Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (82)
- Supreme Court (28)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Judicial Review (9)
- United States. Supreme Court (9)
-
- Civil Rights (7)
- Freedom of Speech (7)
- Judicial Process (7)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (6)
- Judges (6)
- Judicial Power (6)
- Book review (5)
- Courts (5)
- Due Process of Law (5)
- Federal Courts (5)
- Federal Jurisdiction (5)
- Federalism (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- United States Constitution (5)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (5)
- Church and State (4)
- Equal Protection (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Law (4)
- Legal Briefs (4)
- Legislative Power (4)
- Pleadings (4)
- Right to Counsel (4)
- SCOTUS (4)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (4)
Articles 181 - 210 of 210
Full-Text Articles in Law
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Retroactivity: A Study In Supreme Court Doctrine As Applied, John Bernard Corr
Retroactivity: A Study In Supreme Court Doctrine As Applied, John Bernard Corr
Faculty Publications
The judicial creation of a new rule of law raises the essential question whether that rule is to be applied retroactively orprospectively only. The consistency of the traditionalm andatoryr etroactivityr ule has given way to a more flexible retroactivity ana sis. The change occurred in 1965 when the Supreme Court in Linkletter v. Walker squarelfaced a rule that, if applied retroactively, would have affected thousands of criminal convictions. The Linkletter doctrine has since defined the contours of federal retroactivity ana sis to include three basic considerations: purpose of the rule in question, reliance by theparties on the rule, and effect …
Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer
Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel. In the federal jurisdiction this principle was vigorously applied, even to indigent persons, very early in the Twentieth Century. The United States Supreme Court, however, was reluctant to impose this requirement on the states except in cases of unusual circumstances where the absence of counsel would have affected the basic fairness of the trial. Finally, in a landmark decision by the Supreme Court, it was held that the right to counsel applies in both federal and state cases. For the past twenty years, federal and state …
Fourth Amendment Standing And Expectations Of Privacy: Rakas V. Illinois And New Directions For Some Old Concepts, Richard A. Williamson
Fourth Amendment Standing And Expectations Of Privacy: Rakas V. Illinois And New Directions For Some Old Concepts, Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Burger Court, 1969-1979: Continuity And Contras, William F. Swindler
The Burger Court, 1969-1979: Continuity And Contras, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Rites Of Passage: Race, The Supreme Court, And The Constitution, William W. Van Alstyne
Rites Of Passage: Race, The Supreme Court, And The Constitution, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Private Speech And The Private Forum: Givhan V. Western Line School District, Frederick Schauer
Private Speech And The Private Forum: Givhan V. Western Line School District, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Speech And Speech - Obscenity And Obscenity: An Exercise In The Interpretation Of Constitutional Language, Frederick Schauer
Speech And Speech - Obscenity And Obscenity: An Exercise In The Interpretation Of Constitutional Language, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
Commentators have criticized the Supreme Court's use of the "two-level" theory of speech to place obscenity beyond the pale of the first amendment. They charge the Court with shirking the task of balancing first amendment values and the states' interests in regulating obscene material. Professor Schauer meets this criticism by examining the meaning of the word "speech" in the context of the purposes of the first amendment and the Constitution as a whole. He concludes that "speech"does not include a category.of obscenity'that performs the function of a surrogate sexual act and is lacking in communicative content. The Court's treatment of …
The Supreme Court, Warrantless Searches, And Exigent Circumstances, Richard A. Williamson
The Supreme Court, Warrantless Searches, And Exigent Circumstances, Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Court, The Constitution, And Chief Justice Burger, William F. Swindler
The Court, The Constitution, And Chief Justice Burger, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Critical Guide To Ex Parte Mccardle, William W. Van Alstyne
A Critical Guide To Ex Parte Mccardle, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
Given the growing trend of proposed Congressional bills seeking to remove certain types of cases from the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction, this examination looks back on Ex Parte McCardle, the quintessential case that defined the limits of the Exceptions Clause.
Book Review Of Equal Justice: The Warren Era Of The Supreme Court, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Book Review Of Equal Justice: The Warren Era Of The Supreme Court, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Fifty-One Chief Justices, William F. Swindler
Fifty-One Chief Justices, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Chief Justice And Law Reform, 1921-1971, William F. Swindler
The Chief Justice And Law Reform, 1921-1971, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court: Completion Of A Constitutional Revolution, William F. Swindler
The Warren Court: Completion Of A Constitutional Revolution, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court, The President And Congress, William F. Swindler
The Supreme Court, The President And Congress, William F. Swindler
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Critical Guide To Marbury V. Madison, William W. Van Alstyne
A Critical Guide To Marbury V. Madison, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
The concept of judicial review of the constitutionality of state and federal statutes by the Supreme Court is generally rested upon the epic decision in Marbury v. Madison. The controversies which have surrounded the exercise of this power by the Supreme Court require a periodic reexamination of the concept of judicial review at its source, the Marbury opinion. This article proceeds by examining the historical context in which the case arose and analyzes the opinion in terms of various alternative approaches which might have been utilized by Chief Justice Marshall. The specific holding of the case is isolated in contrast …
The Fourteenth Amendment, The “Right” To Vote, And The Understanding Of The Thirty-Ninth Congress, William W. Van Alstyne
The Fourteenth Amendment, The “Right” To Vote, And The Understanding Of The Thirty-Ninth Congress, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
An examination of the Fourteenth Amendment’s legislative history is juxtaposed with Justice Harlan’s steadfast conclusion that such history reveals states’ right to set voting requirements.
The Supreme Court On Trial, William W. Van Alstyne
The Supreme Court On Trial, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
This review of The Supreme Court on Trial questions why the work’s tackling the age-old issues of the source of judicial review and its constitutionality is particularly novel or unique from other such examinations. Issue is also taken with Brown v. Boards dominance of such discussion and the book’s poor treatment of the desegregation cases.
Constitutional Separation Of Church And State: The Quest For A Coherent Position, William W. Van Alstyne
Constitutional Separation Of Church And State: The Quest For A Coherent Position, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
One Man’S Stand For Freedom: Opinions And Lectures Of Mr. Justice Hugo Black, William W. Van Alstyne
One Man’S Stand For Freedom: Opinions And Lectures Of Mr. Justice Hugo Black, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
This review champions the editor’s use of Mr. Justice Black’s own opinions in showcasing his emphasis of the emancipating aspects of the Constitution. This work cautions the reader to avoid relying on this compilation as an accurate depiction of the state of the law, especially considering that most of the included opinions are dissents.