Law Commons^™

Preventing The Use Of Unenforceable Provisions In Residential Leases , Kurt E. Olafsen

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Harmful Use Of Harmless Error In Criminal Cases, Donald A. Winslow

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Journal Staff

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Public Assurance Of An Adequate Minimum Income In Old Age: The Erratic Partnership Between Social Insurance And Public Assistance, Peter W. Martin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Reforming The International Trading System: The Tokyo Round Trade Negotiations In The Final Stage, Thomas R. Graham

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Responses To The Growth Of Crime In The United States And West Germany: A Comparison Of Changes In Criminal Law And Societal Attitudes, Gunther Arzi

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Search Of The Vanishing Foreign Tax Credit: Implications Of Revenue Ruling 76-508, David R. Clarke

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Foreign Commerce And State Power: The Constitutionality Of State Buy American Statutes, J. Allen Miller

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dividend Withholding For Third Country Investors Under The United States-Netherlands Antilles Tax Treaty, Kathleen A. Bursley

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Extraterritorial Application Of Federal Wildlife Statutes: A New Rule Of Statutory Interpretation, Daniel C. Brennan

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction Vver Foreigners, Pamela A. Cummings

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Must The House Consent To Cession Of The Panama Canal, Raoul Berger

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hidden Right To Direct Appeal From A Federal Plea Conviction, Paul D. Borman

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Lack Of Fair Procedures In The Administrative Process: Disciplinary Proceedings At The Stock Exchanges And The Nasd , Lewis D. Lowenfels

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Journal Staff

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reply To Lowenfels, Norman S. Poser

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Impeachment By Prior Conviction: Adjusting To Federal Rule Of Evidence 609, Bruce P. Garren

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Escape From Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Theory Of Constitutional Necessity, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The inmate who escapes from a federal or state prison and seeks to introduce evidence of unconstitutionally cruel and unusual confinement conditions to defend her action is barred by the well-established rule that prison conditions alone, no matter how intolerable or inhumane, neither justify nor excuse escape. If she attempts to use the defense of necessity—a limited exception to this rule—the prisoner will be required to show that a specific, imminent threat of death or serious injury prompt her escape. Evidence of prolonged or repeated deprivation and mistreatment sufficient to prove a violation of the eighth amendment may not be …

The Antidumping Law: Repeal It Or Revise It, John J. Barceló Iii

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Legal Education And Legal Services--Some Reflections, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Property, E. F. Roberts

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Luther And The Justifiability Of Resistance To Legitimate Authority, Cynthia Grant Bowman

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Professor Fuller's Jurisprudence And America's Dominant Philosophy Of Law, Robert S. Summers

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The late Lon L. Fuller played an influential role in the development of American jurisprudence, but his views have not always prevailed. In this tribute to the memory of Professor Fuller, Professor Summers outlines the major tenets of what he perceives to be our dominant philosophy of law – “pragmatic instrumentalism” – by way of contrasting that philosophy with the views of Professor Fuller. Professor Summers concludes that these two philosophies differ in many important respects and that our dominant philosophy of law should accommodate, and may indeed already be in the process of accommodating, the thought of Professor Fuller.

Supreme Court As A Legislature, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Journal Staff

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Article Two Warranties In Commercial Transactions, Andew M. Baker, Donald R. Frederico, John H. Mckeon Jr., Phil Mueller

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Judges In Life/Death Decisions For The Neurologically Impaired, H. Richard Beresford

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has recently ruled that decisions about withholding care from hopelessly ill, legally incapacitated patients must be made by judges. It clearly rejected the view that families and attending physicians should be empowered to make such decisions. In this respect, the ruling contrasts with that of the Quinlan case and highlights the issue of whether judges or physicians and families are better able to make medically and morally sound decisions respecting this class of patients.

Implementing Federal Environment Policies: The Limits Of Aspirational Commands, James A. Henderson Jr., Richard N. Pearson

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Cognitive Death: Differential Problems And Legal Overtones, H. Richard Beresford

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Conservatorship Model: A Modification, Gregory S. Alexander

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Reform-minded probate lawyers have discussed the idea of ante-mortem probate for many years. Yet, owing to several seemingly unavoidable defects, it has never attracted widespread support and only recently has been implemented anywhere in the United States. In his article, Living Probate: The Conservatorship Model, Professor John Langbein has eliminated many of those defects and has made the idea much more feasible. In doing so, he has contributed to the development of simple, convenient, and efficient systems of probate. However, his proposal introduces new flaws that threaten the practical working of his procedural model.

Basically, Langbein proposes that living …