Law Commons^™

Excluding Unfit Workers: Social Control Versus Social Justice In The Age Of Economic Reform, David E. Bernstein, Thomas C. Leonard

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

States Of Resistance: The Real Id Act And The Limits Of Federal Deputization Of State Agencies In The Regulation Of Non-Citizens, Shirley Lin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Assessing Substance Abuse And Mental Health Among Lawyers, Susan Grover, Mark R. Voss

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

E-Filing And Privacy: What Every Lawyer Needs To Know, Rebecca Green

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

A Choice Of Law Dilemma: The Conflict And Reconciliation Of Laws Governing Cross-Border Transfers Of Stolen Art, Monique Lee

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note explores the complexities of cross-border transfers of stolen art, focusing on the legal dilemmas posed by differing international property laws. It examines how courts decide which jurisdiction's laws to apply, particularly contrasting the traditional lex situs rule with the Second Restatement's "most significant relationship" test. The analysis highlights New York's unique "combined modern" approach, which balances these methods to align with its policy goals, especially its role as a global art market hub. The note concludes that while this approach offers flexibility, it may lead to forum shopping and inconsistencies, complicating recovery efforts for claimants.

A License To Kill: America's Balance Of War Powers And The Flaws Of The War Powers Resolution, Michael Mandel

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The War Powers Resolution, enacted to balance executive and legislative war powers, has struggled with effectiveness due to judicial non-intervention and executive discretion, as seen in cases like Crockett v. Reagan and deployments such as Grenada, highlighting the need for reform.

The High Costs Of Costs: Fees As Barriers To Access Within The United States And Canadian Freedom Of Information Régimes, Zachary Pall

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that the fee structures under the United States Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Canadian Access to Information Act create significant barriers to accessing government records, undermining the principle of transparency. While both systems aim to balance access with resource management, the U.S. system is particularly criticized for its complexity and inefficiency, which discourages requesters and fails to serve the public interest. The Canadian system, though flawed, offers a more streamlined approach that could provide valuable lessons for reforming the U.S. system.

Administrative Law And Culture For The U.S. Collaborative Governance State, David H. Rosenbloomn, Mei Jen Hung

Journal of Dispute Resolution

During the 1980s and 1990s, collaborative governance emerged as a potentially new global paradigm for public administration. It comes in many forms. However, its essence is governmental reliance on nongovernmental entities for the delivery of public services and constraints. Simply put, collaborative governance calls on government to focus on "steering" while relying on third parties to do the "rowing." In the United States, collaborative government is not new in kind-the federal government relied on contractors to convey the mail from the early days of the republic. Rather it is new in scope, accounting for billions of dollars and millions of …

Unexcused Absence: A Review Of The Need, Costs, And (Lack Of) State Support For Peer Mediation Programs In U.S. Schools, Matthew D. Decker

Journal of Dispute Resolution

You might not have heard about peer mediation lately. You might not have heard about it at all. That's a problem. Peer mediation, though grossly underutilized, could be the potent and cost-effective answer to many of the problems facing U.S. schools.

A Mile Wide And An Inch Deep No More: Achieving Access To Justice In Rural Montana, Klaus Sitte

Montana Law Review

A Mile Wide and an Inch Deep No More

The Politics Of Merit Selection, Brian T. Fitzpatrick

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

In this Article, I undertake an evaluation of a method of judicial selection known as "merit selection." The merit system is distinctive from the other systems of judicial selection in the powerful role it accords lawyers. Proponents of the merit system contend that it is superior to the other forms of judicial selection -- elections or appointment by elected officials -- because lawyers are more likely to select judges on the basis of "merit" and less likely to select judges on the basis of "politics" (i.e., the personal ideological preferences of judicial candidates) than are voters or elected officials. But …

The Tangled Web Of Ugc: Making Copyright Sense Of User-Generated Content, Daniel J. Gervais

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Even as a mere conceptual cloud, the term "user-generated content" is useful to discuss the societal shifts in content creation brought about by the participative web and perhaps best epitomized by the remix phenomenon. This Article considers the copyright aspects of UGC. On the one hand, the production of UGC may involve both the right of reproduction and the right of adaptation-the right to prepare derivative works. On the other hand, defenses against claims of infringement of these rights typically rely on (transformative) fair use or the fact that an insubstantial amount (such as a quote) of the preexisting work …

Managing Incidental Findings In Human Subjects Research: Analysis And Recommendations, Ellen Wright Clayton, Susan M. Wolf, Frances P. Lawrenz, Charles A. Nelson, Et Al.

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Researchers, institutional review boards (IRBs), participants in human subjects research, and their families face an important but largely neglected problem - how should incidental find- ings (IFs) be managed in human subjects research. If researchers unexpectedly stumble upon information of potential health or reproductive significance, should they seek expert evaluation, contact the participant's physician, tell the research participant, or respond with some combination? What should consent forms and the entire consent process say about how IFs will be handled in research? What should IRBs require? An IF is a finding concerning an individual research participant that has potential health or …

Back To A Future: Reversing Keith Simpson's Death Sentence And Making Peace With The Victim's Family Through Post-Conviction Investigation, John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

In 1993, Keith Simpson was arrested for the murder of Joe Harrison; in 2006, he was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole in 2022. Between those two events, Simpson was sentenced to death, had his death sentence vacated by the post-conviction relief court, reached a plea agreement with the victim's family and the new Solicitor, saw the agreement invalidated when the Attorney General's office overrode the family and the Solicitor by appealing the post-conviction court's decision, lost the lower court's decision to an appellate reversal, and won a cross-appeal for a new trial. You just never know. You …

Executive Branch Contempt Of Congress, Josh Chafetz

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

After former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten refused to comply with subpoenas issued by a congressional committee investigating the firing of a number of United States Attorneys, the House of Representatives voted in 2008 to hold them in contempt. The House then chose a curious method of enforcing its contempt citation: it filed a federal lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that Miers and Bolten were in contempt of Congress and an injunction ordering them to comply with the subpoenas. The district court ruled for the House, although that ruling was subsequently stayed …

Celebrating Critical Race Theory At 20, Angela Onwuachi-Willig

Faculty Scholarship

The year 2009 marks the twentieth anniversary of the first Critical Race Theory (CRT) workshop. On July 8, 1989, more than twenty scholars "who were interested in defining and elaborating on the lived reality of race, and who were open to the aspiration of developing theory" gathered together at a workshop in Madison, Wisconsin. 1 The 1989 workshop, which was spearheaded by Kimberle Crenshaw and organized by her, Neil Gotanda, and Stephanie Phillips, also included as its participants Anita Allen, Taunya Banks, Derrick Bell, Kevin Brown, Paulette Caldwell, John Calmore, Harlon Dalton, Richard Delgado, Linda Greene, Trina Grillo, Isabelle Gunning, …

A Quality Life, Frances H. Miller

Faculty Scholarship

DEDICATION OF ISSUE TO ALLAN MACURDY

Allan Macurdy passed away June 23, 2008. Mr. Macurdy was a visiting associate professor at the Boston University School of Law and the director of Boston University’s Office of Disability Services. Mr. Macurdy was also a graduate of the Boston University College of Arts and Sciences (’84) and the School of Law (’86).

The following three pieces are memories of Mr. Macurdy by Professor Frances Miller, Professor Larry Yackle and William S. Richardson School of Law Dean Aviam Soifer. The tragedy of Mr. Macurdy’s passing, a noted disability rights advocate, was only underscored by …

Review Of Outlawed Pigs: Law, Religion, And Culture In Israel, Pnina Lahav

Faculty Scholarship

In "Safe Treyf' (http://soc.qc.cuny.edu/Staff/levine/SAFE-TREYF.pdf), Gaye Tuchman and Harry G. Levine explain how Chinese Food helped New York Jews overcome the Jewish Taboo on eating pork. Chinese Food "disguises the tabooed ingredients by cutting, chopping, and mincing them.... [It] could be adopted by rebellious Jews because the forbidden substances were so disguised that dishes did not reflexively repulse and so undermine their ability to rebel." Daphne Barak-Erez, a professor at the faculty of law at Tel Aviv University, has written a fine book in which she looks at the history of the pork taboo-but from the perspective of Israeli Jews.

This …

Rwu School Of Law Enewsletter, Roger Williams University School Of Law

School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events

No abstract provided.

Moving In The Open Daylight, Nicola Colbran

Human Rights & Human Welfare

The road ahead for Sri Lanka is certainly not easy. Although the government has declared that the LTTE ( Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) has been defeated, this “victory” has come at a high cost for civilian lives and democratic values. Decades of instability and violence have given rise to deep rooted and sustained human rights violations. Thousands of Sri Lankans have been displaced, killed or wounded, and are malnourished and traumatized after months of extended fighting between the two sides.

Justice After War: Sri Lanka And The Rights And Duties Of A Vanquisher, William Paul Simmons

Human Rights & Human Welfare

Human rights scholars, attorneys, and activists will deservedly focus on the human rights abuses committed by the Sri Lankan military as the decades - long civil war against the Tamil Tigers came to a crushing end this past spring. The military’s brutality, especially its failure to discriminate combatants from non-combatants, should be investigated by both domestic and transnational institutions. It remains to be seen whether such wanton disregard for civilian collateral damage will become the norm for regimes embroiled in civil wars and present yet another realpolitik threat to humanitarian law, or will Sri Lanka and other regimes face accountability …

Muddy Waters: Congressional Consent And The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Resources Compact, Sonya Ziaja

All Faculty Scholarship

After nearly a century of negotiations among the Great Lakes states, tribes, and provinces, a promising new agreement was recently ratified by the parties and recognized by Congress, this is the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact ("GLC"). Interstate compacts, like the GLC, may serve as a particularly useful tool for solving regional environmental problems which the federal government lacks the interest to resolve. However, due to constitutional strictures, interstate compacts are not binding unless Congress grants consent to the compact. This Note will focus on the GLC as a means to examine the current state of the …

Collateral Children: Consequence And Illegality At The Intersection Of Foster Care And Child Support, Daniel L. Hatcher

All Faculty Scholarship

This Article is the third in a series addressing the conflict between state revenue maximization strategies and the missions of state agencies serving low-income children. The Article examines the policy of foster care cost recovery through child support enforcement. When children are removed from poor families and placed in foster care, federal law requires child welfare agencies to initiate child support obligations against the parents. Resulting payments do not benefit the children but are converted into a government funding stream to reimburse the costs of foster care. This cost recovery effort often subordinates the child welfare system’s primary goals of …

Legal Strategies To Address Child Support Obligations For Nonresident Fathers In The Child Welfare System, Daniel L. Hatcher

All Faculty Scholarship

The legal and practical issues surrounding child support obligations have enormous impact on families in the child welfare system. Unfortunately, these issues are often ignored, overlooked, or misunderstood. A much-needed effort to engage nonresident fathers in the child welfare system is underway, but those efforts will often be derailed if child support is not properly addressed. This article sheds light on the legal and policy concerns regarding child support enforcement in child protection cases and provides legal strategies for advocates to address those concerns. While primarily aimed at advocates for nonresident fathers, this article should also benefit advocates for custodial …

The Dna Of An Argument: A Case Study In Legal Logos, Colin Starger

All Faculty Scholarship

This Article develops a framework for analyzing legal argument through an in-depth case study of the debate over federal actions for post-conviction DNA access. Building on the Aristotelian concept of logos, this Article maintains that the persuasive power of legal logic depends in part on the rhetorical characteristics of premises, inferences, and conclusions in legal proofs. After sketching a taxonomy that distinguishes between prototypical argument logo (formal, empirical, narrative, and categorical), the Article applies its framework to parse the rhetorical dynamics at play in litigation over post-conviction access to DNA evidence under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, focusing in particular on …

A Historical Overview Of The Fair Labor Standards Act, Pamela Newell

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Obama's Moral Capitalism: Resuscitating The American Dream, Mitchell F. Crusto

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ratings Game: Explaining Rating Agency Failures In The Build Up To The Financial Crisis, Kia Dennis

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rough Waters For The Ratings Companies: Should The Securities Ratings Companies Be Held Liable For Investor Reliance In The Wake Of The Real Estate Meltdown Of 2007-2008?, Kristofor W. Nelson

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.