Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (1412)
- University of Colorado Law School (787)
- Southern Methodist University (525)
- University of Michigan Law School (514)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (420)
-
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (381)
- Seattle University School of Law (317)
- American University Washington College of Law (217)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (213)
- Boston University School of Law (180)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (178)
- University of Montana (175)
- UC Law SF (174)
- Santa Clara Law (145)
- Brooklyn Law School (123)
- Duke Law (123)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (122)
- William & Mary Law School (121)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (112)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (105)
- Singapore Management University (101)
- BLR (95)
- University of Washington School of Law (86)
- DePaul University (85)
- Columbia Law School (82)
- University of Miami Law School (78)
- Fordham Law School (75)
- Pepperdine University (75)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (74)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (71)
- Keyword
-
- Technology (481)
- Privacy (288)
- Artificial intelligence (268)
- AI (203)
- Intellectual property (157)
-
- Copyright (153)
- Regulation (153)
- Internet (143)
- Law (127)
- Science and Technology (119)
- Patent law (102)
- Climate change (101)
- Patents (101)
- Artificial Intelligence (99)
- Science (97)
- Innovation (96)
- Patent (92)
- Surveillance (91)
- Data (89)
- Colorado (85)
- Law and Technology (85)
- Biotechnology (82)
- Intellectual Property Law (82)
- United States (77)
- Blockchain (75)
- Fourth Amendment (72)
- Evidence (71)
- Patents & Technology (70)
- Ethics (66)
- First Amendment (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (793)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (548)
- Faculty Scholarship (482)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (362)
- Colorado Technology Law Journal (361)
-
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (291)
- Seattle University Law Review (245)
- Articles (215)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (175)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (170)
- UC Law Science and Technology Journal (156)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (138)
- Publications (134)
- Computer Law Review and Technology Journal (132)
- Michigan Law Review (110)
- Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet (101)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (100)
- ExpressO (93)
- Faculty Publications (88)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (88)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (82)
- Cardozo Law Review (80)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (69)
- IP Theory (68)
- Indiana Law Journal (65)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (62)
- Scholarly Articles (60)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (59)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7111 - 7140 of 8854
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Inequitable Conduct Defense Lives On: 2003 Federal Circuit Decisions And Their Impact, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 189 (2004), Alan M. Kowalchyk, Thomas R. Johnson
The Inequitable Conduct Defense Lives On: 2003 Federal Circuit Decisions And Their Impact, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 189 (2004), Alan M. Kowalchyk, Thomas R. Johnson
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The inequitable conduct defense remains a viable defense in patent litigation today, as illustrated in four 2003 Federal Circuit decisions. Though an alleged patent infringer must establish the elements of materiality and intent for a valid inequitable conduct defense, recent Federal Circuit decisions indicate that certain factual underpinnings bearing on materiality can raise an inference of intent. To most effectively counter this inference of intent, a plausible explanation for the questioned conduct should be provided by the patentee. However, in providing such plausible explanation, the patentee runs the risk of waiving privileged communications, which in turn may result in far …
“Intellectual Alchemy”: Securitization Of Intellectual Property As An Innovative Form Of Alternative Financing, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 307 (2004), John M. Gabala Jr.
“Intellectual Alchemy”: Securitization Of Intellectual Property As An Innovative Form Of Alternative Financing, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 307 (2004), John M. Gabala Jr.
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
While asset-securitization has been around since the early 1980’s, prior to the now widely known structuring of musician David Bowie’s music catalogue into saleable bonds in 1997, music royalties and copyrights were never before used in a securitization. At the time, Bowie’s catalogue had a proven royalty track record; however, the valuation of the actual bonds remained untested in the illegal music-downloading era of today. This comment explores the benefits of intellectual property-based securitizations and their common valuation approaches. In addition, it is argued that appropriate credit enhancements should be employed to protect future Bowie bond style deals against the …
Dividing The (Statutory) Baby Under Anton/Bauer: Using The Doctrine Of Implied License To Circumvent § 271(C) Protection For Components Of A Patented Combination, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 355 (2004), Daniel M. Lechleiter
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In proscribing contributory infringement of patents, § 271(c) of Title 35 of the United States Code unambiguously provides statutory protection for certain unpatented components of patented combinations and certain unpatented materials or apparatuses used in patented processes. The doctrine of implied license provides a viable defense against claims of contributory infringement. Such a finding may result from a variety of related doctrines, such as the exhaustion doctrine or the doctrine of equitable estoppel. However, unlike the Supreme Court’s application of the former doctrine in Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., involving an unpatentedchemical used in a patented process, …
What A Long, Strange “Trips” It’S Been: Compulsory Licensing From The Adoption Of Trips To The Agreement On Implementation Of The Doha Declaration, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2004), Mark C. Lang
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Startling numbers of people die every day because they do not have access to essential medicines and treatment for diseases such as HIV/AIDS, particularly in Africa and Asia. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) was established by the World Trade Organization (WTO) to set a minimum level of protection of intellectual property rights across international borders, as well as promote and protect the welfare of humanity. This Comment reviews the history of the TRIPS Agreement, including the most recent adoption of the WTO relating to the issuance of compulsory licenses. Specifically, this Comment suggests that the …
“Shamnesty” Vs. Amnesty: Can The Riaa Grant Immunity To File-Sharers From Copyright Infringement Lawsuits?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 279 (2004), Natosha Cuyler-Sherman
“Shamnesty” Vs. Amnesty: Can The Riaa Grant Immunity To File-Sharers From Copyright Infringement Lawsuits?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 279 (2004), Natosha Cuyler-Sherman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is the industry trade association for sound and music recordings and represents various music companies, songwriters, and music artists. One of the main functions of the RIAA is to enforce its members’ copyrights. The RIAA is currently representing members in copyright infringement lawsuits. As an alternative to being sued, the RIAA announced that it would grant amnesty to file sharers who voluntarily identified themselves and promised to stop illegally sharing music. In reality, non-RIAA members and even RIAA members themselves can still sue file sharers because the organization itself does not have the …
Recent Developments In Trademark Law: The Ongoing Refinement Of Rights, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 258 (2004), Chad Doellinger
Recent Developments In Trademark Law: The Ongoing Refinement Of Rights, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 258 (2004), Chad Doellinger
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The year 2003 saw a great deal of activity in the ongoing development of trademark law. While the law both reconnected with its bricks-and-mortar roots and expanded to accommodate new fact patterns in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, 2003 saw the beginning of a doctrinal contraction, with a requirement to tie inchoate harms to empirical foundations. Additionally, several issues of first impression were resolved, including the conclusion that domain names are a form of property. While 2003 saw a contraction of trademark rights, this is not necessarily a negative development for trademark owners. Instead, courts are merely refining the …
Navigating The Bramble Bush In Idea Submission Cases, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 36 (2004), Lisa Pearson
Navigating The Bramble Bush In Idea Submission Cases, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 36 (2004), Lisa Pearson
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Today’s law of idea submissions is a proverbial bramble bush for a variety of reasons. Both the legal theories of recovery and the viability of such claims differ widely from state to state. In addition, notwithstanding the vast body of idea-submission law, there are still many open issues. These complex, fact-specific cases still manage to ensnare plaintiffs and defendants alike in years of litigation. As such, finding one’s way through the bramble bush to defend against idea submission claims is a daunting task. This article provides a map designed to help the litigator navigate the thicket. Following the trail is …
The Accidental And Inherent Anticipation Doctrines: Where Do We Stand And Where Are We Going?, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 63 (2004), Anne Brown, Mark Polyakov
The Accidental And Inherent Anticipation Doctrines: Where Do We Stand And Where Are We Going?, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 63 (2004), Anne Brown, Mark Polyakov
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
It is often unclear when a prior occurrence or disclosure of a claimed invention falls under the patent law doctrines of inherent or accidental anticipation. Courts have applied various tests in determining whether anticipation is inherent or accidental, and the cases are difficult to reconcile. Tests seemingly dispositive to establish an accident in one case may also appear dispositive to establish inherency. As a result of our analysis, we have developed a two-step test that can be used to reconcile the two doctrines and determine whether a product or process anticipates. The first prong is concerned with whether the prior …
Trademark Surveys: Development Of Computer-Based Survey Methods, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 91 (2004), Robert H. Thornburg
Trademark Surveys: Development Of Computer-Based Survey Methods, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 91 (2004), Robert H. Thornburg
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Courts have continually utilized surveys to show evidence of secondary meaning, genericness, dilution, and functionality in trademark litigation. In conducting a trademark survey, an expert must consider various factors that may affect the admissibility of the survey in court, including assuring the correct universe of respondents are questioned, implementing controls, and verifying the results. In light of these considerations, as well as the ever-changing environment of consumer shopping, the manner and mode of survey that a court accepts as appropriate must adapt to these conditions. The use and acceptance of online and computer-based surveys is not currently well received by …
Football's Intellectual Side: The Nfl Versus Super Bowl Parties And The Story Of The Fifty-Five Inch Television, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 125 (2004), Michael M. Fenwick
Football's Intellectual Side: The Nfl Versus Super Bowl Parties And The Story Of The Fifty-Five Inch Television, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 125 (2004), Michael M. Fenwick
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The increasing popularity of the National Football League’s Super Bowl Championship has spawned an increasing number of private parties, some that employ projection-screen televisions measuring up to twenty feet diagonally. Only days before the 2004 Super Bowl, the NFL sent cease-and-desist letters to a number of business proprietors claiming display of the broadcast on televisions larger than fifty-five inches diagonally violated the NFL’s rights under 17 U.S.C. § 110(5). This Comment will show that because 17 U.S.C. § 110(5) was written to protect authors within the music industry, its application to broadcast television fails because of television’s fundamentally different business …
Developments In Patent Law 2004, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2004), Harold C. Wegner
Developments In Patent Law 2004, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2004), Harold C. Wegner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
There are a great number of patent law doctrines that are currently under reconsideration by the Federal Circuit. These doctrines include patent claim construction under the 2006 Phillips case, the problem of foreign activity being used as patent-defeating prior art as shown in the recent Elsner case, the growing challenge of extraterritorial acts as patent infringement as presented in the 2004 expected cases of Blackberry and Eolas, the “Rule 105” implications for patent office practice in Sta Fruits, the change in willful infringement law set forth in the recent KnorrBremse case, the continuing problem of co-inventorship recurring in Xechem, the …
Reducing The Need For Markman Determinations, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 53 (2004), Robert H. Resis
Reducing The Need For Markman Determinations, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 53 (2004), Robert H. Resis
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The uncertainty as to whether claim interpretation decisions will survive appeal is an ever growing concern as the Federal Circuit’s reversal rate of lower court claim interpretations averages fifty percent. At a minimum, uncertainty in claim construction prolongs patent infringement disputes. Moreover, the reality is that many times it is the uncertainty of a claim’s scope and meaning that leads to litigation in the first place. In order to alleviate this stress on patentees, competitors and the federal court system, most if not all questions regarding the scope and meaning of claim terms should be clarified by the applicant during …
Does David Need A New Sling? Small Entities Face A Costly Barrier To Patent Protection, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 184 (2004), Jeff A. Ronspies
Does David Need A New Sling? Small Entities Face A Costly Barrier To Patent Protection, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 184 (2004), Jeff A. Ronspies
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The cost of enforcing patent rights is discouraging the small-entity inventor from seeking out patent protection. The United States Patent and Trademark Office favors the “small entity” by reducing fees, but the world of infringement litigation offers no such discount. For the small entity, the costs related to asserting or defending its patent rights against a well-funded adversary often exceed the benefits of patent ownership. These inventors, in weighing the high costs of patent protection against the potential profits, may simply choose to not patent their innovations. Such a decision would deprive the public of the invention’s disclosure and ultimately …
The Art And Science Of Genetic Modification: Re-Engineering Patent Law And Constitutional Orthodoxies (The Harry T. Ice Chair Inaugural Lecture), Yvonne Cripps
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
The Harry T. Ice Chair Inaugural Lecture
Ownership Of Human Tissue: A Proposal For Federal Recognition Of Human Research Participants' Property Rights In Their Biological Material, Donna M. Gitter
Ownership Of Human Tissue: A Proposal For Federal Recognition Of Human Research Participants' Property Rights In Their Biological Material, Donna M. Gitter
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law As Film: Representing Justice In The Age Of Moving Images, Shulamit Almog, Ely Aharonson
Law As Film: Representing Justice In The Age Of Moving Images, Shulamit Almog, Ely Aharonson
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
Two main theses are presented here. The first is that there is a conceptual resemblance between the ways in which messages are transmitted in the courtroom and the ways in which they are transmitted in the cinema. The second is that the evolution of legal procedure is being influenced by developments taking place in visual culture generally and film specifically. Taken together, these theses lead to the conclusion that the development of a theory of ‘‘law-as-film’’ can provide insights into the contemporary practice of law that might otherwise be overlooked.
Book Review. Gunning, J. And H. Szoke, Eds. The Regulation Of Assisted Reproductive Technology, Jennifer Bryan Morgan
Book Review. Gunning, J. And H. Szoke, Eds. The Regulation Of Assisted Reproductive Technology, Jennifer Bryan Morgan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Copyright Protection For Federally Funded Research: Necessary Incentive Or Double Subsidy?, Samuel E. Trosow
Copyright Protection For Federally Funded Research: Necessary Incentive Or Double Subsidy?, Samuel E. Trosow
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Regulating Genetically Modified Foods: Is Mandatory Labeling The Right Answer?, Jonathan H. Adler
Regulating Genetically Modified Foods: Is Mandatory Labeling The Right Answer?, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
What I want to talk about are some legal issues relating to labeling and, in particular, constitutional issues relating to mandatory labeling for genetically modified foods or food products that may contain genetically modified components. This is a separate issue from whether or not the FDA, or some other agency, has sufficient statutory authority at present to mandate labeling, and that is something worth discussing. Even if they do have such authority, or even if Congress tomorrow were to give the FDA such authority or were to require the FDA to impose labels on genetically modified foods, or if a …
Introduction: The Law, Technology & The Arts Symposium: The Past, Present And Future Of The Federal Circuit, Gerald Korngold
Introduction: The Law, Technology & The Arts Symposium: The Past, Present And Future Of The Federal Circuit, Gerald Korngold
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Musical Copyright Law: Past, Present And Future Of Online Music Distribution, Robert J. Delchin
Musical Copyright Law: Past, Present And Future Of Online Music Distribution, Robert J. Delchin
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Adr Of Patent Disputes: A Customized Prescription, Not An Over-The-Counter Remedy, Marion M. Lim
Adr Of Patent Disputes: A Customized Prescription, Not An Over-The-Counter Remedy, Marion M. Lim
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Eureka! DoubleMe Corporation just discovered "Clone-IT." Believing "Clone-IT" to be the first invention of its kind, DoubleMe invested a great deal of resources into its inventive efforts and kept its research and experiments top secret. After DoubleMe completed the necessary paperwork and paid the requisite fees, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued it a patent for "Clone-IT."
Table Of Contents, Journal On Telecommunications & High Technology Law
Table Of Contents, Journal On Telecommunications & High Technology Law
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Front Matter, Journal On Telecommunications & High Technology Law
Front Matter, Journal On Telecommunications & High Technology Law
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction: A Regulatory Regime For The Internet Age, Philip J. Weiser
Introduction: A Regulatory Regime For The Internet Age, Philip J. Weiser
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Preserving Internet Freedom: Guiding Principles For The Industry, Michael K. Powell
Preserving Internet Freedom: Guiding Principles For The Industry, Michael K. Powell
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Broadband Debate, A User's Guide, Tim Wu
The Broadband Debate, A User's Guide, Tim Wu
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Evolving Core Capabilities Of The Internet, J. Scott Marcus
Evolving Core Capabilities Of The Internet, J. Scott Marcus
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Video Games And Reverse Engineering: Before And After The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Joe Linhoff
Video Games And Reverse Engineering: Before And After The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Joe Linhoff
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Competition Policy For Mobile Broadband Networks, Howard A. Shelanski
Competition Policy For Mobile Broadband Networks, Howard A. Shelanski
Colorado Technology Law Journal
No abstract provided.