Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Cornell University Law School

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 181 - 210 of 7209

Full-Text Articles in Law

Kelvin Hangandu V Law Association Of Zambia Scz Judgment No. 36 Of 2014, O'Brien Kaaba, Judith Kamoko Nov 2020

Kelvin Hangandu V Law Association Of Zambia Scz Judgment No. 36 Of 2014, O'Brien Kaaba, Judith Kamoko

SAIPAR Case Review

The appellant, Kelvin Hang’andu, had been a member of the Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) since 15 November, 1996, when he was admitted to the Bar. On 24 May 2003, he converted from the Catholic Church to the Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) Church, which considers Saturday as a sacred day set aside for worship and complete abstention from work and other activities unrelated to religious practice. The essence of the appellant’s complaint was that the LAZ held its annual general meetings on Saturday, which was a violation of his religious freedom and discriminatory. His protests to the LAZ yielded no …


Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 2 Others V Attorney General & 4 Others [2020] Eklr Civil Appeal No 13 & 10 Of 2015, Teddy J.O. Musiga Nov 2020

Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 2 Others V Attorney General & 4 Others [2020] Eklr Civil Appeal No 13 & 10 Of 2015, Teddy J.O. Musiga

SAIPAR Case Review

Kenya’s Court of Appeal delivered the decision in Okiya Omtata Okoiti & 2 Others v Attorney General & 4 others on the 19th of June, 2020. This decision was an appeal arising from the High Court and it revolved around a dispute regarding the construction of the standard gauge railway in Kenya.


Editor's Note, O'Brien Kaaba Nov 2020

Editor's Note, O'Brien Kaaba

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Public Protector V South African Reserve Bank 2019 (6) Sa 253 (Cc), Dunia P. Zongwe Nov 2020

Public Protector V South African Reserve Bank 2019 (6) Sa 253 (Cc), Dunia P. Zongwe

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Mutembo Nchito V Attorney General 2016/Cc/0029 (27 October 2020), O'Brien Kaaba, Pamela Towela Sambo Nov 2020

Mutembo Nchito V Attorney General 2016/Cc/0029 (27 October 2020), O'Brien Kaaba, Pamela Towela Sambo

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Vol. 3, Issue 2 Masthead Nov 2020

Vol. 3, Issue 2 Masthead

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Vol. 3, Issue 2 Table Of Contents Nov 2020

Vol. 3, Issue 2 Table Of Contents

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Phinate Chona V Zesco Limited Caz Appeal No. 66/2019, Chanda Chungu Nov 2020

Phinate Chona V Zesco Limited Caz Appeal No. 66/2019, Chanda Chungu

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Prof. E. Clive Chirwa V Zambia Railway & Another (2018/Hp/0578), Kayula James Nov 2020

Prof. E. Clive Chirwa V Zambia Railway & Another (2018/Hp/0578), Kayula James

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Vedanta Resources Holdings Limited V Zccm Investment Holdings Plc And Konkola Copper Mines Plc, Caz/08/249/2019, Sangwani Patrick Ng’Ambi, Chanda Chungu Nov 2020

Vedanta Resources Holdings Limited V Zccm Investment Holdings Plc And Konkola Copper Mines Plc, Caz/08/249/2019, Sangwani Patrick Ng’Ambi, Chanda Chungu

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Savenda Management Services Limited V Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited & Gregory Chifire (Alleged Contemnor) (Appeal No. 37/2017) [2018] Zmsc 11, Mwami Kabwabwa Nov 2020

Savenda Management Services Limited V Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited & Gregory Chifire (Alleged Contemnor) (Appeal No. 37/2017) [2018] Zmsc 11, Mwami Kabwabwa

SAIPAR Case Review

Adjudicators have a social responsibility. When the Judiciary/judges carry out their constitutional mandate of dispensing justice it is critical to bear in mind that judges carry a level of responsibility for the impact that their decisions have on society. For this reason, judges ought to be held responsible for every judgment they render either good or bad. Contempt is an exceedingly powerful instrument in the hands of the courts to tame the conduct and behaviour of lawyers and lay people who come into contact with judicial authority. Like any other power, the exercise of contempt power has to be checked. …


Zccm Investment Holdings Plc V Konkola Copper Mines Plc And Vedanta Resources Holdings Ltd 2019/Hp/0761, Sangwani Patrick Ng’Ambi Nov 2020

Zccm Investment Holdings Plc V Konkola Copper Mines Plc And Vedanta Resources Holdings Ltd 2019/Hp/0761, Sangwani Patrick Ng’Ambi

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Vedanta Resources Holding Limited V Zccm Investment Holdings Plc And Konkola Copper Mines Plc Caz 08/249/2019, Muna B. Ndulo Nov 2020

Vedanta Resources Holding Limited V Zccm Investment Holdings Plc And Konkola Copper Mines Plc Caz 08/249/2019, Muna B. Ndulo

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Itula And Others V Minister Of Urban And Rural Development And Others 2020 (1) Nr 86 (Sc), Dunia P. Zongwe Nov 2020

Itula And Others V Minister Of Urban And Rural Development And Others 2020 (1) Nr 86 (Sc), Dunia P. Zongwe

SAIPAR Case Review

At the heart of this electoral case lies deep questions about what it means exactly to ‘know’ something and about a few steps that judges should avoid when reasoning from unknowns. In short, the court refused to cancel a presidential election because those who challenged that election in court failed to prove that the absence of verifiable paper trail changed the outcome of the election. If a judge lacks evidence of any claim put forth by the parties, they cannot lean on the absence of evidence to arrive at any conclusion, except to conclude that they do not know whether …


Okafor V Nweke [2007] 10 Nwlr (Pt. 1043) 521, Oluwakemi A. Dowodu-Sipe Nov 2020

Okafor V Nweke [2007] 10 Nwlr (Pt. 1043) 521, Oluwakemi A. Dowodu-Sipe

SAIPAR Case Review

No abstract provided.


Frand And Antitrust, Herbert Hovenkamp Sep 2020

Frand And Antitrust, Herbert Hovenkamp

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Volume 105, Number 6 Front Matter Sep 2020

Volume 105, Number 6 Front Matter

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Against Prosecutors, I. Bennett Capers Sep 2020

Against Prosecutors, I. Bennett Capers

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Developing A Digital Property Law Regime, Kevin Dong Sep 2020

Developing A Digital Property Law Regime, Kevin Dong

Cornell Law Review

Despite scholarship and conversation of digital and virtual property having been around for well over a decade, we are still stuck in the same cycle of arguing whether property law, contract law, or intellectual property law should govern. The problems, although different in scope from what early scholars had thought, have grown in severity and multitude. We have made some good strides in the scholarship since then. Whether scholars are proponents of property law, contract law, or intellectual property law, they have all recognized that there are some problems with the current governing structure of digital objects. We have a …


Equity, Punishment, And The Company You Keep: Discerning A Disgorgement Remedy Under The Federal Securities Laws, Theresa A. Gabaldon Sep 2020

Equity, Punishment, And The Company You Keep: Discerning A Disgorgement Remedy Under The Federal Securities Laws, Theresa A. Gabaldon

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Disciplinary Sodomy: Prison Rape, Police Brutality, And The Gendered Politics Of Societal Control In The American Carceral System, David Eichert Sep 2020

Disciplinary Sodomy: Prison Rape, Police Brutality, And The Gendered Politics Of Societal Control In The American Carceral System, David Eichert

Cornell Law Review

This Note engages with critical legal scholarship about gender and race to reframe discussions about sodomy in American law. Instead of concentrating on the history and constitutionality of sodomy bans, I instead demonstrate how disciplinary sodomy remains an intrinsic part of the American carceral system. I detail several scenarios in which anal rape and the threat of anal rape have been used by prison staff and law enforcement agents to control male bodies in the American carceral system. I then identify the "audiences" of this violence, demonstrating how ideas of sexuality, gender, and race are weaponized against marginalized populations to …


The Capital Commons: A Plan For Building Back Better And Beyond, Robert C. Hockett Aug 2020

The Capital Commons: A Plan For Building Back Better And Beyond, Robert C. Hockett

Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers

To build our Republic back better we must build our banks better. The overwhelmingly greater part of our investment capital is now publicly generated yet privately managed. But pervasive and still underappreciated recursive collective action predicaments endemic to all exchange economies, combined with the decoupling of profits from production made possible by stratified capital ‘markets’ in such economies, render this unsustainable.

The only way to get public capital allocation right, and thus to get credit modulation and long-term productive investment right, is to manage public capital publicly and private capital privately. This paper shows how to do that through the …


Harm To Border Irreparable, Sara C. Bronin Jul 2020

Harm To Border Irreparable, Sara C. Bronin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Volume 105, Number 5 Front Matter Jul 2020

Volume 105, Number 5 Front Matter

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.


Chevron As Construction, Lawrence B. Solum, Cass R. Sunstein Jul 2020

Chevron As Construction, Lawrence B. Solum, Cass R. Sunstein

Cornell Law Review

In 1984, the Supreme Court declared that courts should uphold agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions, so long as those interpretations are reasonable. The Chevron framework, as it is called, is now under serious pressure. Current debates can be both illuminated and softened with reference to an old distinction between interpretation on the one hand and construction on the other. In cases of interpretation, judges (or agencies) must ascertain the meaning of a statutory term. In cases of construction, judges (or agencies) must develop implementing principles or specify a statutory term. Chevron as construction is supported by powerful arguments; it …


Demanding Trust In The Private Genetic Data Market, Benjamin T. Van Meter Jul 2020

Demanding Trust In The Private Genetic Data Market, Benjamin T. Van Meter

Cornell Law Review

This Note argues that to prevent the most damaging consequences of the trade in genetic data, U.S. law should impose tailored fiduciary duties on private genetic testing companies to ensure that their business practices do not harm their own customers. These testing companies rely on their customers' genetic information to turn a profit, while all of the risk of this information's exposure or misuse falls on customers. This Note will proceed as follows: Part I will describe the fundamental difficulties of de-identifying and aggregating genetic data to the point that it cannot be reidentified; Part II discusses how de-identification and …


Why Has Antitrust Law Failed Workers?, Ioana Marinescu, Eric A. Posner Jul 2020

Why Has Antitrust Law Failed Workers?, Ioana Marinescu, Eric A. Posner

Cornell Law Review

In the last several years, economists have learned about an antitrust problem of vast scope. Far from approximating the conditions of perfect competition as long assumed, most labor markets are characterized by monopsony-meaning that employers pay workers less than their productivity because workers lack a credible threat to quit and find a higherpaying job in the same market. Yet while antitrust law regulates labor monopsony in the same way as it regulates monopoly on the product market side, antitrust litigation against employers is rare. We document both the magnitude of labor monopsony and the paucity of cases and argue that …


Legitimate Interpretation - Or Legitimate Adjudication?, Thomas W. Merrill Jul 2020

Legitimate Interpretation - Or Legitimate Adjudication?, Thomas W. Merrill

Cornell Law Review

Current debate about the legitimacy of lawmaking by courts focuses on what constitutes legitimate interpretation. The debate has reached an impasse in that originalism and textualism appear to have the stronger case as a matter of theory while living constitutionalism and dynamic interpretation provide much better account of actual practice. This Article argues that if we refocus the debate by asking what constitutes legitimate adjudication, as determined by the social practice of the parties and their lawyers who take part in adjudication, it is possible to develop an account of legitimacy that produces a much better ftt between theory and …


Mdl As Category, Zachary D. Clopton Jul 2020

Mdl As Category, Zachary D. Clopton

Cornell Law Review

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) dominates the federal civil docket. MDL has been used to consolidate hundreds of thousands of cases, including with respect to asbestos, the BP oil spill, Johnson & Johnson baby powder, NFL concussions, opioids, and more. In recent years, MDL has attracted the attention of reformers and scholars, who have offered proposals for rules or practices that would apply to all MDLs, and to only MDLs. These proposals are premised on a fundamental error about what MDL is. Using quantitative and qualitative data, case studies, and interviews with judges, this Article demonstrates that reformers and scholars have made …


International Cultural Heritage Law: Link Between Cultural Nationalism, Internationalism, And The Concept Of Cultural Genocide, Ashley Mullen Jul 2020

International Cultural Heritage Law: Link Between Cultural Nationalism, Internationalism, And The Concept Of Cultural Genocide, Ashley Mullen

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.