Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (885)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (858)
- University of Michigan Law School (385)
- Seattle University School of Law (309)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (309)
-
- UIC School of Law (290)
- University of New Mexico (255)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (226)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (226)
- University of Colorado Law School (212)
- Georgetown University Law Center (204)
- American University Washington College of Law (176)
- BLR (175)
- Pepperdine University (167)
- Barry University School of Law (166)
- Notre Dame Law School (165)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (158)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (149)
- University of Georgia School of Law (138)
- Universitas Indonesia (132)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (125)
- University of Miami Law School (116)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (116)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (109)
- New York Law School (105)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (104)
- Brooklyn Law School (103)
- Fordham Law School (98)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (97)
- Cornell University Law School (96)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (1406)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (397)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- Supreme Court (268)
- Constitutional law (223)
-
- Constitution (208)
- Constitutional Law (208)
- Judges (190)
- Law (186)
- United States Supreme Court (182)
- Courts (143)
- First Amendment (132)
- Judicial review (126)
- Law and Society (113)
- Legislation (111)
- Legal History (102)
- Legal theory (97)
- Statutory interpretation (96)
- Inc. (87)
- Justice (87)
- Criminal law (84)
- Due process (83)
- Federalism (82)
- Originalism (81)
- Evidence (80)
- Fourteenth Amendment (76)
- Legal history (76)
- International Law (75)
- Federal courts (72)
- Discrimination (71)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (856)
- Cardozo Law Review (483)
- Faculty Scholarship (407)
- Articles (301)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (297)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (294)
- UIC Law Review (277)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (253)
- Michigan Law Review (247)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (198)
- Publications (198)
- Touro Law Review (171)
- ExpressO (170)
- Scholarly Works (159)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (149)
- Journal Articles (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (118)
- Barry Law Review (109)
- Faculty Publications (99)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (95)
- Journal of Legal Education (91)
- Pepperdine Law Review (86)
- UAEU Law Journal (80)
- Akron Law Review (79)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (74)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (72)
- Northwestern University Law Review (72)
- Maine Law Review (70)
- Publication Type
Articles 7861 - 7890 of 9282
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judgment After The Fall, Barbara Herrnstein Smith
Judgment After The Fall, Barbara Herrnstein Smith
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Critical Tribunal, Stephen Watson
Deconstruction And The Impossibility Of Justice, Thomas Keenan
Deconstruction And The Impossibility Of Justice, Thomas Keenan
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deconstruction And The Possibility Of Justice: Comments On Bernasconi, Cornell, Miller, Weber, Judith Butler
Deconstruction And The Possibility Of Justice: Comments On Bernasconi, Cornell, Miller, Weber, Judith Butler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roman Law And English Law: Two Patterns Of Legal Development, Alan Watson
Roman Law And English Law: Two Patterns Of Legal Development, Alan Watson
Scholarly Works
It is commonplace among scholars to link in thought the growth of Roman law and of English law. S.F.C. Milsom begins his distinguished Historical Foundations of the Common Law with the words: "It has happened twice only that the customs of European peoples were worked up into intellectual systems of law; and much of the world today is governed by laws derived from the one or the other." More strikingly, some scholars see an essential similarity in legal approaches in the two systems. Fritz Pringsheim entitled a well-known article The Inner Relationship Between English and Roman Law. W.W. Buckland and …
Feminism Historicized: Medieval Misogynist Stereotypes In Contemporary Feminist Jurisprudence, Jeanne L. Schroeder
Feminism Historicized: Medieval Misogynist Stereotypes In Contemporary Feminist Jurisprudence, Jeanne L. Schroeder
Articles
The article argues that contemporary feminist theories are ahistorical and culturally narrow, often mirroring medieval misogynist stereotypes by assuming that late-twentieth-century, white, upper-middle-class American experiences represent universal truths about gender. By examining medieval canon law and societal norms, the analysis reveals that patriarchal structures have persisted across time, adapting to different cultural definitions of masculinity and femininity. The author advocates for a more historically and cross-culturally informed approach to jurisprudence and gender theory to avoid replicating past oppressions.
Resisting Theory, Jonathan Culler
"Le Hors De Texte, C'Est Moi" - The Politics Of Form And The Domestication Of Deconstruction, Pierre Schlag
"Le Hors De Texte, C'Est Moi" - The Politics Of Form And The Domestication Of Deconstruction, Pierre Schlag
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Road To Radical Reform: A Critical Review Of Unger's Politics, Richard F. Devlin
On The Road To Radical Reform: A Critical Review Of Unger's Politics, Richard F. Devlin
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Two aims drive this essay. The first is to provide the reader with an accessible, yet relatively comprehensive, introduction to Roberto Mangabeira Unger's social and legal theory. The second aim is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Unger's most recent scholarship and to make some suggestions as to where he goes awry. In particular, the author draws several parallels between the Ungerian enterprise and that of some feminists. The central motivation of the essay is to keep the critical conversation between male radicals and feminists open. To this end, the author posits the possibility of mutually beneficial contributions.
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I develops more fully the differences that divide liberal and conservative commentators on criminal procedure, taking special note of the series of Reports prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy and published recently in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Part II explains my disquiet with the suggestion that original-meaning jurisprudence ought to guide criminal procedure doctrine. Part II also defends the thesis that the fourteenth amendment protects the individual interest in freedom from unjust punishment, rather than any abstract interest in truth for its own sake. Part III considers two familiar controversies in criminal …
The Truth About Massiah, James J. Tomkovicz
The Truth About Massiah, James J. Tomkovicz
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
First, the Article will summarize the Justice Department's discussion of the Massiah right to counsel and the exclusion of evidence under Massiah. Next, it will evaluate the nature of the Report and the character of legal scholarship. Finally, it will explore the substantive debate over Massiah. In that section, the Article will point out the matters on which the DOJ and I agree, will attempt to frame the fundamental questions raised by the Massiah doctrine, and will investigate potential sources of answers to those constitutional questions. Ultimately, it will provide the answers that I prefer, explaining the premises …
The Hohfeldian Approach To Law And Semiotics, J. M. Balkin
The Hohfeldian Approach To Law And Semiotics, J. M. Balkin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Judicial Discretion by Aharon Barak
Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects And Limitations On The Use Of Modern Darwinism Throughout The Legal Process, Steven Kasten
Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects And Limitations On The Use Of Modern Darwinism Throughout The Legal Process, Steven Kasten
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects and Limitations on the Use of Modern Darwinism Throughout the Legal Process by John H. Beckstrom
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Sociological Justice by Donald Black
The Role Of International Law As A Canon Of Domestic Statutory Construction, Ralph G. Steinhardt
The Role Of International Law As A Canon Of Domestic Statutory Construction, Ralph G. Steinhardt
Vanderbilt Law Review
From the beginning of our constitutional life, the Supreme Court has articulated principles that structure the juridical relationship between international law and domestic law. These principles purportedly offer rules of decision for resolving in domestic courts the potential in-consistencies between external and internal sources of law, and they do so with the surface simplicity of axioms. Treaties, for example, cannot trump constitutional norms.' Customary international law can provide a rule of decision at least in the absence of controlling legislative or executive acts. In the case of an irreconcilable conflict between a treaty and a statute, the latter-in-time prevails. When …
Original Intent: "With Friends Like These…", Thomas Gibbs Gee
Original Intent: "With Friends Like These…", Thomas Gibbs Gee
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Original Intent and the Framer's Constitution by Leonard W. Levy
History's Challenge To Feminism, Jeanne L. Schroeder
History's Challenge To Feminism, Jeanne L. Schroeder
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe by James A. Brundage
History's Challenge To Feminism, Jeanne L. Schroeder
Of Persons And Property: The Politics Of Legal Taxonomy, David Cohen, Allan C. Hutchinson
Of Persons And Property: The Politics Of Legal Taxonomy, David Cohen, Allan C. Hutchinson
Dalhousie Law Journal
To talk of law without politics or history is nonsensical. All lawyers must concede that what they do takes place in historical circumstances and has political consequences. Every piece of law-making and law-application is a governmental act; it relies on political authority and claims binding force. Moreover, all legal activity occurs within a particular historical context; it is intended to respond to or influence a past, existing or anticipated state of affairs. This means that the study of law must concern itself with politics and history generally: it must not confine itself to only the politics and history of law. …
Retrieving Positivism: Law As Bibliolatry, Frederick C. Decoste
Retrieving Positivism: Law As Bibliolatry, Frederick C. Decoste
Dalhousie Law Journal
Legal positivism is a curious phenomenon in both its theoretical and sociological parts. It is curious as theory because its very existence, as theory, is often questioned, and because, even when its existence is admitted, the nature of the theory, and who does and does not qualify as an adherent most often remains in dispute. It is curious sociologically because rare is the legal theoretician who forthrightly endorses positivism: positivists, it would appear, are as scarce as the formalists among whom they used to be numbered.
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B). Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation?, Richard F. Devlin
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B). Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation?, Richard F. Devlin
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Part A of this essay, "The Killing Fields", I developed a critique of the disciplinary impulses that underlie modern law and legal theory. Invoking a number of perspectives and a plurality of analyses, I proposed that male-stream legal theory and contemporary law both assume as inevitable, and legitimize as appropriate, the funnelling of violence through law. The problem with a funnel, however, is that it does not curtail or reduce that which is channelled through it. On the contrary, to funnel is to condense and to intensify. Viewed from this perspective, interpreted from the bottom up, law and legal …
Rawls On Political Community And Principles Of Justice, James W. Nickel
Rawls On Political Community And Principles Of Justice, James W. Nickel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Contracts—The Trend Toward Legal Realism. Shearson Lehman Cmo, Inc. V. Tcf Banking & Savings And Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association V. Tribune Co., 670 F. Supp. 491 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)., Janne G. Siegel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Narrative Jurisprudence And Other Heresies: Legal Education At The Margin, David O. Friedrichs
Narrative Jurisprudence And Other Heresies: Legal Education At The Margin, David O. Friedrichs
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Stare Decisis And Judicial Restraint, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Stare Decisis And Judicial Restraint, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Michigan Law Review
The article's central thesis is that the understandings of the constitutional tradition most central to both paradigms are determined by sometimes implicit, but more often explicit, political dispositions toward various forms of social and private power, and the normative authority to which social and private power gives rise. Very broadly, conservative constitutionalists view private or social normative authority as the legitimate and best source of guidance for state action; accordingly, they view both the Constitution and constitutional adjudication as means of preserving and protecting that authority and the power that undergirds it against either legislative or judicial encroachment. Progressive constitutionalists, …
Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.