Law Commons^™

Taking Chances: The United States' Policy On Internet Gambling And Its International Implications, Yevgeniya Roysen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Super Bowl Hero To Bank Account Zero, Scott Hollander

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Satellite Transponders And Free Expression, Monroe E. Price

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Where's The Remote? The Importance Of The Location Of The Remote Control (And The One Who Uses It) In Determining Liability For Copyright Infringement For Remote Storage Dvrs, Cindy Abramson

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Beginning Of A New Age?: The Unconscionability Of The "360-Degree" Deal, Ian Brereton

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Transformation Of Originality In The Progressive-Era Debate Over Copyright In News, Robert Brauneis

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

No More Power To Imply: Gonzaga V. Doe And The Evisceration Of § 253(C) Of The Telecommunications Act, Josh Gajer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Striking Nafta Gold: Glamis Advances Investor-State Arbitration , Jordan C. Kahn

Fordham International Law Journal

On June 9, 2009, a controversial and longstanding North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") arbitration was resolved in favor of the United States. Overviews of the dispute and NAFTA investor-state arbitrations are set forth in Parts I and II, respectively. Part III explains that the process employed was commendably transparent, especially in accommodating tribal interests, and should serve as a model for future proceedings. The award positively advances two international legal protections: regulatory takings and "fair and equitable treatment." Although the takings analysis described in Part IV confirms that NAFTA claimants have procedural advantages over domestic litigants, its pro-government framework …

A Legal Regime For The Mining Of Helium-3 On The Moon: U.S. Policy Options, Richard B. Bilder

Fordham International Law Journal

Absent an agreed international legal framework, attempts by the United States or any other nation or private entity to acquire and bring to Earth significant quantities of He-3 could give rise to controversy and conflict. Consequently, it seems timely to revisit the issue of the legal regime potentially applicable to exploiting He-3 and other lunar resources. Part I of this Article will briefly discuss the technical and economic prospects for the develop of He-3-based fusion energy. Part II lays out the present legal situation concerning the exploitation of lunar resources such as He-3. Part III analyzes whether it is prudent …

Nuclear Weapons And The Rule Of Law, Sergio Duarte

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Japan's New Criminal Jury Trial System: In Need Of More Transparency, More Access, And More Time, Matthew J. Wilson

Fordham International Law Journal

The lay judge system has considerable potential both in concept and form. To realize its full potential, the system needs to overcome various structural impediments and cultural challenges. This Article further contributes to the emerging discussion by detailing three related areas that merit attention and reform if the system is going to realize its full potential. Namely, the lay judge system would benefit from 1) increased transparency by eliminating punitive measures against citizen judges desiring to freely speak about the trial proceedings or deliberation process oncle the trial is complete; 2) impoved access to the interrogation of detained suspects and …

Who Is Making International Tax Policy?: International Organizations As Power Players In A High Stakes World, Diane Ring

Fordham International Law Journal

This Article begins the process of mapping the inquiry into the role of international organizations in tax policy. It identifies four basic questions that must be addressed and specifies the more sophisticated inquiries that must then be undertaken. This Article commences the empirical examination through two case studies: one regarding inclusion of a mandatory arbitration clause in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (“OECD”) Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital, and one regarding recent international efforts to curb “harmful” tax competition. Part I outlines the rising importance of international tax matters and the reasons that international organizations are …

Federalism And The Rule Of Law: Perspectives From The European Court Of Justice, Koen Lenaerts

Fordham International Law Journal

This Article unfolds as follows: Section I looks at the "pervasive effect" of European Union ("EU") law upon the substantive law of the Member States. Instead of attempting to cover all cases where this effect has arisen, a selective but in-depth approach is preferred. In this regard, four areas falling within the competences of the Member States will be discussed, namely education, family law, direct taxation, and health care. Section II is devoted to the pervasive effects of EU law upon national rules of procedure. Taking four cases as examples, this Section sets out to demonstrate that the European Court …

If At First You Don't Succeed: Vote, Vote Again: Analyzing The Second Referendum Phenomenon In Eu Treaty Change, Gráinne De Búrca

Fordham International Law Journal

The aim of this Essay is to probe the causes of the European Union's ("EU") second-referendum practice with a view to better understand what strikes many observers as a procedurally bizarre and democratically dubious exercise. It is not the intention of this Essay to offer any justification for the practice, but rather to explain the factors specific to the EU which have contributed to its recurrence.

Revisiting Free Movement Of Workers, Robin C. A. White

Fordham International Law Journal

This Essay examines aspects of the free movement of workers and the issues concerning the content and impact of the introduction of citizenship of the European Union ("EU" or "Union"). This Essay draws from seven years of opinions from Advocate General Slynn, which were written during a highly formative period in the development of Community law. Defining who is a worker and examining the benefits of having and retaining this worker status remain as important today as they were in the late 1980s, when relevant seminal case law of the Court of Justice was established. In many of those cases, …

Child Support And (In) Ability To Pay: The Case For The Cost Shares Model, Pamela Foohey

Scholarly Works

Currently enacted child support guidelines primarily focus on maintaining children's economic well-being when a single household is split into two. This article argues that this focus discounts another consideration which, when combined with the current analysis, could further advance children's well-being: the ability of parents to pay. An analysis of payment characteristics demonstrates that lower child support obligations may increase the amount of child support paid on average. Lowering presumptive obligations will make lower-income parents better able and more likely to pay their obligations, thereby increasing the amount of child support paid to lower-income children, while at most only marginally …

The President's Welcome Address The President's Welcome Address (2008 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Symposium), Franklyn M. Casale

Intercultural Human Rights Law Review

Rev. Monsignor Franklyn M. Casale's welcome address for the 2008 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Annual Symposium.

Sanctions And International Law (Keynote Address), W. Michael Reisman

Intercultural Human Rights Law Review

Keynote Address by W. Michael Reisman, Myres S. McDougal Professor of International Law at Yale Law School, for the 2008 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Annual Symposium.

Human Rights: The Crises Today, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen

Intercultural Human Rights Law Review

Keynote Dinner Address by Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Ranking Member of U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Foreign Affairs, for the Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Annual Symposium.

International Legal Instrument On Human Trafficking And A Victim-Oriented Approach: Which Gaps Are To Be Filled, Federico Lenzerini

Intercultural Human Rights Law Review

The present contribution will first provide a description of the evolution of the international anti-trafficking legal action, with particular attention to the specific provisions aimed at ensuring victim protection. This article will attempt to explore which possible improvements could be adopted in order to make such an action more effective in the light of the contemporary characterization of the awful practice of trafficking in human beings.

Why Civil Liability For Disclosure Violations When Issuers Do Not Trade?, Merritt B. Fox

Faculty Scholarship

Civil damages liability for securities law periodic disclosure violations has come under attack, particularly fraud-on-the-market class-action lawsuits for investor losses incurred in connection with trading in the secondary market when the issuer has not sold shares. The main line of attack has been the weakness of the compensatory rationale for such suits. Without a compensatory justification, the attackers suggest, the availability of this cause of action is hard to defend given the very substantial use of social resources involved in the litigation that it generates. The critics are right concerning the weakness of the compensatory justification for civil liability. They …

The Effects Of Asymmetric Vs. Symmetric Probability Of Targets Following Probe And Irrelevant Stimuli In The Complex Trial Protocol For Detection Of Concealed Information With P300, J. Peter Rosenfeld, Monica Tang, John B. Meixner Jr., Michael Winograd, Elena Labkovsky

Scholarly Works

The complex trial protocol (CTP, [J.P. Rosenfeld, E. Labkovsky, M. Winograd, M.A. Lui, C. Vandenboom & E. Chedid (2008), The complex trial protocol (CTP): a new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate P300-based method for detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 45, 906–919.]) is a sensitive, new, countermeasure-resistant, P300-based concealed information protocol in which a first stimulus (Probe or Irrelevant) is followed after about 1.4–1.8 s by a Target or Non-Target second stimulus within one trial. It has been previously run with a potentially confounding asymmetric conditional probability of Targets following Probes vs. Irrelevants. This present study compared asymmetric vs. symmetric conditional probability groups and …

Assigned Versus Random Countermeasure-Like Responses In The P300-Based Complex Trial Protocol For Detection Of Deception: Task Demand Effects, John B. Meixner Jr., Alexander Haynes, Michael Winograd, Jordan Brown, J. Peter Rosenfeld

Scholarly Works

The Concealed Information Test (CIT) is a credibility assessment protocol of an entirely different nature than the traditional lie detector test. Instead of attempting to detect actual lying (the goal of the commonly used Control Question Test), the goal of the CIT is to determine whether an individual possesses knowledge of specific details of a crime or event. For example, if a murder was committed at 800 Church Avenue using a .38 caliber revolver, the CIT seeks to determine whether a suspect recognizes the address and type of weapon.

The CIT presents subjects with various stimuli, one of which is …

Section 8(F) Prehire Agreements And The Exception To Majority Representation: Are Construction Workers Getting The Shaft?, Desiree Leclercq

Scholarly Works

Congress has neglected the federal labor rights of construction workers for half a century. Back in 1959, Congress addressed the needs of construction workers and attempted to ensure that those workers, who were hired by construction employers for erratic and short periods of time, retained the right to organize in unions. To that end, Congress added section 8(f) to the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), authorizing construction employers and unions to enter voluntarily into prehire collective bargaining agreements covering construction workers. Additionally, Congress included a proviso permitting employers to require, as a condition of employment, that their employees join the …

Procedural Adequacy, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Scholarly Works

This short piece responds to Jay Tidmarsh’s article, Rethinking Adequacy of Representation, 87 Texas Law Review 1137 (2009). I explore Professor Tidmarsh’s proposed “do no harm” approach to adequate representation in class actions from a procedural legitimacy perspective. I begin by considering the assumption underlying his alternative, namely that in any given class action both attorneys and class representatives tend to act as self-interested homo economicus and we must therefore tailor the adequacy requirement to curb self-interest only in so far as it makes class members worse off than they would be with individual litigation. Adopting the “do no harm” …

Procedural Justice In Nonclass Aggregation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Scholarly Works

Nonclass aggregate litigation is risky for plaintiffs: it falls into the gray area between individual litigation and certified class actions. Although scholars have formulated procedural protections for both extremes, the unique danger and allure posed by nonclass aggregation has been undertheorized, leaving mass tort claimants with inadequate safeguards. When hallmark features of mass torts include attenuated attorney-client relationships, numerous litigants, and the demise of adversarial legalism, the attorney-client relationship itself becomes another bargaining chip in the exchange of rights. This Article thus takes the initial steps toward advancing a cohesive theory of procedural justice in nonclass aggregation by exposing the …

The Case Against The Arbitration Fairness Act, Peter B. Rutledge

Scholarly Works

The Arbitration Fairness Act is a well-intended but ultimately misguided attempt to address a system of dispute resolution that has largely worked well. The bill currently being considered by Congress rests on a series of flawed empirical premises. This article addresses three. First, though the bill posits that arbitration leaves consumers and employees worse off, data demonstrate individuals overall are often better off under a system with enforceable predispute arbitration agreements than a system without them. Second, although the bill promises improved access to justice, the proposal actually erects more impediments. Third, though the bill suggests that postdispute arbitration will …

Scott V. Harris And The Role Of The Jury In Constitutional Litigation, Michael Wells

Scholarly Works

Suits brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 to recover damages for excessive force by the police bear some resemblance to common law tort litigation, since the key Fourth Amendment issue is whether the force was 'unreasonable.' In ordinary negligence law the jury typically decides whether an actor has exercised reasonable care, even when there is no dispute as to the facts. In section 1983 litigation the federal courts are badly split on the allocation of decision making between judge and jury, sometimes even within a particular circuit. The Supreme Court recently faced the judge-jury issue in Scott v. Harris, where …

A Litigation-Oriented Approach To Teaching Federal Courts, Michael Wells

Scholarly Works

The traditional focus of the course on Federal Courts has been the study of highly abstract principles of separation of powers and federalism. This paper argues that most students are better served by a course that focuses on what lawyers need to know in order to litigate issues regarding the types of disputes federal courts may address and the division of authority between federal and state courts. With that aim in mind, the paper suggests that the course should focus largely on the opportunities and obstacles faced by lawyers seeking to advance federal constitutional or statutory claims in the federal …

Shareholder Bylaws And The Delaware Corporation, Christopher M. Bruner

Scholarly Works

Much like hostile tender offers in the 1980s and 1990s, shareholder bylaws purporting to limit board authority in key areas of corporate governance are, once again, forcing Delaware's courts to grapple with the fundamental nature of the corporate form.

In this (short) essay written for a roundtable discussion at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools, I discuss CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan - the 2008 opinion in which the Delaware Supreme Court began to define the nature and scope of the shareholders' bylaw authority. In CA, Inc. the court held that a proposed …