Law Commons^™

“El Principio De Precaución En La Jurisprudencia Del Tribunal De Justicia De Las Comunidades Europeas: ¿Un Principio De Buen Gobierno?”, Luis González Vaqué

Luis González Vaqué

La jurisprudencia examinada no parece confortar las tesis de quienes se muestran favorables a una concepción maximalista del principio de precaución.

En definitiva, no puede considerarse que concluir que el citado principio se ‘limita’ a permitir a los ‘poderes públicos’ adoptar medidas preventivas proporcionadas, no discriminatorias y de carácter provisional cuando, a pesar de haberse realizado una evaluación de riesgos lo más completa posible, persisten incertidumbres sobre el alcance y naturaleza de un riesgo inaceptable, sea optar por una definición minimalista del principio de precaución. Especialmente, si se tiene en cuenta que una interpretación maximalista del mismo tiende a restarle …

El Derecho Del Consumo En La Unión Europea: La Problemática Planteada Por La Armonización Mínima En Las Normativas Comunitarias Relativas A La Protección De Los Consumidores, Luis González Vaqué

Luis González Vaqué

Debido a las limitadas competencias de la Unión Europea en materia de protección de los consumidores, el legislador comunitario se ha visto obligado a recurrir al artículo 95 CE para adoptar la mayoría de las Directivas vigentes en este ámbito.

El legislador ha justificado la elección de la citada base jurídica para las Directivas en cuestión subrayando que su finalidad primordial es asegurar el correcto funcionamiento del Mercado Interior. Paradójicamente, sin embargo, en muchas de las Directivas adoptadas en el marco de la política de protección de los consumidores se ha utilizado la técnica de la armonización mínima, mediante la …

La Sentencia 'Malagutti-Vezinhet': ¿Quién Es Responsable De La Información Facilitada Por El Sistema Comunitario De Alerta En El Ámbito De La Seguridad De Los Productos?, Luis González Vaqué

Luis González Vaqué

Non-contractual liability on the part of the Community is subject to a number of conditions: unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the Community institutions, actual damage and the existence of a causal link between the conduct of the institution and the damage complained of. If one of those conditions is not satisfied, the entire action must be dismissed and it is not necessary to consider the other conditions.

The Community rapid alert system for food and feed introduced by Directive 92/59 on general product safety confers on the national authorities only, and not on the Commission, responsibility for establishing whether …

A Woman For All Seasons: A Tribute To Nancy I. Kenderdine, Dennis W. Arrow

Dennis W. Arrow

No abstract provided.

The Effect Of Context On Practice [Book Review], Susan D. Carle

Susan D. Carle

Rethinking Corporate Federalism In The Era Of Corporate Reform, Renee Jones

Renee Jones

No abstract provided.

Free At Last From Obscurity: Clarity—Part Ii, Gerald Lebovits

Hon. Gerald Lebovits

No abstract provided.

The Spirituality Of Communion: A Resource For Dialogue With Catholics In Public Life, Amelia J. Uelmen

Amelia J Uelmen

No abstract provided.

Arbitration Clauses, Jury-Waiver Clauses And Other Contractual Waivers Of Constitutional Rights, Stephen Ware

Stephen Ware

Consenting to a contract containing an arbitration clause or a jury-waiver clause alienates or waives the Seventh Amendment jury-trial right in federal court. The standards of consent in arbitration law, however, tend to be lower than the standards of consent in the federal caselaw governing jury-waiver clauses. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires courts to apply contract law's standards of consent to arbitration agreements, while certain commentators argue that courts are instead constitutionally required to apply the higher standards of consent (knowing consent) found in the caselaw governing jury-waiver clauses. This article responds to these commentators and argues that the …

The Source Of Alabama's Abundance Of Arbitration Cases: Alabama's Bizarre Law Of Damages For Mental Anguish, Stephen Ware

Stephen Ware

This Article gives an overview of arbitration litigation in Alabama, including the evolution of mental anguish jurisprudence in contract cases, especially with regard to the automobile and home industries; a proposal to bring Alabama law in line with controlling authorities through substantive and procedural reforms; and an appendix listing a decade of arbitration cases decided by Alabama appellate courts.

The Revival Of Federalism, John C. Eastman

John C. Eastman

This article explores the efforts over the past quarter century by the conservative public interest law movement to revive the principle of federalism and, ultimately, the notion that the federal government is one of only limited, enumerated powers. Focussing on the Commerce Clause, the article traces the original meaning of the powers of the federal government over interstate commerce, as those powers were understood by those who drafted and ratified the Constitution, and contrasts that understanding with the expansionist view of the Commerce Clause adopted by the New Deal Court, which became the ruling orthodoxy for more than half a …

Association Of American Law Schools Conference: Transcript Of The Sections On Natural Resources In Atlanta, Georgia, Barlow F. Burke

Barlow F. Burke

The Globalization Of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion In The International Political Economy, Zachary Elkins, Beth Simmons

Zachary Elkins

No abstract provided.

Is E-Discovery So Different That It Requires New Discovery Rules? An Analysis Of Proposed Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Henry S. Noyes

Henry S. Noyes

The U.S. Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules recommended a package of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to address issues raised by discovery of electronic information. The recommendations were based on the theory that discovery of electronic information is truly different from discovery of non-electronic information and that the differences require a special set of discovery rules. This Article tests the bases for the Advisory Committee's theory and concludes that there are five true differences between discovery of electronic information and discovery of traditional hard copy information, but two of the differences are addressed by …

Private Ordering And The Creation Of International Copyright Norms: The Role Of Public Structuring, Graeme B. Dinwoodie

Graeme B. Dinwoodie

International copyright law must be based on an assessment of what types and levels of protection best further the purposes of copyright law. But constructing the international copyright regime is difficult as the international system must wrestle with copyright dilemmas that exist at the national level as well as broader challenges facing international law. This paper delineates the connection between international copyright law and the generation and distribution of knowledge by discussing two recent examples of (possible) unconventional international copyright rulemaking, namely, norms generated by Internet Service Providers in responding to infringement claims, and norms arising out of digital rights …