Law Commons^™

Hall V. Nalco Co.: Redefining Female Infertility, Erin Percy

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Be Quick-But Don't Hurry: Competing Purposes Of The Federal Arbitration Act And Hall Street Associates V. Mattel, Keith Joseph Fernandez

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Citizen Employees, Richard R. Carlson

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Case Information: People V. White

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

No abstract provided.

Presentation On People V. White, Frederick K. Brewington, Esq.

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

No abstract provided.

Presentation On People V. Goetz, Mark Baker, Esq.

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

No abstract provided.

Health Care Law, Kathleen M. Mccauley, Kristi L. Vanderlaan

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Labor And Employment Law, Vijay K. Mago, Nancy B. Sasser, Allison M. Perry

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Land Use And Zoning Law: The Current Lay Of The Land, Philip C. Strother, Matthew R. Farley

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taxation, Craig D. Bell

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preface, Matthew R. Farley

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Memoriam: Robert E. Shepherd, Jr., John G. Douglass

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Professor Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. September 22, 1937 - December 11, 2008, Hon. Walter S. Felton Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Special Education Law, William H. Hurd, Stephen C. Piepgrass

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Virginia Uniform Power Of Attorney Act, Andrew H. Hook, Lisa V. Johnson

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Partnership Derivative Suits: Jennings V. Kay Jennings Ltd. P'Ship, Patricia Collins Mccullagh

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bankruptcy Law, Hon. Douglas O. Tice Jr., Suzanne E. Wade, K. Elizabeth Sieg

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Corporate And Business Law, Laurence V. Parker

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law And Procedure, Michael T. Judge, Stephen R. Mccullough

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Museletter: November 2009, Suzanne Corriell

Museletter

This Issue:

An Interview with President-Elect Joyce Manna-Janto

Converting a PDF to a Word File by Kimberly Wiseman Computer Services Coordinator

Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice: a Review by Timothy L. Coggins, Associate Dean for Library and Information Services

Law Library Newsletter, Volume 1, Issue 4 – November/December 2009, Kresge Law Library

Law Library Newsletter

We are quickly moving toward the end of the fall 2009 semester. For me and my colleagues in the Kresge Law Library, the end of this semester will mean that we are only one semester away from the completion of the renovation of the “old” law school. As the 2010 spring semester ends, we will be starting to move all of our print volumes and microforms into Biolchini Hall. This edition of the Law Library News contains some photographs of the construction site. The Reading Room ceiling has been finished, and I think the final renovated space will be spectacular. …

Employment And Training Policy In The United States During The Economic Crisis, Christopher J. O'Leary, Randall W. Eberts

Conference Papers

No abstract provided.

A Minimalist Charter Of Rights For Australia: The U.K. Or Canada As A Model?, Rosalind Dixon

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Ambiguous Statutes, Saul Levmore

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Judge Frank Easterbrook is known for insisting that legislative intent is a misconception, bordering on oxymoron. He has also advanced the idea that legislative bargains should be upheld by courts and that where a legislature leaves a “gap,” courts should be non-activis rather than eager gap-fillers. Still, there are many cases where legislation leaves ambiguities. I suggest that the cause of an ambiguity has some bearing on the best way for a judge to resolve it. Easterbrook decisions, including an Equal Pay Act case, where (unequal) wages were based on prior compensation, are used to reveal various strategies for dealing …

Interest Groups And The Problem With Incrementalism, Saul Levmore

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Incrementalism, as opposed to dramatic change, is conventionally lauded in law as the prudent path of change--a path that gives credit to history and precedent. But the conventional view pays little attention to interest groups. Step-by-step change poses a serious problem when it alters the constellation of supporters and opponents of further moves. The core problem is that once an interest group loses and becomes subject to some regulation, it has reason to turn on its competitors and encourage that they be similarly regulated. The laws that emerge on the incrementalist's path may therefore not mark progress toward socially desirable …

Justifying Jones, M. Todd Henderson

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

No abstract provided.

Nra V. City Of Chicago: Does The Second Amendment Bind Frank Easterbrook?, Richard A. Epstein

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

In NRA v. City of Chicago, Judge Easterbrook held that the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms, did not bind state governments. This article examines the reasoning that he uses to reach that result, which it contrasts with the style of argumentation that led to the opposite conclusion in Judge O'Scannlain's decision in Norkdye v. King. Easterbrook's approach emphasized the imperative need for lower court deference to the Supreme Court's explicit Reconstruction Era holdings that the Second Amendment does not bind the states, even after the Supreme Court's game-changing decision in District of Columbia V. …

Procd V. Zeidenberg And Cognitive Overload In Contractual Bargaining, Eric A. Posner

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in ProCD v. Zeidenberg has been heavily criticized for ignoring the law and making unrealistic assumptions about the ability of consumers to read and understand contract terms. This contribution to a symposium on Judge Easterbrook's judicial output argues that the opinion is a classic example of the manipulation of legal doctrine to advance a policy goal— here, enabling sellers to communicate contract terms when buyers' time and attention are limited. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, Judge Easterbrook implicitly assumes that buyers are fallible, not hyperrational; his doctrinal solution persuasively addresses the problem of cognitive overload while …

Antitrust And Innovation: Framing Baselines In The Google Book Search Settlement, Randal C. Picker

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

No abstract provided.

Assessing Competition Issues In The Amended Google Book Search Settlement, Randal C. Picker

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

No abstract provided.