Law Commons^™

Not Beyond Justice: A Reply To Heller And Eisele, Arthur J. Jacobson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

European Community Law And The Doctrine Of Legitimate Expectations: How Legitimate, And For Whom, Eleanor Sharpston

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

This article aims to provide a fairly succinct, practical analysis of the way in which the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the "supreme court" for all questions of interpretation arising under the EEC, ECSC and Euratom Treaties) has developed one particular fundamental principle of Community law, the doctrine of "legitimate expectations". The emphasis throughout is not only on the exact legal formulation of the doctrine, but also on whether or not the doctrine can be said to match up to expectations that, economically, might be regarded as "legitimate". Before embarking on the substance, it may be useful to …

Retrospective Justification, Jeffrey Malkan

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(C): A Search For Judicial Consistency, Kathleen M. Potocki

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

When Does Parental Liability End?: Holding Parents Liable For The Acts Of Their Adult Children, Joan Morgridge

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Brief Argument For Greater Control Of Litigation Discretion - The Public Interest And Public Choice Contexts, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1990), Walter J. Kendall Iii

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 165 (1990), Roger C. Cramton

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.: Can The "No State Action" Shibboleth Legitimize The Racist Use Of Peremptory Challenges In Civil Actions, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1990), David Park

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Back To Open Season On American Product Ingenuity: Bonito Boats, Inc. V. Thunder Craft, Inc., 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1990), Alex Devience Jr.

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Natural Law Of Rhythm And Equality, John W. Ragsdale Jr

Faculty Works

The quest for natural law can easily seem futile to the secularist, and the legal terrain beyond human institutions has often been abandoned to the theologians and the supernaturalists. Most contemporary legal philosophers tend to focus on law as process, on legal positivism and legal realism, on the relativity of values or on the legal masking of class, race or gender interests. This piece will not do direct battle with these philosophies, all of which may have internal integrity and legitimacy within their chosen spheres. Instead, this piece will reexplore the possibility and propriety of linking the reality of law …

Whose Nature? Practical Reason And Patriarchy, Lynne Henderson

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

The (Unlikely) Death Of Property, James E. Krier

Articles

Is property dead? Thomas Grey has argued that it is.' If he is right, we have an answer to the principal question of this symposium panel, which asks whether regulation and property are allies or enemies. If Professor Grey is right, they are neitherbecause property no longer exists. If he is wrong (as I believe he partly is), then, I argue, regulation and property are allies and enemies alike, and will remain so.

A Need For Clarity: Toward A New Standard For Preliminary Injunctions, Lea B. Vaughn

Articles

This Article examines the various standards for preliminary injunctions and demonstrates the ways in which the standards have become confused by irrelevant layers of meaning. Those layers of meaning are analyzed; nonfunctional accretions are discarded, and legitimate modem meanings are developed. The discussion is conducted against a background of assumptions about what makes a good standard, for example, accessibility and comprehensiveness. By modernizing the standard, the parties and the courts will frankly and openly discuss the underlying legal issues and values. This, in turn, should lead to more legitimate decisions.

Under a modernized standard, a court should redress immediate pretrial …

In Memoriam.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Limitation Of Liability Of Limited Partners While Affording Control Of Partnership Affairs To Limited Partners., Kenneth L. Bennight Jr., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

This article examines the liability provisions of the Texas Revised Act Section 3.03 and compares it with other uniform limited partnership acts. It attempts to ascertain the amount of control a limited partner can exercise over the partnership without risking unlimited liability as a general partner. Limited partners invest capital and share in the profits of the business, but their liability is limited to the amount of capital they invest. If the limited partners exercise control over the business, however, the limited partners may forfeit their limited liability and become liable as general partners. In the last century, the law …

Prenatal V. Parental Rights: What A Difference An A Makes., Ali Gallagher

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Lust - Deep In The Heart Of Texas: Federal Epa Regulations Affecting Underground Storage Tanks - The Texas Statutory And Regulatory Counterparts., Blaine D. Edwards

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

1989 Texas Dtpa Reform: Closing The Dtpa Loophole In The 1987 Tort Reform Laws And The Ongoing Quest For Fairer Dtpa Laws., John T. Montford, Will G. Barber, Robert L. Duncan

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., James P. White

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., Sam S. Crutchfield

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Commanding Respect: Criminal Sanctions For Environmental Crimes., Eva M. Fromm

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Standards Of Appellate Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Punitive Damages For Breach Of Contract - A Principled Approach., Frank J. Cavico Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Reasonable Belief That A Third Party Had Authority To Consent To A Search Is An Exception To The Warrant Requirement., S. Jeffrey Gately

St. Mary's Law Journal

In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether a warrantless search is valid when police rely on consent of a third party whom they reasonably believe had common authority over an area but does not. A reasonable belief that a third party had authority to consent to a search is an exception to the warrant requirement. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects people and their possessions by prohibiting unreasonable searches by government authorities. Although this protection extends to any place where a person may claim a reasonable expectation of privacy, it especially protects …

Under The Boren Amendment, Health Care Providers Have An Enforceable Right, Actionable Under 42 U.S.C. 1983, To Challenge A State's Reimbursement Plan Under The Medicaid Act., C. Lee Cusenbary

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.