private Accreditation As An Alternative To Direct Government Regulation, Michael J. Astrue
Law and Contemporary Problems
The various subagencies of the HHS have opposing positions on the use of private accreditation in health care regulation, due to their different views of their missions. The use of the private delegation doctrine, an obscure constitutional doctrine, in health care cases in court is examined.
Public Law From The Bottom Up, William N. Eskridge Jr.
Public Law From The Bottom Up, William N. Eskridge Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
One Person One Office: Separation Of Powers Or Separation Of Personnel , Steven G. Calabresi, Joan L. Larsen
One Person One Office: Separation Of Powers Or Separation Of Personnel , Steven G. Calabresi, Joan L. Larsen
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ninth Life: An Interpretive Theory Of The Ninth Amendment, Chase J. Sanders
Ninth Life: An Interpretive Theory Of The Ninth Amendment, Chase J. Sanders
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Digging Up New Revenue: Retrospective Estate Taxation And The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, Michael George
Digging Up New Revenue: Retrospective Estate Taxation And The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, Michael George
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The People Seriously , Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
Taking The People Seriously , Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Purely Retroactive Legislation Limited By The Separation Of Powers?: Rethinking United States V. Klein , J. Richard Doidge
Is Purely Retroactive Legislation Limited By The Separation Of Powers?: Rethinking United States V. Klein , J. Richard Doidge
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deficit Reduction: Democracy, Technocracy, And Constitutionalism In The European Union, Paul D. Marquardt
Deficit Reduction: Democracy, Technocracy, And Constitutionalism In The European Union, Paul D. Marquardt
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law
No abstract provided.
Florida Constitutional Theory (For Clifford Alloway), Patrick O. Gudridge
Florida Constitutional Theory (For Clifford Alloway), Patrick O. Gudridge
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Les Représentations De «Société Libre Et Démocratique» A La Cour Dickson : La Rhétorique Dans Le Discours Judiciaire Canadien, Andree Lajoie, Regine Robin, Sebastien Grammond, Henry Quillinan, Louise Rolland, Stéphane Perrault, Armelle Chitrit
Les Représentations De «Société Libre Et Démocratique» A La Cour Dickson : La Rhétorique Dans Le Discours Judiciaire Canadien, Andree Lajoie, Regine Robin, Sebastien Grammond, Henry Quillinan, Louise Rolland, Stéphane Perrault, Armelle Chitrit
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The expression "free and democratic society" is the focus of our research, which sheds light on the contribution of the Supreme Court to the constitutionalization of this concept. Leaving aside the institutional and psycho-social factors, the study confirms the hypothesis that the interpretation of this expression will vary (1) according to the conceptions formerly held by the individual judges and (2) with respect to the factors favoured by a rhetorical Perelman-like analysis, which considers the factual and judicial context and the expectations of both the universal and specific audiences. At the Supreme Court level, the expectations of the latter should …
The Continuing Evolution Of Criminal Constitutional Law In State Courts, S. Carran Daughtrey
The Continuing Evolution Of Criminal Constitutional Law In State Courts, S. Carran Daughtrey
Vanderbilt Law Review
Although early state constitutions were important and ambitious documents for their time, the development of state constitutional law stagnated after the drafting and adoption of the federal constitution., As the doctrine of federalism has resurfaced, however, states have begun to turn to their constitutions to grant more protection for their citizens. The states' criminal constitutional laws have changed significantly and continue to evolve today.
In the 1960s, the Warren Court expanded basic protections for criminal defendants by finding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. The Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual …
A Precarious Path: The Bill Of Rights After 200 Years, Tony A. Freyer
A Precarious Path: The Bill Of Rights After 200 Years, Tony A. Freyer
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Bill of Rights occupies an ambiguous place in American society. Americans favor the Bill of Rights in principle, but when asked whether they support particular rights guarantees for real-life practices such as gun ownership, capital punishment, abortion, and flag burning, Americans fervently and profoundly disagree. The essays David J. Bodenhamer and James W. Ely, Jr. have compiled in The Bill of Rights in Modern America After 200 Years, richly suggest why Americans have reconciled principle and practice with such difficulty. Written for a popular audience by specialists who possess a profound knowledge of and differing views concerning the technical …
State Courts Reject "Leon" On State Constitutional Grounds: A Defense Of Reactive Rulings, Leigh A. Morrissey
State Courts Reject "Leon" On State Constitutional Grounds: A Defense Of Reactive Rulings, Leigh A. Morrissey
Vanderbilt Law Review
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court announced a broad exception to the federal exclusionary rule' in United States v. Leon. The Court held the exclusionary rule inapplicable when police officers obtain evidence in reasonable, good faith reliance on a warrant later found to be defective. Commentators had advised against the creation of the so-called good faith exception before Leon. After Leon, they promulgated a torrent of commentary criticizing both the Leon Court's reasoning and its result. Today, because Leon does not control state constitutional decisions, the battle over the good faith exception is fought on the state level. Currently, …