Law Commons^™

Protecting The Freedom Of Movement For All: A Proposal For Complete Street Policies That Prioritize The Needs Of Travelers With Idds And Autism In The Wake Of N.J. Bill S147, Olivia Handelman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the groundbreaking implications of New Jersey Bill S147, which mandates the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) to develop complete street designs specifically addressing the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (autism). This legislation represents a significant shift in complete streets policies, which traditionally focus on physical accessibility but rarely prioritize non-physical disabilities. The note argues that NJDOT’s implementation of these designs must include tailored strategies, such as mobility education, staff training, and improved signage, to ensure independent and safe travel for this population. By addressing these needs, New Jersey …

A Masque Of Red Death: The Fda's "Individual Risk-Based" Blood Donor Final Guidance Report Is A Poorly Constructed Facade Covering Continued Animus Toward Queer Men, Gerald Dryden

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that the FDA's blood donation guidelines discriminatorily target queer men, perpetuating stigma and failing to align with contemporary science. These guidelines, while aiming to protect blood recipients, are unconstitutional and not tailored to avoid discrimination, thus requiring revision to reflect current scientific understanding and eliminate bias.

Pay Transparency Laws Clear As Mud: A Discussion Of And Proposal For The Pay Transparency Legislation In Colorado And New York, Emily Hall

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that while pay transparency laws in Colorado and New York represent progress, they fall short of achieving true pay equity because they do not require employers to disclose the factors influencing salary ranges. The author advocates for amendments to these laws, including mandatory annual pay audits and the disclosure of factors and their weights used in determining salary ranges, to enhance transparency and fairness in negotiations.

Annotated Legal Bibliography

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Convention On Safety For Survivors Of Family Violence Involved In International Custody Disputes, Merle H. Weiner

Cardozo Law Review

This Article proposes a new treaty to fix the "domestic violence problem" that plagues the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. It argues that a new international instrument is legally permissible and would be the most efficient way to solve the problem. It compares the proposed solution to other child abduction instruments that exist in the European Union (EU) and Latin America but that do not address domestic violence. This Article proposes specific treaty provisions and provides commentary on those provisions. This Article is intended to influence state parties to the Hague Abduction Convention who are …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Law Review, Volume 46, Issue 4

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Corporate Evolution, Omari Scott Simmons

Cardozo Law Review

Political entrepreneurs have declared war on environmental, social, and governance policies ("ESG"), going so far as to attempt to criminalize ESG-influenced investing. They seek a return to some real or imagined past. They amplify and elevate their efforts into mainstream public discourse. They pursue extraordinary goals and tactics to disrupt and even dismantle institutional structures, norms, and established processes. The contemporary anti-ESG backlash is not simply a battle over corporate purpose and the dueling perspectives of shareholder primacy versus stakeholderism or disputes concerning sustainable investment and operational strategies. It reflects aggressive political entrepreneurship and the tension between competing narratives: stasis, …

The Problem Of Biased Precedents, Ronen Avraham, Issachar Rosen-Zvi

Cardozo Law Review

This Article addresses the problem ofbiased precedents, wherein sophisticated repeat players, often corporate and state entities armed with superior resources and a vested interest in shaping the law, manipulate legal proceedings to systematically establish self-advantageous precedents. Specifically, by strategically choosing to litigate cases they anticipate will lead to favorable precedents and settling those expected to produce unfavorable outcomes, these players systematically bias the law over time to their advantage, at the expense of one-shot parties and society at large. The problem of biased precedents challenges the commonly held view about the efficiency and fairness of the legal system and raises …

Equity And Clarity: The Impact Of Tyler V. Hennepin County On Property Taxation And Homeowners’ Rights, Analy Feigel

Cardozo Law Review

This Note explores the implications ofthe U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County, which significantly impacts property taxation and foreclosure laws. The Court ruled that property owners are entitled to surplus proceeds following a tax foreclosure, setting a new precedent by deeming it unconstitutional for governments to retain surplus proceeds without just compensation. Tyler clarified property rights under the Fifth Amendment, affirming that owners have a constitutional right to the surplus value of their foreclosed properties, even if local statutes do not explicitly allow it.

Further, this Note also addresses unresolved issues following Tyler's ruling, including how the …

The Truth Should Set You Free: The Case For Removing State Knowledge Requirements From False Testimony Standards, Alexa Pietrowsk

Cardozo Law Review

False testimony claims are an increasinglypopular vehicle in a handful ofstates through which petitioners can challenge unconstitutional criminal convictions. Successful false testimony claims grant petitioners access to remedies guaranteed by the Due Process Clause and overturn offending convictions, giving individuals access to new trials or similar relief But like many post-conviction standards, false testimony is evaluated differently from state to state, producing disparate results. While every state's standard requires that the testimony used at trial be proven both false and material to the petitioner's conviction, states diverge as to whether petitioners must show that a state actor-usually prosecutors or police-knew …

Book Talk With Sarah Staszak, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution, Sarah Staszak

2025 Event Invitations

Princeton Professor Sarah Staszak will be here on April 1 to talk about her new book, Privatizing Justice: Arbitration and the Decline of Public Governance in the United States. The book examines arbitration's shift from a voluntary dispute resolution tool to a mandatory process favoring corporations. Staszak explores its historical and contemporary contexts, linking legal developments to broader institutional, political, and social dynamics.

Disabled And Disenfranchised: The Fight For Reproductive Freedom And Democracy Post-Dobbs, Robyn M. Powell

Cardozo Law Review

The Supreme Court has thrust abortion onto ballots nationwide, transforming fundamental rights into political battlegrounds. In the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, people with disabilities face a perfect storm of eroded reproductive freedoms and persistent barriers to democratic participation. This Article exposes the hollow promise of the Court's purported deference to "the people's elected representatives," revealing instead a landscape where those most affected by abortion restrictions struggle to have their voices heard. The Court's invocation of democracy is arguably disingenuous, serving more as a rhetorical device than agenuine commitment to democratic principles. Nevertheless, engaging with this …

U.S. Territories And The Criminal Law Curriculum, Emmanuel H. Arnaud

Articles

No abstract provided.

Springboard To Article V (Or Electoral Democracy And The End Of Constitutional Amendment In The Nation And States), Wilfred U. Codrington Iii

Articles

Drafted in exceedingly sparing terms and notoriously difficult to amend, the U S. Constitution is falling short in one of the most important functions of a government charter: establishing and maintaining a fair and just electoral framework-marked by rules that promote the values of equality, participation, competition, and transparency in elections. That is, the Constitution increasingly fails to preserve electoral democracy even as the nation's systems for voting and elections are plagued by a cascade of problems. State constitutions, though not uniform, are uniformly easier to amend than the national charter and tend to be better stewards of electoral democracy. …

California’S Gamble: Trading In Rehabilitation For Incarceration, Drew Svensson

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

No abstract provided.

Tiktok: To Ban Or Not To Ban: A Threat To Free Speech, Hannah Cohen

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

On January 17, 2025, the Supreme Court in TikTok Inc. v. Garland upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”),[2] effectively banning TikTok in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, sells its American operations.  This decision impacts over 170 million Americans and presents a significant threat to their First Amendment rights.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice website on March 27, 2025. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

President Trump’S Attack On Congestion Pricing Is An Attack On New York City, Alyx Mckinnon

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

Despite a rocky start, New York City’s Central Business District Tolling Program, more commonly known as the city’s congestion pricing plan, has seen demonstrable success in its implementation.  The plan aims to ease traffic in some of Manhattan’s busiest streets by charging motorists nine dollars for entry to the Congestion Relief Zone during peak hours, with the revenue supporting the struggling Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) and funding the public transportation that keeps the city running.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice website on March 27, 2025. The original post can be …

The Bet Tzedek's 40th Anniversary Celebration, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, Bet Tzedek Civil Litigation Clinic

2024–2025 Flyers

Join us for cocktails & hors d'oeuvres as we celebrate Prof. Salzman’s 35th and final year at Cardozo!

Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution

2025 Event Invitations

Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events:

• A Conversation with Gretchen Carlson & Julie Roginsky, Thursday, March 27 at 12:40 p.m.
• Book Talk with Sarah Staszak, Tuesday, April 1 at 4:00 p.m.
• Trauma-Transformed Law: The Why and How of Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Practice, Wednesday, April 2 at 12:40 p.m.

Dean Melanie Leslie’S Office Hours On Retribution Against Law Firms By The Trump Administration, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2025 Event Invitations

Join Dean Leslie and Professors Jessica Roth and Haiyun Damon-Feng to discuss President Trump’s recent attacks on lawyers, law firms and federal judges. Topics will include Trump’s executive orders issued against DEI programs at law firms, as well as orders seeking to punish specific lawyers and firms that represented his political enemies. In addition, the professors will discuss the president’s recent call for the impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against the administration, which drew a rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts. The three will also answer questions raised by the student attendees.

The Future Of Non-Competes In Ny: Non-Competes Reconsidered In Senate Bill S4641a, Daisy Elliot

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

Non-competes are contracts that prevent an employee from working for or starting a competing business.  Typically, non-competes are enforceable for a specific period of time, ranging from six months to two years.  These agreements can affect all employees, ranging from low-wage workers to CEOs.  Non-competes are a controversial topic, with ongoing debate about their necessity.  Advocates often argue they are necessary to protect trade secrets, while opponents argue they lower wages and limit job opportunities.  In New York, non-competes remain enforceable; however, as lawmakers push for reform, their future remains uncertain.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal …

Cardozo Law News Brief: March 21, 2025, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2025

Highlights from the March 21, 2025 Cardozo Law News Brief include:

• Daniel J. Dominguez ’05 honored at the 15th Annual BALLSA Celebration, where three students also received awards.

• Professor Matthew Wansley quoted in The New York Times on Tesla’s permit for robotaxi services in California.

• Professor Zalman Rothschild published an opinion piece in The Washington Post about Hasidic education and the right to secular learning.

• Professor Haiyun Damon-Feng discussed immigration authority and birthright citizenship in Bloomberg Law and the Miami Herald.

• Professor Saurabh Vishnubhakat published in Nature Biotechnology and presented at major conferences on trade secrets and IP law.

The Legal Reckoning Of Reality Television: Contestant Rights And Producer Responsibilities, Tyler Caffrey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

Reality television has become a dominant force in modern entertainment. Behind the scenes, however, contestants face serious legal and ethical concerns. Many reality TV participants allege exploitative working conditions, misleading contracts, and inadequate compensation. Traditionally, networks classify contestants as independent contractors, exempting them from labor protections such as minimum wage and overtime pay.

The Trump Administration’S Recent Removals To El Salvador Violate The Prohibition On Transfer To Torture, Rebecca Ingber, Scott Roehm

Online Publications

Several of our colleagues have already provided excellent analyses of the fast-evolving legal and factual questions presented by President Donald Trump’s pretextual and abusive invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to transfer to El Salvador 238 Venezuelan men who it alleges are members of the Tren de Aragua gang. We are writing to flag a separate issue that this case has created, one that applies to anyone removed from the United States under any authority: the administration is sending people to a country where there is a quite significant risk they will be abused. Whatever the authority the administration might …

A Conversation With George Bouvier, Cardozo Fame Center, George Bouvier

2025 Event Invitations

Join the FAME Center as we host the Founder and Executive Director of Academia Cerebra, George Bouvier. He will be in conversation with the Fashion Law Society to discuss FAME’s collaboration with Academia Cerebra, Europe’s premier academy specializing in luxury fashion.

Daniel J. Dominguez ’05 Honored And 3 Students Receive Awards At The 15th Annual Ballsa Celebration, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Archive

The 15th Annual BALLSA Celebration honored Daniel J. Dominguez ’05 for his leadership and commitment to equity, while awarding scholarships to students Stacy Moses ’25, Andrea Mendoza Diaz ’25, and Elisa Davila ’26 to support diversity and inclusion at Cardozo Law.

The Puzzle Of Biologics Manufacturing Platform Patents, Osmat Azzam Jeferson, W. Nicholson Price Ii, S. Sean Tu, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Arti K. Rai

Articles

The predominance of manufacturing process patents asserted in litigation by originator biologics companies against would-be biosimilar entrants has resulted in a number of Congressional and administrative agency proposals that could increase scrutiny and limit enforceability.

Cardozo Law News Brief: March 14, 2025, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Brief 2025

Highlights from the March 14, 2025 Cardozo Law News Brief include:

• Professor Matthew Wansley spoke to The Washington Post about safety concerns with Zoox’s self-driving vehicles.

• Professor Haiyun Damon-Feng wrote in Slate on the Trump administration's immigration actions against children.

• Professor Michael Herz discussed constitutional spending powers in Fortune.

• Professor David Rudenstine published an op-ed in the New York Law Journal defending press freedoms.

• Professor Lindsay Nash was interviewed by The New Yorker and Zeteo on immigration and due process rights.

• Adjunct Professor Gary Galperin analyzed a pretrial motion in Business Insider.

• Faculty scholarship updates include:

  • Professor Emmanuel …

    ---

    Go to article

The Bro-Economy And The Bro-Democracy, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2024–2025 Flyers

Cardozo’s Professor Michael Pollack will host Michael Abramowicz (Professor, George Washington University Law School), Jennifer Lawless (Professor, University of Virginia), and Craig Holman (Government Affairs Lobbyist, Public Citizen) to discuss the manosphere, election betting, and prediction markets, and how these forces shape our democracy for good and for ill.

The Bro-Economy And The Bro-Democracy, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2025 Event Invitations

Cardozo’s Professor Michael Pollack will host Michael Abramowicz (Professor, George Washington University Law School), Jennifer Lawless (Professor, University of Virginia), and Craig Holman (Government Affairs Lobbyist, Public Citizen) to discuss the manosphere, election betting, and prediction markets, and how these forces shape our democracy for good and for ill.